Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

Bryan Hoyer Fan Club

Impressive start to your posting history. Showing off your intelligence? :sarcasm:

Did you start off with your new classmates in 5th grade the same way a few months ago?

He said, "retarded." Must be Republican. At any rate I'd resent that if I were anyone but me. :D
 
All thrown behind the receivers ...
Which is why Hoyer deserves some of the blame.. But the WR's don't get an out just because the pass isn't 100% perfect. If you get your hands on a ball late in the game, make the ******* catch. None of the passes were perfect but all of them looked catchable. I'm not a Hoyer fan but I don't pin this loss entirely on him.
 
A good portion of those balls were very much catchable..his placement was bad overall in those last 2 drives but many were definitely catchable. the one he threw to Shorts that he dropped when he got lit up was right on the money that was a 1st down throw by Hoyer that would've extended that drive... The one he threw to Nuk that he dropped was behind him a little but very catchable and also was a 1st down throw..

There was a throw deep and the 1 late in the game that he missed Washington on...dude was under seige and got lit up both times literally the split second after he released that ball both times... U can't fault the guy for errant throws in those situations..
I would agree that you SHOULDN'T, but you can see for yourself that anyone who is not Great is worthless to these guys. There is no good, just GREAT or BAD.
 
I would agree that you SHOULDN'T, but you can see for yourself that anyone who is not Great is worthless to these guys. There is no good, just GREAT or BAD.

That is not true at all... I've never heard anyone accuse Hoyer of being great
 
Here was Buffalo's offense in the 3rd quarter plus first half of 4th quarter in a one-score game...

3 plays, 8 yards (punt)
6 plays, 8 yards (punt)
7 plays, 59 yards (missed FG)
3 plays, 0 yards (punt)
4 plays, 22 yards (punt)
3 plays, 4 yards (punt)

That's 26 plays for 99 yards and 0 points. So how did our offense respond to the defense standing up?

5 plays, 19 yards (punt)
6 plays, 13 yards (punt)
6 plays, 15 yards (punt)
6 plays, 83 yards (TD)
3 plays, -1 yard (punt)
3 plays, 4 yards (punt)

That's 29 plays for 133 yards and 8 points. Our defense stood up and held Buffalo on 6 straight drives and we only managed 1 scoring drive during that span.
Soooo during that stretch we got in the endzone and they did not...
...what's your point?
 
Soooo during that stretch we got in the endzone and they did not...
...what's your point?

The point is....

Yes! You heard me right.

I believe we have a GOOD QB at the helm now and I'm anxious to see where he goes from here.

He is currently ranked 14th by one metric (one of the QBR type ratings) with 3 of those above him having completed less than 10 passes making him ABOVE AVERAGE

!http://www.nfl.com/stats/categoryst...447263-s=PASSING_PASSER_RATING&qualified=true


...that post is a vucking joke.
 
This game was lost because the same defense that shut down Drew Brees couldn't contain Tyrod-freakin'-Taylor.
/thread
 
This game was lost because the same defense that shut down Drew Brees couldn't contain Tyrod-freakin'-Taylor.
/thread
So. It doesn't make Hoyer a good QB. And that's exactly the point to be made here. If the defense isn't Raven-esque like it has been the last 4 weeks, Brian Hoyer isn't winning you a football game.
 
So. It doesn't make Hoyer a good QB. And that's exactly the point to be made here. If the defense isn't Raven-esque like it has been the last 4 weeks, Brian Hoyer isn't winning you a football game.
I guess my point is that there's enough "blame" to go around.
If you have, supposedly, one of the best defenses in the league and, also supposedly, the best defensive player in the NFL, and they let Buffalo run all over them for 140 (at a 5 yds/att clip), only manage one sack. and let Flacco's former backup throw for three TDs and run for another that's not ALL on the QB.

Again, I never said Hoyer would be a Brady or a Rodgers. I've said before, if O'Brien is going to roll with Hoyer - and I think he will for this season and possibly the next - we're gonna need a stud at RB and, to borrow your term, a Raven-esque defense if we're gonna win.
 
Last edited:
So. It doesn't make Hoyer a good QB. And that's exactly the point to be made here. If the defense isn't Raven-esque like it has been the last 4 weeks, Brian Hoyer isn't winning you a football game.
3 TDs in a game makes you GOOD. More makes you better. NOBODY said he was GREAT! Not even me. But he's NOT GARBAGE like many think ANY QB who is not GREAT AT THE MOMENT is. The standards are ridiculous.
 
Well, Hoyer is like any other player, if he does well, I love him, if he doesn't, I'll say horrible nasty things about him in here. Football fans, during the heat of a season, sometimes have very short memories. In this case, I'll forget about his ineffectiveness in the past and celebrate his current status as a decent QB if he keeps it up. Yall forget to soon the lesson we learned from the Schaub deal. A whole lot of us hated that deal, hated Schaub before he even put on a uniform, but once he got our offense going we seemed to forgot a lot of our hate.

Consider me a fence sitter on the subject of Hoyer though.
That is reasonable. What happened? LOL! for those who think I'm serious.
 
Soooo during that stretch we got in the endzone and they did not...
...what's your point?

The point is we had 6 possessions (multiple with good field position) to take the lead and all we could do was tie.

You certainly cannot absolve the defense of its play, but there was a very long stretch in the 2nd half where we got a bunch of defensive stops and had a great chance to take control of the game and did not.
 
The point is we had 6 possessions (multiple with good field position) to take the lead and all we could do was tie.

You certainly cannot absolve the defense of its play, but there was a very long stretch in the 2nd half where we got a bunch of defensive stops and had a great chance to take control of the game and did not.


Come on, we all knew going into the season it would take a herculean effort by the defense for this team to play winning football. Yesterday Hoyer had a pedestrian day, which is all you can expect from him. The defense on the other hand, they were just bad in the first half which ended up being too much for this offense to overcome. If you expect Hoyer to play like Brady, or Brees, or Rodgers, you're going to be disappointed every time he takes the field. This loss is on the defense. 21 points was more than enough to win the last 4 games, should have been this time too if the defense would have showed up in the first half.
 
Come on, we all knew going into the season it would take a herculean effort by the defense for this team to play winning football. Yesterday Hoyer had a pedestrian day, which is all you can expect from him. The defense on the other hand, they were just bad in the first half which ended up being too much for this offense to overcome. If you expect Hoyer to play like Brady, or Brees, or Rodgers, you're going to be disappointed every time he takes the field. This loss is on the defense. 21 points was more than enough to win the last 4 games, should have been this time too if the defense would have showed up in the first half.

The defense is not going to win every game or hold every opponent under 20. Ain't gonna happen. Sometimes the offense is going to have to step up and win a game. And I think that is all anyone is saying. Hoyer is not capable of stepping up and winning a game. Pedestrian is as good as he's gonna get, and that ain't good enough.
 
People have been ridiculing Hoyer, and perhaps it's rightfully so, but the WR's have to help him out. 2nd to last drive: the ball to Washington wasn't perfect but Nate got both hands on it and didn't catch it. The ball to Hopkins on that drive should have been caught. The ball to Shorts late in the game (can't recall if it was that drive or not) should have been caught. Catch one of those three balls and there is at least a chance of a different outcome to the game today.
Those were horrible passes. When a receiver's body and momentum is going one way and as a QB you throw the ball to the wrong shoulder with the momentum of the ball going the complete opposite way, that error belongs to the QB. People who really know football understand that completion % is not the be all end all. Throwing a ball where the receiver gets YAC and other ball placement items are what are important. Hoyer has the most deceiving stats imaginable. Cam Newton's passing numbers might not be great, but there is no question he makes game winning plays for his team and is my MVP unlike Hoyerrible.
 
Last edited:
He's a game manager and nothing else.. always has been so I don't know why people get upset when he keeps showing that.

He's a QB that you have to keep in a positive down and distance and give a lead to and not have to bring you back from a deficit too often, because he sucks at driving the ball down field.. He doesn't have the arm or the accuracy to do it.

Our defense played like crap today, but I do give some credit to the Bills playcalling.. So that put Hoyer in a uncomfortable position right there from the get go..

Long story short.. was Hoyer the sole reason we lost.. no, but he is why we won't consistently win until we find a franchise QB.. because your defense is going to have days like this no matter how good they are (that's just how today's league is) and in those games you need a QB who can carry you to a victory.

Well said, man. Yesterday was the best you'll ever see from Brian Hoyer. This guy is another Trent Dilfer that needs high performing players and squads to succeed. He's never going to be a QB that can put a team on his back and will them to win, so the best you can hope for is yesterday's performance from him but much better play from defense, special teams, and the running game.

That's exactly what it is...the back up qb is always the fan favorite until he plays that is.

The problem is that our starting QBs have been nothing but backup caliber the last couple of seasons.

I get how the fan base wants to invest their hopes in a young QB taken early in the draft. The problem is if they do take one, it won't be the one the fan base wants. They'll expect him to 'win now' instead of allowing him to develop.

David Carr regurgitated.

DC was a very unique situation for an expansion team. I would hope this franchise learned a few lessons from that experience, like giving a rookie QB a QB coach, decent line, and some guidance on how to be a leader. Maybe even give the young dude some time to develop before throwing him to the wolves.

The defense is not going to win every game or hold every opponent under 20. Ain't gonna happen. Sometimes the offense is going to have to step up and win a game. And I think that is all anyone is saying. Hoyer is not capable of stepping up and winning a game. Pedestrian is as good as he's gonna get, and that ain't good enough.

This is exactly it, as well. We have to temper expectations about QBs like Hoyer. Yesterday is as good as he's going to get, so expecting anything above and beyond is just unrealistic. Blame O'Brien for him being our starter, our defense for not being able to hold the Bills to lower score, the special teams for not running back a kick for a score, the running game for not opening up some big plays, but keep it real about Hoyer. Yesterday was a career day for that dude, because he's never going to be any better than that.

Only in Houston can a perennial mediocre un-clutch QB have a fan club. Myopic or pathetic, but sad nonetheless.
 

So you're arguing with leprechauns? I see no one around here arguing it is ALL on the QB.
I don't see anyone around here (and admittedly I haven't visited the gameday thread) mentioning the fact that the winning TD was scored by a guy that was WIDE-azz open either.
The theme seems to be why didn't Hoyer make up for the defenses screw up?
 
Those were horrible passes. When a receiver's body and momentum is going one way and as a QB you throw the ball to the wrong shoulder with the momentum of the ball going the complete opposite way, that error belongs to the QB. People who really know football understand that completion % is not the be all end all. Throwing a ball where the receiver gets YAC and other ball placement items are what are important. Hoyer has the most deceiving stats imaginable. Cam Newton's passing numbers might not be great, but there is no question he makes game winning plays for his team and is my MVP unlike Hoyerrible.
I'm not saying they were good passes. The WR's still had a chance to make the play on all three balls and didn't. I don't even care about YAC. Just make the play and get a first down. The ball to Shorts was good, he just took a licking and couldn't hold onto it. The pass to Washington was horrible, no doubt, but I can't be the only one who saw that Washington got both hands on it. Make the catch & move the chains. Same thing with the Hopkins ball, that was a ball I expect him to catch. If we expect Hoyer to be MVP good, then we're going to be disappointed every game. Cam Newton was a #1 pick and is a franchise QB, Hoyer is not. In order for us to win with Hoyer, we're going to need someone to step up and make a catch on those balls. Maybe I just got tired of hearing that the Texans lead the league in dropped passes yesterday. If that's what you expect from the WR's, then they didn't disappoint late in the game.
 
The defense is not going to win every game or hold every opponent under 20. Ain't gonna happen. Sometimes the offense is going to have to step up and win a game. And I think that is all anyone is saying. Hoyer is not capable of stepping up and winning a game. Pedestrian is as good as he's gonna get, and that ain't good enough.

Well then you're going to be disappointed.
 
3 TDs in a game makes you GOOD. More makes you better. NOBODY said he was GREAT! Not even me. But he's NOT GARBAGE like many think ANY QB who is not GREAT AT THE MOMENT is. The standards are ridiculous.
Ryan Fitzpatrick threw 6 TDs in a game. Matt Flynn threw 6, Gary Hogeboom 5. Talk about ridiculous standards. Those aren't good QBs either.

Brian Hoyer was throwing behind receivers the whole game. He underthrew 2 deep balls where the receiver had his man beat both times and would have been TDs but Hoyer couldn't get it there. 3 possessions in the 4th quarter with the game on the line, he leads the Texans to 13 yards total offense and doesn't get them past their own 20 yard line. I could go on and on but you'll just pull some random stat out of your ass and declare him the king of good.

Brian Hoyer didn't lose this particular game against Buffalo, not on his own, but he sure as hell didn't win it either. If the defense isn't playing lights out and winning games, Brian Hoyer is not going to. Brian Hoyer is NOT a good QB.
 
Only in Houston do fans pick apart a 300 yds passing & 3 TDs performance as not being good enough..unbelievable....
 
Only in Houston do fans pick apart a 300 yds passing & 3 TDs performance as not being good enough..unbelievable....
How many times have you seen a QB throw for 300+, 400 yards in a game and lose?

Fan-freaking-tastic!!! The great Brian Hoyer threw for 293 yards and 3 TDs in a loss. I guess we're on the right track.

Never mind that he couldn't do jackshit in the 4th quarter where they could have taken the lead or tied. He was 0-7 in those three 4th quarter drives the Texans never got beyond their own 20.

Brian Hoyer is not the answer and I just don't get how anybody thinks he could be. He's not good. Not saying I don't hope he throws 6 TDs against the Pats next week. I'm rooting for him because he's who we've got. But he's not good.
 
Only in Houston do fans pick apart a 300 yds passing & 3 TDs performance as not being good enough..unbelievable....

Are all yards created equal? Are the defenses approaching things the same throughout?

More to the point, does anyone here feel confidant, with time running out and we need 80 yards and a TD, with Hoyer behind center?

Because I don't think only fans in Houston would pick that apart as not being good enough.
 
Are all yards created equal? Are the defenses approaching things the same throughout?

More to the point, does anyone here feel confidant, with time running out and we need 80 yards and a TD, with Hoyer behind center?

Because I don't think only fans in Houston would pick that apart as not being good enough.

Mostly it depends on how that offense has been playing that day, but to answer your question, no i'm not all that confident in any qb that has to drive his team down 80+ yds for a TD as time is running out.. whether it be Brady, Rodgers or a prime Manning..just too many variables & its a totally different animal from driving a team into FG range vs. for a TD; it's just exponentially more difficult to do. It's the difference between Brady having 6-7 SB rings instead of 4..It's the difference in alot of teams over the years..some with great qbs..some with bad qbs winning big games.

Defenses approach things differently in those situations yes..but so do offenses...playcalling changes on both sides.
 
How many times have you seen a QB throw for 300+, 400 yards in a game and lose?

Fan-freaking-tastic!!! The great Brian Hoyer threw for 293 yards and 3 TDs in a loss. I guess we're on the right track.

Never mind that he couldn't do jackshit in the 4th quarter where they could have taken the lead or tied. He was 0-7 in those three 4th quarter drives the Texans never got beyond their own 20.

Brian Hoyer is not the answer and I just don't get how anybody thinks he could be. He's not good. Not saying I don't hope he throws 6 TDs against the Pats next week. I'm rooting for him because he's who we've got. But he's not good.

Yeah..b/c the offense was the only side of the ball that played in the 4th...b/c the offense was out there defending Charles Clay in the seam in the 4th..or should i say not defending him.

& it's not that i think he's the answer...It just seems patently ridiculous for folks to be in here belittling a guy who posted a 90 something rating with no TO's to be blaming him for your team's loss............... when your defense gave up 30 pts & couldn't stop the opposing offense for ****.
 
No gymnastics involved, I just don't cling to oversubscribed NFL axioms is all. Never have especially when my eyes tell me otherwise.

No, you just subscribe to calling things oversubscribed NFL axioms and blaming media and all other manner of things instead of looking at your QB with two minutes left and saying, "go ahead, lead".
 
No, you just subscribe to calling things oversubscribed NFL axioms and blaming media and all other manner of things instead of looking at your QB with two minutes left and saying, "go ahead, lead".

lol, don't get mad at me b/c your a sheep & you bought into hook line and sinker...
 
Yeah..b/c the offense was the only side of the ball that played in the 4th...b/c the offense was out there defending Charles Clay in the seam in the 4th..or should i say not defending him.

& it's not that i think he's the answer...It just seems patently ridiculous for folks to be in here belittling a guy who posted a 90 something rating with no TO's to be blaming him for your team's loss............... when your defense gave up 30 pts & couldn't stop the opposing offense for ****.

Brian Hoyer didn't lose this particular game against Buffalo, not on his own, but he sure as hell didn't win it either. If the defense isn't playing lights out and winning games, Brian Hoyer is not going to. Brian Hoyer is NOT a good QB.
 
Brian Hoyer didn't lose this particular game against Buffalo, not on his own, but he sure as hell didn't win it either. If the defense isn't playing lights out and winning games, Brian Hoyer is not going to. Brian Hoyer is NOT a good QB.
This is what I think we can all agree upon. Hoyer is not going to single-handedly win us football games. He's not going to carry this football team on his back like Aaron Rodgers or Tom Brady can. If we're going to continue winning this year, we're going to need the defense to not allow Charles Clay to catch a 50-yard TD pass late in the game. We also might need a WR to make a catch that's behind him to keep a drive moving. Neither happened. Hoyer is who we thought he was when we signed him; an average NFL QB.
 
Fan-freaking-tastic!!! The great Brian Hoyer threw for 293 yards and 3 TDs in a loss. I guess we're on the right track.

Never mind that he couldn't do jackshit in the 4th quarter where they could have taken the lead or tied.

I wonder how many drops we had there in the 4th qtr.

I don't know what the answer is, but I remember several drops & I think quite a few in the 4th.

I know many of the passes were off target, but just using the rules we'd use for any other QB/WR... if it git his hands, should have been caught.

I just rewatched that 4 & out possession. The first pass was off Nate's fingertips (Shorts also slowed down on his route which compromised Washington's route. Had Shorts not impeded Washington, Nate could have been in a better position to make the catch). Then the ball low & behind Nuk... if there was no pass rush, Hoyer probably could have thrown a better ball.

Then the one he threw outside when Shorts was looking inside... route combo looked like it was designed to get Shorts open to the outside. There was also a safety in the middle... maybe Hoyer threw that ball where it was supposed to go.

The last one, he was hit as he was thrown.

180 degrees from where I was this morning. Yes. I know. I'm still not on the Hoyer train, but maybe it wasn't him that didn't step up in that game.
 
Only in Houston do fans pick apart a 300 yds passing & 3 TDs performance as not being good enough..unbelievable....
I understand the desire for great, but refusing to recognize good or average play is frustrating for those who see the entire spectrum.
 
I understand the desire for great, but refusing to recognize good or average play is frustrating for those who see the entire spectrum.

You don't see the entire spectrum though. So quit lying about that. You ignore the guy constantly throwing behind receivers, overthrowing, under throwing, padding stats in garbage time, against crap defenses, not being able to throw his team on his shoulders and go win a game on a day his defense needs him and is having a bad day, you totally ignore all of that.

The Carolina Panthers defense had a bad day Sunday. Cam Newton leads his team to TDs twice in the 4th quarter for the lead and the win. Brian Hoyer's not doing that.

You think posting Hoyer's QB rating and declaring him a good QB is the entire spectrum? Now you're just trolling. And if you're on this Hoyer is good BS just to get a rise out of people, then what a childish bunch of BS that is, and you are nothing but a troll.

Again, he's not "the" reason the Texans lost Sunday. I'm not saying that. But he didn't do anything to win it either. 3 4th quarter drives that could have given them the lead or tied it, they gain 13 yards, don't get the ball past the 20. Texans D gives up 38 to the Saints last week, you think Hoyer's going to win that game like Cam did? Not a freaking chance. He's not good.

This is what I think we can all agree upon. Hoyer is not going to single-handedly win us football games. He's not going to carry this football team on his back like Aaron Rodgers or Tom Brady can. If we're going to continue winning this year, we're going to need the defense to not allow Charles Clay to catch a 50-yard TD pass late in the game. We also might need a WR to make a catch that's behind him to keep a drive moving. Neither happened. Hoyer is who we thought he was when we signed him; an average NFL QB.

I don't disagree with any of that. My argument is against the OPs claim that #7 is a good QB. He's not.
 
And my argument is that you and many others have no middle ground in a bipolar world. Your an on-off switch and I'm a rheostat (dimmer switch).

ON - OFF; GOOD - BAD
vs
BAD - POOR - AVG - GOOD - VERY GOOD - GREAT
 
And my argument is that you and many others have no middle ground in a bipolar world. Your an on-off switch and I'm a rheostat (dimmer switch).

ON - OFF; GOOD - BAD
vs
BAD - POOR - AVG - GOOD - VERY GOOD - GREAT


Do you think that by using caps it makes your statements more true?
 
Back
Top