Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
I don't know why you've hopped in to dispute some position I haven't taken.
I'm not defending Fitz as the guy. In fact it's written clear as day in my posts that I don't think he's the guy, that I would like to see Mallett. My point all along has been about the timing of the switch. That to say Fitz has contributed nothing and anyone could just come in cold and make any of the plays he's made is purely conjecture and shows little regard for the amount of focus, attention, and 1st team oriented detail that's attributed to being a starting NFL quarterback.
So 2 touchdowns and 6 ints is working? Losing 2 of 3 is working? Your offense is near the bottom of the league is points per game, that is working too? Near the bottom in passing yards per game, thats working out too right? Thats how OB drew up the season? The Raiders are the only team with less passes beyond 20 (including 40+ passes) yards...thats what OB and co. want?
Stop being naive people. OB is not happy with our poor qb play and he will make a move. His whole coaching structure is based on team above individuals and playing your best players. Clearly Fitz is not that guy.
Now everyone says, how do you know Mallett or Savage is that guy....we DON'T, thats why you try them and see how it goes.
If we were 1-4 this would be a lot easier to decide for OB. But we are 3-2 with a chance to take first place tonight. Why would we change QBs if we are 4-2 and in first place?
I don't understand all of this, "Fitzpatrick should/will be the starter as long as we're winning" talk.
I think they roll Fitz out there and if he does bad again, we MIGHT see Mallett at the half. If not and Fitz goes back out there and we lose, then I see Mallett starting next week.
The only way IMO Fitz keeps his job is if he lights up the Colts.
If we were 1-4 this would be a lot easier to decide for OB. But we are 3-2 with a chance to take first place tonight. Why would we change QBs if we are 4-2 and in first place?
So uh, if we make it to 9-2, you'd still want Fitz to be replaced...?
By the way, Cameron had years of offensive ineptitude with the Ravens before he was finally let go. There was a long history there.
TJ Yates came off the bench as the third string qb and won a game for us, THAT IS ICE COLD.
Mallett knows the system and has been here a month. He should be just fine under center. Sure he will have kinks to work out, but its not like what we are running right now is some complex machine. Fitz is almost dead last in the league in passes over 20 yards, only Oakland is worse than us. I think Mallett or Savage could come in and throw 4 yard passes while staring down AJ, Hopkins and Arian. Im sure I COULD do that. Let alone an NFL qb who has been in the league for a few years under the same system (Mallett).
Oh, well now that you've cited one time that a guy came in cold and didn't completely blow it I guess there's nothing more to be said on the matter. Certainly not anything about, maybe, perhaps, oh I don't know, the tenfold other examples there are of guys coming in cold and getting eaten alive for it. Maybe as recent as Mike Vick last weekend.
But no, you're right, NFL head coaches should use T.J. Yates as the standard bearing example and refrain from giving Mallett as well organized a shot at success as could be. Because T.J. Yates came in, out of necessity, with a 7 point lead against a glorified high school team and didn't spontaneously combust, that's why we won't use reason and a sound tactical approach to seeing what Mallett can best give this team moving forward.
Because T.J. Yates "won" some game ...
The organization entered the season aiming to avoid a full-blown reconstruction effort in 2014. As long as they remain competitive, Fitzpatrick's job is secure.
In the event of a prolonged losing streak, though, NFL Media Insider Ian Rapoport reported on NFL Network's Around The NFL on Thursday, Mallett will get his chance
Remind me of the point at which the 7th becomes a 6th?
40% of the snaps.
i just saw Mallet warming up with Fitz , Mallet was wearing a wrist band with plays on it . Fitz was not .
i would have thought he would not need it by now , maybe he is still far behind
So uh, if we make it to 9-2, you'd still want Fitz to be replaced...?
By the way, Cameron had years of offensive ineptitude with the Ravens before he was finally let go. There was a long history there.
So you just danced around my point.. Okay.
Point is, you said as long as the Texans were winning, Fitzpatrick shouldn't be replaced. The Ravens were winning with Cameron.. Yet he was replaced. As far as year's of ineptitude and a long history, Fitzpatrick has been the same player for a decade now, what else are you expecting to see?
didn't see the last 3 mins fumble but obvs that was garbage time
Fitz payed just well enough to keep his job maybe till the bye
didn't see the last 3 mins fumble but obvs that was garbage time
Fitz payed just well enough to keep his job maybe till the bye
How is a potential game winning drive garbage time?
It's not and the opportunity was fumbled.
With 10 days to prepare for the Monday Night Football game at Pittsburgh, I'd at least give Ryan Mallett some first-team reps in practice over the course of the following week. Doesn't hurt to take a little look at what he can do. This team is 3-3 and going to need a spark at the quarterback position to make a run at a wild-card spot. The offensive line has to pass block better but we need some exciting quarterback play at the same time. Somebody with a canon arm which I believe Mallet-Magic has.
They need to attack the middle of the field ...
The problem we have is we have a choice between
Fitz
Mallet
Savage
at QB
Those are our f#&#&%g choices.
WHO do we have to thank for this?????????????????/
GET RID OF RICK on shoes baby.
I'm sorry, you're going to have to point out middle of the field to me. Haven't seen it in awhile.
It's like Carr is QB again - anything between the hashmarks is invisible.
How many of the QBs from last year do we have?
And you think that's on Smith? LOL
These are OB's boys.
Like I mentioned in the other thread.
Rick had no one in line to step up. You cannot think that we would be in better shape with Case and TJ.
I am sure OB would rather have Peyton but he wasn't made available.
![]()
How many of the QBs from last year do we have?
And you think that's on Smith? LOL
These are OB's boys.
Yep, Rick Smith is never to blame for anything.
Going to Mallett doesn't change a thing.
All I will ever need to know about Blow me Rick is that we had a shot at one of the best ILB prospects of the last 10+ years and we decided to draft a 19 year old shitty DT. If you look at Willis and Zerokoye and say "Wow, Amobi is it" you are dead to me. Period.
You can't say for certain and I completely disagree with you. I think this team needs a leader and they need to start looking for one now before this season gets away from them completely. Fitz can't lead the Texans anywhere but the top of next year's draft and they know it.
Need to look in their other bottle(s) and see if one of them might have a little lightning in it.
Three out of the four players taken after "Phe" were Patrick Willis, Marshawn Lynch, and Darrelle Revis.
Every time I think about that I want to scream. It's like when Casserly traded away from Derrick Johnson and selected Travis Johnson (AKA: The Slug)
Mallett (or any QB) cant solve all the other problems .... piss poor blocking , unimaginative route combinations , everything going to the sidelines instead of attacking the middle of the field , poor time management .... the list goes on.
You could Steve Young back there doing his best impersonation of Barry Sanders and it wouldn't change those things. This offense blows chunks. /vomit.
A guy with great pocket presence and escapability can still make things work with poor blocking. Just look at Luck last night. He made some great plays in the pocket to keep things alive despite being under heavy pressure. Of course, that's part of the reason he was a #1 overall pick, but it is possible.
Problem is Mallett and Savage have never displayed great pocket presence or escapability in the past. Fitz has been able to escape, which is a huge plus, but he doesn't have great awareness and makes some very poor decisions that kind of erase the good things he might bring to the table.
Mallett is going to get his shot eventually, but I worry about what will happen to him behind this protection. He's a statue back there. Fitz has been able to avoid a lot of hits and he's still taken some wicked punishment.
Luck is pretty damn special .... there were a couple times he made plays with guy's all over him. I don't know if there is another QB in the league that makes those plays - Maybe Roethlisberger at his best which is behind him.
Luck isn't handcuffed by a poor scheme either , they play to his strengths. Fitz doesn't have that luxury , he has to deal with poor blocking and poorly designed plays / scheme.
Agreed. To be fair though, part of the reason for some of the scheme issues is that they are being designed to compensate for Fitz's shortcomings. Luck doesn't have very many shortcomings (if any) that need to be schemed around.
Screen/draw on 3rd & long because O'Brien either doesn't have the faith that we can protect or complete intermediate passes. Conservative early game playcalling to hold off until latest moment before 'unleashing' Fitz.
Is that why they go five wide and put the ball in Fitz hands ?!
They've done it all season , ahead or behind .... I don't think OB is limiting Fitz at all. I think the playbook is missing a few pages.
IMO, 5 wide is to try and limit the pressure that Fitz is getting on most snaps. Most of those formation snaps are designed to spread the field and get easy looks at short throws and keep Fitz from having 3 guys in the face by the time he's dropped back.
I'm not saying that OB is limiting Fitz. I'm saying his playcalling is limited by Fitz. Those extra pages would be in play if he had a more talented QB that he had faith in (Brady, for instance).