Carr Bombed
Hall of Fame
I dunno but maybe former GM Rick Smith is the one to whom an apology is owed since he's the person most responsible for DW4 being here in Houston?
Umm..no
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
I dunno but maybe former GM Rick Smith is the one to whom an apology is owed since he's the person most responsible for DW4 being here in Houston?
Lol "it's the amount of hits" argument now. I bet most of these bozos don't even know how he got injured. So then if that type of freak play is so frequent why are more QBs not sidelined with injury on those plays each year.
Weak arguments.
When we get there some of you have some explaining to do since admitting being wrong is so hard to do around here and the need to be right so overwhelming.
Umm..no
Should we praise Ricky for getting Watson and condemn him for failing to protect him?
I dunno but maybe former GM Rick Smith is the one to whom an apology is owed since he's the person most responsible for DW4 being here in Houston?
That is not what I said. I said the amount of hit was not the reason why Watson got injured. That is foolish on your part to even think so.
Aaron Rodgers played how many years before finally getting hurt. And his oline has been one of the worst for several years.
Brady took a beating last season for the first 6-8 games. During that time he was the most hit QB. Did he get hurt?
It's not just mobile QBs , every QB takes a beating out there. Even Dak behind the best oline took a good old fashioned beating. That's why he had that sophomore slump.
All we can do is wish and hope Watson stays healthy during his tenure as a Texans.
What does that have to do with the statement? Are you foolish enough to co-sign your name along with Uncle Rico here that higher amounts of hits doesn't create a higher % chance to get injured? :kubepalm:
Or praise him for getting Watson after his multiple f*ck ups at trying to fill the position, including having to dump a 2nd round pick to omit one mistake from the roster.
Rick got a lot of years of employment and millions of dollars of compensation when he should've been let go with the previous staff. He's owed nothing, especially a apology.
You're talking over some peoples heads here.
# Simple Math
I think Watson faked the injury because he doesn't like Bill O'Brien's offense.
Should we praise Ricky for getting Watson and condemn him for failing to protect him?
Hell, Tom Savage might as well sue the pants off of Smith for the assaults he took from that Oline last season.
Yeah, we've somehow entered a place where no matter what is written or presented, mathematical probability doesn't even exist, and we all want Watson to turn into a train wreck. :wadepalm:
Very possible he would have continued to drop. Rick felt uneasy with Mahomes going a few picks before and just wanted to trade up and get his guy.
For all we know, though, the Cards could have taken him at 13. (Even though Bruce Arians said they weren't targeting Watson with that pick)
Edit: Took a quick glance at the draft results. Very possible Broncos might have taken him at 20. Maybe the Redskins take him at 17 so that they could deal Cousins? Who knows. It does look like Watson would have fallen if we didn't trade up. (Or maybe the Browns just take him at 12?)
No idea. Good question, though.
Well, It was probably all a part of the Osweiler trade. They took the trash out for us and traded 1sts under whatever conditions. I personally don’t care to know why or how, as the important part/thing already happened.I think this is the reason the Texans moved up to #12 spot. They knew the Cards were looking for a QB and with Trubisky and Mahomes off the board, and only Watson left of the top 3, they couldn't take the chance of the Cards taking him. My questions are, why did the Browns (who were QB needy) pass on all of the top 3 QB's and, how did Rick know the Browns weren't going to take Watson for themselves and then called them to make the trade? Would be interesting to know how that all went down.
I think this is the reason the Texans moved up to #12 spot. They knew the Cards were looking for a QB and with Trubisky and Mahomes off the board, and only Watson left of the top 3, they couldn't take the chance of the Cards taking him. My questions are, why did the Browns (who were QB needy) pass on all of the top 3 QB's and, how did Rick know the Browns weren't going to take Watson for themselves and then called them to make the trade? Would be interesting to know how that all went down.
I think the Brownies nailed it at QB this year. I'm working in the Cleveland area and loved their draft this year.Well that's easy to answer... They are the Cleveland Browns. They only draft/sign bust QBs.
I am sure some people believed and were deceived by the 'reports' of Watson's lack of arm strength.I especially loved the part last year when posters were complaining about his throwing speed being under 55 MPH and how it was a death sentence for him. Sometimes people get caught up in ridiculous things.
15 games Vince Young: 51.5 comp % --2199 yds--12 TDs--13 INTs--67 Passer Rating--QBR 60 -- 552 rush 7 TDsFunny you mention VY without even acknowledging the historical context of it.
15 games Vince Young: 51.5 comp % --2199 yds--12 TDs--13 INTs--67 Passer Rating--QBR 60 -- 552 rush 7 TDsFunny you mention VY without even acknowledging the historical context of it.
It depends on how you define skillset. If you mean it in a very generic and general sense then sure...they both are dual threat QBs.They were the ones out there claiming that Watson was so different the RG3 (Same skill set)
Huh? Its the NFL. Almost EVERYONE gets injured. Being warry about a QB because they might get injured is an exercise is pointless guess work. Some QBs get hurt some don't. Lets not pretend its something that can be predicted based on style of play.They somehow refused to believe that QB's can get hit and injured on any given play in the NFL and didn't care that Watson took a lot more hits than most guys with his crappy Oline or that his improvising to extend plays is great, but also creates a higher % chance for him to get injured. And what happened?
Didn't Savage also get hurt behind the OL? Is Savages injury his fault due to his style of play? So why are you/other knocking Watson for the risk of injury due to an OL that YOU admit is poor? scratching my headYou mean ridiculous things like worrying about him getting hurt with his build, behind last yrs OL?
Savage helped injure himself. He's so slow he couldn't avoid a hit from a turtle.Didn't Savage also get hurt behind the OL? Is Savages injury his fault due to his style of play? So why are you/other knocking Watson for the risk of injury due to an OL that YOU admit is poor? scratching my head
Didn't Savage also get hurt behind the OL? Is Savages injury his fault due to his style of play? So why are you/other knocking Watson for the risk of injury due to an OL that YOU admit is poor? scratching my head
Didn't Savage also get hurt behind the OL? Is Savages injury his fault due to his style of play? So why are you/other knocking Watson for the risk of injury due to an OL that YOU admit is poor? scratching my head
Exactly...How is worrying about Watson getting hurt behind a piss poor line knocking Watson?
Exactly...
Some people are hiding behind Watson's injury as a valid reason for their stance against him prior to the season.
But they also acknowledge that the OL would and did injury other QBs.
So they may as well start issuing apologies....
delete
not fair
Some people are hiding behind Watson's injury as a valid reason for their stance against him prior to the season.
But they also acknowledge that the OL would and did injury other QBs.
So they may as well start issuing apologies....
I semi owe him one.
Looking back, I remember watching Clemson take on Alabama back to back and being amazed, I hoped and wished we’d draft Watson but was convinced there was absolutely NO way in hell he’d be there as he was sure to be the first quarterback off the board. (In my mind.) I remember settling for Mahommes thinking we’d have a better shot at him, not that it was guaranteed he’d be there or that we’d even draft a quarterback.
I guess I bought into the “Run First, Only Reads Half The Field, Slow Throw Velocity, Weak Arm” comments lots of posters here made about him. I feel like such an idiot now, lol.
God bless our DW4!
Think back to predraft. That was "last year" too.I don't recall any out right against him last year.. many thought he should wait a year before starting in order to improve the OL ald let him get some learning in. He proved to be a much quicker study though. Shame he got injured and strange that it was without a massive breakdown of the OL
Think back to predraft. That was "last year" too.
And think back to all the b!tching about how much it "cost" to move up and grab him.
Yeah, there were some who didn't want him here/wanted someone else. To me, that counts as "against".
I won a huge bet that night he played 'Bama. Knew he was special. Cannot believe we had the chance to draft him - as I thought the worthless Browns would definitely take him. But no... they choose the wrong fate and did something that will forever change the NFL landscape, theirs, and ours.
I was all-in on him when he was at Clemson. Never dreamt he would be in Houston. Knew he was a winner bc of the amount of games I watched of his on Saturdays. I can honest to God say I can't remember being more sold on a college QB. He just has 'it' and I know that is cliché but I never thought "this guy has the biggest arm ever" or anything like that, but he just seemed like Michael Jordan in cleats (before his college coach made the comment). Should have been the #1 overall pick.
Some people tends to turn a blind eye on things like that. I remember having some heated debates about starting him on day one, that bull about that velocity crap some nerd came up with and the point about moving up to get him ( some thought the cost was too much). But hey it's still a wait and see. Especially with his early injury history.
The debate over starting him day one wasn't necessarily a knock against Watson. I was one of those who wanted him to sit for at least part of the season and learn. It wasn't because I didn't think he was capable. I am just not a big fan of starting any rookie QB. Part of it is I have seen plenty of rookie QB's with talent destroyed by being thrown into bad situations before they were ready. I also grew up watching NFL football when it was rare for a head coach to start a rookie at QB. I was excited when we drafted Watson and the more I found out about him, the more excited I was. What he did on the field was amazing. He was much, much more competent on the field than I expected. Anyone he says they expected him to be as good as he was his rookie year I don't think really appreciates what he accomplished. The kind of greatness he displayed in those handful of games was unprecedented.
Did I want Watson to sit? Yes. But it wasn't a knock on Watson and I feel no need to apologize. I was in his corner from the start I just believed another path was better for his development. As a rule, I still don't like starting rookies at QB, but DW is an exception to the rule.
There were others here who wanted him to sit because the line was suspect, I don't think they owe him an apology, either.
There were a few who doubted his arm and his accuracy or saw him as a "run first" type QB. I don't remember who they were.
I think the whole attitude that anyone who had questions about Watson or wanted him to sit owes him an apology is absurd. No matter how good a player is in college, they are still an unknown commodity when they enter the NFL. It doesn't matter whether their name is Watson, Montana, Manning, or Brady, they still have/had to prove it on an NFL field in NFL games.
The debate over starting him day one wasn't necessarily a knock against Watson. I was one of those who wanted him to sit for at least part of the season and learn. It wasn't because I didn't think he was capable. I am just not a big fan of starting any rookie QB. Part of it is I have seen plenty of rookie QB's with talent destroyed by being thrown into bad situations before they were ready. I also grew up watching NFL football when it was rare for a head coach to start a rookie at QB. I was excited when we drafted Watson and the more I found out about him, the more excited I was. What he did on the field was amazing. He was much, much more competent on the field than I expected. Anyone who says they expected him to be as good as he was his rookie year I don't think really appreciates what he accomplished. The kind of greatness he displayed in those handful of games was unprecedented.
Did I want Watson to sit? Yes. But it wasn't a knock on Watson and I feel no need to apologize. I was in his corner from the start; I just believed another path was better for his development. As a rule, I still don't like starting rookies at QB, but DW is an exception to the rule.
There were others here who wanted him to sit because the line was suspect, I don't think they owe him an apology, either.
There were a few who doubted his arm and his accuracy or saw him as a "run first" type QB. I don't remember who they were.
I think the whole attitude that anyone who had questions about Watson or wanted him to sit owes him an apology is absurd. No matter how good a player is in college, they are still an unknown commodity when they enter the NFL. It doesn't matter whether their name is Watson, Montana, Manning, or Brady, they still have/had to prove it on an NFL field in NFL games.
great post.The debate over starting him day one wasn't necessarily a knock against Watson. I was one of those who wanted him to sit for at least part of the season and learn. It wasn't because I didn't think he was capable. I am just not a big fan of starting any rookie QB. Part of it is I have seen plenty of rookie QB's with talent destroyed by being thrown into bad situations before they were ready. I also grew up watching NFL football when it was rare for a head coach to start a rookie at QB. I was excited when we drafted Watson and the more I found out about him, the more excited I was. What he did on the field was amazing. He was much, much more competent on the field than I expected. Anyone who says they expected him to be as good as he was his rookie year I don't think really appreciates what he accomplished. The kind of greatness he displayed in those handful of games was unprecedented.
Did I want Watson to sit? Yes. But it wasn't a knock on Watson and I feel no need to apologize. I was in his corner from the start; I just believed another path was better for his development. As a rule, I still don't like starting rookies at QB, but DW is an exception to the rule.
There were others here who wanted him to sit because the line was suspect, I don't think they owe him an apology, either.
There were a few who doubted his arm and his accuracy or saw him as a "run first" type QB. I don't remember who they were.
I think the whole attitude that anyone who had questions about Watson or wanted him to sit owes him an apology is absurd. No matter how good a player is in college, they are still an unknown commodity when they enter the NFL. It doesn't matter whether their name is Watson, Montana, Manning, or Brady, they still have/had to prove it on an NFL field in NFL games.
But apparently, all post draft debate and vitriol over Watson was just imagined. And the only objection to Watson was because people wanted him to sit behind Savage.....but imho wanting Watson to sit behind Savage is still evidence of a flaw in the assessment of the QBs.
Admitting being wrong is the worst possible thing in the world right now with the climate in this country. Better to go down in a blaze of hypocrisy and innuendo then to simply say .. "I was wrong"
The difference between RGIII and DW4 is that the HC didn't throw DW4 back out on the field with an obviously busted wheel like Shannahan did with RGIII. That was criminal negligence by Shannahan.I wanted Savage to play last yr because it was obvious the Texans OL was going to suck and I wanted Savage to take the beating.
BTW, you know what Watson and RGIII have in common?
Both blew out one knee in college and blew out their other knee as rookies in the NFL. We know how things turned out for RGIII and I hope Watson doesn't suffer the same fate. They are basically running the same NFL offense.
I'm also worried that they didn't do enough to fix the OL (A bunch of backups and, yes I think they will be better. Lower 1/3 better) and hope Watson doesn't get hurt again. Without draft picks the OL couldn't really be fixed. If Watson can stay healthy next yr then the 2019 draft looks at 1st glance to be rich at the OT position.