Rod Gardner?

[Texas_Thrill]

Ok I know bradford's hands weren't the greatest but neither are gardeners and he's slower. He's also has an attitude problem which i've not heard of bradford. No need to add a cancer.

I dont see any reason to believe he'd be a #2 with his lack of consistency.

 

[DRIFTAWAY]

I agree with Thrill, why bother doing all the releasing and signing? Bradford can play solid football, if not better then Gardener. And we all know that Bradford can come up with some big plays.

 

[Porky]

I don't know what ya'll are looking at. Gardner isn't a great player, but a good player, and a clear upgrade over Bradford. Bradford isn't a #2. Bradford, if anything is a #4. Gardner is a legit #2. His stats last year were 51 catches for 650 yards for a TERRIBLE offense. Bradford had 27 catches for 399 yards. When Bradford hit the FA market, there was so much clamor to sign him, he had to come back with his tail between his legs begging to resign here. There is no comparison. You might want to rethink things.

 

[Texan in Japan]

I actually like our receiving corps. In fact, I think it can be very strong this year, if we can get Carr more protection. I'd pass on Gardner, when I lived in DC-area, he didn't impress me much. He has size, but from DC reporters, they didn't think he had the work ethic to improve his game.