expwrlifter said:
jerek,
you need to read some more info... the ticket sales are not going fast for the astros especially when they didnt offer arbitration for the ROCKET... and mark my words if he does come back MAY 1st it wont take a rocket scientist to figure out what will happen then... let me help you out.. additional hires for season tickets again..
And to answer all the reason to pick him because of Tickets ...didnt say that was a reason but its funny to me that the FO keeps extending the deadline.. its like they are afraid the fan base will turn on them if they dont make the VY pick...
I don't have data on this year's sales, and I would be interested to know what data you have access to. Not saying you are wrong, but since you seem to have more information than I do, would appreciate the look.
I was simply referring to the general sports trend: winners sell, losers don't. Countless highly successful sports franchises sell out game after game without a "hometown" player on their roster. Players become popular, become icons, when they win. Tom Brady was an unheralded nobody when New England drafted him, and he's nothing less than a national celebrity now, to say nothing of his status in Boston.
The "draft for tickets" argument is not invalid, but the problem is that it can be contrary to "draft to win." Because it provides the wrong skew towards evaluating football talent, no franchise is going to seriously consider a player's "popularity" whenever that attribute is a potential factor in fanbase reception, and I am getting tired of hearing pro-Vince arguments because the front office is supposed to be concerned with bringing a popular guy in. This isn't a comedy club, this isn't a circus, this is a football team, and while it is an elevated form of "entertainment" which must be concerned with what the buyer wants, buyers ultimately want winning. That is sport. For all of those loud but minority voices threatening to rescind their support of the team if we don't draft Vince, winning will quickly replace those lost ticket sales. If we draft Vince and continue to lose, two years later, no one will care. If we aren't drafting to replace Vince, we are still drafting to rebuild a franchise and restore fanbase.
Few if any wildly successful figures in the history of sport were drafted on the basis of being a hometown guy, or were close to the community because they grew up in it. Players reach out, roots are put down, and winning makes damn near everyone good friends. You are simply in denial if you don't understand that.
If the front office thinks Vince is the QB to lead this franchise, then his already substantial Houston fanbase makes for a sweet bonus. If it is a dead coin flip between Vince and Leinart in terms of replacing Carr, then Young will easily win the tiebreaker because of his local status. But if the FO is not convinced that Vince needs to replace Carr, then they are not going to suddenly rethink any aspect of that decision because of the fan outcry for Vince, as it exists now.
Trust me, we go 12-4 two years from now? David Carr is going to get really popular around here.