texansfaninla
Waterboy
Vince Young: Still The One:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/writers/michael_silver/04/14/young/index.html
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/writers/michael_silver/04/14/young/index.html
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
jgite said:Well it's never been totally one game. He has been doing this for a year and a half. The Rose Bowl was his coming out party. I think of it as if he was a musician. You might have wrote him off as being not worth it, but that was the one album that caught your ears and you become a fan. Look at winston justice and vernon davis, they went from second round or low first round to the top 10 or top 15 all because of their combine. Whats the difference with one game vs. one combine.
Well said.texansfaninla said:Feel free to disagree. Just my. All I really know is, April 29 can't come soon enough.
Reggie Bush will be a great addition. More talent on the offensive side of the ball - which used to feature Jabar Gaffney and Cory Bradford and no TE to speak of. With Reggie, you get a running back and a receiver and a leader.texansfaninla said:Reggie Bush would be a great addition, but he's not in a position to lead the team like a QB. He just isn't. Vince is, and would be a much better leader than David Carr has been. And I think that's what this team needs. David Carr has had four years - FOUR YEARS - to do something. The article makes a great point - what if Carr's problems are not because of the OL, but are because Carr just isn't as good as we'd like him to be? At some point you have to take the right step forward. And as for right now, Vince Young just feels so right, more so than Reggie Bush.
texansfaninla said:I must say - I've watched a ton of Vince Young video and Reggie Bush video online over the last several days, and I just go back and forth and back and forth. Here's what I think - my- Reggie Bush has an amazing amount of athletic skill, work ethic, etc., but he's just a vital cog to a larger well-oiled engine. In other words, he's not a guy to take the wheel, put the team on his shoulders, and lead it to a win.
As perspective, for years I was a Lions fan - during the Barry Sanders era after the Oilers were ready to be gone. Barry was and is my all-time favorite RB. The guy was flat out unbelievable in spite of playing on a bad team with a poor surrounding cast, esp. QB. He could make great plays, but just couldn't take the team on his shoulders and deliver a W. It's not the nature of the position. It's a role most suited for a quarterback.
Now, what I'm getting to is, the Texans need a star to identify it in the NFL galaxy. And as a dedicated Texans fan now, I don't want to see them make the same mistake the Lions did with Barry. He had some years when he was surrounded with talent, but he could only do so much. The ball was in Scott Mitchell's hands a heckuva lot more than his, and it could only go so far. What's Barry remembered for? Being a stellar athlete on an underperforming team, which ultimately drove him to early retirement.
In that respect, the linked article really nails it on the head. Reggie Bush can make some fantastic plays, but...Vince Young could be the real catalyst of this team - the guy whose leadership and mere will carries the team when it needs him most.
Make no mistake - Bush is an incredible prospect. But I just have a sense that he's not quite the leader that Vince is.
Add to that the genuine desire on the part of Vince to be The Guy in Houston, and the connection he would have with the fans, and the instantaneous widespread fan growth that would take place throughout what presently is Cowboy Country, and it just seems that Vince is too right for the Texans to pick. (Plus, it would be extremely awkward to attend a Texans-Titans game, with VY at QB for Tenn., and have half the crowd secretly cheering for a Titans win and/or disappointed with a Titans loss.)
And I by no means am a VY homer. Hell, I'm an LSU alum who would love to see either Bush or Young in a Texans uniform - and that's with Domanick Davis in the backfield.
But you watch the big plays Vince makes in crunch situations, see how his teammates gravitate to him, and keep in mind that the combine has been completely wrong about guys before...the question becomes, who do you want to lead this team?
Reggie Bush would be a great addition, but he's not in a position to lead the team like a QB. He just isn't. Vince is, and would be a much better leader than David Carr has been. And I think that's what this team needs. David Carr has had four years - FOUR YEARS - to do something. The article makes a great point - what if Carr's problems are not because of the OL, but are because Carr just isn't as good as we'd like him to be? At some point you have to take the right step forward.
Add to that the comments by Gary Kubiak about how he wants Carr to be able to throw on the run, and tuck the ball and run...is there anybody better than doing that who's in the draft than Vince? As for right now, Vince Young just feels so right, more so than Reggie Bush.
Feel free to disagree. Just my. All I really know is, April 29 can't come soon enough.
Yeah - what el toro said...el toro said:You know what the Texans need to do? Win. Now. Enough with all of the sentimental crap about VY and UT and Houston and what not. He's not going to do anything in this league for the next 2 seasons, if ever. If the NFL was about something else other than winning might I care about the VY drama. Take away the Rose Bowl win against a weak *** USC defense and VY would be lucky to break the top 15 in the draft.
Bush will be ready to play on the 1st down of the season. He won't be holding a clipboard. He fits your offense. VY doesn't even fit in the NFL. Forget about trading down for the sake of trading down because you're afraid or because your lust for VY cannot be sated.
jgite said:Well it's never been totally one game. He has been doing this for a year and a half. The Rose Bowl was his coming out party. I think of it as if he was a musician. You might have wrote him off as being not worth it, but that was the one album that caught your ears and you become a fan. Look at winston justice and vernon davis, they went from second round or low first round to the top 10 or top 15 all because of their combine. Whats the difference with one game vs. one combine.
What you say about Bush is true!el toro said:Bush will be ready to play on the 1st down of the season. He won't be holding a clipboard. He fits your offense. VY doesn't even fit in the NFL.
texansfaninla said:Reggie Bush would be a great addition, but he's not in a position to lead the team like a QB. He just isn't. Vince is, and would be a much better leader than David Carr has been. And I think that's what this team needs. David Carr has had four years - FOUR YEARS - to do something. The article makes a great point - what if Carr's problems are not because of the OL, but are because Carr just isn't as good as we'd like him to be? At some point you have to take the right step forward.
Frank_The_Tank said:I do not agree that David Car had identical stats as John Elway for their first 4 years in the league. I do not even believe you can compare the two guys.
Games Started
Carr yr1 16 yr2 12 yr3 16 yr4 16
Elway yr1 11 yr2 15 yr3 16 yr4 16
YARDS
CARR: YR1 2592 Yr2 2013 Yr3 3531 Yr4 2488
Elway: Yr1 1663 Yr2 2598 Yr3 3891 Yr4 3485
Touchdowns
Carr: 9, 9, 16, 14
Elway: 7, 18, 22, 19
what runningback ever took their team to a superbowl and dont say walter payton b/c he didn't go until they got the best defense known to man.....f.y.i......gayle sayers never went to the superbowl despite what he did for the team...oh yea barry sanders, earl campbell,jim brown,and i think eric dickerson never went also, so what does that say, if you dont know then let me tell you it means that RB is not the answer guy and QB's are the General's on the field and they make things happen.......like my mom always told me "people are afraid of what they don't understand(referring to VY)"el toro said:You know what the Texans need to do? Win. Now. Enough with all of the sentimental crap about VY and UT and Houston and what not. He's not going to do anything in this league for the next 2 seasons, if ever. If the NFL was about something else other than winning might I care about the VY drama. Take away the Rose Bowl win against a weak *** USC defense and VY would be lucky to break the top 15 in the draft.
Bush will be ready to play on the 1st down of the season. He won't be holding a clipboard. He fits your offense. VY doesn't even fit in the NFL. Forget about trading down for the sake of trading down because you're afraid or because your lust for VY cannot be sated.
Untamed Guerillaz said:what runningback ever took their team to a superbowl and dont say walter payton b/c he didn't go until they got the best defense known to man.....f.y.i......gayle sayers never went to the superbowl despite what he did for the team...oh yea barry sanders, earl campbell,jim brown,and i think eric dickerson never went also, so what does that say, if you dont know then let me tell you it means that RB is not the answer guy and QB's are the General's on the field and they make things happen.......like my mom always told me "people are afraid of what they don't understand(referring to VY)"
Hmmm, so what you are saying is we should get a 6th round RB like Terrell Davis to take us to the super bowl? Jamal Lewis was drafted with the 5th pick in the 1st round, but the year they won the Super Bowl, the Ravens won because of their defense. Lewis had 1364 yds rushing and 296 yds recieving that year. His best year, 3 years later, he had over 2000 yds rushing and 205 yds recieving, but he couldn't carry them to a super bowl.cap1 said:Untamed,
To answer your question. Terrell Davis won two superbowls. One of those seasons he rushed for 2,000 yards. Another running back was Jamal Lewis and he rushed for 2,000 yards. True both of these guys had other people on thier teams, but you cannot say this guy never won a superbowl. It is a team game.
If the Broncos had to get rid of Davis or Elway for whatever reason, they would get rid of Davis not Elway. RB's are a dime a dozen....QB's who come thru in the clutch are rare.cap1 said:Untamed,
To answer your question. Terrell Davis won two superbowls.
Yeah, but it was an opinion piece from the John McClain school of journalism. Make sure you only grab quotes from sources that agree with your slant. These type articles have been a dime a dozen since the Rose Bowl. Nothing new here.Texan in Japan said:Nicely written article, was entertaining to read.
Untamed Guerillaz said:what runningback ever took their team to a superbowl and dont say walter payton b/c he didn't go until they got the best defense known to man.....f.y.i......gayle sayers never went to the superbowl despite what he did for the team...oh yea barry sanders, earl campbell,jim brown,and i think eric dickerson never went also, so what does that say, if you dont know then let me tell you it means that RB is not the answer guy and QB's are the General's on the field and they make things happen.......like my mom always told me "people are afraid of what they don't understand(referring to VY)"
Untamed Guerillaz said:Terell Davis had all american team with him just like walter did b/c he didnt go until they posted the best defense ever known in football just like the batimore ravens had an awesome defense when they went to the superbowl. The last time i checked isnt Elway one one of the greatest QB to play the position.....i rest my case its more elway doing than TD
kastofsna said:actually he was 0-3.i doubt there would've been 3 if not for elway.
Texan in Japan said:Nicely written article, was entertaining to read. However, it still boils down to how our coaching staff and front office evaluate our current talent and draft talent. I'll be happy with any of the following guys Bush, Mario, Vince, AJ, D'Brick or VD(avis).