Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

David Carr is 2nd.

David will only get better when the O line can start controling the line of scrimage....Demeco is a animal, Pro-bowler in the making.............
 
Good post. When I watched the game on Sunday, I just wanted to see an improvement from the week before.

QB is probably the best place to start.
 
MYDAUGHTER'STEXANS said:
David will only get better when the O line can start controling the line of scrimage....Demeco is a animal, Pro-bowler in the making.............

I bet the NYG fans are happy Eli isn't waiting around for his OL to start controlling the line of scrimage.......
 
He's doing a lot better, but his numbers are a little inflated from throwing shorter passes. He did also have the snap fumble. I find it really irritating that people think our losses are his fault, but he's no Pro Bowler yet. Let's keep things in perspective. He could start on a lot more teams than a lot of people think, but he's still not at all a top 5 QB. He's not our problem, nor is he the only answer we need. He's one player.
 
I agree, Ryans is a stud for a rookie and I hope he keeps building off of that in the future. He has an uncanny ability to sniff out the ball and make plays. As for Carr, everyone keeps saying the teams goes as Carr goes, so I think the team should start not making serious mistakes that cost the us the game and put us in compromising situations.... :shades: Just kidding, I think they all can get better and build off of the last two weeks.
 
thunderkyss said:
I bet the NYG fans are happy Eli isn't waiting around for his OL to start controlling the line of scrimage.......

I bet NYG fans are happy their defense contributes to their team. And duh--the Giants OL is already controlling things to the tune of 136 yards per game at a 5 ypa clip. Wow, talk about being off target.
 
infantrycak said:
I bet NYG fans are happy their defense contributes to their team. And duh--the Giants OL is already controlling things to the tune of 136 yards per game at a 5 ypa clip. Wow, talk about being off target.

Wow, they gave up 9 sacks, 7 in regulation..... we only gave up 5.... wow, talk about missing the boat........
 
I really had thought your offense would be impressive this year with a healthy DD and the addition of Moulds, but we see how that went (in terms of DD). At this stage of his career, I think Moulds is still a #1 WR, who just happened to have terrible Qb's throwing to him the last few years in a system bent on running the ball and controlling the clock. Yes, I realize you have traditionally been a run oriented team, but with AJ taking on the #1 Wr role, Moulds can really flourish without facing the oppositions top corner. You have Carr throwing to two #1's. I'd look for Carr to continue doing well, assuming the line can keep him on his feet. One can't help to wonder though how having DD and his pass catching from out of the backfield, how that could have taken your offense the next step forward and really put Carr's numbers through the roof. Hopefully if DC continues to do well statistically, that somewhere down the road it can translate into wins. AJ stretching the D with Moulds working underneath and intermediate has loads of potential.
 
Chawky1 said:
I really had thought your offense would be impressive this year with a healthy DD and the addition of Moulds, but we see how that went (in terms of DD). At this stage of his career, I think Moulds is still a #1 WR, who just happened to have terrible Qb's throwing to him the last few years in a system bent on running the ball and controlling the clock. Yes, I realize you have traditionally been a run oriented team, but with AJ taking on the #1 Wr role, Moulds can really flourish without facing the oppositions top corner. You have Carr throwing to two #1's. I'd look for Carr to continue doing well, assuming the line can keep him on his feet. One can't help to wonder though how having DD and his pass catching from out of the backfield, how that could have taken your offense the next step forward and really put Carr's numbers through the roof. Hopefully if DC continues to do well statistically, that somewhere down the road it can translate into wins. AJ stretching the D with Moulds working underneath and intermediate has loads of potential.


Thanks for your input CHAWKY. I would have liked to see us this year with a healthy DD as well, but things like this always seem to happen and it's how you handle the adversity that shows the character of your team. I have to say that Kubes & Co. have been active in finding a suitable replacement on short notice. No one would have thought that he wouldn't be able to play this year, it's a crying shame. As far as AJ & Moulds, I think that they have the ability to be an elite tandem in this league as long as Carr can get the ball to them and has time in the pocket.
 
thunderkyss said:
Wow, they gave up 9 sacks, 7 in regulation..... we only gave up 5.... wow, talk about missing the boat........

and that's because carr has had 4 years of learning how to scramble, and carr has learned to accept that the o-line will never block consistently for him...as to where eli will just stand there and try and make a throw, which is the other reason eli will have more int's than carr at the end of the season...imho. besides, they were playing the eagles. they blitz on every day that ends in "y". eli isn't that mobile.
 
PowerfulDragon said:
Keep in mind that half his stats were earned against the Colts second stringers.


Yeah, I've heard that as well. I also remember hearing at the beginning of the game that we only had one starter out there as well. Maybe they meant a returning starter from last year, but I do remember hearing the announcer say something along those lines. (not that it makes it any easier to swallow)
 
HJam72 said:
He's doing a lot better, but his numbers are a little inflated from throwing shorter passes. He did also have the snap fumble. I find it really irritating that people think our losses are his fault, but he's no Pro Bowler yet. Let's keep things in perspective. He could start on a lot more teams than a lot of people think, but he's still not at all a top 5 QB. He's not our problem, nor is he the only answer we need. He's one player.

Nice balanced post on David Carr.
 
Good for Carr. Hopefully this goodness will help the team along the way. We need players that make other players better.
 
In the first two games of last year,

David Carr

@ Buffalo, Passing: 0 TD, 3 INT, QB rating 12.1 with 5 sacks
Pittsburg, Passing: 1 TD, 0 INT, QB rating 92.9 with 8 sacks

The next two games that year, David Carr was sack 14 times. If the sack count continues to drop and the passer rating hold, we will see some good thing from him. I think he is much better this year. :yahoo:
 
Carr has been improving while Plummer has looked like Jake 1.0 pre-Kubiak. I think it is obvious Kubiak is a heck of a QB coach. Those stats really don't mean much because those are the same stats that said Carr had a better game than Manning did Sunday. If Carr can get the ball upfield in the seams early in the game it will open up the running game as teams can't keep squatting on the run and zoning the middle. If he can, we will go .500 this year. If he can't we are a 4 win team at best.
 
thunderkyss said:
Wow, they gave up 9 sacks, 7 in regulation..... we only gave up 5.... wow, talk about missing the boat........

Geez, as long as we keep turning the ball over and getting blown out in the first half of all of our games, maybe Carr can have the #1 QB rating and get invited to the Pro Bowl with a 0-16 record. Oh and Thunderkyss, its probably not too healthy to correct a Carr apologist moderator.....just spew the party line 'David Is Great. It's Not David's Fault. David Is Fine. Go Texans Go'.

doug ftw
 
Vinny said:
Carr has been improving while Plummer has looked like Jake 1.0 pre-Kubiak. I think it is obvious Kubiak is a heck of a QB coach. Those stats really don't mean much because those are the same stats that said Carr had a better game than Manning did Sunday. If Carr can get the ball upfield in the seams early in the game it will open up the running game as teams can't keep squatting on the run and zoning the middle. If he can, we will go .500 this year. If he can't we are a 4 win team at best.

Everyone knows that the stats for yesterday were exaggerated. They were playing the prevent and Carr blazed um. Does that mean he deserves no credit? No... like you said, he just need to perform like that earlier in the game. Kubiak really wanted to get the running game going, but that didnt happen. That limited our options. Thats the only problem with his offensive scheme... you need a smart O-line and patient RBs. The QB will get playing time after the run is established.

Judging things on a play by play basis, Carr deserves credit for his stats. He really proved a lot with both the AJ TD and the Daniels TD. He is showing that he is improved.
 
Second Honeymoon said:
Geez, as long as we keep turning the ball over and getting blown out in the first half of all of our games, maybe Carr can have the #1 QB rating and get invited to the Pro Bowl with a 0-16 record. Oh and Thunderkyss, its probably not too healthy to correct a Carr apologist moderator.....just spew the party line 'David Is Great. It's Not David's Fault. David Is Fine. Go Texans Go'.

doug ftw
being a moderator has nothing to do with having a 'pro Texan' or 'pro Carr' opinion. Fans can think what they want...being a mod has zero to do with anything in that area.

No need to spew your hatred at the people who help keep this place clean enough and mature enough as most of the league has given up moderating mb's (because it really is a pain - trust me on that).....and the fans end up having to rely on private fan sites. Say what you want but the personal stuff needs to go to the side. Keep in mind that all I have to do is hit a button and I can solve any problem that doesn't include cooperation. It's hard enough keeping the rival trolls straight without fighting our fans.
 
Vinny said:
being a moderator has nothing to do with having a 'pro Texan' or 'pro Carr' opinion. Fans can think what they want...being a mod has zero to do with anything in that area.

No need to spew your hatred at the people who help keep this place clean enough and mature enough as most of the league has given up moderating mb's (because it really is a pain - trust me on that).....and have to rely on private fan sites. Say what you want but the personal stuff needs to go to the side. Keep in mind that all I have to do is hit a button and I can solve any problem that doesn't include cooperation. It's hard enough keeping the rival trolls straight without fighting our fans.

There was no hatred in my post so I dont have anything to worry about.

Maybe once the organization starts making positive moves there will be a lot less negative stuff to address. I am just kool aid-free and proud of it.

doug ftw

p.s. many times I have given props to moderators for the thankless work they do.
 
Vinny said:
being a moderator has nothing to do with having a 'pro Texan' or 'pro Carr' opinion. Fans can think what they want...being a mod has zero to do with anything in that area.

No need to spew your hatred at the people who help keep this place clean enough and mature enough as most of the league has given up moderating mb's (because it really is a pain - trust me on that).....and the fans end up having to rely on private fan sites. Say what you want but the personal stuff needs to go to the side. Keep in mind that all I have to do is hit a button and I can solve any problem that doesn't include cooperation. It's hard enough keeping the rival trolls straight without fighting our fans.

It's not really the rival trolls that bother me.
 
thunderkyss said:
I bet the NYG fans are happy Eli isn't waiting around for his OL to start controlling the line of scrimage.......


There are precious few posts that will draw a response from me - as evidenced by my whopping post total.

But this is quite possibly one of the most ridiculous statements I've read on here and trust me, I've reads loads of stupid posts.

No offense intended Thunderkyss, just pass the dutchie, please.


Peek
 
Second Honeymoon said:
There was no hatred in my post so I dont have anything to worry about.

Maybe once the organization starts making positive moves there will be a lot less negative stuff to address. I am just kool aid-free and proud of it.

doug ftw

p.s. many times I have given props to moderators for the thankless work they do.
you can express disdain with the franchise as much as you want, but when you imply the mods are treating you (or anyone who carries your opinion) different because they reside on the other side of your argument I just view this as an agenda. People come here with various agendas from spam to just wanting to see chaotic responses, but we encourage debate about the team and can't get it with this place full of flip personal agendas. That goes from "homer guy" to "waaa my pee pee hurt guy". Most of us fall in the middle somewhere but all of us need to help keep this a place worth hosting. It just takes the smallest effort really.
 
Carr has show alot more poise in the pocket.. he still has a ways to go but he has definatly looked alot better.

And to all the people saying he only has good stats cause he dumps it off.. I disagree. I have seen too many QBs that cant make a short 5-7 yard pass.
 
Chawky1 said:
I.... Yes, I realize you have traditionally been a run oriented team, but with AJ taking on the #1 Wr role, Moulds can really flourish without facing the oppositions top corner. You have Carr throwing to two #1's.....

Vinny said:
...If Carr can get the ball upfield in the seams early in the game it will open up the running game as teams can't keep squatting on the run and zoning the middle....


Paging Ibar.... I think you just had two people "verbally" agree with you to have the pass setup the run. (I'm sure there are many more that agree behind the scenes, m. board, as well.)

As for the original post... agree with some stats may be misleading, and there may have been some garbage time to adjust those stats.... but I tell you what - I would rather have that than the "give up" attitude or lousy stats on the team.

.... but I'd like a win as well - as I'm sure the team would. :redtowel:
 
Vinny said:
you can express disdain with the franchise as much as you want, but when you imply the mods are treating you (or anyone who carries your opinion) different because they reside on the other side of your argument I just view this as an agenda. People come here with various agendas from spam to just wanting to see chaotic responses, but we encourage debate about the team and can't get it with this place full of flip personal agendas. That goes from "homer guy" to "waaa my pee pee hurt guy". Most of us fall in the middle somewhere but all of us need to help keep this a place worth hosting. It just takes the smallest effort really.

kick his a** vinny!!!! ha!!! :cowboy1:
 
A4toZ said:
Paging Ibar.... I think you just had two people "verbally" agree with you to have the pass setup the run. (I'm sure there are many more that agree behind the scenes, m. board, as well.)

As for the original post... agree with some stats may be misleading, and there may have been some garbage time to adjust those stats.... but I tell you what - I would rather have that than the "give up" attitude or lousy stats on the team.

.... but I'd like a win as well - as I'm sure the team would. :redtowel:

make that three...i think ibar is a smart guy.
 
bigTEXan8 said:
and that's because carr has had 4 years of learning how to scramble, and carr has learned to accept that the o-line will never block consistently for him...as to where eli will just stand there and try and make a throw, which is the other reason eli will have more int's than carr at the end of the season...imho. besides, they were playing the eagles. they blitz on every day that ends in "y". eli isn't that mobile.

Eli will have more TDs & Ws than Carr as well.......


& I'm comparing Carr against Eli, both against the Eagles.
 
thunderkyss said:
Eli will have more TDs & Ws than Carr as well.......


& I'm comparing Carr against Eli, both against the Eagles.
For about 50 minutes against the Eagles, Carr acctually had better stats. Obviously Eli exploded in the 4th, but dont forget you need a defense to get you the ball back after you score. The Giants had that, we didnt.
 
thunderkyss said:
I bet the NYG fans are happy Eli isn't waiting around for his OL to start controlling the line of scrimage.......
Yea too bad Jeremy Shockey, Tiki Barber, Plexico (I am 6-5 throw it up to me when rushed) Burress were not on Carrs team when he first got in the league.

David Carr is better then Eli Manning.
 
Vinny said:
Carr has been improving while Plummer has looked like Jake 1.0 pre-Kubiak. I think it is obvious Kubiak is a heck of a QB coach. Those stats really don't mean much because those are the same stats that said Carr had a better game than Manning did Sunday. If Carr can get the ball upfield in the seams early in the game it will open up the running game as teams can't keep squatting on the run and zoning the middle. If he can, we will go .500 this year. If he can't we are a 4 win team at best.

You make it sound as if you're placing the onus for our poor running game on Carr's deficiencies. Isn't the Broncos system based on using the run to set up the pass, and not vice versa? Not trying to argue or call you out, but just generally curious as to whether it's the other way around.

You have to admit Carr is looking downfield much more often instead of dumping it off all the time, albeit not in the 'seams'. Most of his throws have been 5 or 6 yard darts, but he's shown great accuracy on his longer throws as well. I haven't seen him come out throwing our receivers uncatchable balls.
 
blockhead83 said:
You make it sound as if you're placing the onus for our poor running game on Carr's deficiencies. Isn't the Broncos system based on using the run to set up the pass, and not vice versa? Not trying to argue or call you out, but just generally curious as to whether it's the other way around.

You have to admit Carr is looking downfield much more often instead of dumping it off all the time, albeit not in the 'seams'. Most of his throws have been 5 or 6 yard darts, but he's shown great accuracy on his longer throws as well. I haven't seen him come out throwing our receivers uncatchable balls.
Yes it is.
 
blockhead83 said:
You make it sound as if you're placing the onus for our poor running game on Carr's deficiencies. Isn't the Broncos system based on using the run to set up the pass, and not vice versa? Not trying to argue or call you out, but just generally curious as to whether it's the other way around.

You have to admit Carr is looking downfield much more often instead of dumping it off all the time, albeit not in the 'seams'. Most of his throws have been 5 or 6 yard darts, but he's shown great accuracy on his longer throws as well. I haven't seen him come out throwing our receivers uncatchable balls.
Football is a game of countermeasures. You have to do both run and pass because teams can take away any one-dimensional strength you may have unless of course you have a true superstar like Earl Campbell or John Elway that can impose their will on you. We don't have one of them.
 
Anyone else notice that Carr is the only one in the top 5 quarterbacks that hasn't won a game so far? The fact that he is able to have a 100+ Qb rating and still be winnless says something...

I'm just not sure what it says exactly.
 
NJ Texan said:
Anyone else notice that Carr is the only one in the top 5 quarterbacks that hasn't won a game so far? The fact that he is able to have a 100+ Qb rating and still be winnless says something...

I'm just not sure what it says exactly.
It means you have to actually watch a game to figure out who played well when the game is on the line.
 
NJ Texan said:
Anyone else notice that Carr is the only one in the top 5 quarterbacks that hasn't won a game so far? The fact that he is able to have a 100+ Qb rating and still be winnless says something...

I'm just not sure what it says exactly.
It says our Defense is terrible..............in the last 2 games.

I dont think we are as bad on D as we have shown, I mean who does look good vs the Eagles and Colts.

Washington will be our 1st win.
 
PowerfulDragon said:
Keep in mind that half his stats were earned against the Colts second stringers.


Yeah,
after his CENTER and two of his STARTING O-Linemen were taken out with injuries. In other words Carrs protection was deminished. What's your point again?

DH
 
Vinny said:
It means you have to actually watch a game to figure out who played well when the game is on the line.


Translation: Everything that's wrong with the Texans..ISN'T Carr's fault.

DH
 
NJ Texan said:
Anyone else notice that Carr is the only one in the top 5 quarterbacks that hasn't won a game so far? The fact that he is able to have a 100+ Qb rating and still be winnless says something...

I'm just not sure what it says exactly.

It means he's not throwing interceptions and that the Texans have been far enough behind that the safties are playing deep.
 
"He's [Carr] got to play for four quarters," Kubiak said. "I'm gonna be on his butt until he becomes a four-quarter player."

In my mind, this quote from Kubiak speaks volumes over Carr's stats in two losses. :hmmm:
 
Vinny said:
It means you have to actually watch a game to figure out who played well when the game is on the line.
Keep in mind its difficult to play hard with the game is on the line when you are down by 40 points.
 
indeed, something else is wrong witht the texans, the defense isn't as good as it was the first three years, still doesn't mean that david carr is any good, the stats are inflated because in both games the opposing team had no worry of losing the game, true the two teams are playoff bound, but the texans didn't even look like worthy opponents, that says alot about where this franchise is in it fifth year
 
Back
Top