awtysst
Draft Guru
Let me first state that I am not sure what I want to do with the number one pick. I am still thinking what is the best move for the team but I want to hear some intelligent discussion.
I do not understand why we would take Reggie Bush first. While he has shown some great play at the college level can you justify drafting him first? We all know he will not be a 25 carry back but what could he do? He will likely be a 12 carry a game back and probably get about 4-5 catches per game. That would work out to about 16-17 touches per game. Now while some people would say what about kickoff and punt returns, would you REALLY invest that much in a guy and put him in a positon to get hit hard by the entire Special teams? There is a reason 2nd and 3rd stringers go to the special teams afterall. Based on this idea, can we really justify that much money on 17 touches a game?
I do not understand why we would take Vince Young first. While he has shown some great play at the college level, can you justify drafting him first? He will likely not start at all the first season and might end up in a Phillip Rivers- Drew Brees situaiton. We know he can run in college, but he made some bad D's look awful. He never faced an NFL style Defense all year. Also, he played out of a shotgun system. Last year's number one ALex Smith played out of a shotgun system and he was horrendous. Will VY be like ALex Smith, probably not, but he wont be Steve McNair, Randall Cunningham, or McNabb his firststarting year either, if ever. Can we jutify that much money who has that many ?s.
I do not understand how we can trade down. Trading down will net us a few picks. But the fact of the matter is, this team is bad. There are a lot of holes and losing s potential difference maker is not wise. Both Bush and Young have the ability to make you pay attention to THEM. If the linebacker or safty has ot look at Bush or Young for an extra couple seconds that could help get some of our other options free. That can be the difference between extending the chains and picking up that first down and having to punt away. We cannot be the best D and O in one year so why not really build up our Offense with Kubiack? Bush and Young are picks for the future whereas trading down is a pick for now. If we draft Young or Bush, get a solid TE to throw to, and then let Kubiack find and mold his type of Olineman, we will be building a solid team.
Ok. Obviously i have presented the arguments of all three sides. Please intelligently respond by saying your choice and why. And please try to use solid arguments that do not say why a particular player "sucks". Thanks.
I do not understand why we would take Reggie Bush first. While he has shown some great play at the college level can you justify drafting him first? We all know he will not be a 25 carry back but what could he do? He will likely be a 12 carry a game back and probably get about 4-5 catches per game. That would work out to about 16-17 touches per game. Now while some people would say what about kickoff and punt returns, would you REALLY invest that much in a guy and put him in a positon to get hit hard by the entire Special teams? There is a reason 2nd and 3rd stringers go to the special teams afterall. Based on this idea, can we really justify that much money on 17 touches a game?
I do not understand why we would take Vince Young first. While he has shown some great play at the college level, can you justify drafting him first? He will likely not start at all the first season and might end up in a Phillip Rivers- Drew Brees situaiton. We know he can run in college, but he made some bad D's look awful. He never faced an NFL style Defense all year. Also, he played out of a shotgun system. Last year's number one ALex Smith played out of a shotgun system and he was horrendous. Will VY be like ALex Smith, probably not, but he wont be Steve McNair, Randall Cunningham, or McNabb his firststarting year either, if ever. Can we jutify that much money who has that many ?s.
I do not understand how we can trade down. Trading down will net us a few picks. But the fact of the matter is, this team is bad. There are a lot of holes and losing s potential difference maker is not wise. Both Bush and Young have the ability to make you pay attention to THEM. If the linebacker or safty has ot look at Bush or Young for an extra couple seconds that could help get some of our other options free. That can be the difference between extending the chains and picking up that first down and having to punt away. We cannot be the best D and O in one year so why not really build up our Offense with Kubiack? Bush and Young are picks for the future whereas trading down is a pick for now. If we draft Young or Bush, get a solid TE to throw to, and then let Kubiack find and mold his type of Olineman, we will be building a solid team.
Ok. Obviously i have presented the arguments of all three sides. Please intelligently respond by saying your choice and why. And please try to use solid arguments that do not say why a particular player "sucks". Thanks.