infantrycak
Hall of Fame
SESupergenius said:Why do you think that Aikman is a good measuring stick. In his career he had 165 TD's and 141 Int's, far from a great QB. Just because Aikman has some superbowl rings makes him the best QB??? He's not better than Marino or Manning, yet he has the rings. So you are basically saying that you need the rings to be considered a great QB.
On a little side note here--greatness can be defined in different ways. Like AT says, he looks at it and sees it rather than relies on the stats as much. One thing which was obvious about Aikman was his game massively elevated once he was in the post-season. When opposing D's were greater, when O's were sticking up points, Aikman would perform virtually flawlessly. He had some otherworldly streak of quarters of post-season play without an INT at one point. Playing your greatest when it counts the most is a measuring stick of greatness IMO.
On the flip side, although this is overstated to a degree, look at Manning. I don't give two flips if you have 150 TD's in the regular season if you can't figure out a way to win playoff games except against Denver.