texplayer2 said:
Reggie will start contributing from day one and not only get a few touchdowns himself, but will help AJ,DC,EM, and DD get a few more. You are suggesting Vince takeover in week nine and start becoming a one man show again? Where ever Vince does land they better get him an offense around him, because the one man show approach will not translate to the Pros. The Comparison would have to be how many more TDs Carr will be able to engineer with the help of Bush vs. what Vince might be able to squeeze out of defensive mistakes without the extra option and in fewer games. (Team sport...Draft for the team aspect, not for individual stardom)
If Carr's getting it done, then Vince won't play till year two.... depending on how well Carr does, it might be late in year 2.
My Point is without Reggie Bush, we've already got a pretty potent offense..... Kubiak's running game, should help DD to a breakout year..... much like Terrell Davis' Breakout year. I don't think he'll have 2000 total rushing yards, but I do expect 2000 total.
Yes, he will stay healthy, if our offensive line does their job, and get him into the secondary untouched..... if our fullback does his job, and take out the first linebaker.... & with the still legal cutblock, there will be fewer DLinemen to catch him after 50 yards.. & with Morency getting the 10 carries a game you guys are slotting for Reggie, DD will have a very good year.
With this run game, although DD doesn't create a true mismatch, defenses will have to respect our run game. Even if they don't put 8 men in the box.. with 6 men playing the line of scrimmage, there are only 5 men to watch AJ, Moulds, Putz, and Mathis. Only one of those 4 can be double teamed......
Imagine Reggie Bush in this lineup..... We can use him to replace Putz..... well, Putz is a bigger target, with WR speed...... I don't know if I want to take Putz out of the game.....
We can use him to replace Mathis..... well, Mathis is faster, so I don't think we want to take Mathis out.... It would be stupid, to think we would replace either of our 2 proBowl recievers with Reggie.....
So what is it exactly that Reggie will give us that we don't already have?? The ability to score from the 80 out of the backfield?? While it might be nice to have, I don't believe we should use the #1 overall to fill that need. Heck, we can run a reverse with AJ, or Mathis.
That, and the fact that Reggie will actualy take away from(rather than add) from the games of our ProBowlers, our tight end, and our developing WRs.. don't forget we also signed Keven Walter.
If we can keep David Carr on his feet, our run game is enough, more than enough, to open the game up for the offensive talent we have... with or without Reggie Bush, we will have 4 proBowlers on the offensive line. 2 as Widerecievers, on every down, and another to put in the slot.
how much more, is Reggie Bush going to open up the field for these guys??
Let's say we've got AJ, Moulds, Mathis, Cook, and Reggie in the backfield..... if I'm a DC, I'm going Nickel everytime I see Reggie... 2 deep, man under coverage. Reggie's going to have to run it up the middle, and my Safeties will make him pay. If he motions out as a 4th reciever, I've got a DB to cover him.... if I'm the Cowboys, that's either T.Newman, or Aaron Glenn..... I think I'm in pretty good shape. I've got corners playing AJ & Moulds man coverage. I've got a corner on Bush, 1 deep safety, Keith Davis, or Marcus Coleman will have to play over the top of Mathis........... I've still got Chris Canty, Marcus Spears, D'Marco Ware, & Ferguson, to go after Carr. Then two LBs, to play underneath in the middle, or cover the TE/FB, or to be the fifth man to go get Carr...... with my 2 deep safeties, I can Jam Reggie/Mathis at the line. Send that defender on the Blitz to get Carr, still with a LB under, and a Safety over the top. No big deal, I've still got good coverage, and good pressure.