Preseason doesn't mean anything. Obviously if you look awful in preseason, it should be a warning. But good preseason play against vanilla Ds doesn't really mean a thing.
Lundy and Morency are the perfect examples:
Both had Excellent with a capital E preseasons, and both haven't transitioned that into regular season.
Our D had an excellent preseason, again, no translation.
Our pass rush was awsome in the preason.
So why should Sage's good presason (against #2 and 3 defenses, nonetheless) mean he will translate into our savior at QB?
I know Carr's numbers were padded because of the prevent D, but the fact remains that he is playing much better than a lot of people are giving him credit for, considering we never seem to get good field position (can't make a stop on D and our KR situation only recently seems to have been resolved) and the OL that never ceases to redefine the word swiss cheese.
Lundy and Morency are the perfect examples:
Both had Excellent with a capital E preseasons, and both haven't transitioned that into regular season.
Our D had an excellent preseason, again, no translation.
Our pass rush was awsome in the preason.
So why should Sage's good presason (against #2 and 3 defenses, nonetheless) mean he will translate into our savior at QB?
I know Carr's numbers were padded because of the prevent D, but the fact remains that he is playing much better than a lot of people are giving him credit for, considering we never seem to get good field position (can't make a stop on D and our KR situation only recently seems to have been resolved) and the OL that never ceases to redefine the word swiss cheese.