Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

All Encompassing Lockout Thread

She got inside your head, she left you, and you say you're over her...but then she calls one day and asks you to hang out at her place and have a few drinks and watch a movie.

Tell me what you're going to do. Are you going to answer her with "Yeah, no thanks. I'm going to my mom's house for meatloaf tonight." LOL.

I'll tell her I'm married now with three beautiful daughters & I wouldn't trade that for one night with her trifling ass.
 
That was my fault. It's a $120 million cap(reported by ESPN) and $21 in benefits. NFL Network is reporting that the cap is $123 though. Maybe they are factoring in the $3 mil exception.

If a team spends over $120 million on player salaries, they technically MIGHT get slapped by the NFL with a penalty for going over that "cap." This is to try and make sure that the rich teams (Cowboys, for example) could not spend big, big money and essentially buy all the better players in the NFL.

What I think Allstar was saying is this:

The salary cap can "feel" like it's really at $130 million because of how teams will be allowed to stick in some extra benefits to their players, which then pushes them OVER the $120 million mark...but yet is not considered by the NFL to have violated the $120 million salary cap.

Hope that helps.
Do you guys like this new cap?
 
Players' secret lockout insurance could have sparked talks

Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/20.../secret-lockout-fund/index.html#ixzz1SBkIrIdV



From the moment he was elected executive director of the NFL Players Association in March 2009, DeMaurice Smith always took the long view when it came to negotiations with the owners on a new collective bargaining agreement. Hope for the best, plan for the worst.

It's one of the reasons that slightly more than a year ago he received approval from the executive committee to secure insurance that would pay each player roughly $200,000 if there were no football in 2011.

Smith disclosed the fund to only a handful of people outside of the executive committee. However with negotiations seemingly at a standstill late Wednesday night, the decision was made to play one of their aces in the hole. So in the relative quiet of the sides' New York City bargaining room the next morning, Baltimore Ravens cornerback Domonique Foxworth informed the owners of the previously secret lockout fund.

Was that the shove in the back that moved the sides closer to a potential agreement? Only the owners know for sure, but a source close to one of them said the disclosure definitely got that side's attention. Perhaps for good reason.

The common perception has been that the players' solidarity would crumble once they started missing paychecks. However the foundation beneath that line of thinking would be as solid as Jell-O if the players could couple the insurance with a large financial award from U.S. District Judge David Doty, who previously ruled the owners had illegally created a $4.3 billion lockout fund for themselves by renegotiating their TV deals at the expense of the players.

"Players Association leadership looked into this as a last possible resort to keep players together in case games would be missed," one players-side source said of the insurance war chest. "It was never intended to be used as a bargaining chip or negotiating point until things became critical."

Thursday was a critical point. If the sides could not advance negotiations then the possibility of hundreds of millions of dollars being lost to canceled preseason games was real. And if the owners allowed the impasse to get that far, what was to stop them testing the players' pain threshold by extending the lockout into the regular season?

The Players Association began informing its membership about the insurance fund over the past week and brought it up in the negotiating room for the first time Thursday. There's no way to know at this time whether it was the final oomph that pushed negotiations onto positive ground, but it's hard to believe it didn't have some impact considering the talks were "not in a good place" the previous night when the sides broke for the day.
 
Marijuana dealers everywhere cringe at the thought of the lockout ending.

I know that a lot of players have been smoking their asses off.
 
Players' secret lockout insurance could have sparked talks

Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/20.../secret-lockout-fund/index.html#ixzz1SBkIrIdV



From the moment he was elected executive director of the NFL Players Association in March 2009, DeMaurice Smith always took the long view when it came to negotiations with the owners on a new collective bargaining agreement. Hope for the best, plan for the worst.

It's one of the reasons that slightly more than a year ago he received approval from the executive committee to secure insurance that would pay each player roughly $200,000 if there were no football in 2011.

Smith disclosed the fund to only a handful of people outside of the executive committee. However with negotiations seemingly at a standstill late Wednesday night, the decision was made to play one of their aces in the hole. So in the relative quiet of the sides' New York City bargaining room the next morning, Baltimore Ravens cornerback Domonique Foxworth informed the owners of the previously secret lockout fund.

Was that the shove in the back that moved the sides closer to a potential agreement? Only the owners know for sure, but a source close to one of them said the disclosure definitely got that side's attention. Perhaps for good reason.

The common perception has been that the players' solidarity would crumble once they started missing paychecks. However the foundation beneath that line of thinking would be as solid as Jell-O if the players could couple the insurance with a large financial award from U.S. District Judge David Doty, who previously ruled the owners had illegally created a $4.3 billion lockout fund for themselves by renegotiating their TV deals at the expense of the players.

"Players Association leadership looked into this as a last possible resort to keep players together in case games would be missed," one players-side source said of the insurance war chest. "It was never intended to be used as a bargaining chip or negotiating point until things became critical."

Thursday was a critical point. If the sides could not advance negotiations then the possibility of hundreds of millions of dollars being lost to canceled preseason games was real. And if the owners allowed the impasse to get that far, what was to stop them testing the players' pain threshold by extending the lockout into the regular season?

The Players Association began informing its membership about the insurance fund over the past week and brought it up in the negotiating room for the first time Thursday. There's no way to know at this time whether it was the final oomph that pushed negotiations onto positive ground, but it's hard to believe it didn't have some impact considering the talks were "not in a good place" the previous night when the sides broke for the day.

Wow. The players went Don Corleone on the owners.

I have to think this was a big motivator for the owners to concede some things to the players, which probably brought the deal to the point it is today.

Knowing that the players would have $200k to wait out the 2011 season has got to have been a wake-up call--Owners have the possibility of losing their TV money stash, AND they had zero revenue coming in due to canceling the season. Advantage: NFLPA. Game, set, match.

Here we had Panthers owner Jerry Richardson, IIRC, screaming about how they signed a bad deal back then and now the players have to pony up and sign a bad deal themselves...and it looks like the owners, once again, got seriously owned. I know there's no "true winner" here, but if there was one to be decided upon, it seems the players could be called the victor in this saga. LOL.
 
Playing that 'lock-out insurance' card is brilliant! The players have nothing to lose if pre-season is canceled, but the owners have almost a $ billion on the line. And couple the lock-out insurance with a good chance that the players could win the $4.3 billion tv deal, I think it's obvious that the owners got caught with their pants down.

Well played, DeMaurice Smith, well played. :clap:
 
Playing that 'lock-out insurance' card is brilliant! The players have nothing to lose if pre-season is canceled, but the owners have almost a $ billion on the line. And couple the lock-out insurance with a good chance that the players could win the $4.3 billion tv deal, I think it's obvious that the owners got caught with their pants down.

Well played, DeMaurice Smith, well played. :clap:

BUT! What about the rookies? Are they covered with this insurance? Since a huge hunk of the BS going on had to do with how much to pay them in the first place, would they still be left out in the cold, with NO big bucks? Just wondering.
 
BUT! What about the rookies? Are they covered with this insurance? Since a huge hunk of the BS going on had to do with how much to pay them in the first place, would they still be left out in the cold, with NO big bucks? Just wondering.

Good question! Hopefully the answer does not matter in the long run because they get a deal done.
 
Good question! Hopefully the answer does not matter in the long run because they get a deal done.

I hope so DB! So tired of this nonsense! Takes the joy out of my fav professional sport. Sure making me think twice about the entire business of pro football! It really SUCKS, on all levels!!
 
BUT! What about the rookies? Are they covered with this insurance? Since a huge hunk of the BS going on had to do with how much to pay them in the first place, would they still be left out in the cold, with NO big bucks? Just wondering.

Don't see how that would be if the policy was signed for 1 year ago.....and it would certainly not cover UDFAs.
 
I hope so DB! So tired of this nonsense! Takes the joy out of my fav professional sport. Sure making me think twice about the entire business of pro football! It really SUCKS, on all levels!!

The upside, though, is that this ought to give us a solid 10 years of consistency.

NBA fans are about to understand what NFL fans were going through all through the late winter, spring, and midway through the summer. Sucks to be them.

I live for NFL. Period.
 
I'm waiting for the post somebody will inevitably make stating how unfair it is that the players keep their "insurance policy" while the owners "insurance policy" is tied up in escrow.
 
mortreport Chris Mortensen
In fact, owners have now abandoned the right of first refusal issue on this year's free agents. They'll have 72-hour period to re-sign

It's looks like smooth sailing now, fellas. Owner's meeting next Thursday is most likely the end of the lockout, if not sooner.
 
mortreport Chris Mortensen
In fact, owners have now abandoned the right of first refusal issue on this year's free agents. They'll have 72-hour period to re-sign
I think a lot of players and teams will take advantage of this and get deals done during this exclusive period. It's going to get real crazy when the flood gates open.
 
I believe teams are allowed to sign undrafted rookies during that 72-hour period as well. If not, then they have their own designated time as well. undrafted rookies and re-signed players will be taken care of before the UFA period begins.
 
JasonLaCanfora Jason La Canfora
If "handshake" deal comes by Tues as expected, I hear estimates of 10 days for all procedural matters resolved so that free agency can begin

AlbertBreer Albert Breer
As we reported on Total Access, after two furious days of talk, agreement in principle expected early next week. Nearly nothing in the way.

These reports are from the NFLN guys, who seemed more pessimistic than the ESPN reporters. Breer wouldn't even use the word "close"(as in a deal is close) yesterday.
 
I wish this was going to be a life long CBA without any opt outs that would be the best part fan wise.
 
I think a lot of players and teams will take advantage of this and get deals done during this exclusive period. It's going to get real crazy when the flood gates open.

Agreed - and hopefully Leach will be one of those re-signed before FA even begins.

OTOH, there will also be a number of vets who are waived in order to free up cap space. Reggie Bush seems to be a prime candidate for this.

I can't remember who was saying it (might have been Schefter), but he calculated that if the average NFL team has 40 players under contract (just an estimate on his part I believe), and the TC roster limit is 90, that means there will be 1600 players signed in a matter of 2-3 weeks.
 
I wish this was going to be a life long CBA without any opt outs that would be the best part fan wise.

That would be nice, but could never happen. Things change too frequently. New issues will arise. People will always be greedy.
 
Playing that 'lock-out insurance' card is brilliant! The players have nothing to lose if pre-season is canceled, but the owners have almost a $ billion on the line. And couple the lock-out insurance with a good chance that the players could win the $4.3 billion tv deal, I think it's obvious that the owners got caught with their pants down.

Well played, DeMaurice Smith, well played. :clap:

Setting it up was brilliant.


Playing the card..... that was gangsta
 
I don't care anymore. I hope they never sign a ****ing agreement. I am so sick of this horseshit. Every goddamn one of those MFs from owners and players and lawyers and newsman can all kiss my damn ass.

I'm sleeping in on Sundays this fall. I just don't give a **** anymore.
 
I don't care anymore. I hope they never sign a ****ing agreement. I am so sick of this horseshit. Every goddamn one of those MFs from owners and players and lawyers and newsman can all kiss my damn ass.

I'm sleeping in on Sundays this fall. I just don't give a **** anymore.

You'll be watching. Old habits are hard to break.

I'm reminded of The Godfather, when Clemenza says that every few years there's gotta' be a war among the families...too much bad blood that's gotta' be settled. Then things calm down. Rinse and repeat.
 
LOL.

You're the man. If I didn't have an old man already, I'd adopt you as my dad.

I'll adopt you. It'll cost you dollars though. I'm not into this old man hates everyone thing for nothing you know. I have to have something to do when I retire.
 
Somehow, I don't see how a 7 to 10 year span difference for the length of the CBA will not potentially be a "sticking" point for the parties. That's a pretty significant difference.
 
Speaking on ESPN Saturday, Chris Mortensen also indicated that players “won’t give in” on the remaining player health and safety issues still on the table.

We know about the reduction of OTAs and offseason practices. Mort also reports players want less contact during camp and to “basically eliminate” two-a-days. We’ll have to wait for an agreement before we see the fine print, but it’s fair to expect the players to get what they want here.

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell has focused on player safety, and these sort of changes don’t need to be approved by coaches who would be more likely to blanch at reduced camp contact.
link

I bet the coaches are schizing out. This may not effect veterans (that remain on the same team with the same scheme). But I believe this reduction will adversely affect the early development of a rookie, UDFA, FA and vet being introduced to a new team or new system.
 
I just read that the new CBA will not have franchise tags. Does that mean unless Peyton is resigned he becomes a free agent? :D

I doubt that you will come up with a legitimate link for this happening. The owners would never concede to no franchise tags after conceding to FA term/conditions.


As to your question, the last mention on this question is pretty much answered.....even though it is a 3 week old source........it remains the most reliable.
More NFL CBA Updates: Franchise Tags Will Carry Over, Tenders Meaningless
 
Playing that 'lock-out insurance' card is brilliant! The players have nothing to lose if pre-season is canceled, but the owners have almost a $ billion on the line. And couple the lock-out insurance with a good chance that the players could win the $4.3 billion tv deal, I think it's obvious that the owners got caught with their pants down.

Well played, DeMaurice Smith, well played. :clap:

DB saved me some keystrokes. I was fomulating that post practically verbatim.

Good show DB.
 
Last edited:
I don't care anymore. I hope they never sign a ****ing agreement. I am so sick of this horseshit. Every goddamn one of those MFs from owners and players and lawyers and newsman can all kiss my damn ass.

I'm sleeping in on Sundays this fall. I just don't give a **** anymore.

What harm has really been done? No OTAs? We will have a full pre season and season. Why are you so upset?
 
I doubt that you will come up with a legitimate link for this happening. The owners would never concede to no franchise tags after conceding to FA term/conditions.


As to your question, the last mention on this question is pretty much answered.....even though it is a 3 week old source........it remains the most reliable.
More NFL CBA Updates: Franchise Tags Will Carry Over, Tenders Meaningless

I was getting first right of refusal tags mixed up with franchise tags. My bad :kubepalm:
 
Albert Breer
Sides have no plans for owners & players to meet again unless necessary. Details expected to be worked out via email, phone, thru lawyers...

Albert Breer
... This, of course, is another good sign of the direction of things. Like I said yesterday, virtually nothing standing in the way now.
 
Glaringly absent from any reporting is if there will be any increase in roster numbers and active roster numbers........especially for THIS year where there will have been lessened/foreshortened REAL preparation.

How are contract signings going to be handled by player agents, since there has been no mention of setting up these rules for the new CBA? This really has a potential for chaos.
 
mortreport Chris Mortensen
It ain't over til it's over. Filed to ESPN that NFL & NFLPA negotiations necessary Mon and Tues in Wash DC w Judge Boylan.

Main point : NFL/NFLPA need more hard negotiations on unresolved issues when hoping tough stuff was over. Talk location DC or NY conflicted

Regardless of the work left, there is still optimism. And if it gets done, as expected, it will be a 10-year agreement.
 
No sign of the fat lady yet.

@mortreport Chris Mortensen

It ain't over til it's over. Filed to ESPN that NFL & NFLPA negotiations necessary Mon and Tues in Wash DC w Judge Boylan. On SC in 7 min

1 hour ago via TweetDeck

The owners and players will meet again after all.

Short after a report surfaced that the two sides were unlikely to need face-to-face sessions again, ESPN’s Chris Mortensen reports the two sides will indeed meet again on Monday and Tuesday.

It appears the meetings will be to go over some issues we haven’t heard a lot about before. (We recommend reading Florio’s post on this possibility from Friday night.)

Mort reports players want $320 million in lost benefits from the 2010 season restored. They also want the franchise tag to only be allowed once per player, instead of being able to use it in successive years. (That could be a nod to Brady antitrust plaintiff Logan Mankins, among others.) Workman’s compensation is also reportedly an issue, as are the two hanging lawsuits. (The antitrust suit and the television revenue.)

This news seems to come as a small surprise to some. NFL outside counsel Jeff Pash told Albert Breer of NFL Network that the “principles” did their job, and that the CBA was in the hands of the lawyers now. The league’s network reported no further face-to-face talks were expected to be necessary.

Something clearly changed in the meantime. We don’t think there is any reason for fans need to panic, but it’s a reminder that it’s not a deal until it’s a deal.

Consider this report lukewarm water.
link

It's ONLY $320 million (plus all the other "unimportant" stuff)..........NO PROBLEM!!!!!!!:wadepalm::shots::shots::shots:
 
Back
Top