TheRealJoker
Hall of Fame
I stopped concentrating on the game after the 1st half, did Nelson play well? I noticed Smith was throwing away from him alot.
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
I stopped concentrating on the game after the 1st half, did Nelson play well? I noticed Smith was throwing away from him alot.
I stopped concentrating on the game after the 1st half, did Nelson play well? I noticed Smith was throwing away from him alot.
Smith was throwing away from everyone tonight including his own receivers.
All in all Nelson didn't hurt or help his stock. T. Smith was the loser in that department tonight.
LOL!!! True...but you know Smith may have played himself into our # 40 pick if we choose to go that route...JUST SAYIN![]()
I think the tater tot looked very ordinary with Ginn Jr. on the side lines in a soft cast. Made a difference. I beileve he is a day two guy now.
Nelson played well. He was beat on that one play but most safeties will get beat in those situations from time to time. He moved across the field to fill the open running lane where Pittman had outrun two tacklers and broke outside but could not make the tackle. You can't make every tackle I suppose.
He also took a bad angle on the opening kick-off that Ginn ran back....
But IMO, he's still the number 1 safety coming out...His name wasn't called alot, but you also didn't see him messing up a lot....everyone misses tackles at times so I don't think he really hurt his stock at all...
His angle didn't look that bad, because he would have been in position had he not had a slight tug on the back of his jersey to slow him down. Some people don't think it was a real hold (and I'm not saying it is) but it was enough to keep him from making the play.
I don't want the Texans to draft him @ #8 anymore after watching him last night![]()
DOWN.
He looked slow in comparison. Took bad angles. Late first round, early 2nd at best.
LaRon Landry is #1 in the NFL Draft at safety.
It's so obvious that your comments aren't biased...
Did you see Landry in his bowl game ?
Ive seen LaRon lead LSU in tackles the last 2/3 seasons. I have seen enough if LaRon, and not enough of Nelson. So before you start to play your "im smarter than you because I watch more football" card, dont. I know what im talking about, and LaRon is better than Nelson period.
So one game made you come to that decision ?
speed, battling back when beaten, bad technique, gets by on athletic ability & benefits from a strong supporting cast.
it's impossible to say nelson's stock went down after last night.
Super Mario said:Ive seen LaRon lead LSU in tackles the last 2/3 seasons. I have seen enough if LaRon, and not enough of Nelson.
a player that you freely admitted that you haven't even seen a lot of....
You are saying Nelsons stock dropped because of a few missed tackles in his bowl game, but I recall Landry missing a few in his bowl game as well...So did his stock drop too ? He was also playing No speed Notre Dame...Nelson's team just won the N'tl title last night, and though he missed a tackle.....one whole tackle....you're saying his stock dropped ?
ONE ASSISTED TACKLE thats Reggies box scorecard against OSU. the other games I watched (of Reggie) where against Arkansas in the SEC Championship game (one assisted, one solo, one int.) & LSU (one assisted, two solo) where Landry was clearly the more productive FS (9 solo, 3 assisted).
I was hoping to see more from Reggie, some fullfilment of his potential. Landry is a more complete FS, most ready to enter the NFL therefore #1 prospect at that position. so its not impossible for me given the game last night combined with his big game performances this season to downgrade him from being a top 10 pick (if thats if fact where he has been rated)![]()
ONE ASSISTED TACKLE thats Reggies box scorecard against OSU. the other games I watched (of Reggie) where against Arkansas in the SEC Championship game (one assisted, one solo, one int.) & LSU (one assisted, two solo) where Landry was clearly the more productive FS (9 solo, 3 assisted).
I was hoping to see more from Reggie, some fullfilment of his potential. Landry is a more complete FS, most ready to enter the NFL therefore #1 prospect at that position. so its not impossible for me given the game last night combined with his big game performances this season to downgrade him from being a top 10 pick (if thats if fact where he has been rated)![]()
In bowl games where teams have a month to prepare, good head coaches don't tend to challenge the top playmaker on a defense, so neither guy really were put in too many positions to impact the game. To figure out if guys can play it usually takes watching a guy more than once anyway.nelson and landry had the same gameplan, really. stay in coverage, completely shutdown the ability to pass the ball deep, and let the front 7 do their job. they weren't asked to be playmakers, because they didn't have to be.
I think either would be an enormous asset to the team.
I agree with this statement....
Honestly I wouldn't be upset with either one....
I think Landry is a solid, fundamental safety....I view Nelson as a flare...a spark....
Landry is a hard, hitter that you feel in your bones....Nelson hit's with a pop, the kind that makes you jump out your seat....
I think there are pro's and cons with both of them........But I'm not going to sit here and talk negatively about one, just because I prefer the other one....Neither one have established themselves as the clear cut # 1 safety IMHO.... I just happen to like one over the other....no biggie
But I'm not really a stat guy anyway...I like to actually watch the games, and the player and not judge talent from a stat line....And never mind the fact that Nelson had twice as many INT's on the year as Landry....Just pick out a few games where he didn't have a lot of tackles, and declare him the better FS....
LSU, Arkansas & Ohio State are the games I watched. I base my opinion on those games not just stats (from those games).
I also noticed that Landry played more up on the line & was asked to provide more run support, while Nelson played back more like a centerfielder. it does make it hard to evaluate & come to a clear undisputed grade based on match-ups, schemes and personel. I just don't want to fall into the measureable trap that can become the scoop post combine. I do base my opinion on game film 1st![]()
He also took a bad angle on the opening kick-off that Ginn ran back....
The rushing TD I will give you that he took a bad angle, but not the kickoff.
sorry, but he wasn't going to get ginn. i don't care what angle he took, ginn was gone
it's impossible to say nelson's stock went down after last night.
What kind of tape could you get your hands on, Young Texans fan? Do you know somebody in the NFL or with Ohio State or Florida?
speed, battling back when beaten, bad technique, gets by on athletic ability & benefits from a strong supporting cast.
Another thing about Landry, he actually caused Zenon to drop (but not really after replays) the interception by stripping it out of his hands.