Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

Domanick Davis, any questions?

I would still like to see us go after Lamont Jordan or Larry Johnson after this season. That would give us a speedier RB, Davis as a 3rd down back, and Wells as a goalline back. I am pretty sure Johnson is faster than Davis, not sure about Jordan though, I might be wrong I dunno. IMO it would give us 3 different RB's that could all contribute different things to our run game, so we could mix it up some.
 
HJam72 said:
In the last 7 games, we've averages 118.3 yds. rushing and 171.6 yds. passing. They're ignoring DD.

You just answered your own question right there. 171.6 yards! that is horrible if anybody is to blame its Carr! Well not necessarily the blame should be based on the O-Line they can't keep any Defense off of Carr's back and give him time to make a pass play. The running game is not where the problem lies its the passing game. In the beginning of the season people were saying that carr couldn't do it all without and running game well he got that, but then the passing protection fell to ****.

I think once our O-Line gets together and start blocking like they are suppose to then our running game will get even better and the passing game will do the same. The offense revolves around the O-Line. To pass you have to have time in the pocket without being pressured. And to run obviously you have to a good O-Line to run the ball also. Even for special teams you have to have a good O-Line. We saw against Tennesee, Rien Long just steppd str8 through and blocked Kris Brown's field goal. Nearly costing us a 10 point swing! :thud:

It is a new blocking scheme and the haven't even finished the year, so i am not saying that we should just go find an entirely new line, but with time as the O-Line gets better, you can expect the running game and passing game; offense to take off and be a rell big threat for the opposing defense.
 
I'm not saying that DD is at all our biggest problem. He does, however, have his biggest games when we lose, because the defense is causing it to happen that way.

When a defense uses zone pass coverage throughout the entire game and you lose, it's a bad sign that both your run blocking AND your runner are not getting it done. DD does break some tackles, but not enough. He is definitely good enought to be in the NFL, either as a sub-par starter or as a very good 3rd down back.

He's not fast enough to run outside, he's not big enough to run over people, at least not very often, and he doesn't fake people out or show that he can out maneuvre them. He has some of all of those attributes, but he's not really great at any one of them. He is great at one thing: catching the ball out of the backfield.
 
AndreJ said:
You just answered your own question right there. 171.6 yards! that is horrible if anybody is to blame its Carr! Well not necessarily the blame should be based on the O-Line they can't keep any Defense off of Carr's back and give him time to make a pass play. The running game is not where the problem lies its the passing game. In the beginning of the season people were saying that carr couldn't do it all without and running game well he got that, but then the passing protection fell to ****.

I think once our O-Line gets together and start blocking like they are suppose to then our running game will get even better and the passing game will do the same. The offense revolves around the O-Line. To pass you have to have time in the pocket without being pressured. And to run obviously you have to a good O-Line to run the ball also. Even for special teams you have to have a good O-Line. We saw against Tennesee, Rien Long just steppd str8 through and blocked Kris Brown's field goal. Nearly costing us a 10 point swing! :thud:

It is a new blocking scheme and the haven't even finished the year, so i am not saying that we should just go find an entirely new line, but with time as the O-Line gets better, you can expect the running game and passing game; offense to take off and be a rell big threat for the opposing defense.
Have you not read one word I have typed in previous posts??? The reason the pass protection sucks is because teams are pinning there ear backs and rushing game. If Davis gets the ball, big deal. The defense will get him. One play that I keep pointing to was during the last Colts game. Davis had a couple of good runs but on 1st and 10 when Carr was in the shotgun and play faked to Davis, Freeney (who had already got by Wand) didnt even flinch at that play fake. He went right after Carr, and oh my goodness. Carr was the one with the ball. Freeney didnt even make an attempt at Carr. If that is LT or some other game breaking back, you better believe Freeney honors the play fake...
 
texan279 said:
I would still like to see us go after Lamont Jordan or Larry Johnson after this season. That would give us a speedier RB, Davis as a 3rd down back, and Wells as a goalline back. I am pretty sure Johnson is faster than Davis, not sure about Jordan though, I might be wrong I dunno. IMO it would give us 3 different RB's that could all contribute different things to our run game, so we could mix it up some.

With the way Johnson is playing, I dont think they would want to trade him. Or that they ever wanted to trade him.

I dont think a GM would spend a #1 on a guy that they plan on trading.
 
Lets see how many other teams would take Davis over their current RB:

Bills - The Bills would take McGahee
Dolphins - The Dolphins would take Davis
Pats - The Pats would take Dillion
Jets - The Jets would probably take Jordan and Martin over Davis

Ravens - Jamal Lewis over Davis
Bengals - Rudi Johnson over Davis
Steelers - Staley over Davis
Browns - Suggs over Davis and probably would take Green over Davis (thats one is iffy)

Colts - James over Davis
Jags - Taylor over Davis
Titans - Brown over Davis

Broncos - Bell over Davis
Chiefs - Larry Johnson or Priest Holmes over Davis
Raiders - They take Davis
Chargers - LT over Davis

Girls - Jones over Davis
Giants - Barber over Davis
Redskins - Portis over Davis
Eagles - Westbrook over Davis

Bears - Thomas Jones over Davis
Lions - Kevin Jones over Davis
Packers - Green over Davis
Vikings - Any of their 4 RBs over Davis

Falcons - Duckett or Dunn over Davis
Panthers - Foster over Davis (May even take Goings over Davis)
Saints - McAllister over Davis
Bucs - They would take Davis

Cards - They would take Davis
Rams - Steven Jackson over Davis
49ers - Barlow over Davis (remember that the 49ers liked him so much they gave him a big extension and there are no offensive players on that team)
Seahawks - Alexander over Davis


So out of 31 other franchises, only 4 teams would take Davis and the combined record for those 4 teams is 17-38 (.309 winning percentage)
 
i think its interesting that everyone keeps bringing up davis' lack of outright speed, among other things. did anyone see the jets game? so what if his 61 yarder was called back, the holding wasn't on the LB's or safety he juked, and i don't remember him getting caught from behind either. and on that note, i can't remember DD getting caught from behind....EVER! and didn't he pick up 23 yds on a sweep against a fairly stout chicago D last sunday? didn't he have to be fast enough to turn the corner to gain those yards? i just can't get the mentallity that davis isn't, at the very least, a good runningback for the texans right now.

why do we have to have a freakish hershal walker/jamal lewis human plow? or a lightning quick barry sanders clone? why don't all the naysayers see that versatility can be just as effective, if not more, than a specialized runningback that only excels in a few areas? and although im not saying davis is even worthy of emmit smith's dirty socks, but i think physical comparisons and running styles can be seen as comprable. was smith the biggest back? was he the fastest back? was he the quickest back? well did any of that stop him from being more than just a "third down back"? did it stop him from being the cowboys "franchise back"?

i hope the comparison doesn't take away from my very valid points to much, but im just a little frustrated with talk drafting a RB high after DD's very workman like performance (with 23 carries, 95 yds and a TD) that contributed to a texans victory. im gonna go watch monday night countdown, but i leave with this thought.....why do we need a back that can break multiple tackles to gain yards? or better said, why are multiple defenders always around our running backs? :bouncey:
 
Emitt Smith was small also, but he broke tackles time and time again. DD doesn't do that. As far as DD being good enough for now, I agree. We need other things more than we need another RB.
 
jr0ck said:
i think its interesting that everyone keeps bringing up davis' lack of outright speed, among other things. did anyone see the jets game? so what if his 61 yarder was called back, the holding wasn't on the LB's or safety he juked, and i don't remember him getting caught from behind either. and on that note, i can't remember DD getting caught from behind....EVER! and didn't he pick up 23 yds on a sweep against a fairly stout chicago D last sunday? didn't he have to be fast enough to turn the corner to gain those yards? i just can't get the mentallity that davis isn't, at the very least, a good runningback for the texans right now. why do we have to have a freakish hershal walker/jamal lewis human plow? or a lightning quick barry sanders clone? why don't all the naysayers see that versatility can be just as effective, if not more, than a specialized runningback that only excels in a few areas? and although im not saying davis is even worthy of emmit smith's dirty socks, but i think physical comparisons and running styles can be seen as comprable. was smith the biggest back? was he the fastest back? was he the quickest back? well did any of that stop him from being just a third down back? did it stop him from being the cowboys "franchise back"? i hope the comparison doesn't take away from my very valid points to much, but im just a little frustrated with talk drafting a RB high after DD's very workman performance (with 23 carries, 95 yds and a TD) that contributed to a texans victory. im gonna go watch monday night countdown, but i leave with this thought.....why do we need a back that can break multiple tackles to gain yards? or better said, why are multiple defenders always around our running backs? :bouncey:
I dont know what you have been watching, but Davis always gets caught from behind. Even the Bus has a couple of 20 yards run. Lets not get caught up in that. Every back in the league will get a couple of those each year.

We need a back that can break multiple tackles because Capers wants to pound the ball for 4-5 yards a carry and then play action fake deep. We cant do that with Davis. There are multiple defenders around our RB because it is impossible to block everyone. There is always people around Priest, LT, and Jamal Lewis but they find ways to get around, by, and threw them.
 
49ers-they BENCHED BARLOW for the past two games, and are starting a RB with his only two starts coming while he is STARTING OVER BARLOW! They would most definatly take DD

Bears-Thomas Jones? They would love a trade for DD.They would most definatly take DD

Browns-Lee Suggs had one good game for them...LAST YEAR!What has he done this year? And William green is a first round bust/HEADCASE.

Falcons-TJ Duckett is a Falcons version of Johnathan Wells(also a first round bust) and Warrick Dunn(Texans version of Tony Hollings, not good)

These teams PLUS the others that you already named.
 
jr0ck said:
i think its interesting that everyone keeps bringing up davis' lack of outright speed, among other things. did anyone see the jets game? so what if his 61 yarder was called back, the holding wasn't on the LB's or safety he juked, and i don't remember him getting caught from behind either. and on that note, i can't remember DD getting caught from behind....EVER! and didn't he pick up 23 yds on a sweep against a fairly stout chicago D last sunday? didn't he have to be fast enough to turn the corner to gain those yards? i just can't get the mentallity that davis isn't, at the very least, a good runningback for the texans right now. why do we have to have a freakish hershal walker/jamal lewis human plow? or a lightning quick barry sanders clone? why don't all the naysayers see that versatility can be just as effective, if not more, than a specialized runningback that only excels in a few areas? and although im not saying davis is even worthy of emmit smith's dirty socks, but i think physical comparisons and running styles can be seen as comprable. was smith the biggest back? was he the fastest back? was he the quickest back? well did any of that stop him from being just a third down back? did it stop him from being the cowboys "franchise back"? i hope the comparison doesn't take away from my very valid points to much, but im just a little frustrated with talk drafting a RB high after DD's very workman performance (with 23 carries, 95 yds and a TD) that contributed to a texans victory. im gonna go watch monday night countdown, but i leave with this thought.....why do we need a back that can break multiple tackles to gain yards? or better said, why are multiple defenders always around our running backs? :bouncey:

First off, have you ever heard of a paragraph? LoL just kdding. I like what you had to say, especially at the end when you said why are multiple defenders around our running back?

As four Fiddy where are you getting this stuff? Who are you to say a team would take one player over another? All players do not fit all teams schemes. If you dont beleive me take a look at clinton portis, he hasn't done jack **** with the redskins this year. I mean what do you have against DD? I'm dying to know. You keep coming up with this empty yards bull, which i think is the dumbest thing i have ever heard of. If he is moving the chains and getting us first downs whether its a dump off pass, or running the ball then why does it matter. And earlier you said he only get yards off of "great blocks" by a lineman and he cant run by or over anyone for a gain.

Yesterday on his 11 yd TD run he flat out ran over R.W. McQuarters and dragged him into the endzone with R.W. hanging on to his leg. If i recall correctly he did the same thing in houston against Idianaplois on his TD run leaving a trail of defenders in his pass (Please don't make me go find any pictures). What more can the guy do this season he has 972 rushing yards and is leading the AFC running back with 515 recieving yards (1442 yards total)! Their are WR's who wish they could have the many yards recieving. Oh and not to mention his 12 TD's on the season. Who cares if he is moving the ball by running or passing a 12 yd pass is no different the a 12 yard run. The leading running back in the league (Curtis Martin) has 1690 total yards (179 passing) and 14 TD's. DD is only trailing Curtis by 248 yards and 2 TD's, who is to say he isn't getting the job done and that Defenses don't plan for him in their attack when he accounts for damn near 50% of the texans offense. And dont come back and give me that BS (empty yards excuse).

In the past 6 or 7 weeks, he has been doing evrything he can to help out the Texans offense. It is not his fault that our D got embarrassed about 3 games in a row and the Texans lost. What else do you want the guy to do pay off Hocculli (that referee) and tell him to call the game in our favor. Geeesh get off his back. The texans have much bigger problems and holes in the team than trying to find a "franchise back"

P.S As far as DD getting empty yards and nott putting points on the board, he ties Tiki Barber with 11 Rushing TD's and thats 6th in the NFL. Once again he's doing his job and it aint his fault the taxans have been losing. :hmmm:
 
THANK YOU!!!!! FINALLY SOMEONE SAID IT! WHAT DO YOU HAVE AGAINST HIM? Last summer, me and you were arguing about who was the better back, DD or Tony Hollings? You must have a problem with him! if he is one of the TOP PRODUCING RBs(total yards), and you are still wining about him being the reason we lose games, you will never be happy. Please dont gimme that **** about "empty yards" anymore.undefined
 
Beastlyman2003 said:
49ers-they BENCHED BARLOW for the past two games, and are starting a RB with his only two starts coming while he is STARTING OVER BARLOW! They would most definatly take DD

Bears-Thomas Jones? They would love a trade for DD.They would most definatly take DD

Browns-Lee Suggs had one good game for them...LAST YEAR!What has he done this year? And William green is a first round bust/HEADCASE.

Falcons-TJ Duckett is a Falcons version of Johnathan Wells(also a first round bust) and Warrick Dunn(Texans version of Tony Hollings, not good)

These teams PLUS the others that you already named.
Have you seen what has happened to the 49ers over the last year??? They lost their star WR, their Pro Bowl QB, and a couple of starting offensive lineman. If you dont think Davis is getting blocks, take a look at a 49ers game and you will be happy. But you know what, the 2-12 record they have shows it.

Thomas Jones was tearing people up the first couple of weeks of the season, until he got injured. He signed a 4 year, $10 million deal with a $3.5 million in the offseason. And that was because of 3 good games. I doubt Davis could get that money...but since I am such a nice guy, I will give you the Bears

Okay, I will give you the Browns.

I dont know how you can be calling TJ Duckett a bust and Dunn a version of Hollings. Duckett is averaging 4.8 yards a carry this season, while Dunn is running 4.2 yards per carry. They play their ROLE very nicely. I will not give you these, too.

So lets add the 2-12 49ers, the 5-9 Bears, and the 3-11 Browns to the 17-38 record. That drops the winning percentage of teams that would take Davis to .278. Have you noticed that all the teams that would take Davis are teams that stink???
 
Whats your point? Arent bad teams supposed to look to upgrade with better players? I guarantee you that if some of those teams had DD as a RB, they would not have such bad records. Heck, with DD, the dolphins could be talking playoffs.

And by the way, A major knock on Bryan Westbrook was that he is a "good third down back", not a starter. So, DD and Brian Westbrook are about even.
 
AndreJ said:
As four Fiddy where are you getting this stuff? Who are you to say a team would take one player over another? All players do not fit all teams schemes. If you dont beleive me take a look at clinton portis, he hasn't done jack **** with the redskins this year. I mean what do you have against DD? I'm dying to know. You keep coming up with this empty yards bull, which i think is the dumbest thing i have ever heard of. If he is moving the chains and getting us first downs whether its a dump off pass, or running the ball then why does it matter. And earlier you said he only get yards off of "great blocks" by a lineman and he cant run by or over anyone for a gain.

Yesterday on his 11 yd TD run he flat out ran over R.W. McQuarters and dragged him into the endzone with R.W. hanging on to his leg. If i recall correctly he did the same thing in houston against Idianaplois on his TD run leaving a trail of defenders in his pass (Please don't make me go find any pictures). What more can the guy do this season he has 972 rushing yards and is leading the AFC running back with 515 recieving yards (1442 yards total)! Their are WR's who wish they could have the many yards recieving. Oh and not to mention his 12 TD's on the season. Who cares if he is moving the ball by running or passing a 12 yd pass is no different the a 12 yard run. The leading running back in the league (Curtis Martin) has 1690 total yards (179 passing) and 14 TD's. DD is only trailing Curtis by 248 yards and 2 TD's, who is to say he isn't getting the job done and that Defenses don't plan for him in their attack when he accounts for damn near 50% of the texans offense. And dont come back and give me that BS (empty yards excuse).

In the past 6 or 7 weeks, he has been doing evrything he can to help out the Texans offense. It is not his fault that our D got embarrassed about 3 games in a row and the Texans lost. What else do you want the guy to do pay off Hocculli (that referee) and tell him to call the game in our favor. Geeesh get off his back. The texans have much bigger problems and holes in the team than trying to find a "franchise back"

P.S As far as DD getting empty yards and nott putting points on the board, he ties Tiki Barber with 11 Rushing TD's and thats 6th in the NFL. Once again he's doing his job and it aint his fault the taxans have been losing. :hmmm:
Clinton Portis hasn't done jack ***??? 1283 rushing yards. idonno:

I dont have anything against Davis, I just think their could be an upgrade at the position.

Games arent won by first downs, they are won by points...

Yep, Davis did have a good TD run but every RB in the league can bust out a broken tackle every now and then for a short TD.

Of Curtis Martin's total yards, 1511 them have come on the ground with a 4.6 yards per carry average. Martin does his damage on the ground. So lets not compare them.

Pretend you are a Defensive Coordinator for a team that is about to face the Texans. The first thing that comes to your mind is Andre Johnson and Co. with Carr throwing the ball. If you read quotes from opposing coaches, they never mention Davis. Jeff Fisher cant shut up about AJ, I dont remember him drolling over Davis. But back to the D. Coor. job. You have got to figure out how to stop the passing game because you know when the Texans are passing the ball effectivley, they are winning. So you take away the pass by putting everyone into pass coverage. You are going to allow Davis to get those yards because they wont result in points.

When you bring up Davis' TD #'s, you are saying that he is responsible all the time for getting the ball down their. In another one of my post, I showed every TD run Davis has had this year. A majority of them were one yarders. Wells could have all those TDs if you made him the "goal line" back.

When Davis accounts for 50% of our offense, we lose so why are you bragging about that???
 
Beastlyman2003 said:
Whats your point? Arent bad teams supposed to look to upgrade with better players? I guarantee you that if some of those teams had DD as a RB, they would not have such bad records. Heck, with DD, the dolphins could be talking playoffs.

And by the way, A major knock on Bryan Westbrook was that he is a "good third down back", not a starter. So, DD and Brian Westbrook are about even.
My point is that good teams wouldnt have Davis as a starter. They would have him as a 3rd down back. I am going to pretend you didnt say that about the 2-11 Dolphins talking about the playoff with him, they couldnt even make them with Ricky...

Westbrook has break away speed so they are not even.
 
Beastlyman2003 said:
THANK YOU!!!!! FINALLY SOMEONE SAID IT! WHAT DO YOU HAVE AGAINST HIM? Last summer, me and you were arguing about who was the better back, DD or Tony Hollings? You must have a problem with him! if he is one of the TOP PRODUCING RBs(total yards), and you are still wining about him being the reason we lose games, you will never be happy. Please dont gimme that **** about "empty yards" anymore.undefined
Why do you have to wait for people to say it, why dont you just ask it???

Ask TexansTrueFan, I have nothing against Davis. There can be an upgrade at the position, thats all I think. I critize Pitts sometimes, but that doesnt mean that I dont like him...

And Tony Hollings made me look like a dumb-youknowwhat-

I will be happy when we are winning...
 
Why would they not make it with Ricky? Who else did they lose over the off season? If anything they would have been better than last year because they aquired David Boston. Which adds another demension to their offense, that they didnt have last year(another top reciever to compliment Chris Chambers)
with a line up of Ricky Williams, Chris Chambers, David Boston, Randy McMichael, and then with their defense being one of the top in the league. They would be in the playoff hunt.
 
Yes clinton portis hasn't done jack **** this year i said it. Sure he has 1283 yards, but he also has the most carries in the league (333 carries) and is only avg. 3.9 yards a carry where as his previous two years he avg. 5.5. He also only has 225 passing yards. 225+1283=1508. I think that is what maybe 50 yards more than Davis has had this year not to mention he has missed a few games.

Anyways enough of Portis, what Davis lacks in the running game he makes up in the passing game. For the record, all RB's cannot catch the ball (Jamal Lewis) I have also seen Sean. Alexander drop many passes. Something we never see DD do. Just so you know DD acounts for 50% of our offense in all our games, not just the gm's we lose. And for the last time stop placing the blame on DD for losing the games, by saying when he has 50% of our offense we lose because he always has 50% of our offense. It is not his fault and football is a TEAM sport. It aint like tennis or golf in case you haven't noticed. :hmmm:

Damn, and i said this was gonna be sweet and short.
 
Gee,I wonder how many of you are just on the wagon off the wagon fans of DD,and also how many of you pushed for him to be Rookie of the year last year,you will see in time that he is a good choice for the Texans,you know somtimes players have bad years,just like coaches and everyday workers,maybe he is not a priest holmes,then again maybe he just hasn't been in the league long enough to get that edge,but I know, this last year he was awesome,and there has to be a reason why he hasn't given us that same performance as last year,what ever the prob is I still believe he will show what he is about in the future.
 
Beastlyman2003 said:
Why would they not make it with Ricky? Who else did they lose over the off season? If anything they would have been better than last year because they aquired David Boston. Which adds another demension to their offense, that they didnt have last year(another top reciever to compliment Chris Chambers)
with a line up of Ricky Williams, Chris Chambers, David Boston, Randy McMichael, and then with their defense being one of the top in the league. They would be in the playoff hunt.
They didnt make it with Ricky when he played over there, thats the point. Ricky never led the Dolphins to the playoffs.
 
I really don't see what so wrong with DD (aside from durability). From what I see (with the type of offense that Capers would like to run) he fits the mold.
 
AndreJ said:
Yes clinton portis hasn't done jack **** this year i said it. Sure he has 1283 yards, but he also has the most carries in the league (333 carries) and is only avg. 3.9 yards a carry where as his previous two years he avg. 5.5. He also only has 225 passing yards. 225+1283=1508. I think that is what maybe 50 yards more than Davis has had this year not to mention he has missed a few games.

Anyways enough of Portis, what Davis lacks in the running game he makes up in the passing game. For the record, all RB's cannot catch the ball (Jamal Lewis) I have also seen Sean. Alexander drop many passes. Something we never see DD do. Just so you know DD acounts for 50% of our offense in all our games, not just the gm's we lose. And for the last time stop placing the blame on DD for losing the games, by saying when he has 50% of our offense we lose because he always has 50% of our offense. It is not his fault and football is a TEAM sport. It aint like tennis or golf in case you haven't noticed. :hmmm:

Damn, and i said this was gonna be sweet and short.
Its funny you say that Portis' 3.9 isnt good when Davis is averaging 3.6. Davis has always missed games, so why are you putting "not to mention"??? Davis missed games, that should be counted against him.

Most RBs can catch the ball and when you have pounded out 2000 rushing yards in a season, you really dont need that ability and look at Alexander's career stats. He has been able to catch the ball. It seems that dropping balls has been a problem for anyone on that Seahawks offense. And Alexander has had 4 straight seasons of 15 total TDs...

:read:

Davis accounted for 0% of the offense in the Oakland win...
Davis accounted for 9% of the offense in the Chiefs win...
Davis accounted for 7% of the offense in the Titans road win...
Davis accounted for 26% of the offense in the Jags win...
Davis accounted for 48% of the offense in the Titans home win...
Davis accounted for 37% of the offense in the Bears win...

Davis accounted for all the offense in the first half of the Vikings game and we got 0 points, Davis accounted for little offense in the second half of the Vikings game and we scored 28 points...

So what were you saying???
 
Do you have a website or source where you got those numbers from or did you just make them up in your head?
 
AndreJ said:
Do you have a website or source where you got those numbers from or did you just make them up in your head?
Got them from NFL.com and just added Davis' yards totals up and put it over the total offensive yards for the game...
 
Fiddy said:
Got them from NFL.com and just added Davis' yards totals up and put it over the total offensive yards for the game...

Somehow i question your ability to multiply, add, divide etc.... after your "empty yards" statement that you got from 1 writer from ESPN. Anyways whether you think we need to make a change or not Davis aint going nowhere no time soon. So you can just get used to him being around and i'm done with it i made my point. You can argue with yourself from this point on out. We can butt heads in another thread. Until then...........Go TEXANS!!!!!!!!!!! :banana: :coolb:

6-8 and still improving.
 
AndreJ said:
Somehow i question your ability to multiply, add, divide etc.... after your "empty yards" statement that you got from 1 writer from ESPN. Anyways whether you think we need to make a change or not Davis aint going nowhere no time soon. So you can just get used to him being around and i'm done with it i made my point. You can argue with yourself from this point on out. We can butt heads in another thread. Until then...........Go TEXANS!!!!!!!!!!! :banana: :coolb:

6-8 and still improving.
It's called a calculator so dont worry about any mathmatical errors...

And if you dont like my empty yards comment please enlighten me on how teams can give up a lot of yards but still win games??? The Colts give up a lot of yards, but their defense doesnt give up a lot of points so what do those yards mean...nothing...

And a writer didnt say it, the coach of the playoff bound Atlanta Falcons said it...
 
I haven't bothered to read much of this. But I do have a question regarding Davis:

Is he going to come out next year and predict a 2,000 yard season again?

I'm okay with him being the starter for now. But I don't believe he's the long term answer. If he split carries with another RB, that'd be fine. But he's not a franchise RB in the sense you can count on 20+ carries a game and still expect him to be productive.
 
STEEL BLUE TEXANS said:
Domanick Davis = Kevin Faulk

I think I know what you mean by this, but a bad comparison. Kevin Faulk has never had anywhere near the production of DD. He has never been a feature back and DD has. Kevin Faulk's best season is about half of what DD will do this year.
 
I fumbled through all the threads and actually read them.

Again nothing against Davis.. TEAMS DON'T GAMEPLAN AROUND DAVIS...THEY LET HIM GET THE YARDS ... BEND BUT DON'T BREAK...If teams were worried about Davis.. why is AJ STILL being doubled when Davis is doing all the offensive work? common sense would tell you that teams would bring a safety up and "spy" on davis and in turn open up the offense to the play action pass... sorry but that doesn't happen.

BTW the "empty yards " that is thrown around.. that is what it is that he gets. 200 total yards offense and 1 td .. julius jones ran for 150+ and had 3 TD's that isn't empty yards...

Is it Davis' fault? NO! .. it is just that teams know he won't break one (unless the moon and planets all lineup perfectly) ... If AJ had 200 yards receiving what do you think would happen?
 
The fact that defenses are actually encouraging us to hand off to DD, says everything you need to know about this topic. He isn't the long-term answer.
 
Maybe it's just me but I could swear this is only DD's second year in the league. Everyone says it takes 3 years or so to see if a pick from the draft was worth anything and yet we took DD in the 4th to be a kick returner and special teams player. Sounds like some of you are expecting superman to come in and carry this offense on their back but I thought that's what Carr was for. LOL Great players take time to prove themselves. You have those very few that are natural NFL players and excel as soon as they come into the league. Then you have some that take a little time but once they find that groove are bound for greatness. And of course you have the ones that fall flat on their face. DD is the middle one. Everyone is passing judgement after two years in the league and I think some of your expectations are a bit high for one position considering if this is the way you're going to look at our team then the whole group needs an upgrade and we need to find replacements for everyone, especially Carr in his third year! This argument is a joke and if you wanna talk empty yards then I guess Edge (One of the leading rushers) wouldn't be an upgrade considering everyone is pretty much keying on Peyton, Harrison, Wayne and Stokely and Edges yards are empty. Gimme a break!
 
well for one.. for where we got him and what we got him for.. he has been much better than expected. However, that doesnt make him the franchise back.

two, while the 3 year thing may apply to alot of draft picks, with RBs i think you generally expect results out of them pretty quick.. they do not have long careers. That doesnt mean they dont continue to improve and that by waiting on one you can end up with a good back later.. but its not usually the case with RBs.. from my limited experience anyway.

three, Edge doesnt get empty yards.. they are not covering the receivers and letting edge run because he isnt a big threat.. they are covering the receivers because manning is a BIGGER threat. And if you look at the numbers edge has put up with his "empty yards".. and compare them to DDs numbers.. you will notice that DD is not in Edge's league.

Honestly though.. I think DD COULD be our franchise back.. he as the skills to be one.. the only problem is durability. So far he has shown that he just doesnt have it.
 
RB's take the least amount of time of any position to develop. For the most part, you either have the skills or you don't. DD cannot break tackles consistently and has average speed. He does seem to have good field vision and sometimes exhibits a some quickness through the hole. That is his strength.

He is probably about the 20th-25th best back in the league in terms of ability. With a team that runs first and passes second, we need to do better than that.
 
TheOgre said:
He is probably about the 20th-25th best back in the league in terms of ability. With a team that runs first and passes second, we need to do better than that.

Right now DD is ranked 15th in the league in rushing and we call passing plays 57.9% of the time. We are a passing team. That is not even close to a balanced offense. The total opposite of us in terms of run-pass would be the Steelers. They call run 56.6% of the time. The Steelers run first and pass second, not the Texans.
 
wags said:
Right now DD is ranked 15th in the league in rushing and we call passing plays 57.9% of the time. We are a passing team. That is not even close to a balanced offense.

Reread what I wrote: "He is probably about the 20th-25th best back in the league in terms of ability."
 
wags said:
We are 1-3 when AJ goes over 100 yards receiving this year.
Dont forget to split up the Vikings game. In the first half of that game only Davis touched the ball and we scored 0 points. In the second half of that game, AJ got all his yards and we scored 28 points. So it is really 2-2...

And in the Packers game, AJ got 106 yards on only 6 catches while Davis touched the ball 21 times on rushing plays and 6 times on passing plays. Davis played too big of a role.
 
1000 yard rusher.
Thats all it comes down to. With the way the O-line has been blocking this year along with the fact that we a re usuakky behind and have to pass more to get back into games. He still gets 1000 yards, every year of his NFL carrer 1000 yards so shut up and see what the GM and coaches think should be done about the running game. DD will probably be te starter at the srat of next year and if we have a better O-line I would be shocke dif he had another 1000 yard season, hmmmmmmmmmm. :hmmm:
 
BuffSoldier said:
1000 yard rusher.
Thats all it comes down to. With the way the O-line has been blocking this year along with the fact that we a re usuakky behind and have to pass more to get back into games. He still gets 1000 yards, every year of his NFL carrer 1000 yards so shut up and see what the GM and coaches think should be done about the running game. DD will probably be te starter at the srat of next year and if we have a better O-line I would be shocke dif he had another 1000 yard season, hmmmmmmmmmm. :hmmm:
There is another thread about this subject. The benchmark for a RB nowadays is 1250-1300 yards. You only have to average 62.5 yards per game to get 1000. Not a big deal...
 
1000 yards became the benchmark back when teams played 12-game seasons. That comes to about 83 yards a game. To approximate that in a 16-game schedule, you need 1333 yards a season. It isn't as clean of a number as "1000" so the media still makes a big deal out of 1000 yard seasons. When Davis is routinely topping 1333 yards, then I will give him some props. I don't think he has the stamina, speed, or power to do that though.
 
DomDavis is an adequaete starter in the NFL, probably best being part of RRBC committee system. I will be fine if Davis is the starting RB next year, but if there is a chance to upgrade RB position through the draft or FA then the texans should.
 
caddy said:
DD is giving another game? Gee I thought when a pack
of ya, thought that at the titans game, that you don't
know a thing about our own backs. Boom, open a hole
and he's gone. Get it! No, big deal here. No one in the
NFL looks at the Texans and says... let Davis run the ball
so we can win the game.. Hello :hairpull:
The Titans gave him that long TD so they could get the ball back...
 
Fiddy said:
The Titans gave him that long TD so they could get the ball back...

Total and demonstrable BS. Fisher denied they did and if they were going to give him the TD they would have done it on 1st down, not 2nd down. Oh wait--they really were trying to let him get the TD on 1st down but DD sucks so badly he could only get 3 yards while the Titans were trying to let him score.
 
Yes, the thousand yards per year is not going to cut it. It's nice but alone it's not nearly as meaningful as it looks. Here's what I think of DD's 1,000 yards.

2003: Davis got 1031 and only started 10 games. IMO this was the work of a player who was playing at the level of a "franchise back". He isn't a burner, he's not terribly fast. He just gets positive yards. If you could take what he did and expand that over a full 16 game schedule then he'd have around 1,600 yards (gross oversimplification, I know) and that would have been a monster season. Nobody would be talking about whether or not Davis was the real thing.

2004. He's started 13 games and he's got 927 yards. He's clearly behind 2003's pace. At this rate he's going to finish with around 1100 yards with an additional 6 games where he started. That's not the kind of increase that makes me think "franchise back". Now you can factor in the dents and dings that slow Davis down, and you can of course talk about how the line hasn't got the blocking scheme down. That's absolutely been a factor this year. The net result though is that Davis didn't get it done this year.

2005. If he starts in 2005 from day one and doesn't go down with an injury then I think the guy has to top 1300-1400 yards (1500 would be preferable over 16 games) to continue to hold on to the idea that he's a franchise back and not a role player. Davis I think is an asset and a good one but he's got to produce like a franchise back before I'll be able to call him one.
 
infantrycak said:
Total and demonstrable BS. Fisher denied they did and if they were going to give him the TD they would have done it on 1st down, not 2nd down. Oh wait--they really were trying to let him get the TD on 1st down but DD sucks so badly he could only get 3 yards while the Titans were trying to let him score.
Capers said on his radio show that Fisher probably did give the TD to Davis so they could get a quick score and the have a chance to recover the onside kick. If the stop Davis on 2nd and 3rd down, the Titans never get the ball back and lose. Where did you hear Fisher deny it???
 
Where did you hear Fisher admit it!? This thread is going to go on forever. This talk about empty yards and so on yet not one person has shown any proof of anything other than stats and their own personal opinion and now it looks like it's going to gossip. I understand and respect everyones opinions but I haven't seen or heard anything that makes me change mine as I'm sure everyone else feels the same. So I'm going to stop posting on this one and talk at ya'll later.
 
Back
Top