Vinny
shiny happy fan
It will change sometime before camp....and btw, its DeMeco, not democo.And yes, can we please get like Democo and AJ on the top banner please.![]()
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
It will change sometime before camp....and btw, its DeMeco, not democo.And yes, can we please get like Democo and AJ on the top banner please.![]()
sounds like a new frappucino blend at starbucks.It will change sometime before camp....and btw, its DeMeco, not democo.
sounds like a new frappucino blend at starbucks.
It will change sometime before camp....and btw, its DeMeco, not democo.
You know Porky, after seeing that this thread had appeared this morning, I chose not to read it. But after thinking about it off and on today, I have to say that this is such an immature response to someone who was trying to be nice to David. Don't you think you have enough of these threads already that this is seriously a little redundant?
All of this has been said before. What are you going to do if David is still here come August? Therapy maybe???? Good luck.
Then you caution someone else about a possible need for therapy.
Did I miss anything?
yeah I forgot to respond to this in time.
I already have anger management therapy. And I am not allowed to watch any Texans' games without a big sheet of cardboard taped up on the screen. This blocks out everything on half of the field that might trigger an outburst.
Not to mention the nurses have to prerecord the games and edit out any close-ups and bleep out any foul references before hand.
It's called autism.I don't know what the deal is lately. Maybe still getting used to writing on a laptop keyboard instead of a desktop. I keep messing up, and no I haven't been drinking.![]()
There once was a quarterback named Carr,
Who never took his team very far,
at crunch-time he stumbled,
or worse yet he fumbled,
and thus he remains sub-par.
There once was a quarterback named Carr,
Who never took his team very far,
at crunch-time he stumbled,
or worse yet he fumbled,
and thus he remains sub-par.
-----------------------------------dain!![]()
There once was a quarterback named Carr,
Who never took his team very far,
at crunch-time he stumbled,
or worse yet he fumbled,
and thus he remains sub-par.
Okay, let's recap.
You saw the thread. You decided not to read it. But then you thought about it off and on all day and decided to post something about it anyway. Then you caution someone else about a possible need for therapy.
Did I miss anything?
Just the thought of the fallout, if David is still here, to a bunch of people will be pretty disasterous. You know what I mean?
"Just saying ... Carr isn't the only problem, or the most glaring."
FYI, this was the post I was responding to--see the 3rd word? For me, he named an individual, so I was taking that as he had someone else in mind. His statement as he wrote it could be taken different ways...
If he had written the way you suggest, there is only 1 interpretation..did he ever answer the question either way?
If David is still here, I'll be cheering for him along with the rest of the team. But I can't say that I don't think that if he starts every game, I expect him to cost us at least 2-3 games.
What's the official count for the number of losses with Carr as the starter for the Texans?
I think it is 53. If anybody knows different, let me know.
Testaverde Bucs 88-92 had 56 losses at most ( but Vinny didn't start them all, less than fifty )
Jake Plummer Cardinals 97-01 :53 losses ( I think, could be wrong )
Neil Lomax Cardinals 82-88 :57 at most /strike season though
Jeff Blake only had 50 some odd losses as a starter for the 94-99 Bengals
what a loser.
How many of these guys played from day 1 on an expansion team? None. Sorry, meaningless comparison.
![]()
That works for maybe 1-2 years...not 5. Nice try. The Cardinals might as well be an expansion team.How many of these guys played from day 1 on an expansion team? None. Sorry, meaningless comparison.
![]()
That works for maybe 1-2 years...not 5. Nice try. The Cardinals might as well be an expansion team.
Kolb's stock went up with the Texans based upon his performance in the combine.
Look for the Texans to dump Carr before the Draft.. If they draft Kolb in the 2nd, Carr's trade value approximates that of a 1977 AMC Pacer........
Defense wins championships, sounds good ,and look at who was in the SB Da-Bears, and after Good defense in the playoffs the Colts. If you want wins, start calling all the sport news station with an informed opinion, fix the worst part of our team first, the defense, then tweak the offense, Sage may be the man, why spend $8 + on some other teams reject QB when we already have two ? Let's look at this team logicly, with out hate, write down the numbers by position, and find the cause of the problems and stop chasing symptoms.
How many of these guys played from day 1 on an expansion team? None. Sorry, meaningless comparison.
![]()
I wrote the following nearly five years ago in this space:
Some guy named David Garrard was the Jaguars' fourth-round pick in the NFL Draft 10 days ago. David Garrard is a quarterback from East Carolina. With that sentence, I have completely exhausted my reservoir of knowledge about David Garrard. I don't know whether he's right- or left-handed, how fast he runs the 40, or if he has the arm strength to throw the deep out. But I do know this: There's a decent chance that David Garrard will have as productive a pro career as David Carr, the QB who went to the Texans as the No. 1 overall pick in the draft.
-- Hot Button, April 2002
Not surprisingly, nothing that's happened since has proven those words wrong. Garrard is a backup quarterback for the Jags who has had some impressive moments in relief of Byron Leftwich, and he's likely to start for someone in the future. Carr has had his moments too -- unfortunately many of them were spent on his back after the Texans' porous offensive line allowed another sack, and his future as Houston's starting quarterback is uncertain. The bottom line is that five years after the draft, the QB who was the top overall pick has an NFL future that's not much brighter, if at all, than the QB who was an obscure fourth-round choice. That shouldn't be a surprise; that's the way it is with quarterbacks.