Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

Texans biggest concerns this off-season

trijcomm said:
The entire Browns DL had Carr on the run the entire afternoon. To point your finger and say, "McKinney is to blame!" is very simplistic.

Do you understand the concept of watching each play through a game, evaluating what happened on that play and keep track throughout the game to gain an overall impression of who did well and who did poorly? Saying oh my god it is all just so complex and changes happen we can't evaluate anything is what is simplistic.
 
infantrycak said:
Do you understand the concept of watching each play through a game, evaluating what happened on that play and keep track throughout the game to gain an overall impression of who did well and who did poorly? Saying oh my god it is all just so complex and changes happen we can't evaluate anything is what is simplistic.

Yes, I understand -- I understand I can evaluate a poorly thrown or well thrown pass thrown by David Carr because that's all a QB's responsibility. If David Carr goes back to throw and, without being rushed, throws five straight passes into the ground, you can pretty easily blame that on Carr. But there is NO WAY you can know what the blocking assignments for a particular linemen are unless you are the coach. There is no way you can know who is responsible for a sack from play to play or who missed who in regards to a blocking assignment. Now THAT'S simple -- to understand, that is.
 
trijcomm said:
But there is NO WAY you can know what the blocking assignments for a particular linemen are unless you are the coach. There is no way you can know who is responsible for a sack from play to play or who missed who in regards to a blocking assignment. Now THAT'S simple -- to understand, that is.

BS, it is called game film. You tell me, Texans line up with 4 WR's, no back and TE on Wade. Wand comes off the ball into the DE and Pitts comes off the ball into the DT. Wand gets beat to the outside by the DE. The only way that is not Wand's fault is if you assume Pitts is too stupid to remember who to hit. Yeah it is a possibility, but is one that will happen so infrequently that it is stupid not to assume it away and refuse to make the judgment that Wand got beat. The assignments in pass protection are a lot more tranparent than you make them out to be.
 
trijcomm said:
Yes, I understand -- I understand I can evaluate a poorly thrown or well thrown pass thrown by David Carr because that's all a QB's responsibility.

What if the receiver ran the wrong route? Maybe you judge the QB too harshly, because only coaches know what routes the receivers are supposed to run.

You can use this type of thinking for any position on the field.
 
wags said:
What if the receiver ran the wrong route? Maybe you judge the QB too harshly, because only coaches know what routes the receivers are supposed to run.

You can use this type of thinking for any position on the field.

Not if he does it five times to an open receiver. Plus, there are stats that do legitimately indicate the success of a QB. This is not true for a lineman. Why? Because it's impossible to create ANY stat to judge an individual who is part of a unit like an offensive line. Penalties and sacks allowed by individuals indicate nothing about the success of an individual cog of any OL. It has much more to do with cohesion than who allowed a sack.
 
infantrycak said:
BS, it is called game film. You tell me, Texans line up with 4 WR's, no back and TE on Wade. Wand comes off the ball into the DE and Pitts comes off the ball into the DT. Wand gets beat to the outside by the DE. The only way that is not Wand's fault is if you assume Pitts is too stupid to remember who to hit. Yeah it is a possibility, but is one that will happen so infrequently that it is stupid not to assume it away and refuse to make the judgment that Wand got beat. The assignments in pass protection are a lot more tranparent than you make them out to be.

The only ones who can really assess "game film" are the coaches who know the assignments. No, the assignments in pass protection are NOT all that transparent -- especially when you are assessing blame. Perhaps the offensive lineman was only supposed to hold the guy up for a second or two before moving off to another assignment and then perhaps it was somebody else's job to pick the same guy up. How do you know -- unless you're the coach? Perhaps the QB held on to the ball too long. Perhaps it really was somebody else's guy to pick up. There are a myriad of possibilities that exist when it comes to assessing blame on individuals within the offensive line and only the coaches know for sure. That's why line play succeeds and fails when the unit succeeds or fails. They MUST play together or the whole thing falls apart. When you start assessing blame on individuals when you are ignorant of the blocking schemes for that particular play -- which we all are, of course -- you are opening yourself up to making improper and bad job evaluations which are not fair to the individuals involved.
 
wags said:
I was thinking more like Steve McKinney's dad.

If you think replacing McKinney will solve "The Team's" sack problems, then you are only kidding yourselves. In fact, you might be setting "The Team" back by at least a year if not two.
 
Honoring Earl 34 said:
The Texans have spent a second on Pitts (could of had Portis)
Pitts was our second second round selection, we passed on Portis twice. Every team could have had Portis. Last time I checked all 31 other teams passed on him including his college coach.
Honoring Earl 34 said:
Now they will not allow Pendry to leave.So they like the OL coach , :hmmm: what gives?
It's probably because he is a better coach than most of you guys think.
 
Vinny said:
Pitts was our second second round selection, we passed on Portis twice. Every team could have had Portis. Last time I checked all 31 other teams passed on him including his college coach.

And given Portis' performance this year, we can see he would not have been the majic poultice some people think he would have been for the Texans--especially without Pitts, one of their better run blockers. Portis is a better back than DD but he can't carry a team with a poor OL.
 
trijcomm said:
You seem to love to place the blame at somebody's doorstep, but line play is truly a team game that has everything to do with cohesion and is impossible to judge on an individual basis.
I will say that it is hard to judge line play for some of the reasons you state, plus most people don't know how to grade it and just generalize and reach for someone to point a finger at out of frustration, but you absolutely can assess some culpability on individual plays. To say otherwise is going to the other extreme and is not accurate.
 
trijcomm said:
Remember what McNair said? No big changes will be made on the OL but Carr will be protected.
I haven't seen that. McNair isn't the type to micromanage what type of changes will/won't occur on the O-line. Do you have a link to that quote?
 
He is mixing up McNair saying Carr will be protected and Casserly saying don't expect any high dollar FA signings.
 
Vinny said:
I will say that it is hard to judge line play for some of the reasons you state, plus most people don't know how to grade it and just generalize and reach for someone to point a finger at out of frustration, but you absolutely can assess some culpability on individual plays. To say otherwise is going to the other extreme and is not accurate.

Oh, sure, you can see a guy miss a block or a tackle clearly every once in awhile. But you sure can't judge somebody based on those situations alone. Those situations are a small percentage to their overall job performance during the season.
 
This may sound ridiculous to you but when you watch players perform you can actually tell who has skill, uses technique and has burst and explosion. You seem to want to argue your points down to absurd levels.
 
Vinny said:
This may sound ridiculous to you but when you watch players perform you can actually tell who has skill, uses technique and has burst and explosion. You seem to want to argue your points down to absurd levels.

:loser Until you are wearing coaching credentials and standing on the sideline or sitting in the coaches' box, please refrain from telling me how a linemen performed without knowing what his assignment or task is on each play. To do so is, well, absurd.
 
huh?


passing play and its not a screen...i wonder what the offensive lines' responsibility is?

defensive line and theres no stunt called (wich should be pretty obvious to even occasional fans ) on a passing play....i wonder what their supposed to do.....


:um:

theres more....a lot more...
 
When OL get outworked it is obvious. Maybe not to the common fan, but to the coaches and GM, it is. That is why its their job to go and fix the problems. Not ours, but any educated fan should have the knowledge to know that if one OL is getting blown past, almost every other 3rd or 4th snap, then obviously that player is not performing well enough. and that is where an individual has to take the blame.
coaches have a sense of who the OL should be blocking but when the Offense audibles because of a blitz, and a linemen doesnt pick up either the DL or a LB, then it is the individuals performance. Because then what, do you expect another linemen to come over and assist the incapable one, NO! because then you are leaving a DL or linebacker unblocked (which would be very smart :hairpull: )
 
Quote - "Andre Johnson is possibly the best reciever in the game outside of Randy Moss / T.O but if there is no one on the opposite side of the field to take some heat away from him he will be double covered every play ."


How can you say that? To me right now, he is barely in the top 10. Yea hes got alot of potential to be a top 5 wideout, but best in the game right now? I don't see how you can say that. I'm still seeing him drop balls, and he still needs to work on his route running. Some of Carr's sacks were due to nobody getting open. You can say hes double covered, but look at TO, look at Moss, look at Harrison before Wayne emerged, look at Joe Horn, Muhammad, Jimmy Smith, Chad Johnson (without Warrick this year). But you are right though, we need another WR to take pressure off of Andre.
 
He can say that because it is probably true. AJ is an enourmous talent and really, he rarely dropped passes and made every defense he faced alter their coverages for him. He is one of the top 5-6 WR's in football today.
 
Eh I still don't think so. He goes away.. and then comes. He's not consistently comin up with plays like the big ones. I've seen him in alot of games this year just do nothing, even when Carr had protection, diden't get open.
 
You don't watch many games then. AJ runs great routes and touched the ball 79 times in the passing game for 1150 yards with a horrible offensive line and an inconsistant QB. That is some pretty solid stuff if you ask me.
 
I watch him, not the oline, not the qb, I watch him. He doesen't get seperation alot of times, hes still inconsistent. Look at his sub par games...

4 for 58 vs SD
4 for 66 vs Tenn
3 for 28 vs Denver
6 for 59 vs Indi
4 for 31 vs Tenn(2nd)
3 for 34 vs Indi(2nd)
2 for 21 vs Chicago
2 for 13 vs Browns


Denver's pass defense hasn't been great or good. Indiapolis pass defense is horrible, Tennesee's whole defense has sucked, and Browns?? Your gonna tell me Browns dline was so good they had no protection for Carr to find Johnson for more than 13 yards? Johnson is good, really good, top 10 for sure. But top 5 right now? I still dont think so.. not yet.
 
DoCt3rJ said:
I watch him, not the oline, not the qb, I watch him. He doesen't get seperation alot of times, hes still inconsistent. Look at his sub par games...

4 for 58 vs SD
4 for 66 vs Tenn
3 for 28 vs Denver
6 for 59 vs Indi
4 for 31 vs Tenn(2nd)
3 for 34 vs Indi(2nd)
2 for 21 vs Chicago
2 for 13 vs Browns


Denver's pass defense hasn't been great or good. Indiapolis pass defense is horrible, Tennesee's whole defense has sucked, and Browns?? Your gonna tell me Browns dline was so good they had no protection for Carr to find Johnson for more than 13 yards? Johnson is good, really good, top 10 for sure. But top 5 right now? I still dont think so.. not yet.
That stat line does nothing for me. I too watched those games. If you bothered to watch the games you would have noticed that those teams rolled the coverage to aj. He was pressed at the line and had linebackers pick him up in the mid level and a safety over the top. I guess he made the Pro Bowl on past reputation since he performed so poorly in those 8 games you referenced.
 
The fact is that until we get another receiver that teams respect, honestly i dont see Gaffney or Bradford striking fear in opponents hearts, then AJ will continue to get doubled or tripled, that is possible because teams are usually are leaving linebackers in coverage, because our OL cant block teams front 4... I think if Mike Williams is available at #13, then we take him... leave getting OL and DL for free agency
 
So it stood out to you the times he was pressed by a LB. Did you see the many times he was blanketed by one corner? Or with a safety over top, completely taken him out of the play on several occasions. I just dont think you can put him in the top 5 receivers right now..
 
DoCt3rJ said:
So it stood out to you the times he was pressed by a LB. Did you see the many times he was blanketed by one corner? Or with a safety over top, completely taken him out of the play on several occasions. I just dont think you can put him in the top 5 receivers right now..
Your position was that he wasn't a top-10 guy just a couple of posts ago. Your posture on this has changed to the the point where I wouldn't argue it if you think he is just outside the top-5 guys.

Hammer away.
 
Our weakness on offense was the O-line this year. Hands down. Some young guys playing in new positions combined with a new blocking scheme is not the worlds best recipe for short term success. Now long term it has the potential to be very good.

And just to let my frusterations out - if we could have just moved the ball 10 or 20 more yards even to give Brown a chance to kick a field goal...man that is the difference between a winning and a loosing season.

Carr kept the ball on roll outs way to long and/or failed to execute with creativity in a pinch on those same roll outs. I do believe impovisation will just come with experience.

However, with good reason I do like the progress of this team overall. Another year of free agency combined with another draft - we'll be formitable. Casserly and the coaches will sort out the personel problems. I really do believe that we will get some very good free agents this year. The word is out - Houston *is* the city and team to play for.

Just some initial thoughts for a Friday night.
 
So who they draft first is what they think is the most pressing need.I don't believe their at the point of taking best player there.
 
DominatorDavis said:
Our weakness on offense was the O-line this year. Hands down. Some young guys playing in new positions combined with a new blocking scheme is not the worlds best recipe for short term success. Now long term it has the potential to be very good.

And just to let my frusterations out - if we could have just moved the ball 10 or 20 more yards even to give Brown a chance to kick a field goal...man that is the difference between a winning and a loosing season.

Carr kept the ball on roll outs way to long and/or failed to execute with creativity in a pinch on those same roll outs. I do believe impovisation will just come with experience.

However, with good reason I do like the progress of this team overall. Another year of free agency combined with another draft - we'll be formitable. Casserly and the coaches will sort out the personel problems. I really do believe that we will get some very good free agents this year. The word is out - Houston *is* the city and team to play for.

Just some initial thoughts for a Friday night.

I do believe that if we could have moved the ball a little bit further against the Vikes once we tied it up, we could have certainly won that game and been 8-8. But I wouldn't say that was necessarily the case against GB because our offense completely shut down later in the game and "The Team" was just trying to hold on. I don't think a draft/FA will make the Texans "formidable" but it will make them more competitive. As far as Houston being the city and team to play for, I don't think so. The lure of playoffs and the championship is what attracts players. If you will notice, we haven't really done too well in attracting big-name players to "The Team" for that very reason. The failure to get Stephen Davis over here is a case in point.
 
STEEL BLUE TEXANS said:
I think we need a TE that can catch AND block more than we need another WR.

was it me or isnt that a big reason we brought in Breuner, not to catch the ball, but to help Billy Miller with his blocking ability...since that is what he needed more help with... Also we drafted Joppru thinking he might have been the answer, but all he has been doing is sitting on IR with a nagging groin injury or something like that... i would like to see Miller pan out and imrpove his blocking, since he has been an integral part of this team, for the most part, since day one. If we were to take a tight end in the draft, who would we take? im not sure about a tight end at #13, i think there will be plenty of TE available througout the draft, and i would see it to much of an opportunity to pass on Mike Williams, if he is still available
 
:hmmm: Hey heres a thought,Miller not getting the ball is relative to Gaffney not producing and their best player going a whole game catching two passes.Its called not having enough time or not adapting with shorter drops.The player who benefits the most is DD.
The Offensive Cordinator and Line Coach decides drops and blocking schemes.If we had Tony Gonzales i'm not sure he'd catch 40 passes.


Earl The Tyler Rose
 
I still do believe this is an OL problem.
- defenses are usually only rushing with a front 3 or 4, and maybe one LB at most. if a defense only pass rushes a front four, then there are 7 guys in pass coverage. while we are lining up 6 guys to block 4
- this is a big reason Dre, Gaff, and Bradford are not getting open. its possible for each one to be covered by a CB and a safety, or a LB.
- with the receivers unable to get open, the pocket starts to collapse, and Carr can do nothin else but dump it off to DD.

:fight:
 
:hmmm: San Diego started a 3rd round pick (04) at center and a 7th rounder (04) at tackle and their in the playoffs .Theres more than a personel problem .
 
The Texan's stunk on the final game of the season. David must admit this.

The Texan's have the 13 pick next year, and they are in dire need of offensive linemen. Seth Wand stinks! I only had to watch him let DC get killed or chased out of the pocket on almost ever passing play. No statistics are out on the number of sacks he allowed, but I'll put money on it that it was high.

On the offensive side of the ball. Mark Brunner did an admiral job. He should have had more balls thrown his way. He proved that he can catch. Chester Pitts is solid. Todd Wade was too even with his injury. All the others are questionable.

On the defensive side of the ball, Seth Payne showed glimpses of dominance. Gary Walker was a non-factor not an X-Factor. Robaire Smith can't get through the O-line by himself. So, the Texans' must draft D-linemen desperately.

The Texan's need a receiver, a tightend....their pick from 2 years ago is a total bust. They need at least 1 stud O-lineman, at least 1 stud D-lineman, a cornerbackthat can be groomed....Aaron Glenn is good, but he's getting older.

With that said, the Texan's only scored 26 more points than last year. Only 26, did you hear me! I've said it for 3 years now....Fire Chris Palmer. He stays with the run way to much....way into the 3rd quarter when we need to pass the ball because we are way behind. He always runs on 1st down. He always calls the same run on 1st, run on 2nd, throw on 3rd. This usually takes place in the 3rd quarter, too. He stayed away from play calling to A.J. late in the year. He waits to long to get everyone involved. He doesn't throw on 1st downs, and he rarely runs the play action pass....he prefers the roll out. He turns completely conservative once the Texan's get a lead instead of blowing the game open. It's run, run, run. I'm sorry, but the Texan's don't have an Earl Campbell.

This was the year that Palmer was supposed to focus more on the play calling. Boy, what a job. He engineered 26 more points with fewer job responsibilities. When the Texan's had nothing to play for, Palmer still didn't open up the offense. Why should I expect anything different from him. He hasn't done it in the previous two years either. He's a former Oiler coach. Play to not lose the game....don't play to win. The players just don't appear to be sold on his system.

The offensive line and it's experiment should have been a commercial for Tinker Toys. Seth Wand was a bust! Zone Blocking....was it really that good, or did we play some poor run defenses.....save Jacksonville. The offensive line couldn't block the USC Trojan's much less less pro's There wasn't much fire in their eyes. So, I'm not sold on Joe Pendry's blocking scheme, but then he may not be the one who wanted to implement it. We don't know because he doesn't talk. Where's Carl Mauck when you need him.

I like Dom Caper's and Vic Fangio. Vic's defenses always start off the year slow but they usually end up with a bang. It seems like his play calling gets better as the season goes on. Dom is a perfectionist, but he needs to crack the whip on his offensive coordinator. He needs to tell him....get me some points....not just yardage. Yardage doesn't win games, nor does blaming the players.

I predicted 9-7 this year, and I would have been right had the Texan's not looked flat in Detroit and here with Cleveland. Instead, we are a loser with all our hopes riding on next year for the fourth year in a row. Hmm! I haven't seen that much drastic improvement from any of the three years. I predict we might win more games next season. Maybe we will win 9 games next year, but I bet we would more with a new offensive coordinator. Look at Marty Schotenheimer, and you can see that it can be done, but not with the coach (offensive coordinator) that we currently have in place. But even Schotenheimer said he had to change his thinking, but Palmer is a stallwart and resistant to change. The fact is something had better change Charlie Casserly and Bob McNair, or those seats aren't going to be full to much longer.

Am I really a pessamist....I think not. I am a realist. I turned the Cleveland game off at the beginning of the 3rd quarter because I knew the Texan's weren't going to win. Wow! I was right! I've been right before. I just hope that I'm not right about next year, but I doubt than anything will change with the offensive play calling and I believe the Texan's will be mediocre at best in the offensive catagory, but only time will tell. I haven't been wrong yet! The Texan's are :loser's no matter how you slice the pie.

The Hit-Man!
 
Hmm. I agree Fire Chris Palmer. He makes horrible calls and is probably the reason we lost the close games *Minnesota*...Seth Payne needs to leave. We need another solid Defensive linemen but, before we touch that we need a damn O Line. Bruener did an *Okay* job , as well as Miller. It would be nice to have a better TE but thats no the base of our worries. We need a O line and D line thats worth a ****. The end
 
:howdy: The Texans need OL with some attitude.That OT for the Sooners is one nasty dude.I think his name is Brown.I'd take a DL with 13th pick if I thought he's a better prospect.I'd take Derrick Johnson with the 13th pick if he's there.I would not take a skills position or a secondary player anytime soon.



Beltran means nothing to me anymore. :thud:
 
Supertex said:
Seth Payne needs to leave.

Why would we let go one of the few defensive linemen that actually play well, if any linemen needs to pack up and go if he is not gonna play better, its Gary Walker, .5 sacks in 2 seasons, ridiculous.

The Texans most likely are not gonna draft an OL early in the draft, and i doubt they will go for a DL with the number 13 pick... the team wants to cover those later it the draft or most likely through FA
 
:hmmm: Until the All-star games and combine are completed.Its hard to tell whats what.But I mantain the Texans will take the best 300 pounder at 13.
 
Than we agree to disagree, no problem...to each his own... well just see what shakes out when the draft rolls around. but you got to admit, its a long shot, but if Mike Williams is still available, it would be mighty hard to pass on the possibility of Carr having the option of Dre and Williams, with DD in the backfield. maybe then Palmer would grow some nuts and open up the play book
 
THEFUTURE said:
but if Mike Williams is still available, it would be mighty hard to pass on the possibility of Carr having the option of Dre and Williams, with DD in the backfield. maybe then Palmer would grow some nuts and open up the play book


If it were me , i would take an O or D lineman @ 13 UNLESS there is a skill position player left on the board who is just too good to pass up , Mike Wiliams would fall into that category . At which point you have the option of trading down or taking the player .Thats where you have to weigh the offers from other teams VS. the posibilities that player gives you on the field . Filling multiple holes on the team is nice but adding another player w/ superstar potential .....Depends on the offer you get for the pick
 
Mike Williams would be a nice pick but we have quality receivers now, we need to concentrate on getting better up front, it is hard to throw the ball consistently well went you are running for your life.....our sack total went up this year not down as it should be if your line is progressing. We need quality linemen that will be here for several years. The Line blocks and the Line pass protects and all offense begins and ends with the Line. Remember how valuable Bruce Mathews and Mike Muncheck was to the Oilers and Earl Campbell and Warren Moon. Build a strong line and the offense will be very productive. :BananaWav
 
Hit Man said:
The Texan's stunk on the final game of the season. David must admit this.

The Texan's have the 13 pick next year, and they are in dire need of offensive linemen. Seth Wand stinks! I only had to watch him let DC get killed or chased out of the pocket on almost ever passing play. No statistics are out on the number of sacks he allowed, but I'll put money on it that it was high.

On the offensive side of the ball. Mark Brunner did an admiral job. He should have had more balls thrown his way. He proved that he can catch. Chester Pitts is solid. Todd Wade was too even with his injury. All the others are questionable.

On the defensive side of the ball, Seth Payne showed glimpses of dominance. Gary Walker was a non-factor not an X-Factor. Robaire Smith can't get through the O-line by himself. So, the Texans' must draft D-linemen desperately.

The Texan's need a receiver, a tightend....their pick from 2 years ago is a total bust. They need at least 1 stud O-lineman, at least 1 stud D-lineman, a cornerbackthat can be groomed....Aaron Glenn is good, but he's getting older.

With that said, the Texan's only scored 26 more points than last year. Only 26, did you hear me! I've said it for 3 years now....Fire Chris Palmer. He stays with the run way to much....way into the 3rd quarter when we need to pass the ball because we are way behind. He always runs on 1st down. He always calls the same run on 1st, run on 2nd, throw on 3rd. This usually takes place in the 3rd quarter, too. He stayed away from play calling to A.J. late in the year. He waits to long to get everyone involved. He doesn't throw on 1st downs, and he rarely runs the play action pass....he prefers the roll out. He turns completely conservative once the Texan's get a lead instead of blowing the game open. It's run, run, run. I'm sorry, but the Texan's don't have an Earl Campbell.

This was the year that Palmer was supposed to focus more on the play calling. Boy, what a job. He engineered 26 more points with fewer job responsibilities. When the Texan's had nothing to play for, Palmer still didn't open up the offense. Why should I expect anything different from him. He hasn't done it in the previous two years either. He's a former Oiler coach. Play to not lose the game....don't play to win. The players just don't appear to be sold on his system.

The offensive line and it's experiment should have been a commercial for Tinker Toys. Seth Wand was a bust! Zone Blocking....was it really that good, or did we play some poor run defenses.....save Jacksonville. The offensive line couldn't block the USC Trojan's much less less pro's There wasn't much fire in their eyes. So, I'm not sold on Joe Pendry's blocking scheme, but then he may not be the one who wanted to implement it. We don't know because he doesn't talk. Where's Carl Mauck when you need him.

I like Dom Caper's and Vic Fangio. Vic's defenses always start off the year slow but they usually end up with a bang. It seems like his play calling gets better as the season goes on. Dom is a perfectionist, but he needs to crack the whip on his offensive coordinator. He needs to tell him....get me some points....not just yardage. Yardage doesn't win games, nor does blaming the players.

I predicted 9-7 this year, and I would have been right had the Texan's not looked flat in Detroit and here with Cleveland. Instead, we are a loser with all our hopes riding on next year for the fourth year in a row. Hmm! I haven't seen that much drastic improvement from any of the three years. I predict we might win more games next season. Maybe we will win 9 games next year, but I bet we would more with a new offensive coordinator. Look at Marty Schotenheimer, and you can see that it can be done, but not with the coach (offensive coordinator) that we currently have in place. But even Schotenheimer said he had to change his thinking, but Palmer is a stallwart and resistant to change. The fact is something had better change Charlie Casserly and Bob McNair, or those seats aren't going to be full to much longer.

Am I really a pessamist....I think not. I am a realist. I turned the Cleveland game off at the beginning of the 3rd quarter because I knew the Texan's weren't going to win. Wow! I was right! I've been right before. I just hope that I'm not right about next year, but I doubt than anything will change with the offensive play calling and I believe the Texan's will be mediocre at best in the offensive catagory, but only time will tell. I haven't been wrong yet! The Texan's are :loser's no matter how you slice the pie.

The Hit-Man!

Everyone is talking about this year's improvement. But when you look at strength of schedule and compare it to how we finished last season, I'm not so certain the statistics being quoted as showing improvement mean much. I think most of us at the end of last season were really looking forward to this year and we thought we would see a lot of improvement. Part of that is because of injuries and I still maintain that has set us back up to 2-3 years. That I don't blame the coaches for, but where are the people who performed so well at the end of last year. Will we see coaching changes prior to the next season, probably not, should we, probably yes. I hope I'm wrong in my accessment of what's in store for us next year, but I think we are all going to be a lot more unhappy than you think unless we make a big splash in the FA market and the draft. We may need to give up the 13 and pick up a couple of quality people further down in the draft. We need bodies and good ones to fill all of the holes. We also need BJ, Payne and others to get healthy and reappear as players.
 
:howdy: I'll bet that after Mike Williams gets measured and timed he will not be as highly thought of.I'm not saying Gaffney is great but we used a high 2nd on him.You could have TO and Moss with Gates as your tight end and Carr still would not have time to throw.Either we don't have the talent or we don't have the coaching on the OL.
If we're not going to build a line for Carr then its a shame we don't play a 4-3 defense . We would be farther along drafting Julius Peppers.
 
mwclark said:
Mike Williams would be a nice pick but we have quality receivers now, we need to concentrate on getting better up front, it is hard to throw the ball consistently well went you are running for your life

Ive said before im not quite sold on the idea of having gaff and bradford as the other options at wide receiver, but thats just me... and i have also said i dont see a OL being taken especially with our 13th pick... if we want more results next year, than putting in a rookie OLmen isnt going to help matters...if anything i think it might hurt more. the only real possibilities i see are taking a skill player( Williams preferably :D ), a DE, or trading for more picks...taking a OL is just something i would rather leave to FA

hopefully we can address both, making everyone happy...im sure charley has got something up his sleave :headbang:
 
trijcomm said:
:loser Until you are wearing coaching credentials and standing on the sideline or sitting in the coaches' box, please refrain from telling me how a linemen performed without knowing what his assignment or task is on each play. To do so is, well, absurd.

Funny, isn't that exactly Casserly and every other scout/GM's job when evaluating FA's and potential draft picks? Yup. And how do they do it?--with game film--that tool you consider completely useless without knowing the assignments. Care to go for the truly absurd and claim they get all the assignments from all the college and pro-teams? I'm calling that game, set and match.
 
Back
Top