Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Is Morrency worthless? How about Wells? If you take Reggie Bush, one if not both of them are gone. I didn't want Bush before watching the Rose Bowl, and definately don't want him now. If a college LB can cover him one on one, don't you think an NFL LB can? Bush proved that against equal talent, he isn't that good. He reminds me of a RB that we already have. Tony Hollings is also a fast RB that always tries to bounce to the outside. If Hollings had not been hurt in college, he probably would have had similar numbers to Bush. Is Hollings a great NFL RB now? I see Bush the same way. I'd pas on Bush if Young comes out or not.LikeABoss said:With Bush you would have the change of pace, take it the distance type running back. With Davis you would still have that power run between the tackles type running back. It would be a two-headed monster that teams would have to respect, which should open up the passing game so AJ can see less double teams. Domanick also wouldn't have to carry the load all the time, so that should keep him healthy.
Jus mytho.
Yeah, i am pretty sure if he thought he had a better chance at winning as HC of the Texans with VY or Leinart, he would say that. It's not like we have to give anything up to get rid of Carr. Both Carr or the top pick would get simmillar money, obviously Kubiak feels Carr is the better option, i trust his opinions over yours...Kaiser Toro said:Gary knows whats best for Gary and if that is telling Mr. McNair/Cass what they want to hear about Carr, then he will do it. I have never seen so many people look the other way on such a fruitless pick.
Kaiser Toro said:Just about right when it comes to the Texans since most of us have watched our team more than any of those that you listed.
tulexan said:Did Jordan win a championship before Phil Jackson was the coach?
Kaiser Toro said:Just about right when it comes to the Texans since most of us have watched our team more than any of those that you listed.
and Carr is no better than he was in college...still a ton of unrealized potentialtulexan said:College is much different from the NFL.
Runner said:Hmmm. I actually think some of those people know more about football and judging talent than me.
I could be wrong though - there is always the Joe Pendry example.
vtech9 said:Is Morrency worthless? How about Wells? If you take Reggie Bush, one if not both of them are gone. I didn't want Bush before watching the Rose Bowl, and definately don't want him now. If a college LB can cover him one on one, don't you think an NFL LB can? Bush proved that against equal talent, he isn't that good. He reminds me of a RB that we already have. Tony Hollings is also a fast RB that always tries to bounce to the outside. If Hollings had not been hurt in college, he probably would have had similar numbers to Bush. Is Hollings a great NFL RB now? I see Bush the same way. I'd pas on Bush if Young comes out or not.
pv1999 said:And by that definition, the Texans have no franchise backs.
Kaiser Toro said:I do not doubt they know football more than anyone here. I would argue we have more of a finger on the pulse of what is needed for the Texans as a collective market.
Dude you just got here after 4 years of this franchise, dont come on here and spit crap
Runner said:This isn't directed personnaly at you K.T. , Vinny, or other long time posters on this thread or any others who are down on Carr. Most of you guys have a history of having reasoning behind your positions and have been known to change given sufficient evidence. The board is just crazy right now.
I think Carr still has a lot of potential, but after 4 years of the same, when do you draw the line? Some people never realize their potential.Runner said:I know what you mean. I just wonder if it so clear cut, why doesn't everyone on this board agree? Or is it just the "non finger on the pulse members" who disagree?![]()
I personally haven't made up my mind on what I would do with the first pick. I see the downside of the 3 major options (Young, Bush, trade) and can't decide which is riskier. They all do, hard as it is to believe, have downside.
I'd just like to see more people keep an open mind. It seems battle lines are drawn, and no evidence of any sort can make anyone change their position. (Although it will change in an instant with hindsight). Most people here seem to like Kubiak, but when he says "Carr can be pretty good" or whatever, the response is he's in McNair's pocket. So which is it? Is Kubiak a good coach or a McNair yesman? It seems pretty inconsistent. I'd rather see a little glimmer in the vein of "Well, Kubiak might know what is talking about....", even if we don't agree in the end.
Caveat: I think Carr had great potential coming out of college and he may have been ruined beyond recovery since. I can see the sense in cutting him outright rather than risk signing him and hoping to trade him later. It would be great, IMO, if Kubiak was right, Dave succeeds, and that is a hole we didn't have to fill.
This isn't directed personnaly at you K.T. , Vinny, or other long time posters on this thread or any others who are down on Carr. Most of you guys have a history of having reasoning behind your positions and have been known to change given sufficient evidence. The board is just crazy right now.
vtech9 said:Is Morrency worthless? How about Wells? If you take Reggie Bush, one if not both of them are gone. I didn't want Bush before watching the Rose Bowl, and definately don't want him now. If a college LB can cover him one on one, don't you think an NFL LB can? Bush proved that against equal talent, he isn't that good. He reminds me of a RB that we already have. Tony Hollings is also a fast RB that always tries to bounce to the outside. If Hollings had not been hurt in college, he probably would have had similar numbers to Bush. Is Hollings a great NFL RB now? I see Bush the same way. I'd pas on Bush if Young comes out or not.
jerek said:I understand that the Texans were 2-14 this year.
I understand that Carr finished in the bottom half of the league statistically this year in many categories.
I understand that part of his near-record sack count this year could be fairly attributed to his own fault.
I understand that he locks onto receivers at times, gets happy feet other times, and has, in virtually every way, not lived up to the expectations that were placed upon him when we drafted him #1 in 2002.
Even in light of these shortcomings, I do not, at the end of the day, understand the criticism of Carr and his abilities as a player.
The guy has played for an absolute joke of a coaching staff, has consistently played behind the worst, most inept line in recent memory, and has dealt with, most recently, injuries to key offensive players and bad personnel decisions the rest of the time.
What quarterback in this league could play better than Carr, under the conditions he has endured?
Then, Kubiak - not an analyst, not a reporter, but a successful offensive coordinator on a repeatedly successful team - takes up for Carr and makes the rightful analysis of his performance, and now all of these experts on this board who have "watched Carr since day one" know better?
The naysayers are right: what the hell does Kubiak know? What does Tony Dungy or Dan Marino know (two of the recent names to support Carr as a player and as a Texan, do I need to round up the other names?)
Get off Young's jock. It is fine to be a fan of Young, and hell, it is fine to be a fan of him taking up a Texan's uniform. But if you are going to discredit Carr, make an attempt to look knowledgeable of the game of football while you do so.
Master Po said:Well said. Couldn't agree more. I also wonder if the VY love affair would so extreme on, and around, here if he was from somewhere other than this fine state. We saw it with DJ last year. Geeez, if you are from Texas and star at UT than you are simply the second coming. Gets tiresome.
Goldeagle said:Anyone with any football knowledge, even a tad knows Carr has not gotten the protection he has needed from year one. Thank Casserly for saying it takes 3 years to develop a lineman and never drafting but using that excuse every year.
jerek said:Then, Kubiak - not an analyst, not a reporter, but a successful offensive coordinator on a repeatedly successful team - takes up for Carr and makes the rightful analysis of his performance, and now all of these experts on this board who have "watched Carr since day one" know better?
The naysayers are right: what the hell does Kubiak know? What does Tony Dungy or Dan Marino know (two of the recent names to support Carr as a player and as a Texan, do I need to round up the other names?)
Of course Dungy supports him, Dungy has never lost to Carr, lol. Why would he want the QB to change???jerek said:The naysayers are right: what the hell does Kubiak know? What does Tony Dungy or Dan Marino know (two of the recent names to support Carr as a player and as a Texan, do I need to round up the other names?)
NFLforher said:Guess you know more than Gary. :brickwall
HardKnockTexan said:Right... what would a someone that coached Steve Young and John Elway know about quarterbacks??
Nighthawk said:And the idea that Kubiak "coached" Elway and Young, while technically true, is probably an overstatement of Kubiak's role, don't you imagine? He was a QB who himself could not make it in the NFL and thus spent a great deal of time with a notebook on the sidelines. THereafter he made a swift transition into coaching at an early age.
I'm not saying he's not good, nor that he doesn't know anything about playing QB in the league, and he may be (probably is) a MUCH BETTER coach than he ever was a player, but you don't cite a couple of his approximate contemporaries who were HOF players as beneficiaries of Kubiak's coaching prowess. At that point he was more like holding their water bottles.
tulexan said:Sounds like he is the kind of coach who really stresses hard work and preparation. Something this team really needs.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/01/04/sports/s133451S26.DTL&hw=Kubiak&sn=001&sc=1000
Nighthawk said:Ever cross your mind that Gary might say what he thought his interviewers wanted to hear, the better to get his multi-million dollar job?
Some people.
jerek said:I understand that the Texans were 2-14 this year.
I understand that Carr finished in the bottom half of the league statistically this year in many categories.
I understand that part of his near-record sack count this year could be fairly attributed to his own fault.
I understand that he locks onto receivers at times, gets happy feet other times, and has, in virtually every way, not lived up to the expectations that were placed upon him when we drafted him #1 in 2002.
Even in light of these shortcomings, I do not, at the end of the day, understand the criticism of Carr and his abilities as a player.
The guy has played for an absolute joke of a coaching staff, has consistently played behind the worst, most inept line in recent memory, and has dealt with, most recently, injuries to key offensive players and bad personnel decisions the rest of the time.
What quarterback in this league could play better than Carr, under the conditions he has endured?
Then, Kubiak - not an analyst, not a reporter, but a successful offensive coordinator on a repeatedly successful team - takes up for Carr and makes the rightful analysis of his performance, and now all of these experts on this board who have "watched Carr since day one" know better?
The naysayers are right: what the hell does Kubiak know? What does Tony Dungy or Dan Marino know (two of the recent names to support Carr as a player and as a Texan, do I need to round up the other names?)
Get off Young's jock. It is fine to be a fan of Young, and hell, it is fine to be a fan of him taking up a Texan's uniform. But if you are going to discredit Carr, make an attempt to look knowledgeable of the game of football while you do so.
Nighthawk said:And the idea that Kubiak "coached" Elway and Young, while technically true, is probably an overstatement of Kubiak's role, don't you imagine? He was a QB who himself could not make it in the NFL and thus spent a great deal of time with a notebook on the sidelines. THereafter he made a swift transition into coaching at an early age.
I'm not saying he's not good, nor that he doesn't know anything about playing QB in the league, and he may be (probably is) a MUCH BETTER coach than he ever was a player, but you don't cite a couple of his approximate contemporaries who were HOF players as beneficiaries of Kubiak's coaching prowess. At that point he was more like holding their water bottles.
eriadoc said:Yeah, Young and Elway were really good on their own. But when Kubiak came in, those two players, who at that point were NOT Hall of Fame locks (maaayybe Elway, with 3 SB losses and marginal TD-INT ratio), had their best seasons EVEr under his coaching. Furthermore, his offenses have proven to be very prolific year after year after year, with even Griese or Plummer at the helm. With Olandis Gary and Mike anderson at the helm. Yeah, Kubiak's had some great players, but he's also turned some less-than-premium talent into premium performers. You have to give credit where it's due.
As to his status as a player ... honestly it has nothing whatsoever to do with his coaching ability. Some players have coaching skills and some do not. The best coaches in the NFL were not exceptional players in their own days. In actuality, Kubiak was a pretty decent QB that probably could have made a better run at it than some of the modern-day guys if there were such a thing as free agency back then, because he wasn't supplanting Elway - no one was.
J-Man said:If playing ability had any direct correlation to coaching ability then probably about half of the HCs in the NFL wouldn't have ever gotten hired (see Bill Cowher, Jeff Fisher, and Herm Edwards).
Also...how about guys like Charley Wiess...he never played a down or college football.
Kubes potential as a coach is not tied to the fact that he was a career back-up. In fact if you survive 8yrs in the league period that shows that you have something on the ball as a player anyway.
Kaiser Toro said:I think this is more of a case of someone referencing Young and Elway and implying that Kubiak had something to do with the development of these two established all-pro players, which was not the case. If Plummer and Griese were inserted instead, this would have been a moot point.
I think you will find few who do not want Kubiak, but there are many that want truth in advertising.
Wordem said:McNair cannot afford to lose with Bush. Houstonians will lose interest just like they did this season. The empty seats hurt the bottom line. He has absolutely nothing to lose finaincially if he takes VY. He will increase his fanbase in Texas exponentially. If he takes Bush, this franchise will never compete with the Cowboys for new fans.