Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Yeah, it is a good article.
I think his point about the next two games is right on the money that it will really show us who this team is.
I will add, we'll get a good measuring stick for Carr's stats from the first two weeks. If they are as important as some people say they are, we could really win both of these games.
And David Carr winning both these games because of his play would be a great step forward to settling "THE GREAT TEXANS DEBATE".
I will add, we'll get a good measuring stick for Carr's stats from the first two weeks. If they are as important as some people say they are, we could really win both of these games.
And David Carr winning both these games because of his play would be a great step forward to settling "THE GREAT TEXANS DEBATE".
Ultimately, if you read everything that Kubiak says and does, it is not about individual players on this team. He is loathed to talk about just Mario or just David--he just wants all the pieces and parts to start working together and trusting each other and doing what was practiced.
At thi spoint, I think Carr could post a passing TD in each quarter and have a rating of over 100 and the team would still lose. I'd settle for a 10-7 win, if it just showed the defense playing up to par.
So what is your point?
My point has nothing to do with how Kubiak handles the media. Which is what your are discussing.
Like I said, Carr winning both of those games directly, would be great boost for this team to give them an identity, and really encourage the fans, which would begin to stop this endless debate. Bottom line, fans pay for this team, and there could be a problem in the near future the way things are going with fans continuing their financial support.
I really don't care to discuss the way Kubiak handles the press, which seems to be your point to me. It really is irrelevant.
I think she meant everyone's play should be measured as well as improved every individual player is a accountable. and as for the carr debate... problems with the other areas of the team are just as important..
Agreed, but I think from what we have seen this first two weeks, since the Texans appear to be playing lesser opponents, if Carr's play stays the same (the arguement is he is playing better than other people on offense), we should be able to get a couple of victories here.
It just seems surprising that Carr's stats are so important but there seems to be a reluctance to put the team on his back, not to mention he is probably the highest paid player on the team and #1 pick in the 2002 draft. He should shoulder most of the responsibility, regardless of how Kubiak handles the media.
As I said, this is a great opportunity for Kubiak and Carr to start to put a stamp on this team.
he is probably the highest paid player on the team and #1 pick in the 2002 draft.
If Carr throws a TD every quarter in the next two games, I think the Texans should be able come away with easy victories. The defense will be off the field most of the game, which would be a good thing right now.
The defense took the field with around a minute left in the half versus Philly, when they hadn't tired out yet (we had won the TOP battle at that point) and promptly gave up a TD. Immediately after halftime, they promptly gave up another TD. I really don't see where the defense being on the field too long has been an issue. Unless you're saying that having them on the field at all is a risk, in which case, I would have to agree with you. But I don't think the offense is going to get 60:00 in TOP![]()
I just want to see them competitive. So far, they've looked like they don't belong in the league.
The defense took the field with around a minute left in the half versus Philly, when they hadn't tired out yet (we had won the TOP battle at that point) and promptly gave up a TD. Immediately after halftime, they promptly gave up another TD. I really don't see where the defense being on the field too long has been an issue. Unless you're saying that having them on the field at all is a risk, in which case, I would have to agree with you. But I don't think the offense is going to get 60:00 in TOP![]()
AJ actually has the highest cap hit this year and next is being paid as a franchise WR--he needs to perform to the level of his cap hit as well. Let's face it--every #1 pick the Texans have needs to step up their game and prove their worth--Carr, AJ, Dunta, Babin, TJ and Mario. It is time for several of them to at least seriously be in the discussions for the pro-bowl.
Decent. I just hate having to keep "put things in perspective" after four long years.
I really would like a win on Sunday. Especially since I am going to the game.
yeah but it is what it is. I think everyone on this board would like to win this sunday & i also think that most expected to lose the 1st two as well. The fact of the matter is its a new team, new coaches & its going to take some time for them to gel.
Other than the fact that he uses the term 'chill pill' in the heading, i'd say that's a good article. The stuff he's written over the last few weeks is making me warm up to the guy.
At this point, I think Carr could post a passing TD in each quarter and have a rating of over 100 and the team would still lose. I'd settle for a 10-7 win, if it just showed the defense playing up to par.
Agreed, but I think from what we have seen this first two weeks, since the Texans appear to be playing lesser opponents, if Carr's play stays the same (the arguement is he is playing better than other people on offense), we should be able to get a couple of victories here.
It just seems surprising that Carr's stats are so important but there seems to be a reluctance to put the team on his back, not to mention he is probably the highest paid player on the team and #1 pick in the 2002 draft. He should shoulder most of the responsibility, regardless of how Kubiak handles the media.
As I said, this is a great opportunity for Kubiak and Carr to start to put a stamp on this team.
I'm pretty close to a Carr Hater....... but I don't think David is reluctant to put the team on his shoulder. If David would've placed his foot two inches to his left, on that one scramble against the Eagles(in the 4th), I think that would have been a big stride for David in becoming this teams undisputable leader like he should be.
IT's really been little things like that, and the consistency in which they occur, that has been stopping Carr from emerging as our leader. IMHO.
But I can see how this high QB rating can actually work against him. If he is not trusting our guy to go up & get the ball, more worried about INTs.... personally, I would hate to play for a QB like that.
TK You still under the misguided impression that Andre will fight for the ball?
Guy's to timid on the field.
Don't get me wrong--still a very good WR, but AJ does need to be more aggressive. He is huge for a WR plus tremendously athletic and needs to use those to his advantage.
They should have some designed plays for Carr to throw the ball high when he is covered by guys like Dunta. AJ needs to stretch the bounds of the rules as well. Chad Johnson, TO and many of the greats regularly create room by pushing the limits of the pushing off rules. Just like Aaron Glenn learned to push the limits of the contact rules from the DB side, AJ needs to learn to push the limits from the WR side. Shanahan is failing in his responsibility if we don't see some of this.
I don't understand why we haven't seen more of the "Randy ratio" in effect for Andre. Not that I want Carr to throw to him if he's just not open, but IMO, there are many routes in which Andre, 1 on 1, is "open" almost by default. Throw him a good pass and let him use his size and strength to go get it. I don't mean to oversimplify it but I think Carr would do well to go to Andre more, especially when he's one on one, and yes, Andre needs to get better as a receiver. I used to dream that we would bring in Jerry Rice as a receivers coach; then we got Moulds, who I still think is plenty capable as a mentor.
infantrycak said:I don't want to see an Andre ratio--in fact kind of the opposite. When Carr and AJ were in a pitch and catch groove in 2004 it opened up the other WR's and two thirds of the balls went their way--everyone gained. During that time AJ was making spectacular catches going up over double coverage, not dropping balls, etc. Now since the 2nd half of 2004 Carr seems to have a much tighter definition of open but AJ has to make the plays like the missed one in pre-season as well. Call that a misthrown ball if you want (wrong IMO--misjudged by the WR) but those are the balls great WR's get to make the difference--see Plaxico making the tipped spinning reception to almost come back on the Colts.
I've never really discussed it here for various reasons but my baseline for playing QB waiting games has always been Pastorini.
Dante's first three years in the NFL were a lot like Carr's. When Gilman came in during Pastorini's fourth year and installed his new system (this was several years pre-Earl), Dante's career immediately went from "he sux" to "he's ok" with a lot of the same players still around him.
Gregg Williams is going to blitz the living daylights out of us on Sunday. So will Saban the following week. It will continue until someone, or some group, can make someone else or some other group pay.
TK You still under the misguided impression that Andre will fight for the ball?
Guy's to timid on the field.
![]()
![]()
Call that a misthrown ball if you want (wrong IMO--misjudged by the WR) but those are the balls great WR's get to make the difference--see Plaxico making the tipped spinning reception to almost come back on the Colts.
...
The whole "coporate culture". It is faster to change on an NFL team because you can faster replace the management (GM and coaches) and employees (players), but it will still take time. Kubiak and Smith may have to shed more Capers/Casserly players until the team starts to believe they can win.
...