I don't see a G or TE in rd 1. I really don't. Having said that, I'm not going to throw a hissy fit if Fleener or any of the G or T are picked. We need good football players that are playmakers on either side of the ball.
Thinking it over though, a case could be made that Fleener could add just as much to the pass game as any of the WR taken at that spot. You could still come back around rd 3 and get a WR that you can groom as a Walter replacement...and perhaps get your AJ replacement in the next draft or two.
I could imagine a double TE set with Fleener and OD who can both run the seam and present major matchup trouble. I see Fleener as a big WR with speed more than a traditional TE. I mean you have a guy at 6-6 250lbs, who can run a 4.5. Adding that kind of athletic ability would be intriging. Call him a TE and make fun all you want of Kubes love affair with TE, but as a pass catcher, I like it the more I think of it. Then you can always flare out our vaunted RB who is one of the best out of the backfield...then you can still have AJ and WR2 (whomever that ends up being) in the pattern as well.
That is one hell of a lot of weapons at Matt's disposal so I'm not sure it's as far fletched as it appears. Having said that, I still view it as a longshot.
The last couple of weeks I have been thinking more and more that they are going OLB there at 26 (assuming no trade down). Curry, Branch, McCellin are a handful of names that I think could be there and could be our pick.