Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
TJ had a good game but lets not go that far. Most of TJs passes were slant routes and timing routes that are hard to defend. Dunta was 1v1 a lot during them game and had a good game. Cornerbacks are not expected to be perfect, and Dunta was not perfect but he had a good game and was never burned for a big play. If you break no big plays you didn't make the corner look "silly".Cincinnatikid said:TJ was making dunta look silly and taht is why the bengals ended up winning.
I also find Chad Johnson very entertaining. I mean the clown suit, the gold teeth, the dancing. He is cocky and talks alot but I think it is in good fun. I like him. But I loved seeing CC Brown drop the hammer on him and seeing the confused "I just got knocked the **** out" look on Chad's face. That was worth tuning in for. It was even better when the catch Chad had made got called back so he took that huge hit for nothing.Huge said:I'm kinda torn on Johnson. A lot of the stuff he does seems to be in good fun (I thought the Peptol Bismol bit was hilarious). Even the "list" was meant as a joke as every Bengal player has his own list (their kicker is checking off celebrities he's trying to get dates with).
If Johnson's intent is to embarass his opponents for the sake of drawing attention to himself, then it's clearly another matter. But maybe he's just goofing around. I haven't been able to tell the difference yet.
That's because Chad is well liked around the league. He has fun with the game, and doesn't act like a pompus *** like TO or Moss.Goldeagle said:Funny how this guy does not get talked about as a punk with the likes of TO and or Moss.
Well he cannot check off our guys, he had a mediocre game nothing special at all!
The Browns locker room erupted with laughter when they got the Pepto in the mail. They understand Chad is trying to be an entertainer.Huge said:If Johnson's intent is to embarass his opponents for the sake of drawing attention to himself, then it's clearly another matter. But maybe he's just goofing around. I haven't been able to tell the difference yet.
Wolf said:I saw a quote from him after the game and he said he was doubled and triple teamed at times. He said the Texans were throwing exotic coverages at him.
Wolf said:I saw a quote from him after the game and he said he was doubled and triple teamed at times.. He said the Texans were throwing exotic coverages at him.
I guess he has a hard time giving credit where credit is due
touttail said:I seen very little double team and no triple team coverage on him. MColeman, PBuc, or Petey was covering him one on one during the game.
bobby 119C![]()
Your forgeting Chad had over 10 less yards per catch than he has had in his previous few games, ZERO touchdowns, and no big plays. Chad Johnson was a non-factor in this game, compared to what he normally is.bengalsown said:Yeah, Chad sure did get stopped.
He only had 7 catches![]()
BTW, he checked No.
LBC_Justin said:Your forgeting Chad had over 10 less yards per catch than he has had in his previous few games, ZERO touchdowns, and no big plays. Chad Johnson was a non-factor in this game, compared to what he normally is.
Little short passes build stats but they won't lead you to the land of elite reciever.
Chad was glad the team won but disappointed in his own personal results.
Chad was a factor in that game as the Bengals had several long drives keeping our offense off the field. Do you ever apply your arguments both ways? All we do is throw little short passes and heck, we don't win.LBC_Justin said:Your forgeting Chad had over 10 less yards per catch than he has had in his previous few games, ZERO touchdowns, and no big plays. Chad Johnson was a non-factor in this game, compared to what he normally is.
Little short passes build stats but they won't lead you to the land of elite reciever.
Chad was glad the team won but disappointed in his own personal results.
Goldeagle said:Funny how this guy does not get talked about as a punk with the likes of TO and or Moss.
Well he cannot check off our guys, he had a mediocre game nothing special at all!
HoustonFan said:HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! This is very true. And things haven't been all that good this season, CJ. Shame, shame. AH WELL!!! lol @ CJ.
His play did not lead to the single coverage of Housh. His reputation did, the threat of what he can do did.The Misfortune teller said:Chad checked no for the 7 catches for 67 yards, and the single coverage on Housh. To say he was a nonfactor is stupid
Our Passing game is pathetic. Right now we don't have a #1 reciever. Not much else I can say. Hard to argue anything but that.Vinny said:Chad was a factor in that game as the Bengals had several long drives keeping our offense off the field. Do you ever apply your arguments both ways? All we do is throw little short passes and heck, we don't win.