Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Think Brady did this on purpose? Pretty unusual way to have your hands in that situation.
Photoshopped.Think Brady did this on purpose? Pretty unusual way to have your hands in that situation.
![]()
It's the 1st time a Super Bowl game went into OT so it has to be, right?was this the first time the superbowl champion never had the lead?
was this the first time the superbowl champion never had the lead?
It's the 1st time a Super Bowl game went into OT so it has to be, right?
Not necessarily, although it's considerably more likely to happen in an overtime game where in some instances it effectively becomes sudden death. A team can score on the final play of regulation to win the game and never hold the lead prior to the end of regulation.It's the 1st time a Super Bowl game went into OT so it has to be, right?
Yeah, I know. I don't recall a team winning on the final play with the clock at 0:00, though. I could be wrong there, though.Not necessarily, although it's considerably more likely to happen in an overtime game where in some instances it effectively becomes sudden death. A team can score on the final play of regulation to win the game and never hold the lead prior to the end of regulation.
I'm sure there are several out there, although this one came to mind first for some reason.Yeah, I know. I don't recall a team winning on the final play with the clock at 0:00, though. I could be wrong there, though.
I'm sure there are several out there, although this one came to mind first for some reason. Also happened to be a game Philly never held the lead during the game.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/201012190nyg.htm
I wasn't disputing that (I'm smart/aware enough to know the factual situation). The comment was made that it had to be the first time since it was the first ever Super Bowl to go into overtime. I simply pointed out it didn't have to be an overtime game for that to happen.SUPER BOWL.
The Patriots are the only team to never lead until the last play in the SUPER BOWL.
Next closest, Super Bowl 5. The Colts didn't lead at all in that game until they kicked a FG with 5 seconds left.
Giants-Eagles? I thought we were talking Super Bowl history here. Did I really have to specify that when Super Bowl history is the ongoing conversation?I'm sure there are several out there, although this one came to mind first for some reason.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/201012190nyg.htm
You said it has to be the first time. I didn't dispute that it was the first time, only that your statement about it having to be was flawed.Giants-Eagles? I thought we were talking Super Bowl history here. Did I really have to specify that when Super Bowl history is the ongoing conversation?
Wow. It wasn't a factual statement. I even posed it as a question. Because it was the 1st Super Bowl game to go into OT, and I don't recall a Super Bowl game ending on the final play with the clock at 0:00, I assumed it had to be true.You said it has to be the first time. I didn't dispute that it was the first time, only that your statement about it having to be was flawed.
It is the first time, but simply being the first overtime game didn't mean it defaulted to being the first time.
Yes, you posed it as a question (didn't it have to be the first time because it was the first overtime game), and my answer to the question you posed was "not necessarily". I wasn't attempting to answer the question of if it was the first time (as has been established, it was), but rather answer your question of if overtime meant it had to be the first time. It didn't. It was, but it didn't have to be.Wow. It wasn't a factual statement. I even posed it as a question. Because it was the 1st Super Bowl game to go into OT, and I don't recall a Super Bowl game ending on the final play with the clock at 0:00, I assumed it had to be true.
Which I've already said I knew. I made the comment with the assumption that no SB game ended on the last play of the game, which turned out to be a correct assumption. I've already admitted the comment wasn't intended to be factual. I really didn't even care enough to research it.but rather answer your question of if overtime meant it had to be the first time. It didn't. It was, but it didn't have to be.
So, the Falcons fire DC Richard Smith after this 25 point meltdown.
The same Richard Smith that used to be DC of our crappy defense during the Kubiak years.
But, perhaps more important, the same Richard Smith that was on the Oilers staff for 35-3.
Dude has the worst luck as a coach. I'm not superstitious, but I would never hire the dude after he's been tainted with two of the biggest come from behind postseason games in NFL history.
It's almost like they were tempting fate to bring THAT coach back to Houston, back to the ancient Indian burial grounds under NRG and the Astrodome. The football gods are a-holes, man. Of that I have no doubt.
I really feel for Falcons fans. They have no idea right now. The hurt they have right now will be with them for the rest of their lives as football fans. I think the only way to lose it is to stop caring about pro football altogether (but that's just an assumption on my part because I've never tried it).
I feel like they wanted to get Julio Jones a touchdown. Seems weird they would start passing the ball with that much time. Also, I felt bad for the owner of the Falcons. He went down to the sidelines to celebrate only to be stunned.Baby Shanny out-smarted himself with that idiotic playcalling in the fourth quarter. I re-watched the game a couple of times and all he had to do was call for a few more running plays late in the game. Especially up 8 points with a 1st and 10 at the Patriots 23 yard line.
Why on earth would they even attempt a pass? A Matt Ryan sack took them out of field goal range which allowed Tom Brady to orchestrate the game-tying drive. Run three straight times, hell just fall forward three straight times, and force the Pats to burn a couple timeouts and allow Matt Bryant to hit a 40-ish yard field goal to go up 11 points. It may have even been under 40 yards if they gain any yardage on three straight running play. It's a 40 to 45 yarder (Matt Bryant is 78 % from that range) even if they gain no yards or lose some yards on three straight runs, but they would have been in position to kick a field goal to go up two scores and force the Patriots to burn some timeouts.
Kyle Shanahan should have a shiny Super Bowl 51 ring on his finger.
Instead he's going to coach the 49ers leaving Falcons fans perplexed and stunned.
The only explanation I've got: Being aggressive was their style of football all year. Plus, on 2nd & 11 they wanted the ball in the MVP's hands. If you have an elite QB, as I believe Ryan is in now, you trust the ball in his hands late in the game. Ryan just failed getting rid of the ball.I feel like they wanted to get Julio Jones a touchdown. Seems weird they would start passing the ball with that much time. Also, I felt bad for the owner of the Falcons. He went down to the sidelines to celebrate only to be stunned.
You're right and I agree. However, with with that 28-20 lead with 4 minutes and change left in the game. Matt Ryan just connected on a sensational first down pass to Julio Jones at the Patriots' 23 yard line. It looked like the Falcons were about to take a two-score lead, 31-20. They "DID NOT NEED" to be aggressive and score another Touchdown in that situation. At that point "PLAYING SMART" and winning Super Bowl 51 should have been Kyle Shanahan's only priority.The only explanation I've got: Being aggressive was their style of football all year. Plus, on 2nd & 11 they wanted the ball in the MVP's hands. If you have an elite QB, as I believe Ryan is in now, you trust the ball in his hands late in the game. Ryan just failed getting rid of the ball.
Exactly. I just don't get it. Five total runs after having a 28-3 lead!I heard the stat that the Falcons only ran the ball five times once the score was 28-3. FIVE TIMES!!!
That's just bad playcalling. I agree with BoP and Santo, Kyle just outsmarted himself. His apparent arrogance as a coach and the high powered offense that got him to the Super Bowl was something that his ego could not check and just play smart football with a 25 point lead.
I'm sorry but if Devonta Freeman doesn't miss that block on Hightower, the Falcons win that game.
and I'm not blaming Shanahan for staying aggressive. Like Bum would say, "You dance with who brung ya"; and aggressive offense 'brung' the Falcons to the Super Bowl.
I'm sorry but if Devonta Freeman doesn't miss that block on Hightower, the Falcons win that game.
I get where you're coming from but think about it; on the drive that got them close they had just gashed the Pats for big yards on plays of 49 yds and 27 yds. So aggressiveness had just paid off for them in a big way. That drive started at their own 10 and big passing plays got them damn near in the red zone (Pats' 22). Why would 'going turtle' even inter Shanahan's mind?It's not like Atlanta was all pass, pass, pass. They had the 5th best ground game in both yards per game and yards per attempt. That "brung" them there too. You'd given up 17 unanswered points at that point, you've got to put points on the board to stop the bleeding. Aggressiveness is one thing, playing smart is another.
I get where you're coming from but think about it; on the drive that got them close they had just gashed the Pats for big yards on plays of 49 yds and 27 yds. So aggressiveness had just paid off for them in a big way. That drive started at their own 10 and big passing plays got them damn near in the red zone (Pats' 22). Why would 'going turtle' even inter Shanahan's mind?
I'm not saying *I* would have passed in that situation (I'd have run the ball three times to burn clock and make the Pats use timeouts), but I get why Shanahan thought it would work.
I think we are in, what we used to call, "Violent Agreement".Yeah, that aggressiveness got them in to scoring range. Now you've got to play smart. You're talking about an NFL championship here. And I don't agree that going to the ground game is "going turtle". As I've said, Atlanta has one of the best run games in football and who's to say Freeman doesn't break off another 37 yarder? The run game was a big part of their success all year, not just Ryan and Julio.
Atlanta went up 28-3 with 23 minutes left. From that point on they ran only 17 plays to NE's 49.
You can say that they were too aggressive and didn't run the ball enough but when they did run the ball they got nothing out of it. In fact, most of their runs were so ineffective that it put them in positions where they had to pass.
Run - 5 plays for 0 yards
Pass - 12 plays for 49 yards
Really the only play that made no sense was the 3rd & 1 where they tried to throw while they were up 16 with 8:30 left.
Overall, player execution was the issue not coaching. If Atlanta had been super conservative and still lost people would be criticizing the coaches for that too. Bottom line, Atlanta's coaches put their guys in position to win and the players choked it away.