Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

I am going to boycott until we have a new coach

DatTexBoy said:
The Charlie Casserly with a target on his head is priceless!:yahoo:

Capers should be retained as a defensive coordinator...NOT!:challenge

3-4 defense isn't working under him or Fangio...next!:challenge

I would love to get the Longhorns and develop them into the Texans next team. O-line...D-line...linebackers...backfield...come to thik of it...I think Vince Young and the Horns would embarrass the Texans and Capers...

Okay, rant over!

Its coaching and nothing else is wrong. Yea, we could have changed the emphasis of our draft some, but that is simply a coaches biasis too. Frustrating isn't it?
 
Porky said:
Need I remind you that even the Browns, of all teams, made the playoffs in year 4. One of the worst run franchises of it's time, who had nothing come from the exapnsion draft, and couldn't hit on a first rd pick if their very lives depended on it, made the playoffs in yr 4.

Need I also remind you that the Texans aren't just having an off year, they are historically bad, and much worse than their first yr, with 3 drafts and FA signing periods in between. This team was flirting with an alltime NFL record for not having a lead for even one play the entire year. Disapointing year? Get real. This is way beyond disapointing, and if someone doesn't want to support this mess with their hard earned dollars, I am certainly not one to have a problem with that. OTOH, if people want to support a disaster, it's certainly their perrogtive. That's why they make quarter pounders and big macs.

Dang, Porky, you had to tell me about the Browns. I didn't know they went to the playoffs by year 4. :crying:

I can certainly understand your pov as outlined in your second paragraph. It's not my style as a fan, but it's within everyone's right to support/not support the team.

I'd rather demand the removal of the HC and still support the cause, myself. :texflag:

But losing seasons are still part of the overall cycle of sports teams...I guess we just have a longer cycle than other recent franchise teams, 'eh?
 
cuppacoffee said:
Not quite the way it is in todays NFL.

The Indy Colts are currently undefeated. They have only 1 player who has played for a decade:
10 years..... Marvin Harrison
They currently list 63 players on their roster, (includes injured reserve).
40 of these players have 4 years or less of experience .
(just picked that number out of thin air :rolleyes: )

The Texans have 1 win.
They have five players with 10 or more years experience
Coleman..10 years
Walker..11 years
Bruener..11 years
Weigert..11 years
Banks..10 years

Only 29 of our players have 4 years or less experience.

I didn't break it down to starters and reserves, but as you can see the vast majority of their players have the same or less experience than our Texans.

What does this prove??.......idonno:

Fire away. :cool:

Colts Roster

cac: :coffee:

I was not implying that teams with people who have been in the league for 10+ years will be better than teams with younger players. My point was that we are in the fourth year of our team starting from scratch, whereas these other teams have been building their rosters, coaching staffs, and everyone else involved for however many years, so they have more experience and have had a longer time to collect players that are key components of their team and continually bring up new talent through their team and system. If the NFL forced the Colts to dump their team at the end of the year and start over from scratch and have to pick up a bunch of people in an expansion draft and try to rebuild a team over the next three years, I'm willing to bet they'd be about where our team is now. They might not be 1-7 but they would not be a good team.
 
Yes, the Browns made the playoffs in year 4, but look where they're at now, having a down year after building something relatively successful just like us. The Panthers and Jaguars almost made the Super Bowl in their second year. My point was that all teams go through this cycle, and the Texans got their veteran talent in the expansion draft, they were starting to get older and on their way out, so the team has started a rebuilding process, which is likely about to get much more intense this offseason. I am not pleased with a 1-7 record, but this is a natural thing in professional sports, and many people for some reason expected year 4 to be the magical year in which we would contend for a Super Bowl or something like that so they are already talking about giving up on the team and boycotting it and so on. I am not happy with the results this year, most of you I'm sure are not happy with them, and I know the team is not happy with them, and changes will be made in the offseason and the team will continue building and go from there. So stop calling for boycotts of the team because we aren't Super Bowl contenders in our fourth year (for those of you that this applies to), and just go out and enjoy football and support your team or else jump on someone else's bandwagon until the Texans are Super Bowl contenders.
 
I see the use of the word "cycle" in several posts in this topic.

1 : an interval of time during which a sequence of a recurring succession of events or phenomena is completed
2 a : a course or series of events or operations that recur regularly and usually lead back to the starting point

I suppose our (the Texans) cycle is composed of losing seasons only.,,:rolleyes:
Sorry, but teams like the Boys, Pats, Rams and now even the Bengals have gone through a cycle. A cycle that includes winning anyway.
The word cycle reminds me of the work execute. Makes for a good sounding excuse. But thats just me.

ps My first broker tried to use that excuse, it didn't fly then either.
He is as gone as this bunch of coaches should be.


cac: :coffee:
 
I think the reason everyone had high expectations for this year is because we were told to expect more. We are in the 4th year of a 5 year plan. Calling it a down cycle would presume we had already completed our original plan and now have to rebuild due to defections in free agency because our players are more desired by other teams and defections in coaching because of the same. This has not happened. Jeff Posey and Kenny Wright are two players we let go through free agency. We cut Sharper and Aaron Glenn. Apparently they were no longer a part of the 5 yr plan, they were only to get us to year 4. Face it, we were sold a bill of goods telling us that this year we should expect a run at the playoffs. It was all a part of the five year plan. We all bought into it and that's why we're so perplexed about why our team is possibly one of the worst in NFL history. Through 480 minutes of play this year, our team has led for somewhere around 10-15 of them. That is not what we were told to expect.
 
MorKnolle said:
I was not implying that teams with people who have been in the league for 10+ years will be better than teams with younger players. My point was that we are in the fourth year of our team starting from scratch, whereas these other teams have been building their rosters, coaching staffs, and everyone else involved for however many years, so they have more experience and have had a longer time to collect players that are key components of their team and continually bring up new talent through their team and system. If the NFL forced the Colts to dump their team at the end of the year and start over from scratch and have to pick up a bunch of people in an expansion draft and try to rebuild a team over the next three years, I'm willing to bet they'd be about where our team is now. They might not be 1-7 but they would not be a good team.

One of my points was the fact that most of the new talent they have brought in has been in the last four years.
The decades thing sounds good, but I wonder just how long the Pats current GM and coaches have been on the job.
Not picking a fight with one of my favorite posters, :cool: ..just discussing the state of our favorite team...:texflag:

cac: :coffee:
 
CanadianTitansFan said:
I don't think so. If you're referring to the early 80's, we sucked...but we were expected to suck. We were in the "down" cycle. You guys are not supposed to be there. Your supposed to be getting out of the expansion doldrums and competing for a playoff spot.

If you can get to 5 wins, then I think it's valid to say this season was not so anomolous tot he Houston football scene.... When the Oilers began assembling talent around Moon and people expected us to break through, kind of like where you guys are supposed to be, we had a couple of 5-11 seasons.

But I don't think you're going to get anywhere near 5 wins though you do have some games you should be competitive in (AZ, Jax, Titans, SF)....so you never know.

In 94, we got rid of everyone. It was the dawning of a new era. Once again, 2-14 hurt....but realistically everyone knew we were going down....or at least should have known.

And even though those 5-11 years were dissapointing under Moon when people expected us to break through...it never seemed this dark imo. People had confidence in the youngf talent and everyone seemed to think we were still heading in the right direction. Doesn't seem like that's the case there in Houston right now.

So as a ratio between expectations and success...this is shaping up as the worst year in my lifetime for Houston NFL football imo.

Agree. I've been around since Blanda,Tolar, and Charlie Hennigan, and no Oiler team that I can remember (OK, I'll give you failing memory) was as bad AND as dull as this team that the Houston Pablums have cooked up.
 
'83 was pretty bad - probably as bad or worse than this year's version of the Texans... and we still had Earl - but not much else. I recall going up to Minneapolis that year to watch the winless Oilers take on the Vikings sometime around mid-season. It was the game where a scrambling Archie Manning threw the windmill softball pitch underhand pass to some receiver that's forever etched in the blooper reels. That game was almost as embarrassing as the Texans recent trip to Seattle - at least it wasn't on national tv.

There was a lot of excitement when Hugh Campbell and Moon came in in '84 but that quickly died. It really didn't get fun again until the end of the '86 season when Glanville's boys won their last four home games (including wins that helped knock the Bengals and Vikes out of the playoffs) - the dawning of the House of Pain.
 
Vinny said:
I'll never understand fans that can't be tolerant of a dissapointing year. Every team has them. Why should we be an exception?


That's true Vinny, Look at the Green Bay Packers this year. They are as bad as the Texans! Bet their fans aren't calling for a boycott. I bet they are like me yelling like crazy and wearing Texans gear.
Where are all the Astros hats and t-shirts. You don't see many wearing them now! Guess the bandwagon jumpers have left for greener pastures!

bobby 119C
 
Ibar_Harry said:
Its coaching and nothing else is wrong. Yea, we could have changed the emphasis of our draft some, but that is simply a coaches biasis too. Frustrating isn't it?

Jimmy Johnson said that 95% of the Texan downfall is team talent, not coaching.

bobby 119C
 
gg no re said:
No one's asking for the Texans to be Super Bowl contenders. We just ask for 8-8 or better.

Jeez... most teams in the NFL are not winning teams, expecting a 4-year team to be a winning team is ridiculous!

So tierd of insane fan expectations, you might as well expect that superbowl next year but get ready for the team not to reach your expectations.
 
Expecting 1 or 2 more wins from last year is ridiculous? I think even the FO, coaches, and media were predicting a good (winning) season and possible playoff run for the Texans this year based off last year's performance.... CRAZY these people are!!

Ah, but it's just being optimistic. I think the biggest thing is no one (or very few) saw this big of a drop off between year 3 and 4 for the Texans.

I may be way off, but maybe it's because teams know how to game plan for us. Just like during halftime where game "tweaks" happen, or may not happen, to adjust for the second half... we havn't had much tweaking to throw opposing teams off year to year. Just a thought.
 
touttail said:
Jimmy Johnson said that 95% of the Texan downfall is team talent, not coaching.

bobby 119C

Where did you read that??! I heard just the opposite. Can't remember where I read it, but, JJ was blaming the coaches and the GM for the downfall of the Texans.
 
On a pre-game show either last week or the week before JJ was very critical of Casserly's job of drafting and trading. I don't recall it being said as in the Texans' players are untalented, but more in a direct criticism of Casserly that he had missed opportunities to give more talent to the coaches to work with.

Marcus started a thread with a Chronicle article about this.
 
aj. said:
'83 was pretty bad - probably as bad or worse than this year's version of the Texans... and we still had Earl - but not much else. I recall going up to Minneapolis that year to watch the winless Oilers take on the Vikings sometime around mid-season. It was the game where a scrambling Archie Manning threw the windmill softball pitch underhand pass to some receiver that's forever etched in the blooper reels. That game was almost as embarrassing as the Texans recent trip to Seattle - at least it wasn't on national tv.

There was a lot of excitement when Hugh Campbell and Moon came in in '84 but that quickly died. It really didn't get fun again until the end of the '86 season when Glanville's boys won their last four home games (including wins that helped knock the Bengals and Vikes out of the playoffs) - the dawning of the House of Pain.

But as a ratio of expectations vs. success it was a completely different scenario. Per your point, we had Earl and little else. No one expected us to win w/Archie and Luck and whoever else was playing for us back then.
 
A4toZ said:
Expecting 1 or 2 more wins from last year is ridiculous? I think even the FO, coaches, and media were predicting a good (winning) season and possible playoff run for the Texans this year based off last year's performance.... CRAZY these people are!!

Ah, but it's just being optimistic. I think the biggest thing is no one (or very few) saw this big of a drop off between year 3 and 4 for the Texans.

I may be way off, but maybe it's because teams know how to game plan for us. Just like during halftime where game "tweaks" happen, or may not happen, to adjust for the second half... we havn't had much tweaking to throw opposing teams off year to year. Just a thought.

Well, saying "We just ask for 8-8 or better" IS ridicilous!
Just.. JUST??
 
Nighthawk said:
Agree. I've been around since Blanda,Tolar, and Charlie Hennigan, and no Oiler team that I can remember (OK, I'll give you failing memory) was as bad AND as dull as this team that the Houston Pablums have cooked up.
I've been here since the Oilers were back to back 1-13. That's 2-26 over two years for the Einsteins. ;) There is no way we are as bad as the team was then. There are just times when the team is going to struggle. Each year teams put a plan together...but so do all the other teams. Just so happens that some plans fail and some plans come together. When they fail you regroup and you get after it the next year.
 
touttail said:
That's true Vinny, Look at the Green Bay Packers this year. They are as bad as the Texans! Bet their fans aren't calling for a boycott.

The Packers have tasted success, have multiple NFL Championships in their history to reflect fondly upon. They are a winning franchise that is experiencing an expected downturn in the cycle.

We have never even sniffed the playoffs, much less a winning season. Sure, we almost touched a .500 season last year, but breaking even is not success. It's mediocrity.

If we have a cycle, it's now a cycle of losing. Hey, last year we weren't as big of losers as this year! wooohooo! :tv:

You can't compare the Packers and the Texans. It's not even close to a fair comparison. It's not even apples and oranges. More like comparing apples and styrofoam. ;)

oh yeah, GO TEXANS :texflag: ....always and forever.
 
mean mark8 said:
I think the reason everyone had high expectations for this year is because we were told to expect more. We are in the 4th year of a 5 year plan. Calling it a down cycle would presume we had already completed our original plan and now have to rebuild due to defections in free agency because our players are more desired by other teams and defections in coaching because of the same. This has not happened. Jeff Posey and Kenny Wright are two players we let go through free agency. We cut Sharper and Aaron Glenn. Apparently they were no longer a part of the 5 yr plan, they were only to get us to year 4. Face it, we were sold a bill of goods telling us that this year we should expect a run at the playoffs. It was all a part of the five year plan. We all bought into it and that's why we're so perplexed about why our team is possibly one of the worst in NFL history. Through 480 minutes of play this year, our team has led for somewhere around 10-15 of them. That is not what we were told to expect.

Exactly. See my sig line. That's a quote from the owner himself. Rebuilding huh? Whatever happened to the building part of the equation? Did I fall asleep for several years like Rip Van Winkle, only to have missed a playoff run? In order to rebuild, one has to build. When clearing a new piece of land to build a house on it, would you say you are rebuilding the house? No, you would only be rebuilding, if you built the house, and had to tear it down, to make it newer and bigger. Excuses are like.....

Well, you get the picture. :texflag:
 
Malloy said:
Jeez... most teams in the NFL are not winning teams, expecting a 4-year team to be a winning team is ridiculous!

So tierd of insane fan expectations, you might as well expect that superbowl next year but get ready for the team not to reach your expectations.

Asking a 7-9 team to go 8-8 the following season is unreaslistic? If we ever have a ridicolous post contest, can I be first in line to nominate this one? This goes into the ridicoulous post HOF.
 
Porky said:
Asking a 7-9 team to go 8-8 the following season is unreaslistic? If we ever have a ridicolous post contest, can I be first in line to nominate this one? This goes into the ridicoulous post HOF.

One can hope and wish for a 8-8 or better season, but for anyone to EXPECT something that only a few teams succeed in, that IS ridiculous, especially then one afterwards demand people fired to the left and right. According to that line of thought more than half of the teams should fire their entire organization every year.
 
Malloy said:
One can hope and wish for a 8-8 or better season, but for anyone to EXPECT something that only a few teams succeed in, that IS ridiculous,

Seventeen teams finished 8-8 or better last year. That's more than half the teams in the league. Expecting 8-8 the year after a 7-9 season is not ridiculous or unrealistic, especially when a team is in a building mode - allegedly.

I don't think this team, with the current management and coaching staff, is capable of giving us more than 7-9 even if you give them four more years. The next coaching staff should get even less time (3 yrs max) to produce a winner (that would be 9-7) since there's already a semblance of a foundation built. I was very patient through Year 3 with this team. My patience is running thin now because the team is obviously going in the wrong direction - bumps in the road be dammed.
 
SheTexan said:
Where did you read that??! I heard just the opposite. Can't remember where I read it, but, JJ was blaming the coaches and the GM for the downfall of the Texans.

Page C2 TV-Radio Notebook by David Barron in this mornings Chronicle.
Barron says it was on the Fox Sports conference call this week. Howie Long was questioning Johnson about taking the GM job in Houston.

Link To Story
 
ojthecat said:
I have had enough. Until we have a new coach I will not spend one more dime on Texans memoriblia and I will not buy any thing else at the stadium.

Big deal.
 
It is interesting seeing all the blame gaming and speculation on talk radio and message boards about the Texans.

Once in a while, you hear or read something that sounds spot on, but most of the time the stuff that people are saying is all illogical blathering. When a team loses, folks go nuts and start talking crazy stuff, parsing every public utterance, critizing every gesture, commenting on body language and facial expressions, doing hindsight drafts, grasping for anything that might be "The Answer."

Don't you wish you had a dollar for all the silly things people say about the Texans?

Sometimes I think the worst part of losing is hearing the stupid things that people say about the team after the loss. Factual discussions of the game I can listen to, but the speculating and stupidity just kills me. I don't like thinking that way about other Texans fans, but I just do. I can barely listen to 610 after the game when some of the more crazier comments are made.

And also the gratuitous ugly defeatest pot shots that people take after losses are hard to take too. I betcha before the team plays on Sunday, John McClain thinks up a list of at least 10 snide insults and analogies he can make about the team. Then he just fills in the rest of his Monday column with a few stats. Hello, the team lost, it is obvious--stop just piling on with nasty tired stuff you think is funny and maybe throw in some thoughtful analysis instead of just insults.

I usually like McClain's stuff, but some of his columns on the Texans just seem like lazy Don Rickles stuff with a few canned stats thrown in.

I know that stupidity and ridicule come from your team having only 1 win, but it gets excessive after a while, and hard to find insight among all the blather.

Whenever I hear a statement of someone that says "As a PSL owner who spent bladitty blah money on Texans....", all I can think is that don't you think that Bob McNair who has spent zilliondy dollars on the team wants the team to be successful???

These days, there is parity in the NFL. The talent is similar but injuries and scheduling can really make a big difference.

See e.g.: http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9798495/

Anyhow, the margin of error each year for a team is small. Tough schedules, loss of key players, trying to get team chemistry together, and learning up rookies etc, that for most teams, there is a thin line between a successful season and one that is not so much that way. Some stuff you do works, and some stuff you do nonworks.

I guess what I am trying to say is that there is no evidence that McNair is oblivious to how poor the team is playing, or that he is trying to run a team on the cheap like some losing franchises have, or doesn't care what the fans think about stuff.

So why boycott?

My best guess is that he believes that there is no point making a coaching change now and that a change will be made after the season, when we have more options. As an owner who is not nuts, he can't say that.

So, sit back, pop your beverage of choice, and watch the team we are lucky to have. See who can play. See who has no quit. See the rookies grow and learn. Because you can't fire the whole team, so you might as well cheer on these guys, and see who you want to stay your Texans.

All that being said, it sure would be nice if the Texans could destroy some suicide pools this weekend. Hard to do on their turf, but it sure would be fun.:texflag:
 
No sense in boycotting until a new coach. Who is going to coach the rest of the way? There are still some games left. And most important, NFL IS BACK IN HOUSTON!!!! :D

Coacn Capers has disappointed me b/c I thought he would do for the Texans what he did for the Panthers in their 2nd season - at some point in the Texans existence. I'll still watch the games, get my blood pressure up screaming at the TV for penalties, mistakes, touchdowns, etc.

GO TEXANS!!:texflag:
:rockets: :astros:
 
Double Barrel said:
The Packers have tasted success, have multiple NFL Championships in their history to reflect fondly upon. They are a winning franchise that is experiencing an expected downturn in the cycle.

We have never even sniffed the playoffs, much less a winning season. Sure, we almost touched a .500 season last year, but breaking even is not success. It's mediocrity.

If we have a cycle, it's now a cycle of losing. Hey, last year we weren't as big of losers as this year! wooohooo! :tv:

You can't compare the Packers and the Texans. It's not even close to a fair comparison. It's not even apples and oranges. More like comparing apples and styrofoam. ;)

oh yeah, GO TEXANS :texflag: ....always and forever.



DB,

I wasn't trying to per say compare the Packers to the Texans. I was insinuating about the Packers are having a very bad season and the fans sticking with them, not boycotting the team. I am from Louisiana and was a Saints fan for 30+ years, I know what it's like trying to support a losing team, believe me! I still wore my Archie Manning jersey proudly, and continued supporting "MY" team. I am a Texan season ticket holder and will continue to support the Texans no matter what! I still have a great time tailgating and going to the stadium to be in a NFL atsmosphere. My thinking is you are either a full fledged/die hard fan-no matter what, or a half @$$ fan that is a bandwagon jumper!

Another bigtime game coming on today for me----LSU at Alabama. Looking forward to watching that one today. Geaux Tigers!!!!!!




bobby 119C
 
touttail said:
DB,

I wasn't trying to per say compare the Packers to the Texans. I was insinuating about the Packers are having a very bad season and the fans sticking with them, not boycotting the team. I am from Louisiana and was a Saints fan for 30+ years, I know what it's like trying to support a losing team, believe me! I still wore my Archie Manning jersey proudly, and continued supporting "MY" team. I am a Texan season ticket holder and will continue to support the Texans no matter what! I still have a great time tailgating and going to the stadium to be in a NFL atsmosphere. My thinking is you are either a full fledged/die hard fan-no matter what, or a half @$$ fan that is a bandwagon jumper!

Another bigtime game coming on today for me----LSU at Alabama. Looking forward to watching that one today. Geaux Tigers!!!!!!




bobby 119C

I agree with you 100%, my friend. I'm not a boycotting fan, either. I think we have a lot in common, as both the Saints and Oilers had similar histories of good teams coming up short.

And I'm sure as a seasoned Oiler fan from way back, I've been conditioned to stick with my team through thick and thin.

Does this mean I won't voice my opinions about things I want to change? Of course not.

But it does mean that I'll be at every home game and watching every road game, regardless of how good / bad the team is on any given season.

And if there is Texans merchandise that I want, I'll buy it in spite of losing, too. Lately, though, there hasn't been much new stuff, so I'm not inclined to buy anything other than the 3D cup at halftime of every game.

Thanks for the respectful reply, though. We are brothers in arms as Texans fans. :thumbup
 
HoustonFan said:
No sense in boycotting until a new coach. Who is going to coach the rest of the way? There are still some games left. And most important, NFL IS BACK IN HOUSTON!!!! :D

Coacn Capers has disappointed me b/c I thought he would do for the Texans what he did for the Panthers in their 2nd season - at some point in the Texans existence. I'll still watch the games, get my blood pressure up screaming at the TV for penalties, mistakes, touchdowns, etc.

GO TEXANS!!:texflag:
:rockets: :astros:


I think Capers wanted to do the same thing for the Texans. He was actually a pretty good pick to start a team from scratch. My Panther friends all told me that he was a good starter coach, but eventually you were going to want somebody different.

He is all about creating a stable environment. Putting clocks in all the meeting rooms to make sure people are timely. Trying to keep people from getting too high or low through a time when you are more likely to see losses than wins.

In any event, he was facing a tougher time building this team versus the Panthers for a couple of reasons:

1. When the Panthers were created, IIRC, the league still had loser schedules. That is, if you team played poorly, they got a loser schedule the next year. If your team played well, they played a tough schedule the following year. This resulted in some teams coming out of nowhere with great seasons because the level of the competition they were playing wasn't as high as others. (See my previous post in the same thread to see how scheduling can define your whole season).

2. When the Panthers were first in existence, it was easier to get free agents. The FA market was still being worked out then, and so the Panthers were able to get a lot of quality free agents. When the Texans came around, teams had figured out the system a lot better, so they could work deals to keep their quality free agents and there were not many of those for the Texans to chose from.

3. The Texans had access to some better quality expansion draft players than in previous drafts, but mostly because of the salary cap problems with them (and maybe questions about their health combined with salary). The teams could protect more players than they had in previous drafts.

4. IIRC, because of recent expansion teams quick successes, the owners reduced the number of draft choices the Texans got in their first draft.


It is hard putting a team together from scratch. Some players have stayed with their teams longer than the Texans have been existence. Getting a whole bunch of people together, from different situations and teams, is a hard thing to do.


As for the blood pressure going up, I do hope that the Texans get some sort of the breaks with the refs. It almost seems like every time a key play happens, the refs find a way to kill us with some strange penalty. Not blaming the season on that, but geez, can the team get a break?
 
Texans_Chick said:
As for the blood pressure going up, I do hope that the Texans get some sort of the breaks with the refs. It almost seems like every time a key play happens, the refs find a way to kill us with some strange penalty. Not blaming the season on that, but geez, can the team get a break?

This I think is just a part of representing Houston as a sports franchise. Watch the Rockets, Comets, and I just got into baseball and saw the Astros get screwed a couple of times as well.
 
What we need to do to get some action is let McNair know we aren't planning to help him generate any more revenue. Don't buy merchandise, 2006 season tickets, and so forth until we see action.

Ok, that may be a bit extreme, but I am still ticked about how we lost this game. We played conservative the second half, instead of having faith in our players, and we ended losing the game on a comeback. The coaching staff is responsible for us playing conservatively...
 
Back
Top