Carr Bombed
Hall of Fame
Regardless if Florida wins or not they need to drop, they flat out suck. Steve S. owns them.....Texas would smeer the field with them. I'm not impressed with their defense or offense.
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
they look pretty bad, at home, to a 5-4 South Carolina team.Regardless if Florida wins or not they need to drop, they flat out suck. Steve S. owns them
Louisville doesn't deserve to be in the mix, they lost straight up. Texas lost because their QB was taken out.louisville should still be in the mix, imo
that's pretty absurd.Louisville doesn't deserve to be in the mix, they lost straight up. Texas lost because their QB was taken out.
that's pretty absurd.
How........ Louisville lost to RUTGERS.....again Louisville lost to RUTGERS, playing in a crappy conference, with no injuries, they are done
man, that is SO clever!Bull
Crap
System
Louisville doesn't deserve to be in the mix, they lost straight up. Texas lost because their QB was taken out.
Teams remaining
USC
ND
Flordia
I'll take ND
and hope Texas gets a great match up in a bowl game..........Texas, USC rematch......that would be awesome
Waaaah!!!Louisville doesn't deserve to be in the mix, they lost straight up. Texas lost because their QB was taken out.
Waaaah!!!
louisville lost their starting running back for the season and the starting quaterback for some games!
any losing team can come up with excuses, fact or not still excuses.
Louisville had over 100 yards rushing in the game, they lost to Rutgers because of their defense couldn't stop the run.
They lost, they were overrated, they are done as is Texas
actually louisville lost because of greg schiano's incredible 2nd half adjustments on defense.
okie dokie. WVU ran all over louisville too, but they lost handily. why? because they couldn't stop brohm. rutgers forced tons of mistakes and 3 and outs, and guess what? they won. 1+1=2Louisville also lost because they let Rutgers run their way back into the game.
rutgers can sneak into the nat'l championship pretty easy. all that has to happen:
1: Cal beats USC
2: USC beats Notre Dame
3: Arkansas beats Florida
if that happens, you'll see Rutgers in the championship game. the reason it won't be arkansas is because the computers have arkansas ranked NINTH while they have rutgers ranked SECOND. and here's how i'd see the entire BCS shaking out if those things happen, as well as some other standard wins/losses:
Sugar Bowl: Arkansas vs. Louisville
Rose Bowl: Michigan vs. Cal
Orange Bowl: Wake Forest vs. Florida
Fiesta Bowl: Texas vs. Boise State
National Championship: Ohio State vs. Rutgers
yup, i actually came back to this thread to change that...boise state would be left out. here's what we'd have:If Notre Dame stayed in the top 12 then they would be in a BCS bowl.
They always get picked when they qualify, whether they deserve it or not.
National Championship: Ohio State vs. Rutgers
no one would "obliterate" rutgers. that defense is too good and fast and they're too well-coached.
yup, i actually came back to this thread to change that...boise state would be left out. here's what we'd have:
Sugar Bowl: Arkansas vs. Louisville
Rose Bowl: Michigan vs. Cal
Orange Bowl: Wake Forest vs. Florida
Fiesta Bowl: Texas vs. Notre Dame
National Championship: Ohio State vs. Rutgers
Boise St is in the top 12 in the BcS right now though. Is there a rule that if both qualify, one has to be left out?
there's only so many spots. with cal winning the pac-10 and wake forest winning the ACC, there's 2 spots right there for teams that didn't finish in the top 12.Boise St is in the top 12 in the BCS right now though. Is there a rule that if both qualify, one has to be left out?
i tend to agree with you. but that doesn't mean they'd blow out rutgers. as i said, rutgers is just too well-coached, and that defense is beastly.