Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

Justice on Rome Show!

UGA said:
We get a B for the talent we got and in what positions, but it would have been an A+ if you replaced Williams name with Bush.

Since you love to talk about Bush so much, there's a Saints board I'm sure you'd find yourself happy in.
 
UGA said:
more texan apologist talk...

I am about as far from a Texans apologist as they come and I believe what the people in charge are telling us. I was as pissed as anyone on Friday night but the more we think about it the more this pick will make sense. You may experience some clarity yourself.

You and your boy Justice state that it was a financial decision when it is a know fact that Bush was offered $54 million with 26 of that guaranteed. He was asking for $28 million guaranteed and they ended up giving 26.6 to Williams. Either way, finances were not the issue here.
 
Hervoyel said:
There wasn't an apology in sight there, just an invitation and since you're still here you obviously don't plan on taking me up on it. Pity.

More rubbish....

Hervoyel said:
Look if you're not happy with the pick or you don't like their reasons for it that's fine. It's even understandable. The problem is you're only seeing the side you want to see and you're not interested in doing anything but insulting the front office.

That and lumping anyone who doesn't see it your way in with them.

Now i can atleast respect this portion of your post.

Im at the very least amused by optimism of this board. Especially considering the state of this team and the type of year we are coming off.
 
well, i wanted bush. i never consideredmario seriously but after thinking about it i gotta say..
I LIKE IT!

The more i think about it the more i like it. I predict we will beat the Colts finally this year (once) because of our pass rush. I look for it to really come on the second half of the season. We were 30th in offense last year and 31th in defense. We needed defense.

plus we didn't neglect offense this offseason.

On offense, we gained
3 new O- linesmen (1 is a probowler)
A new probowl reciever ( to line up alongside our other probowl reciever))
A playoff caliber tight end that already knows our system.




...and a couple of other rooks
 
I'm going out on a limb and saying the texans will not only beat the colts this year due to having a pass rush but also that we will have a top 10 defense and go 9-7 or better. I'll go further out on that limb to say that Carr will actually have time to throw this year due to an improved line and coaching and will pass for over 3500.

.
 
UGA said:
more texan apologist talk...

We had a miserable season. Since then, a very competent coaching staff has taken over. They have made massive changes via free agency. We drafted two very good looking OT prospects. We got Demeco Ryan, a good player and extraordinary person in the second round, and our new offensive-minded head coach shunned an offensive star and drafted defense with the first overall pick. I think this situation demands optimism, don't you?
 
UGA said:
They went into discussions with Williams on Thursday. They had been negotiating with Bush for months. Mcnair stated signability was a key concern prior to the draft, almost giving away that they were going away from Bush for that reason.

Face the facts, we let finances make this pick.

BTW, guys... now the Around The Horn guys are slamming us one by one.

We are the laughing stock of the football community.
First I would like to say that at some point in the season when everything is going well and the Texans are working like a well oiled machine, Justice will write somthing to the degree of Mario Williams was the tough smart choice. No other pick would have made since. McNair had the guts to pull the trigger and such a contriversal pick..blah blah blah blah...........

Second, I am thinking of one of five fingers for the rest of the football community. I will even give you five guesses, the first four are wrong.
 
I love the Mario Williams pick. I think we made the right choice. Here is my thinking on this. People like Mario do not come along every year and defensive end is one of the most important positions left in the NFL. I can not say the same about running backs. Last year no one would give up a 2nd round pick for Edg or this years MVP so why should we use the first overall on a RB? My last thought on this.....Next years draft will have Jullian Peterson...who will be the Mario Williams? My guess is there will not be one for many years to come.
 
UGA said:
I also made a thread draft day that this was our best draft ever, and i firmly belive it. As a whole i love this draft. I also like Williams as a player.

But, we blew the first pick. The front office even knows they blew it. They did an about face on Bush two days out only because they werent going to have his contract finalized by draft day. I may be the only one who thinks thats absolutely absurd, and im prepared to take the heat on this homer board, but i dont think anything im saying is out of the box. The majority of the civilized world believes we made a bonehead move, and its not odd that this board just ignores it.


From what I understand, the exact opposite is true of the way the trade went down.

The FO knew a while before the draft that Mario would be the pick and kept slipping that possibility out through the press to get people used to the idea.
The only problem is that despite them telling the media time after time that Mario was a viable pick, the media played conspiracy theorists and refused to believe the truth when it was constantly fed to them.
i bet McNair and Co. were beside themselves that the media wouldn't take the possibility seriously. The FO wanted to soften what they knew would be a hard blow to most fans, but the media wouldn't let the fans take the possibility seriously.
Funny how they were trying so hard to let us all know that it would happen, but no one wanted to listen.
 
This is a message to UGA, and anybody else who wants to get it straight. The Texans did not have months of negotiations with Bush. The USC pro day was in the beginning of April and before that there was really no contact with Bush or his people other than interviews. If you remember correctly a short while after the USC pro-day the Texans flew Bush out and he came out here with his agent at this time no contract discussions were held. After that visit came Young and then Williams. I remember this clearly, the Texans started contract discussions with Williams agent when they were here. After that time they began negotiating with both camps. If you really follow the timeline they showed more interest in Williams than in Bush after Williams visit and everyone thought they were bluffing, but guess what the Texans are straight shooters no B.S. there. We, myself included thought it was a foregone conclusion that Bush would be a Texan so we didn't really consider what they were saying as serious. You say you want to be impartial, then you should present all the facts and not some generalization.
 
tex2theend said:
I love the Mario Williams pick. I think we made the right choice. Here is my thinking on this. People like Mario do not come along every year and defensive end is one of the most important positions left in the NFL. I can not say the same about running backs. Last year no one would give up a 2nd round pick for Edg or this years MVP so why should we use the first overall on a RB? My last thought on this.....Next years draft will have Jullian Peterson...who will be the Mario Williams? My guess is there will not be one for many years to come.

That was because of their age and nothing else. Teams don't like to take chances on older running backs because of the punishment running backs take. It has nothing to do with the importance of the position.
 
trublu said:
That was because of their age and nothing else. Teams don't like to take chances on older running backs because of the punishment running backs take. It has nothing to do with the importance of the position.

Actually it does. good RB's are more common than good DE's off the top of your head you can probably name 5 premier RB's and more than likely their are alot more that are close to those five than you know. You really can't do that with DE's. It's so hard to find them that some teams would rather switch schemes than keep looking. Let's see there's Freeney, Peppers, Kearse, ummm...whatever. Point is it's easier to find good RB's than it is DE's. You point to Bush's versatility but Williams also has versatility he can line up anywhere along the line and if I remember correctly he's even had some LB time in college. I could keep going, suffice to say I don't think your comment is accurate.
 
My comment had to do with the value of James and Alexander and not with defensive ends; the words defensive end weren't even on my post. But if I look at the NFL roster I'm sure I can come up with more impact DE's than what you listed. Also, I never pointed out Bush's versitility, so I don't know where your comment came from.
 
trublu said:
It has nothing to do with the importance of the position.

Really? I guess the huge disparity in salaries has nothing to do with the relative importance of the positions either.

Franchise tag numbers:
RB: $6.0 mil
DE: $8.3 mil

IMO the lack of interest in Edge and Alexander was a combination of age, perceived contract requirements and the need to give up a draft pick. A year later and a year older, both got lucrative deals, but no one gave up a pick on top to get them.
 
ojthecat said:
I wonder when Bush will sign with New Orleans? It was no secret that he was campaigning to go to New York. He also made coments about "getting used to loosing" if he comes to Houston. Now who is the Joke on us?

I dont' think so. Look at every Superbowl winning team (that is right I said every) and the all have at least one dominate pass rusher. Not so with running backs and quaterbacks.

This pick took "stones" and it ROCKS.

McNair made a great choice and if you are not able to see it now that's ok We will all still be here supporting our team!!!

It won't be long till we are winners!!!

That is amazing:drool: Did they all pick these pass rushers up with the #1 pick?:confused:
 
dat_boy_yec said:
Actually it does. good RB's are more common than good DE's off the top of your head you can probably name 5 premier RB's and more than likely their are alot more that are close to those five than you know. You really can't do that with DE's. It's so hard to find them that some teams would rather switch schemes than keep looking. Let's see there's Freeney, Peppers, Kearse, ummm...whatever. Point is it's easier to find good RB's than it is DE's. You point to Bush's versatility but Williams also has versatility he can line up anywhere along the line and if I remember correctly he's even had some LB time in college. I could keep going, suffice to say I don't think your comment is accurate.

People actually look at RB's more (and know more of them) because they touch the Ball. High profile Position. Rookie Linemen(Both sides of the Ball) have a learning curve, which is longer than most RB's. We shall see who is more common.
 
infantrycak said:
Really? I guess the huge disparity in salaries has nothing to do with the relative importance of the positions either.

Franchise tag numbers:
RB: $6.0 mil
DE: $8.3 mil

IMO the lack of interest in Edge and Alexander was a combination of age, perceived contract requirements and the need to give up a draft pick. A year later and a year older, both got lucrative deals, but no one gave up a pick on top to get them.

Again, I'm being qouted out of context. My comment was based on the trade value of James and Alexander not the comparison between RBs and DEs.
While the franchise tag for RB's is 6 mil, James is scheduled to make about 10 mil in his contract. It is obvious that the Cardinals value him alot.
 
TexanAddict said:
"Dan Ferens, the chief negotiator, made offers to Segal and Ben Dogra, who represents Williams. Segal countered. Dogra didn't. Dogra thought his client was being used as leverage. Williams thought he was being used as leverage until Wednesday night, when Dogra became convinced he wasn't."
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports/fb/texansfront/3829918.html

Offers apparently had been made to both, Williams' agent seems to be the reason serious negotiations were slow in starting.

A couple of the comments on here said we didn't start negotiating with Wiiliams till Thursday - I think we'd been talking to the guys agent a lot longer than a couple of days.
 
jmerog said:
I'm going out on a limb and saying the texans will not only beat the colts this year due to having a pass rush but also that we will have a top 10 defense and go 9-7 or better. I'll go further out on that limb to say that Carr will actually have time to throw this year due to an improved line and coaching and will pass for over 3500.

.


top ten run defence top 15 versus the pass
 
Grid said:
#2: Someone pointed out in another thread that the Pats focused on keeping 2 players on thier roster this offseason.. Brady, and Richard Seymour.. thier DE. The Colts let Edge go so that they could re-sign Dwight Freeney. Many people feel that there are three REALLY IMPORTANT positions on a football team. Quarterback, Left Tackle, and Defensive End. A good DE is a VERY VALUABLE thing. Williams is worth the pick.

I've been reading that too, name 5 premier DE'd in this league and I mean top notch.
Freeney
Seymour
Kearse
who else.......I'm probably missing a couple

Darren Howard maybe?

How many RB's can you name?
 
Back
Top