infantrycak
Hall of Fame
It appears that the GM is doing everything he can to get the HC fired.

Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
It appears that the GM is doing everything he can to get the HC fired.
Isn't this precisely what, almost, 100% of the posters to this board also want? What is the reasoning for signing Romo?
Wow, don't know how old you are but that sounded so much like a teenager wanting everything right now. The youngest team to ever win a SB was the Ravens but that was in large part because their team was basically the Browns who were just moved from Cleveland to Balitimore.
Houston may have had the Oilers but the Texans were NOT built on the foundation of the Oilers. It was an entirely new team building from the ground up. When you consider there are decades old teams without a SB win 15 years isn't that much.
As far as the status que goes I would love if they won a SB of course but I also realize there is no magic formula to winning a SB. Not counting selling your soul like BB did most teams are basically guessing as to what will work.
Look at the Panthers and Broncos, last year they are unstoppable, team beating juggernauts and the next one doesn't make the playoffs and the other doesn't even have a winning season.
And as far as Tom Brady goes you are exactly right a pick like that would set us up for the next decade but winning the lottery would set me up for the next decade and the odds are about as good.
He was a sixth round pick that was never suppose to be as good as he was. If ANYONE thought he would become what he did he would have gone at 1 with teams offering their first born to move up in the draft. Brady is the example of the ultimate football lottery win.
Oh and by the way, I have plenty of backbone to say I'm wrong just as soon as I'm actually proven wrong. And no you thinking I'm wrong or disagreeing with me does not equal me actually being wrong.
Two year division champs and a playoff win mean nothing when you actually watch the team and realize how terrible they are. The defense, albeit good, was a mirage too. Defense gave up less yardage because the offense never went anywhere and never gave the opposing offense a long field to play with.
I thought the 2015 playoff team was the worst team I've ever seen actually make the playoffs, but the 2016 team was even more incompetent and impotent.
It's clear that we're not on the level of the Patriots or anyone else that's actually good. Just have to watch the games to see that.
This team has no identity, no balls, no stability, and no leadership. This team needs major work.
Isn't this precisely what, almost, 100% of the posters to this board also want? What is the reasoning for signing Romo?
BWHAHAHA that actually means they are just a few pieces away from taking the next step.
Good lord some fans are too freaking negative. Why follow a team you're so down on? I mean yes they aren't the best looking bunch but they aren't the worst either. Would you want to trade places with a Browns fan, or Jaguars fan.
Too be honest I kinda like what the Browns/Jags are doing now that they have new FO's in place.
Cute
Now tell me hat Ricky has done so far this offseason to make my opinion wrong?
I guess for me there's a line in the sand ,and few people have the backbone to say they're wrong. You either have the backbone to say it or you dont.
This offseason is sculpting the future of our franchise. You can blink if you like but a 6th round brady type draft pick could set us for a decade. A short bus offseason will yield a new coach and another rebuilding period.
You agree or you dont or your indifferent.
Here we are 15 years in without a sb appearance. Is the status que good enough for you?
Im tired of the bs. I believed it with carr and caserly. Again with kubes. And now ob in year 4. Believe if you like. I dont believe. This offseason has sucked mostly because we've lost more then we've gained. It's fairly simple.
If im wrong (and i want to be) i'll be happy to say it. I'd be delighted to revisit this post after a sb championship. Until then, follow the yellow brick road. Chase the rabbit. What the ***** ever.
Nope, for the record I don't want Romo.
With that said I want Ricky to draft a QB high to train for a couple of yrs and let him learn under Romo while Savage is here. If Savage is any indication it takes a couple of yrs to learn BOB's system. Mahomes would be my guy.
I doubt Ricky does this and it really doesn't matter because BOB will be gone after this season. Much to the delight of some on this MB. I just hope the McNair's truly clean house this time and allow the new HC to bring in his GM/scouts. It should be troubling that some of the scouts that Casserly hired still work for the Texans and fans wonder why the team has the Nix/Montgomery/Trevardo Williams type drafts.
I'm with you on Zach Brown. Don't know much about Hankins. I was hoping they'd make a play for Poe but he's out of the mkt now that he signed with the Falcons (one year/$8 mil).
BWHAHAHA I doubt that very seriously. Come on, stop with the unwarranted speculations.Great post.
It appears that the GM is doing everything he can to get the HC fired.
Some on this MB will be very happy when this happen, but someday they will realize that the HC isn't the real problem.
And yet those two franchises aren't going anywhere. This is not the first time they changed office personnel. Both teams have been at the bottom and drafting high draft picks. And still they put out a product that's not pleasing whatsoever. At least our Texans have put together a formidable squad that makes the playoffs, given them a shot at the bigger prize at the end of the season. And brother this is with not so high draft picks.
Last year's draft and free agency the Texans showed they had a solid plan. I truly believe they will continue to build on that plan. Unfortunately Brock didnt fit that plan as expected. But once they fill in that blank, watch out NFL.
You do realize that half the league, 16 teams, haven't been to a Super Bowl in as long as or longer than the 15 years the Texans have been in it, right? Teams that include Dallas, Washington, and Kansas City.
And teams like New Orleans, Baltimore and GREEN BAY, have been just once.
It isn't about being status quo. It's more of it being a very, very hard thing to do.
If you're expecting this franchise to be the Patriots then you probably should just quit Texans football, or Packers, Ravens, Chiefs, Raiders for that matter.
The Packers have been legit SB contenders year after year for over 2 decades, yet they've been to ONE Super Bowl in the last 19 seasons. Are they "status quo"?
The draft is over a month away, free agency is still going on, cuts will be made league wide this summer, a ton of things are going to happen to shape this roster for the coming season. I'm certainly no Rick Smith defender, but the world is not going to end if he gets a couple of hours sleep each night or goes to a fucking basketball game one time.
BWHAHAHA I doubt that very seriously. Come on, stop with the unwarranted speculations.
Man that is too freaking funny. Now Rick is trying to sabotage Bill O'Brien's Texans career. Man where do yall come with these things. Hahahaha
OB has two years left on his contract, so it won't be his decision to leave. So you are suggesting he will be fired after the 2017 season. Even if we have a winning season and make the post season? If we backslide and/or don't see improvement - maybe. But not if we continue to win....I doubt Ricky does this and it really doesn't matter because BOB will be gone after this season. Much to the delight of some on this MB. I just hope the McNair's truly clean house this time and allow the new HC to bring in his GM/scouts...
Dude, you're wasting your time getting into a discussion with SteelB. Rick & the McNairs can do no right in his mind. Every move they do, even the drafting of JJ, or building one of the best defenses in the league, he'll find a way of giving them zero credit. Even if we make it to the SB, barely lose in OT... he'll come back on here right after the game and beat his chest claiming, "Told you guys! We'll never win the big game with this FO."
Let me say this about the BB game thingy, while Ricky was at the game BB was signing Gilmore and working on trading for Cooks. He's still working on trading Butler as we speak. Unless you're willing to work like the Hoodie you're not going to beat the Hoodie.
And yet those two franchises aren't going anywhere. This is not the first time they changed office personnel. Both teams have been at the bottom and drafting high draft picks. And still they put out a product that's not pleasing whatsoever. At least our Texans have put together a formidable squad that makes the playoffs, given them a shot at the bigger prize at the end of the season. And brother this is with not so high draft picks.
Last year's draft and free agency the Texans showed they had a solid plan. I truly believe they will continue to build on that plan. Unfortunately Brock didnt fit that plan as expected. But once they fill in that blank, watch out NFL.
Ask yourself why BOB wanted out at the end of last season.
He hasn't done anything to make it correct.
This is typical for you. Can't just disagree with what's happening, have to ascribe evil intent to someone.
For all you know OB is wearing Romo pajamas to bed
They swung for the fences last year and they might draft a quarterback in the 1st round. Shoots they might even trade down to snap that QB they want. And the chatter around Kirby is they want Romo but are not willing to give up draft picks for him. Old Jerry pulled a fast one by not doing what he said he was going to do. And that's cut the man. But since he knows a few teams are in dire need for a QB, now he wants draft picks for him.
When you're the GM and your swing for the fences is Os you should be fired.
OB has two years left on his contract, so it won't be his decision to leave. So you are suggesting he will be fired after the 2017 season. Even if we have a winning season and make the post season? If we backslide and/or don't see improvement - maybe. But not if we continue to win.
Posters to this board are disappointed in our inaction during free agency. But I see us as having kept the core of a fundamentally sound team. We will address our Oline during the draft. We may or may not sign Romo, but it does appear we will actively seek to do so. If we are outbid for his services, I still see us being improved at the QB position with Savage and Weeden.
As little as this may seem to the disappointed fandom on this board, this should be sufficient to see improvement in our offense and, at worst, holding even defensively. We'll have a better team in 2017 and I just don't see OB being fired under these circumstances.
Godsey was fired for that decision. Glad they are holding people accountable.
Making up your own facts again.
When you're the GM and your swing for the fences is Os you should be fired.
Did BB not add those players during that time in FA? Gilmore specifically.
BB isn't thru he's working on a deal to get back his draft picks in a Butler deal. If the Browns are willing to give up enough for jimmy G you will see another deal.
Tell me what's Ricky McNair doing?
We'll John McCain said it was a collective agreement between the Owner, GM and Coach. By your chain of thought McNair needs to step down and both Rick and Bill should be fired.When you're the GM and your swing for the fences is Os you should be fired.
Because he didn't like getting his butt chewed out. He did a horrible job at coaching after week two.
I have a question for you.
Why did BOB change up the game plan after week two?
Most likely nobody is getting fired over Oz because everyone agreed. But that doesn't fit your agenda.
Yep they just made Godsey the scapegoat.
# The Texans way
Most likely nobody is getting fired over Oz because everyone agreed. But that doesn't fit your agenda.
You have no idea whether anything transpired during the game.
[Quite]BB isn't thru he's working on a deal to get back his draft picks in a Butler deal. If the Browns are willing to give up enough for jimmy G you will see another deal.
We'll John McCain said it was a collective agreement between the Owner, GM and Coach. By your chain of thought McNair needs to step down and both Rick and Bill should be fired.
Gotcha
OB has two years left on his contract, so it won't be his decision to leave. So you are suggesting he will be fired after the 2017 season. Even if we have a winning season and make the post season? If we backslide and/or don't see improvement - maybe. But not if we continue to win.
Posters to this board are disappointed in our inaction during free agency. But I see us as having kept the core of a fundamentally sound team. We will address our Oline during the draft. We may or may not sign Romo, but it does appear we will actively seek to do so. If we are outbid for his services, I still see us being improved at the QB position with Savage and Weeden.
As little as this may seem to the disappointed fandom on this board, this should be sufficient to see improvement in our offense and, at worst, holding even defensively. We'll have a better team in 2017 and I just don't see OB being fired under these circumstances.
BS If that is for Oz. If Godsey is scapegoat for anything it is OB's failure to build an effective offense. He's been on a downward slope his whole time here.
Because BB devised a gameplan that exposed Os for being the fraud that he was. It would've been stupid not to change the gameplan.
What you should really be asking is BOB put Savage in during the Jags game and made him the starter. BOB said at the time Savage gave the team the best chance to win. The Savage gets a concussion (Questionable) loses his job and never sees the field again. What changed to make BOB think Savage didn't give the team it's best chance to win? Particularly when you could see Os stinking up the joint in Foxborough?
If we don't get some quality QB play, or atleast improving (over the season) QB play from a young player, I think OB is certainly gone. I think SteelB is pretty on point in his expectation that we will see Romo and Savage next year, without a high pick at QB. So, I think OB's job rests on the health of Romo and Savage and the hope that either Romo hasn't lost it or Savage takes a big step forward.
If they don't draft a QB high, I could actually kind of get down on SB's opinion that Rick Smith and company don't have the highest confidence in OB. Not that they are sabotaging him, but that they don't have a great deal of confidence in his ability to coach up a young QB that he helps hand pick.
Are you suggesting that they've done something to keep the team intact or that they don't need to do much?
They've only re-signed one player outside of their punter and kicker and have let all the other quality players leave. They haven't needed to make any tough cuts because they haven't spent close to the $24M they started with. They haven't done anything to keep the team intact, that is accomplished almost by default.
My issue with their approach is:
1. They traded a draft asset for cap space that it doesn't appear they need. Don't need to elaborate, I think I've detailed my thoughts on this.
2. I really feel that it's important to go into a draft with as little starters needed as possible. If we have areas on the team that have below average to poor players starting, I'd like to see the team make an attempt to rectify those. We still have Clark and Bergstrom on the team, where they can save $5.7M in cap. People talk about how expensive some of these linemen were, but we're spending almost $6M for what we know without any doubt is poor return in that position group. Why would spending $8-10M on a player near the top of their position be a problem? You're either spending ~$6M on nothing or spending ~$10M on a good player. That seems like a no-brainer to me, even if you have to pay a bit of a premium.
I'm sure they'll sign some guys later on in the FA period, but I'm not expecting those players to be starters. Most of the starters for the position groups that we are weakest are gone now. I'm not sure it's wise to create a plan in which you are expecting to start multiple rookies, especially when you also need to invest in the QB position with a high pick.
Jesus Christ couldn't build an effective offense with Os playing QB.
Nothing changed with BOB, that's the problem.
He's been messing up the QB position since he got here. Why did he ever start Mallet? And then taking him out for getting the wind knocked out of him?
Agreed, I didn't like what he did with Mallett, that really screwed up team chemistry.
McNair said there's more to playing QB than talent, and that's why Hoyer was made the starting QB to start the season. When Hoyer started out that 1st game like crap BOB went back to the more talented Mallett. Then Mallett got the wind kockedout of him and Hoyer was back in. I see a lot of parallels between the Hoyer/Mallett situation and the Os/Savage situation.
Regardless BOB's indecisiveness has caused instability in the lockeroom. But I guess BOB has to do what the boss wants as Kubiak found out the hard way.
Spring Vacation is winding down, probably flying back to H town today so expect flurry of activity next week![]()
Dude wtf, there was nothing about Brock that would suggest he would crash as bad as he did. He had a solid college career followed by being hand picked by a HoF QB turned GM, he sat behind another HoF QB for 4 years, he lead his team to some big wins in the playoffs including one over the Pats and even when he was benched you could make a damn fine arguement that he wasn't to blame for the offense sucking.
People love to comment about Osweilers contract while forgetting that Elway and the Broncos almost matched it and may have matched it if Brock hadn't wanted to play in a different type of offense. Don't believe the Denver BS coming after Elway lost the bidding war, Elway wanted Brock as his starter.
You keep talking like BoB hated Osweiler and was doing everything he could to show he was a fraud and get rid of him. Well frankly unless you are actually BoB or something you don't know what the hell he was thinking, you're just guessing to fit you're point of view.
In every interview I saw he was mostly praising Brock or saying that they weren't giving Osweiler what he needed to succeed. Now yes that was most likely just toeing the line but given the kind of money involved I find it very hard to believe that he in no way wanted Brock and that they flat out came to him in the off season and said "we're signing Osweiler no matter what you say".
As the season went on maybe he said "This guy ain't who we thought he was" and they replied "Bll there's to much money wrapped up in this now, not just on the field but in merchandise (despite what people wear in public #17 was the fastest selling jersey in the off season), endorsements and everything else. We've got to play him at least most of the season. Just do what you can and we'll try and figure something out next year."
If RS really wanted rid of BoB he had an easy way of doing it "Bill, Brock's contract is to big for him not to be the starter this year. You need to play him and maybe we'll see if we can draft a rookie a few round in" Instead RS put his ass on the line by giving up a second next year because BoB couldn't work with Osweiler. They could choose between O'Brian and Osweiler and they chose O'Brian, that doesn't sound like a team trying to get rid of its HC.
And on that note if RS is as far up McNairs ass as you claim why would he need this long, complex evil plan. Just go to McNair and say "We didn't make the SB because of Bill, I need a new HC" and McNair would reply " Sure thing Ricky whatever you want, you know you're like the son I wish I had had. Someday Simba, I mean Ricky, all this will be yours."
Couldn't make it through the book you wrote.
Bottom line and with most NFL orgs when decisions are made and they don't work out the GM is fired. See: Kelly. Eagles, Dolphins: Ireland, Rams: Fisher Browns : Farmer. You miss on the QB of your choice and the GM gets fired or the person responsible for the decision is fired.
That's just off of the top of my head.
With the Texans Godsey gets fired. LOL
They could choose between O'Brian and Osweiler and they chose O'Brian, that doesn't sound like a team trying to get rid of its HC.