Haynesworth impregnates stripper, sued $10m

[CloakNNNdagger]

What Jean says is true, but, it's rarely used for DNA testing, unless you have mega bucks. MUCH to expensive and you can't force a "daddy" to consent to the test. Plus, as far as I know, insurance nor medicaid will pay for such test. Guess what? Usually the payment for such test falls on the "daddy." If he wants to prove he "ain't the daddy" before birth, he better be able to fork over some big bucks, which is no problemo for the rich and famous!

Actually we have a genetics lab right across the hall. The DNA testing will be around $2000 and the amniocentesis sampling can be gotten for approximately an additional $2000. All you have to have is a well-backed contingency attorney to fund the test and wait for pay dirt..........and Fat Albert's DNA can easily and many times unknowingly be obtained by, for example, collecting a dinner napkin he has used or a glass, cup or bottle he has drunk from

 

[gary]

Because the baby does belong to Albert untill we know otherwise he should at least be true daddy and I do not know about you but to me that means playing a normal role in his/her life. But I also don't agree 100 percent with suing Albert for ten million dollars because she also knew darn well what was up just like Albert knew ahead of time. That is what gets me.

 

[CloakNNNdagger]

Because the baby does belong to Albert untill we know otherwise he should at least be true daddy and I do not know about you but to me that means playing a normal role in his/her life. But I also don't agree 100 percent with suing Albert for ten million dollars because she also knew darn well what was up just like Albert knew ahead of time. That is what gets me.

It's time that some people face fact...................wealthy sperm is expensive!

 

[StarStruck]

I place more of the blame on the wealthy man. If Albert wan't wealthy, I would bet that he could never have gotten a date with the woman in the first place. Too many times the pregnancies are planned and 100 percent about financial security for at least 18 years. In most cases more money than they would ever receive from employment. How many times to we read about well educated, high earning career women filing these types of claims? Example after example after example, a wealty dude that still chooses to have unprotected sex, imo, is not a victim. He should have never put himself in the position for someone that he has no intentions of building a life together to ask for $10 million dollars.

I doubt if she gets the $10 million negotiating request, but if it is proven that he is the father, she will certainly be able to choose if she prefers to work again in the coming years. And when she does, Albert has no one to blame but himself because he's been out there long enough to recognize game.

 

[JB]

I place more of the blame on the wealthy man. If Albert wan't wealthy, I would bet that he could never have gotten a date with the woman in the first place. Too many times the pregnancies are planned and 100 percent about financial security for at least 18 years. In most cases more money than they would ever receive from employment. How many times to we read about well educated, high earning career women filing these types of claims? Example after example after example, a wealty dude that still chooses to have unprotected sex, imo, is not a victim. He should have never put himself in the position for someone that he has no intentions of building a life together to ask for $10 million dollars.

I doubt if she gets the $10 million negotiating request, but if it is proven that he is the father, she will certainly be able to choose if she prefers to work again in the coming years. And when she does, Albert has no one to blame but himself because he's been out there long enough to recognize game.

So, you are saying it's his fault because he allowed her to take advantage of him?

 

[StarStruck]

So, you are saying it's his fault because he allowed her to take advantage of him?

Uh huh.

 

[JB]

So, you are saying it's his fault because he allowed her to take advantage of him?

Uh huh.

Wow!

 

[awtysst]

I'm tired of bimbos intentionally getting knocked up by pro athletes then acting as if they've won the lottery. They should CAP child support to $1000 a month. Yeah I know this SERIOUSLY is slanted to protecting rich guys, but let's be honest. Someone can raise a kid on 24K a year and to that end an ADDITIONAL $24K added to the income of a HEALTHY WORKING YOUNG WOMAN means she and the kid will be doing okay.
Getting impregnated by a celebrity shouldn't mean that you get a new Benz (because a Toyota can't possibly take your kid to school) a mansion (because a simple 2 bedroom house would be an affront to the kid of a guy with money) a designer wardrobe and an 18 year vacation. Here's an exta grand a month to raise our kid...keep working that brass pole ya opportunistic skank.

 

[awtysst]

I'm old school too Grid, BUT, it takes two to tango!! You choose a lifestyle like she chose and expect someone else to do the protecting?? I don't think so! There's numerous ways out there for a woman to protect herself against an unwanted pregnancy! The "blame" falls with both, JMO! I am in NO way defending this jerk either. Make him pay child support, but, in no way does she deserve 10 million bucks for her night of fun!

 

[Kulluminatii]

 

[Dutchrudder]

 

[Beer and Metal]

Oh, no! he's got the clap too?

 

[Second Honeymoon]

an extra $1k a month for the kid? are you kidding me? you think it only costs $1k to raise a kid a month? you must not have kids. it costs a helluva lot more than $1k a month to raise a kid well. you know how much summer camps cost? little league? even girl scouts? its pretty steep. that $1k would barely cover a sitter. Haynesworth needs to pay up to this girl and she deserves it for having slept with a man who is such a scumbag that he would leave a girl to get on Medicaid to have his baby when he has upwards of $50+ million in the bank. Screw Haynesworth.

the bottom line is that a rich guy took advantage of a stripper and probably promised her a lot of stuff to be his 'boo'. then he got a little too comfortable with her and stopped wearing his connie (if he ever did in the first place) he then got her pregnant and pretty much left her standing alone when his irresponsibility made their relationship inconvenient.

she deserves everything she gets because if he slept with a woman unprotected and did his business inside of her, he has to accept responsibility for bringing a child into this world and that child should not be neglected or be forced to be raised without the benefit of a father or at least the extra financial benefit that could at least offset the lack of a father in his/her life.

i guess Haynesworth is married so he can't marry the stripper, but if he isn't married he needs to get that chick off the pole and onto his pole on a full time basis as his wife. She would probably make a helluva wife if he showed her the respect that she deserves as the mother of his child.

be a man. be a father. as a successful african american, haynesworth should step up to the plate and try and be a father to his child. the african american community already has enough dead beat dads, do they really need another? all communities have too many dead beat dads but i think it is fair to say, based on statistics, that the african american community has a bad problem with children being raised without their father. you would think some of the more successful african americans would step up and try and make a difference.

as i have said before, he could do a lot worse than that woman. yeah, she is a stripper but big deal. as long as she is fun to be around and could be a good mother, why not give it a try. i would give it a shot just on the basis of her cans. those are some nice ones

 

[gtexan02]

i don't feel that way. these adults were able to have a sexual relationship and seemed to be friends outside of the club, so why not get married when the woman is expecting a child of yours? its the right thing to do and if you arent willing to go that far, stop releasing inside women and not wearing protection.

every child has a mother but every child needs a father. writing a check isn't enough....

...but all of this is for naught, because I believe hayno is married. in other words, your screwed. but he could do a helluva lot worse than that hottie. The only thing that scares me is the whole Brooklyn thing. I wouldn't want to hear a Brooklyn accent for the rest of my life. I got it hard enough with a woman with a Mississippi accent...no offense, honey....but a Brooklyn accent like Rosie Perez? omg I would beat that woman with a cane.

jk

So now you have to be married to be a good father?

 

[TD]

So now you have to be married to be a good father?

You can't be the BEST father unless you are.

 

[infantrycak]

You can't be the BEST father unless you are.

Really that's definitional? Learn something knew every day.

 

[TD]

Really that's definitional? Learn something knew every day.

Glad I can help.

I guess I should have said "live with the child" to be more accurate, but yeah...its a no-brainer that all that things being equal, full-time wins out over part-time.

 

[Dread-Head]

First off, $1000 per month is $12k per year.

Second, in many states there is a soft cap. Texas has a percentage up to a monthly net income cap. Above that the custodial parent has to show the child has special needs justifying additional amounts be paid.

I know Cak...I was assuming that even if the b-yatch was the world's WORST stripper and only made 12K a year (even though there are some strippers who make that from Bill alone) she'd had an income already.

Yeah. To the bimbos who are trying to make getting knocked up by athletes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hkJL6wRBE8

Child support is supposed to HELP the mother raise the kid not move her to a bigger house, buy her a Benz, pay for her trips to Jamaica, get her hair did, get her nails did or make sure she has the newest Gucci. Girl already HAS a lucrative "career" polishing a brass pole with her naked body...the extra $ 12,000 is the father's contribution to raising his kid.
It's not like these women are getting raped and impregnated. They are willing participants in their own impregnation and have to bear some financial responsibility too...or they could just keep their knees together.

 

[gary]

I know Cak...I was assuming that even if the b-yatch was the world's WORST stripper and only made 12K a year (even though there are some strippers who make that from Bill alone) she'd had an income already.

Yeah. To the bimbos who are trying to make getting knocked up by athletes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hkJL6wRBE8

Child support is supposed to HELP the mother raise the kid not move her to a bigger house, buy her a Benz, pay for her trips to Jamaica, get her hair did, get her nails did or make sure she has the newest Gucci. Girl already HAS a lucrative "career" polishing a brass pole with her naked body...the extra $ 12,000 is the father's contribution to raising his kid.
It's not like these women are getting raped and impregnated. They are willing participants in their own impregnation and have to bear some financial responsibility too...or they could just keep their knees together.

This is too hard. Keeping their knees together that is.

 

[Carr Bombed]

I know Cak...I was assuming that even if the b-yatch was the world's WORST stripper and only made 12K a year (even though there are some strippers who make that from Bill alone) she'd had an income already.

Yeah. To the bimbos who are trying to make getting knocked up by athletes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hkJL6wRBE8

Child support is supposed to HELP the mother raise the kid not move her to a bigger house, buy her a Benz, pay for her trips to Jamaica, get her hair did, get her nails did or make sure she has the newest Gucci. Girl already HAS a lucrative "career" polishing a brass pole with her naked body...the extra $ 12,000 is the father's contribution to raising his kid.
It's not like these women are getting raped and impregnated. They are willing participants in their own impregnation and have to bear some financial responsibility too...or they could just keep their knees together.

Spot on...I can't stand it when I hear a ridiculous child support settlement. Who cares if the father is rich...the prices at the store don't go up just, because you had a one night stand with "Everybody knows Joe Blow"

 

[Texecutioner]

Spot on...I can't stand it when I hear a ridiculous child support settlement. Who cares if the father is rich...the prices at the store don't go up just, because you had a one night stand with "Everybody knows Joe Blow"

For the life of me I've never understood how backwards these child support laws are in this country. Totally agree that it should be a set fee and what the father or mother makes shouldn't have to pay a dime extra just because they make a ton of money.

 

[gary]

For the life of me I've never understood how backwards these child support laws are in this country. Totally agree that it should be a set fee and what the father or mother makes shouldn't have to pay a dime extra just because they make a ton of money.

Right, for what it is worth I think they're both at fault for the child 50/50.

 

[StarStruck]

I stand by what I said previously. Ok, the mom is a gold digger, the dad is an egotistical playa. Who gets the raw end of this deal, yes you guessed it, the kid. First he/she has to deal with the gossip of being the kid of someone famous, who hopes he can stop by every now and then for a bit of pride and validation.

Depending on where the kid has to live can have an impact on how promising his future may be. Even if the father's lifestyle doesn't make for the happily ever after family, a kid who is afforded the advantage of living in Sweet River Estates and receiving an education from a private school would probably be at a better future advantage than one who has to live on $1000/month in Glen Colony. In the latter, what does the kid do, sit around and hope that at least once or twice a year rich dad show up in his Ferrari with a Play Station and impresses his friends? How does this help with the promise of a brighter future for the kid?

It all goes back to either of the situations above could have been avoided if the so called victim with the gold had spent his time and gold where he envisioned as the place of his future.

On the otherhand, it would be interesting if the victim would just sue for custody. Given the vast income, I'm sure a good lawyer could prove that his/her client would be the better suited parent. Thus, the victim wins, and the gold digger pays child support.

 

[littlecat]

That's a big problem.


www.america-jerseys.com

 

[Dread-Head]

Last time time I checked it took more than a FATHER to make a baby. There is a woman involved 100% of the time. Also if a girl runs after rich/famous men attempting to get pregnant as part of some hoochie lottery someone should (and this is why I support caps on child support) remind her she still needs to have a job. If she got knocked up by some trifling chump down the block selling weed she wouldn't be using the child support checks to buy a $250,000 house or a BMW. She'd still have a job.
The money a woman gets is to help her support the kid...not to support her and the kid. It's CHILD SUPPORT...no Hoe Support.

And like I said Earlier:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hkJL6wRBE8

Sha na na na...sha na na na na...

And since everyone seems to agrees that $1000 is nothing...the Dread-head foundation is ALWAYS accepting donations. No amount is too small.

 

[gary]

I stand by what I said previously. Ok, the mom is a gold digger, the dad is an egotistical playa. Who gets the raw end of this deal, yes you guessed it, the kid. First he/she has to deal with the gossip of being the kid of someone famous, who hopes he can stop by every now and then for a bit of pride and validation.

Depending on where the kid has to live can have an impact on how promising his future may be. Even if the father's lifestyle doesn't make for the happily ever after family, a kid who is afforded the advantage of living in Sweet River Estates and receiving an education from a private school would probably be at a better future advantage than one who has to live on $1000/month in Glen Colony. In the latter, what does the kid do, sit around and hope that at least once or twice a year rich dad show up in his Ferrari with a Play Station and impresses his friends? How does this help with the promise of a brighter future for the kid?

It all goes back to either of the situations above could have been avoided if the so called victim with the gold had spent his time and gold where he envisioned as the place of his future.

On the otherhand, it would be interesting if the victim would just sue for custody. Given the vast income, I'm sure a good lawyer could prove that his/her client would be the better suited parent. Thus, the victim wins, and the gold digger pays child support.

How are going to make sure the money is used to better his or her life and not the mother? She might have to get a job as early as possible and in many cases the mother has more to gain than the child. It should not work both ways if the money was always used for just needs of life that would be fine but most of the time it isn't.

 

[StarStruck]

Last time time I checked it took more than a FATHER to make a baby. There is a woman involved 100% of the time. Also if a girl runs after rich/famous men attempting to get pregnant as part of some hoochie lottery someone should (and this is why I support caps on child support) remind her she still needs to have a job. If she got knocked up by some trifling chump down the block selling weed she wouldn't be using the child support checks to buy a $250,000 house or a BMW. She'd still have a job.
The money a woman gets is to help her support the kid...not to support her and the kid. It's CHILD SUPPORT...no Hoe Support.

And like I said Earlier:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hkJL6wRBE8

Sha na na na...sha na na na na...
And since everyone seems to agrees that $1000 is nothing...the Dread-head foundation is ALWAYS accepting donations. No amount is too small.

So are you saying that a man worth $40 or 50 million shouldn't provide a $250,000 house for his kid to live? So it's ok for him to drive a Ferrari, and ok for his kid to catch the bus because his mama doesn't have the same earning power. How can you really separate shelter, transportation, food, medical and the endless list of other things a child needs before being in a position to care for himself.

Last time I checked it took more than a MOTHER to make a baby. There is a man involved 100% of the time.

$1000 is a sacrifice to benefit the child if the man earns $30Kperhaps.

Carry on....

How are going to make sure the money is used to better his or her life and not the mother? She might have to get a job as early as possible and in many cases the mother has more to gain than the child. It should not work both ways if the money was always used for just needs of life that would be fine but most of the time it isn't.

There are no guarantees. There are married couples that spend more on their toys than providing for the best interest of their child/ren's future. Also in order for the custodial parent to provide for the minor child will result in the parent living in that same home. Perhaps it's just me, but if I were in a situation that I was not the custodial parent, I wouldn't bean count when it comes to providing support for my children. It's unfortunate that all the money can't stay in the same household, but the child didn't make that decision.

 

[ubecool454]

an extra $1k a month for the kid? are you kidding me? you think it only costs $1k to raise a kid a month? you must not have kids. it costs a helluva lot more than $1k a month to raise a kid well. you know how much summer camps cost? little league? even girl scouts? its pretty steep. that $1k would barely cover a sitter. Haynesworth needs to pay up to this girl and she deserves it for having slept with a man who is such a scumbag that he would leave a girl to get on Medicaid to have his baby when he has upwards of $50+ million in the bank. Screw Haynesworth.

the bottom line is that a rich guy took advantage of a stripper and probably promised her a lot of stuff to be his 'boo'. then he got a little too comfortable with her and stopped wearing his connie (if he ever did in the first place) he then got her pregnant and pretty much left her standing alone when his irresponsibility made their relationship inconvenient.

she deserves everything she gets because if he slept with a woman unprotected and did his business inside of her, he has to accept responsibility for bringing a child into this world and that child should not be neglected or be forced to be raised without the benefit of a father or at least the extra financial benefit that could at least offset the lack of a father in his/her life.

i guess Haynesworth is married so he can't marry the stripper, but if he isn't married he needs to get that chick off the pole and onto his pole on a full time basis as his wife. She would probably make a helluva wife if he showed her the respect that she deserves as the mother of his child.

be a man. be a father. as a successful african american, haynesworth should step up to the plate and try and be a father to his child. the african american community already has enough dead beat dads, do they really need another? all communities have too many dead beat dads but i think it is fair to say, based on statistics, that the african american community has a bad problem with children being raised without their father. you would think some of the more successful african americans would step up and try and make a difference.

as i have said before, he could do a lot worse than that woman. yeah, she is a stripper but big deal. as long as she is fun to be around and could be a good mother, why not give it a try. i would give it a shot just on the basis of her cans. those are some nice ones

You don't marry strippers dude....get real! I just wonder if he has to pay her ten million is he going to stick all that dough in a g string. If she gets the 10 million she will have no problem finding a full time daddy for her little bastard. She will find a po dude that will take all Alberts money from her..lol. My only problem with Albert is that this chick is not all that great looking and she is heavily invested in plastic or silicon.

 

[gary]

Albert should help his own child through out life and play a normal as possible role but he or she should get whatever they want whenever they want it IMO.

 

[ubecool454]

Albert should help his own child through out life and play a normal as possible role but he or she should get whatever they want whenever they want it IMO.

Albert is married and you know what he is saying....Bitoch, I'll come see him/her when we play the giants of jets in nyc. I'm not leaving my wife for you..lol. Be careful Albert...remember Steve McNair...chick could be pyscho if she doesn't get that 10 million and that life you promised her.

 

[gary]

Albert is married and you know what he is saying....Bitoch, I'll come see him/her when we play the giants of jets in nyc. I'm not leaving my wife for you..lol. Be careful Albert...remember Steve McNair...chick could be pyscho if she doesn't get that 10 million and that life you promised her.

I hope that changes but Albert already acts like an ***** on the field. Why should I expect anything different?

 

[CloakNNNdagger]

Rumors are that Fat Albert fears showing up for mandatory minicamp because he appears to be pregnant..........or at least appears to be.

 

[infantrycak]

So are you saying that a man worth $40 or 50 million shouldn't provide a $250,000 house for his kid to live? So it's ok for him to drive a Ferrari, and ok for his kid to catch the bus because his mama doesn't have the same earning power.

OK assuming there is some entitlement to live like whoever is the wealthier parent, where is the cutoff. You threw out $250k for a house. Do a single mother and child need that? No. So ok we are on the lifestyle entitlement. Why end there? If Albert lives in a $3 mil house why isn't the kid entitled to live in a $3 mil house? When he turns 16 and daddy drives a Ferrari is he entitled to that too? My parents had more than enough money to buy me a nice car as a kid and chose to make me earn the money for mine. Somehow Albert loses that choice?

How can you really separate shelter, transportation, food, medical and the endless list of other things a child needs before being in a position to care for himself.

What do you mean here? Nobody has suggested a parent not be responsible for providing basics.

 

[gary]

The basics are all you need through out your life. Does child have to get whinned and dinned for supper just because daddy does? Nope.

 

[StarStruck]

OK assuming there is some entitlement to live like whoever is the wealthier parent, where is the cutoff. You threw out $250k for a house. Do a single mother and child need that? No. So ok we are on the lifestyle entitlement. Why end there? If Albert lives in a $3 mil house why isn't the kid entitled to live in a $3 mil house? When he turns 16 and daddy drives a Ferrari is he entitled to that too? My parents had more than enough money to buy me a nice car as a kid and chose to make me earn the money for mine. Somehow Albert loses that choice?



What do you mean here? Nobody has suggested a parent not be responsible for providing basics.

I read this while out of town and for some reason every time I tried to reply on the IPhone that I would take this up when I returned, it would never post the reply and simply reply that I was not logged on, huh, how many times did the log on cancel out after hitting the submit button.

The $250K I threw out there, IMO, for a wealthy PARENT, I don't see it being a problem for someone worth millions...pennies on the dollar. On the other hand, I can see someone wanting $10 million for one child being quite excessive. Thought to myself, excuse me for a moment...self, I wonder why do men have such a problem with birth control?

$3 million dollar house and Ferrari for a child, for real? But on the other hand, a neighborhood and living conditions that will provide a better advantage for that child to succeed, yes.

What seems to get lost in this topic is that Albert had a choice in this situation. Also, if Albert has an issue with child support and the amount, simply request custody of the child, and with his cash how could she successfully challenge that she is the better parent when it comes to who is in a better position to provide for the child. That would probably be somewhat inconvenient. I don't know if he is married or not, either way he should be able to work out the situation that he had no business being in in the first place.

On this gold digging issue, married or single Albert had no business providing the soil for gold to be found. Seemingly somewhere along the way someone must have told him that storks don't deliver babies.

What are basics? A Murphy bed? Crackers and water, pinto beans perhaps? Thrift shop clothing? One bedroom efficiency? Metro? Help me to understand, seriously. Are basics the same for one earning $30K the same as one earning $30 Million? What is this child's crowning moments? Is it a dad that is trying to give him the best advantages to succeed in life, or the one that pays basics and show up for holidays with cute trinkets?

Smooch, smooch, I respect you dearly as a longtime Texan poster, but this topic has me dazed and confused.

 

[infantrycak]

Smooch, smooch, I respect you dearly as a longtime Texan poster, but this topic has me dazed and confused.

I actually agree with the lifestyle entitlement to a degree. I think Texas has struck a pretty good balance. I was trying to figure out where you would draw the line.

 

[gary]

If the chance is there for he or she to have a better education at a privite school then I am all for that. IF Albert wants to buy the mom and child a big cozey house to live in a good area that would be fine with me. I just do not think should have to buy him/her a new ring, watch, or video game every other day just to flat out spoil him/her JMO.

 

[Dread-Head]

So are you saying that a man worth $40 or 50 million shouldn't provide a $250,000 house for his kid to live? So it's ok for him to drive a Ferrari, and ok for his kid to catch the bus because his mama doesn't have the same earning power. How can you really separate shelter, transportation, food, medical and the endless list of other things a child needs before being in a position to care for himself.

Last time I checked it took more than a MOTHER to make a baby. There is a man involved 100% of the time.

$1000 is a sacrifice to benefit the child if the man earns $30Kperhaps.

Carry on....



There are no guarantees. There are married couples that spend more on their toys than providing for the best interest of their child/ren's future. Also in order for the custodial parent to provide for the minor child will result in the parent living in that same home. Perhaps it's just me, but if I were in a situation that I was not the custodial parent, I wouldn't bean count when it comes to providing support for my children. It's unfortunate that all the money can't stay in the same household, but the child didn't make that decision.

"Let her understand that child's a baby...not a paycheck. Private school, day care, $h:t...medical bills I PAY THAT."

: OutKast "Ms Jackson"

Ma'am I'm not suggesting that we go back to the days when guys got off the hook for child support, not by ANY means, but it shouldn't be a means of economic advancement for lazy skanks who think they're too good to work that's all I'm saying.

Like I said, to the hoochie contengent:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hkJL6wRBE8

 

[StarStruck]

"Let her understand that child's a baby...not a paycheck. Private school, day care, $h:t...medical bills I PAY THAT."

: OutKast "Ms Jackson"

Volumn generally represents a weak argument.

Ma'am I'm not suggesting that we go back to the days when guys got off the hook for child support, not by ANY means, but it shouldn't be a means of economic advancement for lazy skanks who think they're too good to work that's all I'm saying.

In the Haynesworth situation, I doubt if the woman gets anywhere near $10Million. I think it's more shock and awe as well as a basis to negotiate down to a settlement in the best interest of caring for and raising the child. Therefore, I never let that amount be a basis for any of my comments. In other words a non issue.

Like I said, to the hoochie contengent:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hkJL6wRBE8

I watched the youtube performance. The costumes were nice as well as the dance steps, but the music was somewhat annoying. Perhaps the Temptations would have put a smoother edge to it. However, what I could gather from the lyrics was that it was the man that needed to get a job.

 

[leebigeztx]

Maybe he should just give her 1m.Thats 55k a yr for 18 years and about 4700 a month. If thats not good enough, then what is?

 

[ChampionTexan]

Couldn't see creating another thread for this, but once again, Albert demonstrates that in the punchbowl that is the NFL, he's far and away the largest turd.

A Tennessee bank is suing Redskins defensive tackle Albert Haynesworth, alleging that he has failed to make payments on a loan.

The Knoxville News Sentinel reports that Clayton Bank & Trust sued Haynesworth in connection with missed payments on a $2.38 million loan.

LINK

 

[CloakNNNdagger]

Couldn't see creating another thread for this, but once again, Albert demonstrates that in the punchbowl that is the NFL, he's far and away the largest turd.


LINK

Why don't you get off his big butt...........he can't afford it!

 

[ChampionTexan]

Why don't you get off his big butt...........he can't afford it!

Classic case of the overachiever. While most NFL players wait until a year or two after retirement to go broke, Albert has not only done it while still an active player, he's done in within mere months of receiving a $20 Million bonus.

That type of dedication to scumbaggery is a rare thing in this day and age.

 

[CloakNNNdagger]

Classic case of the overachiever. While most NFL players wait until a year or two after retirement to go broke, Albert has not only done it while still an active player, he's done in within mere months of receiving a $20 Million bonus.

That type of dedication to scumbaggery is a rare thing in this day and age.

I feel a movie contract coming on depicting Haynesworth and the Skins...............THE FAT AND THE FURIOUS.............

 

[CloakNNNdagger]

Couldn't see creating another thread for this, but once again, Albert demonstrates that in the punchbowl that is the NFL, he's far and away the largest turd.

Things are getting crazier.

Haynesworth's lawsuits keep piling up

Redskins defensive tackle Albert Haynesworth has found himself on the wrong side of more than a few lawsuits. Most recently, a bank sued him for failing to make payments on a $2.38 million loan he took out in June 2009 -- only three months after signing a deal with a practical value of four years, $48 million. He also faces a lawsuit from a man seriously injured in an accident allegedly caused by Haynesworth, who allegedly was driving too fast. He's also battling with his ex-wife over health insurance and child support.

Then there's the $100 million paternity suit filed by an exotic dancer in New York.

A reader has tipped us off to another lawsuit involving Haynesworth. It possibly arises out of a group known as Crestview Townhomes, LLC. A pending lawsuit that had a court hearing on Wednesday includes Haynesworth and Bryan Puckett, two members of the Crestview Townhomes organization, and CP Construction, LLC. The plaintiff in the case is a company known as Dale and Associates, a Nashville engineering firm.

There's another lawsuit filed only against Haynesworth by Dale and Associates, which also went to court on Wednesday.

We've yet to track down any details regarding these cases. But we've got a feeling that the claims generally arise from Haynesworth and/or the other defendants owing money, and not paying the money.

LINK

 

[gary]

He is just a jackass.