Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

#1 pick

Wow. Does the squad car he is riding in the back of lose control crashing into a bus full of Nuns?

forgive me for being skeptical about entrusting your franchise to a cross dresser.

i dont know about you guys, but i do not want my star franchise qb to be a cross dresser. That's just me, my personal opinion.
 
I would go with:

Bridgewater
Bortles
Trade Down

We need a franchise QB and we're in a position to take the best QB in the upcoming draft.. I think it's fair to ask if we should pass that up for the next Mario Williams?

I don't think you pass on a talent like Clowney for Bortles. He's underwhelming to me anyway.
 
no draft picks are locks.

Until they put on pads and play you don't know what you've got. And how many times have we all played the game of "we should have taken so and so" in the draft a few years ago?

You have to have a good QB to win in the NFL. I don't really want any of the veteran FAs available this year, so that means taking a chance in the draft. Whoever they pick, I hope it's the right choice. And I'm still not convinced that anyone is worth the absolute top 1.1 pick this year. But we may have to use the pick to get what we want anyway.
 
I don't think you pass on a talent like Clowney for Bortles. He's underwhelming to me anyway.

You don't stretch for a less than elite player with the #1-1 pick. That's what you do 1-15+. Get the low risk player with the top draft choices. I still think Matthews is a MY GUY type of player. But there are enough teams stretching for QBs this year for him to fall to 5 or 6 and still get a very good QB prospect in round 2. We would likely pick up a high draft pick or 2 this year or possibly more in future years and still get OUR GUY. Being 1-1 doesn't make anybody elite. It just gives us the opportunity if there IS an elite prospect. I don't think there is one at QB, so trading down, (not too far though), is my top choice.
 
I don't think you pass on a talent like Clowney for Bortles. He's underwhelming to me anyway.

Right now I would be pissed if the Texans took Clowney. This team has had elite level DE's in Watt and Williams and that didn't get them far in the playoffs. We've never had a true franchise caliber QB. Just the possibility of that has me wanting Bridgewater.

Trade down or take Matthews.

A RT at 1.1 would be worse than Clowney.

Teddy Texan

After his game against Miami I'm fully on board with this.
 
From what I've read so far, I'm not going to argue them taking Clowny, Matthews or a QB with 1.1, even though I don't think any of the three are worthy of it. But if we don't take them off the board, someone else will very quickly and then we won't have them.
 
For those of you saying no to Teddy, what's your answer for a QB next season? That's by far our biggest position of need.
 
For those of you saying no to Teddy, what's your answer for a QB next season? That's by far our biggest position of need.

depends on who you ask. It's been all over the boards.

- pick another QB 1-1
- pick other position then another QB at 2-1 (or trade back into first)
- grab a FA for a stop gap and get a QB in next year's draft

There's not a consensus and I don't think many, if any, are gonna be swayed from their decision
 
This draft is deep, but the top players aren't locks. In this environment, tradings for additional picks would help this team more than the best of the non elite picks. You must compare this the prospects with both other prospects in this years class and also other classes to get the most. A plethora of second tier players makes numbers superior to the individual this season. Next year is going to be Top Heavy.

I'd be careful with this line of thinking. Everybody was drooling over this QB class a year ago and now everyone is saying there is no QB worth the #1 pick.

I typically agree with trading down in the first round every year unless there is a guy you can't afford to pass on. Hoarding picks in future drafts is a good long term strategy because they come cheaper than picks in the current draft. But I'd be careful about banking on next year's draft being better when it's still a year and a half away.
 
For those of you saying no to Teddy, what's your answer for a QB next season? That's by far our biggest position of need.

I look for Mettenberger or another QB at 2-1 or try to move up to get him if I think he won't make it to the second round. I look for a veteran QB to sign and possibly play if Mettenberger isn't ready to go right out of the gate.
 
I look for Mettenberger or another QB at 2-1 or try to move up to get him if I think he won't make it to the second round. I look for a veteran QB to sign and possibly play if Mettenberger isn't ready to go right out of the gate.

great plan!!

draft an immobile qb with a torn acl.

more like mettenschaub.
 
A QB, not necessarily Bridgewater. Do not trade down and lose the man you really need. A lot should be up to the new coach.
 
People keep saying this, but what says he has to be the RT?

For me, the question is: why would a great RT be worse than drafting a mediocre or bad DE?... I'm not predicting either will be the case, but I disagree with the idea that we should avoid a great player with 1.1 simply because he plays a position that is not often selected with the first pick. Who cares? Other than K, P, FB, Any position should be within the scope of consideration. By the way, RT is pretty darn important.
 
For me, the question is: why would a great RT be worse than drafting a mediocre or bad DE?... I'm not predicting either will be the case, but I disagree with the idea that we should avoid a great player with 1.1 simply because he plays a position that is not often selected with the first pick. Who cares? Other than K, P, FB, Any position should be within the scope of consideration. By the way, RT is pretty darn important.

We could get a solid RT at 2.1 and still be able to take the best QB in this draft at 1.1. That is why I'm not wanting Matthews 1st overall.
 
Matthews is also not the best player in the draft. He might be the safest pick. Low risk, low reward. He is overrated here due to his family and where he is from.

So "reaching" for a QB is not okay but "reaching" for a RT is?
 
We could get a solid RT at 2.1 and still be able to take the best QB in this draft at 1.1. That is why I'm not wanting Matthews 1st overall.

Perhaps... but if Matthews is clearly the best player on the board and is markedly better than whatever RT would be likely at 2.1, I think he should be strongly considered... It isn't what I want, but I do reject the idea that a player expected to start immediately at RT shouldn't be considered with the pick... This thinking is influenced by the previous CBA, when the pick was going to make over $50million and a team simply couldn't justify that much of the cap going to the RT position... However, a contract around $25 million at RT is perfectly reasonable.
 
great plan!!

draft an immobile qb with a torn acl.

more like mettenschaub.

Right. We all know that no one who tore their ACL ever walked or ran again.

Hey! I got a better idea! Lets draft the stick-man out of Louisville and then he can tear everything up like RGIII did in his first year in the pros! RGIII is immobile now too right?

Someday, when they finally solve the mystery of repairing ACL injuries maybe we won't have to put NFL players down anymore and they can return to compete again. It's a dream I have.
 
Unless we're racing horses, I don't care who his daddy is. Pedigree doesn't mean squat in the NFL.

Some of y'all get so caught up in "local" players that you miss the big picture. Just like Case was hyped up to be the savior at QB, Matthews is being hyped up to be the savior. Hell he might not even be the best tackle in the draft.
 
Unless we're racing horses, I don't care who his daddy is. Pedigree doesn't mean squat in the NFL.

Some of y'all get so caught up in "local" players that you miss the big picture. Just like Case was hyped up to be the savior at QB, Matthews is being hyped up to be the savior. Hell he might not even be the best tackle in the draft.

record_playing_zps8688b134.gif
 
With a new coach coming in, he'll very likely want to build the team with a fresh new QB. I'm not attached to any one in particular but I know it has to be a QB. This is the most important position in all of sports imo and it's really a no brainer. Even if it doesn't work out, you have to take the risk because of the potential rewards.
 
Right. We all know that no one who tore their ACL ever walked or ran again.

Hey! I got a better idea! Lets draft the stick-man out of Louisville and then he can tear everything up like RGIII did in his first year in the pros! RGIII is immobile now too right?

Someday, when they finally solve the mystery of repairing ACL injuries maybe we won't have to put NFL players down anymore and they can return to compete again. It's a dream I have.

Yeah, because having trouble putting on weight after having mouth surgery can't be fixed in the pros... And why are you comparing RG3 to Teddy? You guys are reaching now. Better get used to the idea of Houston drafting him. It's at least a 50/50 chance.
 
With a new coach coming in, he'll very likely want to build the team with a fresh new QB. I'm not attached to any one in particular but I know it has to be a QB. This is the most important position in all of sports imo and it's really a no brainer. Even if it doesn't work out, you have to take the risk because of the potential rewards.

I agree we MUST draft a QB, but there aren't any that justify the #1 slot.
 
I agree we MUST draft a QB, but there aren't any that justify the #1 slot.

Says who? We need a QB. We have a chance to take the best one. I swear it seems like some of you guys want to see the same old Texans. More FGs than TDs and praying your defense doesn't allow a TD.
 
I agree we MUST draft a QB, but there aren't any that justify the #1 slot.

That's your opinion which you are entitled to. I believe there might be 2 or 3 guys who will emerge as the potential no 1 pick and if you're the Texans you pull the trigger and go with it. Also, I don't think there's anyone else worthy of the overall pick. Clowney seems to have issues and I don't think you draft a RT with the top pick. If you can trade down and still get the best QB in the draft, that might be a reasonable option but they better make sure that their guy will be available.
 
If the player you love is not highly regarded, trade down, pick up extra draft picks and then draft your guy. No need to reach. This also holds true if you don't have Your Guy and they look about the same.

It's not logical because If you trade down there is no guarantee he will be there. If you LOVE a player when it's your pick take him.
 
I agree we MUST draft a QB, but there aren't any that justify the #1 slot.

Why? Explain. I keep hearing this but nobody ever explains why there are no QB's worthy of the number 1 pick.

Should the draft just skip the first pick altogether and start at #2? Anybody worthy of the 2nd pick, or should we skip down further and start at 10?
 
Why? Explain. I keep hearing this but nobody ever explains why there are no QB's worthy of the number 1 pick.

Why? Because QB does NOT and should NOT take priority over BPA. And QB, no matter who this year, is NOT the BPA.
 
Why? Because QB does NOT and should NOT take priority over BPA. And QB, no matter who this year, is NOT the BPA.

Ok, let's say Bridgewater is seen as a franchise QB that has drawn comparisons to Aaron Rodgers (which he has), but he's the #3 BPA and Clowney is #1. Do you bypass the franchise QB for the top DE? We've had two elite level DE's on this team since 2006 (Mario & Watt) and neither have led this team far into the playoffs. We have never had a true franchise QB and they are what lead teams deep in the playoffs...
 
Ok, let's say Bridgewater is seen as a franchise QB that has drawn comparisons to Aaron Rodgers (which he has), but he's the #3 BPA and Clowney is #1. Do you bypass the franchise QB for the top DE? We've had two elite level DE's on this team since 2006 (Mario & Watt) and neither have led this team far into the playoffs. We have never had a true franchise QB and they are what lead teams deep in the playoffs...

First thing you need to do is find out who is comparing Teddy to Aaron Rodgers and why?
 
Ok, let's say Bridgewater is seen as a franchise QB that has drawn comparisons to Aaron Rodgers (which he has), but he's the #3 BPA and Clowney is #1. Do you bypass the franchise QB for the top DE? We've had two elite level DE's on this team since 2006 (Mario & Watt) and neither have led this team far into the playoffs. We have never had a true franchise QB and they are what lead teams deep in the playoffs...

I think it will become a lot clearer when Texans select a Head Coach. Clean slate, chance to wipe the board fresh. Right now it is apparent that beauty in in the eye of the beholder, meaning everyone has their own opinion so who is to say who is right or wrong? So new coach first, then underclassman deadline, all star bowl games (always like to see prospects compete) combine then free agency. In about four months from now teams will have pretty much finalized their respective big boards & ready for day one, which is really when the **** hits the fan, trades & movement in draft order. Just remember one thing-
ask yourself, is he Texan worthy?

:wesmantexanfan:
 
Ok, let's say Bridgewater is seen as a franchise QB that has drawn comparisons to Aaron Rodgers (which he has), but he's the #3 BPA and Clowney is #1. Do you bypass the franchise QB for the top DE? We've had two elite level DE's on this team since 2006 (Mario & Watt) and neither have led this team far into the playoffs. We have never had a true franchise QB and they are what lead teams deep in the playoffs...


My sentiments exactly. Bridgewater is the only qb in this draft that has a chance to be a franchise qb in my opinion. I know others think he isn't, but I believe he is. Being a Texans fan since the beginning I'm tired of average to way below average qb play.


Sent from the future...
 
My sentiments exactly. Bridgewater is the only qb in this draft that has a chance to be a franchise qb in my opinion. I know others think he isn't, but I believe he is. Being a Texans fan since the beginning I'm tired of average to way below average qb play.


Sent from the future...

Being a Texans fan from the begining, I want the Trenches fixed for 1st time since the teams inception. It's simple fix the trenches then get your QB. Wasn't anything learned in the Carr debacle?

By trenches I mean the DL too. The difference is that You think Teddy is the savior. I dont, we will see who's right. I do think Teddy will have an Andy Dalton type career.
 
Being a Texans fan from the begining, I want the Trenches fixed for 1st time since the teams inception. It's simple fix the trenches then get your QB. Wasn't anything learned in the Carr debacle?

By trenches I mean the DL too. The difference is that You think Teddy is the savior. I dont, we will see who's right. I do think Teddy will have an Andy Dalton type career.

1st time? I thought we were very good in the trenches in 2011 & 2012.
 
Why? Because QB does NOT and should NOT take priority over BPA. And QB, no matter who this year, is NOT the BPA.

If you don't have a decent QB on the roster, then I say it does take priority over BPA. A good QB can mask a lot of deficiencies on the team (see Brady).
 
Back
Top