Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Huge said:I don't think anybody classifies as a Bush "hater". They simply think the team would be better served by addressing other areas of need with high quality players that would be available.
But back to your question: No...I wouldn't change my mind.
1. It's only one game. Everybody seemed to change their mind about Bush being the best player in the country when he went nuts on Fresno State. Turned out Fresno State wasn't as good as what many thought they were.
2. Stephen McGee (Texas A&M QB) rushed for over 100 yards against Texas. They can be suspectible against the rush as any other team. Especially when the other team has a player that can get to the edge, where Texas is their weakest, as fast as Bush can. I almost expect 200 yards from him on Wednesday.
If Texas employs the same strategy against USC as they did OU last year where Adrian Peterson went off for 225 but no TDs but they held their passing game in check, then I think that gives Texas the best shot at winning. Let Bush get his yards. Just minimize the big (pass) plays.
We don't have weapons? We do, just didn't have the coach to utilize them.tulexan said:I think Leinart will succeed on a team that has a lot of weapons like the Lions for example.
El Tejano said:We don't have weapons? We do, just didn't have the coach to utilize them.
El Tejano said:We don't have weapons? We do, just didn't have the coach to utilize them.
Dime said:Bush Hater.... Just because I dont agree what position we should fill does not make me a hater. I like the guy .... alot.. I would love to have him on the team. The problem is that he is coming into a position that is already filled and there are so many other empty slots available that need to be filled first.
JackDizzle said:IMO AJ is our only offensive weapon. Carr and Davis are far from "weapons". Throw in Mathis and we have 2 "weapons".