Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

All Encompassing Lockout Thread

What's funny is that the 7 year opt out has been reported initially by ESPN and subsequently by other independent sources as being requested by SOME, NOT MOST of the players. The "NFLPA" process has shown itself to be so poorly structured that it could potentially disrupt the entire CBA negotiation with a last minute demand by "SOME."...............PATHETIC!!!!!!
 
What's funny is that the 7 year opt out has been reported initially by ESPN and subsequently by other independent sources as being requested by SOME, NOT MOST of the players. The "NFLPA" process has shown itself to be so poorly structured that it could potentially disrupt the entire CBA negotiation with a last minute demand by "SOME."...............PATHETIC!!!!!!

That's why I said I hope the majority of players send about 1,890 texts to the player leadership and say "Hey, thanks for the ride. We want to stop here and stretch our legs awhile. Vote "Yes" on the deal, please. Thank you."

The players need to step in and tell their leadership to find a way to get a win-win for both sides--I floated the idea of the players giving up the opt-out clause if the owners allow them to re-certify the way the players want to (at camp, by passing out cards to each player).

And it IS looking like players don't care about preseason now.
 
I have a question.

If the preseason represents, for some teams, perhaps their entire profit margin for the year--Meaning the revenue they get from preseason is what they actually end up taking home at the end of the year, which means the reg season is almost LOSING them money--then why did the owners want to increase reg season games and decrease the amount of preseason games??? This would be like a restaurant owner deciding to decrease soda and liquor/beer sales and increase food production--The profit margin on those items is 98% of the time night-and-day different.

The 4-game preseason seems to be verrrrry valuable to the owners. The players know this, and unfortunately I think the players are making a big mistake by toying with the owners and putting preseason in jeopardy. I won't say that the owners are without fault, but am saying that if the players shaft the owners on even ONE week of preseason revenue, it could make for revenge-minded tactics the NEXT time around in 7 or 10 years from now.
 
@AdamSchefter Named plaintiff Vincent Jackson now is willing to release his claim without compensation - meaning no money or lifting of the franchise tag.

So there won't be a problem with this guy. I am sure Mankins will do likewise.
 
@AdamSchefter Named plaintiff Vincent Jackson now is willing to release his claim without compensation - meaning no money or lifting of the franchise tag.

So there won't be a problem with this guy. I am sure Mankins will do likewise.

I have this weird feeling that Jackson and Mankins are/were being jerks just to give the NFLPA some breathing space and they'll drop their suits when their peers want them to.

EDIT: "Peers" is probably the wrong word. NFLPA Management would probably be more accurate.
 
I have this weird feeling that Jackson and Mankins are/were being jerks just to give the NFLPA some breathing space and they'll drop their suits when their peers want them to.

EDIT: "Peers" is probably the wrong word. NFLPA Management would probably be more accurate.

I dunno, Mankins seemed to have a beef with the Patriots last year for not signing him to a long term contract. Didn't report until halfway through the season. Wouldn't surprise me if he really did want a large sum of money.
 
I have a question.

If the preseason represents, for some teams, perhaps their entire profit margin for the year--Meaning the revenue they get from preseason is what they actually end up taking home at the end of the year, which means the reg season is almost LOSING them money--then why did the owners want to increase reg season games and decrease the amount of preseason games??? This would be like a restaurant owner deciding to decrease soda and liquor/beer sales and increase food production--The profit margin on those items is 98% of the time night-and-day different.

The 4-game preseason seems to be verrrrry valuable to the owners. The players know this, and unfortunately I think the players are making a big mistake by toying with the owners and putting preseason in jeopardy. I won't say that the owners are without fault, but am saying that if the players shaft the owners on even ONE week of preseason revenue, it could make for revenge-minded tactics the NEXT time around in 7 or 10 years from now.

A key question in this answer is whether the revenues from pre-season games are included in the pie that is divided up to determine the salary cap. I've heard things in the past that lead me to believe they are, but I can't state that for a fact.

If the above is correct, than a dollar of preseason revenue is no more or less valuable than a dollar of regular season revenue, and the increased Television dollars from two additional regular season games would provide essentially the same margin as every other dollar - preseason dollars included. And if this is the case, it would mean that while some NFL teams profits may be essentially equal to their preseason revenues, it is the result of a coincidence, rather than the regular season being a break-even proposition.

Edit: A little bit of research turned up this:
Lost preseason hurts players financially, too
 
Last edited:
Let's see.....the players get copies of the proposal and reads it today..........and tomorrow. Monday they get a lawyer to explain to them what they just read. Tuesday they get a friend to ask the lawyer what the **** the lawyer just said. Wednesday the friend reports back to the player to put in layman's terms what the lawyer told him.

Thursday the player goes public with his rejection of the deal saying he's not stupid enough to take such a deal.

FML
 
Let's see.....the players get copies of the proposal and reads it today..........and tomorrow. Monday they get a lawyer to explain to them what they just read. Tuesday they get a friend to ask the lawyer what the **** the lawyer just said. Wednesday the friend reports back to the player to put in layman's terms what the lawyer told him.

Thursday the player goes public with his rejection of the deal saying he's not stupid enough to take such a deal.

FML

:spit:
 
Let's see.....the players get copies of the proposal and reads it today..........and tomorrow. Monday they get a lawyer to explain to them what they just read. Tuesday they get a friend to ask the lawyer what the **** the lawyer just said. Wednesday the friend reports back to the player to put in layman's terms what the lawyer told him.

Thursday the player goes public with his rejection of the deal saying he's not stupid enough to take such a deal.

FML

This is starting to piss me off....:yawn:
 
Let's see.....the players get copies of the proposal and reads it today..........and tomorrow. Monday they get a lawyer to explain to them what they just read. Tuesday they get a friend to ask the lawyer what the **** the lawyer just said. Wednesday the friend reports back to the player to put in layman's terms what the lawyer told him.

Thursday the player goes public with his rejection of the deal saying he's not stupid enough to take such a deal.

FML

Later that night, Smith talks to the player and says "Yes you are!"
 
This portion of the summary regarding in-season practices contains one more open issue we didn’t previously noticed. The players want five straight days off during the bye week; it’s not known whether the league included that provision in the labor deal that was approved Thursday.
link

Since I know so many players play Madden, I expect them to come back and demand that 4 season games be determined on the video game........and that they shall not be required to wear pads and helmets during that time, in return for agreeing to full contact..........with their keyboards.:kitten:
 
Last edited:
This could certainly put a little dent into Bob's willingness to spend.

New revenue sharing plan features tax on highest-earning teams


When the NFL approved a labor deal to which the NFLPA* hadn’t, and still hasn’t, agreed, the league surprisingly announced a new supplemental revenue sharing plan.

In hindsight, it shouldn’t be much of a surprise. With the salary floor rising to unprecedented heights, supplemental revenue sharing becomes more important than ever, given that all revenue — including unshared revenue — drives up the per-team salary cap. This necessarily forces low-revenue teams to devote a larger piece of their already lower earnings to player costs.

Per a source with knowledge of the details of the arrangement, the new supplemental revenue sharing plan includes a 10-percent tax on the “local revenue” of the highest-revenue teams. The money will be distributed to the lowest-revenue teams.

We haven’t yet gotten our eyeballs on the formula that determines the teams who’ll pay the tax — or the teams who’ll get the second half of the Robin Hood treatment.

We also haven’t seen the definition of “local revenue,” but it likely includes luxury suites, parking, and pretty much anything and everything other than ticket sales, TV money, all national sponsorships and media deals, and any sources of shared revenue.

The previous supplemental revenue sharing plan was funded by taking 40 percent of each team’s club seat sales and putting the money into a fund that serviced league-incurred stadium debt. The excess was distributed to low-revenue teams based on need.

The NFLPA* has objected, sort of, to the decision of the NFL to include revenue sharing in the approved deal. However, the NFLPA* had every opportunity to focus on this issue during negotiations, and the NFLPA* chose not to do so.
 
mortreport Chris Mortensen
John Clayton and I reporting major progress in talks today. Players committee meet Mobday in DC to hopefully recommend approval.
 
I seem to remember lots of articles early on with a very pro-player slant, talking about how the owners had all these unreasonable and unfair requests of the players. I started with more of a pro-owner stance, then after reading some of that, starting having more sympathy for the players. But, after seeing lots of these details, I'm way more on the owners' side.

So, it seems that critical points that the players were/are negotiating for are that:
  • They don't want to have to practice as much
  • They don't want to have to practice as hard
  • They want more days off of work, especialy in the bye week
  • They want to be paid for stuff they didn't do (due to the lockout)
  • They want to be paid for things that they shouldn't have been paid for under the uncapped year of previous CBA, that they agreed to.
Some of these are reasonable enough - all workers generally want less work and more pay. But, they're not part of some highly principled stand as they were making it out to be. You can at least make high-sounding arguments for things like needing more money allocated to medical treatment for retired players, making sure that they get a "fair" amount of the revenue coming in to the NFL, or not playing games that might lead to more injuries. This is just raw "give us what we want" stuff.
 
ESPN News - Clayton/Mortensen: NFLPA tentatively agrees to vote on labor deal, union recertification next week

Recertification vote reportedly on Wednesday, with camp possibly opening on Friday. And apparently that's the best case scenario.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/6...fl-sides-eye-camps-recertify-vote-source-says


Under the plan, players would begin reporting to training camps as early as Wednesday to physically vote on whether to recertify, with the hope that it will be done by Friday at the earliest, the source said.
 
ALL of the talking heads have been talking through their butts all along. Had they taken their daily "It's going to happen tomorrow" predictions to Las Vegas, they would have lost their butts. Predictions on this Board have at least matched their accuracy........and we aren't syndicated and making big bucks doing it. These people must have been weather men in their previous lives.
 
With all of new practice and time off rules the players want implemented they should just change the name to the Nerf Football League.

Due to his ongoing neck problems, Peyton, in the name of safety, has petitioned the league that Nerf be made the official maker of NFL footballs. Meanwhile, Manning has already been seen preparing for the transition.

payton_manning_smallpic_with_FB.jpg
 
@mortreport Goodell & Smith working directly on couple finishing details but trust is there & determined. In fact, Goodell may be invited to Mon. presser

--------------------

Goodell and Smith, IMO, perhaps working out a few rough spots. Entirely possible that the lawyers drafting the actual contract MIGHT have had a spot or two that was not jiving with the previous talks and handshakes. Or, at very least, it was poorly worded/constructed and led to confusion.

If it meant delaying it until Monday'ish, to make sure that the players are 100% certain that there's not any shenanigans contained in the contract, then I don't think either side should be vilified for the delays.

Both sides dilly-dallied and should have been at it like this throughout February, March, and April. But oh well.

I feel that our NFL lives will resume, in full, by next week. It's going to be good to know that NFL is on "the right track." This is the only pro sport, but MMA is a close 2nd place, that I truly yearn for every year. My best times every year? Summer training camps, preseason games, opening day NFL and college, the leaves turning and marching bands and homecoming parades, reg season, playoffs, bowl games, Super Bowl, and then it all goes "dark" until the draft combine and the draft. It's my circle of life.
 
Per NFL.com

Tentative 2011 league calendar*

Wednesday: Team facilities open,
free agency and trading period begins

Friday: Training camps open

Aug. 11-15:
Preseason Week 1

Sept. 8: Kickoff game, Saints at Packers

*Assuming players ratify deal Tuesday

So looks like free agency might go down on Wednesday anyways.
 
It's going to be great to watch NFLN and NFL Live on ESPN again.

Haven't watched a single SECOND of it since end of Super Bowl. I couldn't even bring myself to watch draft combine footage. Didn't event watch the draft--Got my news from right here on the boards.

Can't wait to see the MASSIVE amount of actual, 100% REAL news on the greatest entertaining sport in my personal world. Should be packed with news once Wednesday hits. And no stopping or slowing down. It's going to be wicked awesome.
 
I dunno, Mankins seemed to have a beef with the Patriots last year for not signing him to a long term contract. Didn't report until halfway through the season. Wouldn't surprise me if he really did want a large sum of money.

Mankins got the Owen Daniels treatment. Forced into an RFA deal after earning all-pro status. So he made a million or two last season, but is now stuck with the franchise tag.
 
Mankins got the Owen Daniels treatment. Forced into an RFA deal after earning all-pro status. So he made a million or two last season, but is now stuck with the franchise tag.

Owen Daniels was forced into a RFA deal because we offered him a deal that would make him a top 5 TE?

How does that work?
 
Owen Daniels was forced into a RFA deal because we offered him a deal that would make him a top 5 TE?

How does that work?

Point is, because of the opting out of the CBA, Mankins was forced to become a RFA, same as OD. any other year, both would have been UFA.
 
The games continue as the fans continue to get played.
From PFT.

New CBA sets up eventual 18-game stare down


The NFL players successfully have beaten back the league’s desire to expand (i.e., enhance) the regular season from 16 to 18 games.

For now.

A source with knowledge of the terms of the deal approved by the owners on Thursday tells PFT that, while the new CBA removes the league’s unilateral right to expand from 16 to 18 games (while keeping four preseason games, if so desired), the agreement gives the league the ability to shift to a 16-and-2 format without the input or approval of the post-asterisked NFLPA.

The thinking is that, if the players decline in the future to agree to move to 18 games (which would push the season deeper into the winter months) and cut the preseason from four games to two, the league would simply invoke its right to cut the preseason in half. With the players now getting 48 percent of the gross, the players would lose 48 percent of the revenue lost from a reduced preseason.

And that’s where the owners once again are badly underestimating the players. As we’ve learned over the last 60 hours, the players don’t care about the preseason nearly as much as the owners do. Spread over 1,900 players, the financial impact of the loss of two preseason games is relatively small. Spread across 32 teams, the disappearance of two money-for-nothing games would chew deeply into the profit margin of many teams, especially since expenses in the preseason are minimal.

So when the league says to the players, “Well, our fans really don’t want four preseason games, and since this is all about the fans, we need to reduce the preseason to two games, even if that means keeping the regular season at 16,” the players should respond by saying, “Fine. Do it.”

And then the owners will decide, after further reflection, that they care about their profits more than they care about what the fans want when it comes to the preseason.
 
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...ying-to-d-c-sunday-final-deal-points-reached/

ESPN has upped the language and certainty of their report that says the process to end the lockout will start with a vote Monday.

No longer is a meeting between the NFLPA* executive committee “expected.” Now the players have bought tickets and are flying in Sunday for a Monday meeting.

No longer are there a few minor points left to figure out. Adam Schefter reports the two sides “have reached agreement” on the remaining issues.

“Despite the fact the new deal will require a majority vote from the players, that part of the deal between the two sides is considered a formality, according to sources,” Schefter writes.

The timeline we laid out last night remains. While it’s not official, some teams could potentially report to their team facilities Wednesday. The two sides would hope to have enough players officially vote to open free agency and training camp next Saturday. These dates remain subject to tweaking, but the report of an agreement apparently does not.

Either this is one of the biggest gaffes in sports journalism history or this thing is really going down Monday.
Could this be it? Could we all get our NFL back?
 
The trend will carry itself well into the regular season.

July 24, 2011, 4:01 pm

Patriots linebacker Tully Banta-Cain underwent surgery to repair an abdominal tear, according to a report by the Boston Globe.

The injury felt "fine" a source told the Globe, but got worse during recent workouts.

ESPN Boston spoke with sources who hesitated to call the injury a "tear," and said Banta-Cain was expected to be out 4-5 weeks.

With the number of unsupervised workouts going on during the lockout, many are predicting that there will be more injuries that will be reported as the league gets closer to returning to work.

One note about the timing of the surgery: With the lockout expected to end later this week, Banta-Cain will soon be allowed to rehab his injury with Patriots staff. If he had surgery earlier this year, he would not have been allowed to use team facilities or visit team doctors to get ready for the season.

AlbertBreer Albert Breer

Good reporting by @shalisemyoung on Banta-Cain injury ... With all unsupervised workouts this offseason, expect more news like that to come.

35 minutes ago
 
Sucks for the already pass rush-depleted Pats.Though I find it very hard to feel sorry for them :)

Report: Franchise tags will now be % of salary cap, not average of top players. Starting 2012.
 
Not sure if anybody else had posted this, so here goes:

Major breakthroughs in Saturday discussions set up the timetable for the resolution to the 130-day lockout.

Owners tentatively agreed to a players-recommended plan for the NFLPA to bring players into team facilities starting as early as Wednesday to physically vote on whether to recertify the current trade association as a union, a source told ESPN.com's John Clayton. Edit by GP: IIRC, the owners wanted electronic signatures and were not "cool" with the idea of players being allowed at team facilities to sign union cards. This was an owners "give" and you'll see some players' "give" further down in this article.

The players' executive committee will meet in Washington on Monday, a move that, according to a high-ranking NFLPA official, was not communicated to the NFLPA executive committee until Saturday morning via phone.

Following that, a recommendation has to be made by the 32 player representatives, likely via conference call. As of late Saturday night, no time had been set for that vote, but it is expected to occur Monday after the executive committee votes to recommend approval, according to the high-ranking official.

The executive committee is also expected to vote to recommend recertifying itself as a union, according to the source. A recommendation also has to be made by the 32 player representatives on that count.

When the executive committee accepts the new CBA, players from certain teams will be granted permission to report to training camps Wednesday and players from other teams will be asked to report to training camps Friday, a source said. The hope from both sides is there are enough votes to recertify the union by as early as Friday.

For that to happen, a 50-percent-plus-one-vote majority of the players have to accept the NFLPA as its union and accept the terms of a CBA.

Much of the confidence in Monday's vote is due in part to the continued working relationship between Smith and NFL commissioner Roger Goodell, a source said. The pair have been working with each other directly as the sides near an agreement and continued to do so through the weekend to ensure the remaining issues were resolved, according to a source. Edit by GP: This is important, because later in the article you read that Kessler has not had a good working relationship with the NFL. So was Kessler "bad cop" and De Smith "good cop?" Makes ya' wonder...

Edit by GP: And here is the players' "give" I spoke of earlier: Smith, a source said, has pledged to Goodell that he will also expedite the remaining issues before the first preseason game is played, creating optimism that those games will not be canceled. In that vein, Smith has personally taken on much of the work on the actual CBA-related documents, with his legal team, including NFLPA lawyer Jeffrey Kessler, assisting.

Edit by GP: Kessler doesn't play nice with others. According to the source, Smith took on this responsibility as a show of good faith, because the NFL's management council executive committee had been skeptical due to its prior experience with Kessler as legal counsel.


The NFL announced Thursday it would open its doors to players under contract two days after the NFLPA executive committee accepts the CBA and settlement terms from existing lawsuits. The league also said that free agency would start the day after the union is recertified.

Therefore, under this tentative schedule for recertification, the pre-league year buffer period could start Wednesday.

Under that scenario, teams could potentially open contract talks with their own unrestricted free agents, restricted free agents and draft choices Wednesday. However, no contracts could be signed until Saturday at the earliest. In that scenario, teams would also be able to renegotiate contracts with players from their own team starting as early as Wednesday.

Upon recertification of the union, free agency could start Saturday at 2 p.m. ET and rosters would be allowed to expand to 90 players.

It is still uncertain when teams would be able to sign undrafted free agents.

It was vital for the NFLPA to have enough time for recertification and have a period of time for the renewed union to work out final details of its benefit plans.

Only a union can negotiate benefits for its members and the NFLPA feared a Tuesday deadline to recertify would not leave enough time to properly negotiate changes in the benefits packages. Under terms of the owners' agreement from Thursday, players would have reverted back to the 2010 benefits plan if they didn't make adjustments within a certain time period.

As talks progressed Saturday, the sides removed one roadblock while moving the dial on another.

A league source said San Diego Chargers receiver Vincent Jackson, one of the 10 named plaintiffs in the players' antitrust lawsuit against the NFL, is now willing to release his claim without compensation, meaning no money or lifting of the franchise tag. Jackson was the last of the 10 named plaintiffs unwilling to drop his claim.

The sides also got closer to settling the $4 billion network television insurance case, according to a source....

Link to full article.
 
GP, its not that Kessler doesn't play well with others it has been him trying to scuttle the whole thing from the git go so that he had a shot at getting the 30% he would get from a 12 BILLION dollar anti-trust lawsuit he wants to bring. Right from the git go he has been doing his best to push the players that way. As little as I think of De Smith, he at least a couple of weeks ago started pushing Kessler out of the way and got him to sign a flat fee for the negotiations. Personally, if I were the players, I would make damn sure Kessler had zero to do with any future negotiations. He drug this out for billing hours and was trying to set up the anti-trust deal and NEVER seemed to be working to move things forward in the best interests of his clients ... the players.
 
GP, its not that Kessler doesn't play well with others it has been him trying to scuttle the whole thing from the git go so that he had a shot at getting the 30% he would get from a 12 BILLION dollar anti-trust lawsuit he wants to bring. Right from the git go he has been doing his best to push the players that way. As little as I think of De Smith, he at least a couple of weeks ago started pushing Kessler out of the way and got him to sign a flat fee for the negotiations. Personally, if I were the players, I would make damn sure Kessler had zero to do with any future negotiations. He drug this out for billing hours and was trying to set up the anti-trust deal and NEVER seemed to be working to move things forward in the best interests of his clients ... the players.

I have a feeling THIS will be the last gig Kessler gets with NFLPA.

In 10 years, I doubt he's even on the radar.

Good details, edo! Thank you for sharing all that. Very enlightening.

I have learned SO MUCH about the NFL and the union and the CBA, etc., from this whole experience. Never knew this stuff before this year.
 
JasonLaCanfora
Email from Drew Brees to Saints players indicates "expected" deal and press conference Mon. Emails says its possible Tue/Wed/Th teams sign Their own players and that "the thought" is full free agency could start Fri, but Brees notes that's not final. The email notes the start Of the league year set for Sun 7/31 and says Saints will report 7/31 with a team meeting at 2pm. Full story on NFL Network and NFL.com
 
Ravens: Domonique Foxworth updates teammates on labor talks, upcoming schedule
By Aaron Wilson, Times Staff Writer | 0 comments

OWINGS MILLS -- Updating teammates on the labor situation, Baltimore Ravens cornerback Domonique Foxworth outlined what they should expect after the NFL collective bargaining agreement is ratified.

Foxworth emphasized they should be prepared for a fairly chaotic transition from a lockout of four months to getting back to work. The labor deal is expected to be finalized as soon as Monday.

"I want you guys to be prepared for the possibility of this week being very crazy," Foxworth wrote in an email obtained by the Times. "None of this is set in stone, but this is how the week may look. Players who are on a roster may be asked to report Wednesday or Thursday. A report date will likely involve a full physical and possibly a conditioning test, but no practice. The next two days will be non-padded helmets only."

Foxworth added that teams won't get into full pads until the fourth day of training camp with very few padded practices until the end of the preseason.

As for free agency, Foxworth wrote: "Free agents may be able to talk to teams as early as Tuesday or Wednesday but not sign with the team or report to camp until after we vote to reconstitute the union, negotiate benefits and ratify a CBA."

It's going to be a flurry of activity as soon as the labor deal is ratified.

"The time crunch will be tough on all of us, but may work to the advantage of some free agents," Foxworth wrote."As I said, none of this is set in stone, but I want to give you guys the latest information so you can begin to plan."

According to a summary of the proposed collective bargaining agreement obtained by the Times, NFL practice guidelines are about to change significantly with fewer full-padded practices allowed.

There would only be 14 total padded practices during the regular season. That represents scaling back in a major way compared to previous years.

Eleven of those padded practices have to be held during the first 11 weeks of the season and teams can hold two padded practices during only one week. The remaining three can only be held during the final six weeks.

During the playoffs, just one padded practice per week is permitted.

Padded practices are limited to three hours.

During bye weeks, players must be given five consecutive days off.

During the preseason, there can only be one padded practice per day limited to three hours with the second practice up to a four-hour limit for a walkthrough session.

As for minicamps during the offseason, players can only be on the field for 3 1/2 hours per day with one practice per day up to 2 1/2 hours and the second practice limited to walkthroughs.

The offseason conditioning program is limited to nine weeks. It would be broken up into three phases.

The first phase is limited to strength and conditioning with only strength coaches allowed on the field. During the second phase, individual and 'perfect play' drills are allowed with no offense versus defense and all coaches are allowed on the field.

In the third phase that includes four weeks and 10 organized team activities, there's a maximum of three OTAs for the first two weeks, four for the third or four weeks and the other week designated for the minicamp.

There will be hefty fines for violations as well as losing workout times.

Coaches would be fined $100,000 for the first violation, $250,000 for the second.

And teams would be fined $250,000 for the first violation and $500,000 for the second one.

Bottom line: It's a new day in the NFL, one that's much less harsh on players' bodies.

EDIT: Brees sends another email, possible full free agency tuesday

Latest Brees e-mail suggests full free agency could start Tuesday

Saints quarterback Drew Brees has spent plenty of time composing e-mails to teammates of late. His most recent message, a copy of which we have obtained, suggests that full free agency could open as soon as Tuesday.

Here’s the full text of the message.

“As has been the case with this entire process, it looks like the details and schedule has changed for training camp and free agency,” Brees writes. “This is the latest although I cannot confirm anything at this point. I just want to make you aware as to what is being discussed so nothing catches you by surprise.

Free Agency - It now looks like free agency will begin at noon on Tuesday and it will be open free agency. There will be no 3 day grace period for teams to sign their own players. It will be open for anyone to sign anywhere.

Training Camp - It looks like the NFL is trying to force teams into camp on time. This would move us to a report date of Thursday, July 28. We would have physicals, conditioning, and meetings on this day. The day before would be a travel day and the hotel would be open that night for guys to check in as well as physicals but nothing mandatory until Thursday.

“I will keep you updated with the latest information. Unfortunately, it tends to change very quickly. Just stay prepared for anything.”

That last message applies to all of us, really. As the craziest week in recent memory comes to a conclusion, an even crazier week could be starting.
 
Last edited:
I can't wait for free agency this year and the few of ya'll that show up to training camp and give us your reports on this website, my favorite time of year because we ain't lost a game yet. I am so glad this is coming to a end.
 
I just read this on MMQB with Peter King. I'm surprised. One thing people liked about Garrett taking over the Cowboys last season was he added some practices in pads to get guys a little tougher and used to gameday. Now this...Winston's comment can be seen both ways...you had the leading rusher but the team was soft and finished 5-11

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/20...07/24/labor/index.html?xid=cnnbin&hpt=hp_bn10

Padded practices. Teams can have 14 per regular season, including only three in the last six weeks of the season. Grumbling leaguewide has begun over the sissification of the NFL; coaches won't be able to toughen up soft teams anymore.

"Not sure this is a very big deal,'' Winston of the Texans said. "We had the leading rusher in the league last year [Arian Foster] and I bet we only had 17 padded practices all season.
 
Back
Top