S
SESupergenius
Guest
I don't know it's like some wierd parallel universe thread. Yes it is, not it isn't, no it isn't, yes it is.
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
What the heck are you arguing?
I think you are underanalyzing the play.....David Held the safety in the middle of the field with his eyes....A.J was the #1 option on that play....It wasn't that he "went" for it....He just did a good job holding the safety, and didn't have to check down....
so David giving the ball to Indy on our 20 on our 1st & second possesions of the game had nothing to do with it?? I mean we should expect that with a new scheme, poorly utilized running game, and poor line protection??3 reasons why our offense has sputtered. New scheme, no running game, line protection. Same old song the last 5 years.
Again, you show you don't know what the heck you're talking about. Before the half, in both the Indy & Washington game, our running game was pretty avg.... getting 8 & 11 yard runs, picking up every 1st down they were asked to, and picking up positive yards on 1st & second down.Our running wasn't even average, but this type of offense is geared towards the play action pass...no running game directly influences the ability to pass. It's simple, if the running game gets going it opens the playbook for the pass as we saw in the 2nd half yesterday. It's no coincidence that the running game was great the second half and our passing game score points.
He played no differently than he did against Philly & Indy. If we'd have given him the ball in the second half of those games, he would have got the same results.Again, I don't know what game you are watching but I watched the one where Lundy had the biggest gain all season by any of our running backs, gained first downs, and almost 100 yards rushing. I don't even seen how you can compare that. Kubiak took time out for him to learn the system a little better and gain some knowledge. He comes in a plays lights out. Lundy looked way better than any running back up this point, stats prove it and the live game proved it.
That was a great game. Great Defense, Andre had a great game.... Carr had a good game..... sorry, he played good enough.Good enough to win is the Miami game, this was great game for him and the offense, the offense scored 27 points, that's more than just good enough, that's a pounding.
Andre took the ball out of the Safeties hands, how can that be late??Safety was late because he didn't blanket him and Carr wouldn't have thrown deep if the safety picked up AJ on time. It was a perfect throw, but I guess to everyone that has a knock on Carr it was just lucky.
I think it's obvious that my standards are higher.No interceptions is no interceptions. With 2 TD's a no Int's and over a 70% completion percentage, that is a great game in my book, I don't care how they are catching it. Maybe your standards are higher.
He's had turnovers in most games, this game there were none, not 1 can be attributed to him. Add all that together and that is a great all-around game.
Those are your words.He's had turnovers in most games
Again, it's not that the running wasn't consistent, we had to abandon it to try to catch up.but it wasn't consistant enough to respect the run. the 2nd half opened some doors because once we got the lead they Jags had to play the run more.
I'm done talking to you. If this is all you expect out of a #1 overall...... or an $8 million contract extension, it's better if you and I do not discuss QBs any more.your=you all,y'all, everyone that is in the group mention. It wouldn't be "our" because I am not included in that group.
Ok, I'll take the David Carr from 2004 and add a West Coast offense, good TE, Eric Moulds and different offensive line. I'll take that any day, THANKS! No give me the defense from 2002 and we are set for a good run in 2007.
Then your thoughts are misquided. He's got the talent to be a an above average QB, a top 10 QB sometimes, but the success of this team will be the put on the success of the defense. That is where you should look more than the QB position. I know offense get all the glory and neat to look at with highlight tapes, but the defense is the one that'll "get er done."
Carr was 49 - 55 for 873 yards with no turnovers or fumbles during warmups ... Rosenfels was equally impressive though
Troll. Being late is the same thing as saying David held the safety at bay. It's a cause and effect. Nice staing the obvious.
I once had a puppy, it was dog.
Please help me understand why the 2nd quarter is meaningless. It must be, the Texans scored 10 points in the 2nd, including a TD pass by Carr. I already understand that when Carr had success in the 4th quarter, that is was meaningless because the 4th quarter is just garbage time. The fact that we scored 17 points in the 4th is more proof of how bad Carr is. A QB who does well in the 4th quarter _YECH!! Nothing could be worse!
I also understand that 1st quarter scores are meaningless because Carr had some TD passes in the 1st quarter this year. Why those plays are scripted and the QB has no impact!
But now I am confused. Please explain why the 2nd quarter is irrelevant, and only the 3rd quarter has any meaning. Thanks for your help!
Carr took two big shots downfield. One was intercepted, and we got lucky. The other was that touchdown..... so I don't know.
I admit that I too criticize David for not stretching the field. If the passing game is going to open the running game, it's the throws that stretch the field, that is going to do it. the short passes, force the defense to play where we don't want them, closer to the line, making it more difficult to run the ball. We need the deep pass to back them up.
Now I was cussing Carr all game, because I thought the reason we got Moulds was to force one on one coverage, and challenge that coverage, thinking we should win more times than not.
That doesn't appear to be in Carr's makeup, or he just hasn't got used to Molds just yet. I say this because I see AJ & Moulds running in single coverage often from 608.
Then I got to thinking...... every now and again, you'll see Peyton, Palmer, or McNabb making some tight throws..... but most of the time, ReggieWayne is wide open. Reggie Brown is Wide open, who'sYourMamma is wide open...
& that's because of play design. Why would anybody ever leave Westbrook uncovered?? Play design... The LB/Safety has to make a decision, and neither is ever a good decision.
I haven't seen any of our plays that do the same thing... except that bootleg OwenScored his 3rd touchdown on.... (2 rookies on our team combine for 4 touchdowns..... wow. 3 out of the passing game, 1 out of the running game... what more could anyone expect from the '06 draft??)
I understand the play action gets that for us, but I think we need to draw up some plays that attack the LB/Safety.
Bob, let me explain it to you. Unless we can't have Kubiak script every play of every possession, & present these scripts to the QB a day in advance, we'll be at a serious disadvantage when it's time to play football.
scoring 10 points in the second Qtr is huge...... that's what we've been asking for. Now if we can get this TEAM(which just happens to be lead by DavidCarr on offense) to score in the 3rd QTr, we'd be onto something. Then we can start working on scoring in all 4 Qtrs in the same game. That would be special.
But scoring 2 touchdowns in the 4th Qtr when you started the Qtr down by 31. it's meaningless. If we could've scored a touchdown in the 1st, 2nd, and/or 3rd Qtr, those 2 touchdowns in the 4th would have meant something.
MrMcNair, I'm really surprised that I'm having to explain this to you. Look, instead of hosting that Boar for the next home game(George that is) invite me to your box, and I'll show you a few more things that will help your franchise win more games.
You're damned if you do and you're damned if you don't ----- Bart Simpson
TK ----- please submit your Tennessee gameplan on Tuesday so that the coaches can digest it prior to Wednesday
Now don't go blaming the coaches. They have recievers running deeper routes, they are getting the one on one coverage that we said AJ & Eric will thrive on. We've seen one safety, and we've seen the middle of the field wide open. We've seen Eric Moulds covered by LBs & OwenDAniels covered by midgets, but David will throw the underneath route everytime.
& I have nothing against the underneath route, or the RBs in the flat, but if it's 3rd & 10, there better be 10 yards of empty field in front of that RB, and we better not have single coverage on either of our ProBowl WRs....
Thanks for enlightening us all to why you feel the way you do. It's either Carr's fault or Bush's in your book I'm sure.
I do not think you addressed the question, but I cannot debate your take, except for midgets covering Owen Daniels. I will go back and watch the other games, but I do not recall any midgets on the opposing side.
Aaron Glenn is a midget, and the LB Jacksonville Matched up on Eric & Owen in the slot was a midget.
I pity the fool that goes up against this midgetAaron Glenn is a midget, and the LB Jacksonville Matched up on Eric & Owen in the slot was a midget.
MrMcNair, I'm really surprised that I'm having to explain this to you. Look, instead of hosting that Boar for the next home game(George that is) invite me to your box, and I'll show you a few more things that will help your franchise win more games.
I pity the fool that goes up against this midget
![]()
You are wonderfully absurd at times.![]()
Now don't go blaming the coaches. They have recievers running deeper routes, they are getting the one on one coverage that we said AJ & Eric will thrive on. We've seen one safety, and we've seen the middle of the field wide open. We've seen Eric Moulds covered by LBs & OwenDAniels covered by midgets, but David will throw the underneath route everytime.
& I have nothing against the underneath route, or the RBs in the flat, but if it's 3rd & 10, there better be 10 yards of empty field in front of that RB, and we better not have single coverage on either of our ProBowl WRs....
Aaron Glenn is a midget
Proof that you can let people define themselves.
Is it, or is it not a mismatch in our favor based on size??
Once the running game gets going you'll see this whole offense open up
Yes everytime a QB sees a 5' 9" Aaron Glenn (multiple pro-bowler) they should assume anyone taller is a mismatch or maybe a 5' 10" Dunta Robinson, or 5' 10" DeAngelo Hall or 5' 10" Ronde Barber or 5' 10" Nathan Vasher--especially on a TE no taller than WR's they cover every day like AJ, Roy Williams, Javon Walker, Keyshawn Johnson. But no--you have cracked the case.
If you can't see the difference between Scoring a touchdown in the 4th Qtr, when you are down by three scores, and scoring a touchdown when you are up by 3 points, or 4 points...........
....... well, I can see why I'm the only one arguing with you.
... and a very complex offense....
Are you just jumping into the middle of an argument, or do you know what all we are talking about.
You don't see OwenDaniels on AaronGlenn is a mismatch?? in our favor??
Based on size, it's not a mismatch, because skill can overcome size. Based on AG's diminishing skills due to age, it's a mismatch in our favor. Size has little to do with it.
I wouldn't say size has "little" to do with it....A size disadvantage can be overcome....But size defintely plays a role in football...
I guess I should have clarified my statement - In this case (AG vs. OD), size has little to do with it. AG in his prime would eat OD alive.
As an aside, however, the game seems to be changing again to focus on speed and quickness as opposed to size in some positions. For a while, all you could hear about were the big, physical WRs. Today, there are some small WRs making a big impact. Smallish CBs have always held their own against the larger WRs if they are highly skilled (AG, Bailey, our own Robinson, Hall, etc.), and it seems like whenever a team is willing to give an "undersized" MLB a chance, he usually plays well. I'm sure perception has a lot to do with this view, but I can probably come up with a pretty extensive list of current players who lack ideal size and perform well against larger players.
If Owen gets position on Glenn, it would be difficult for the 5'9" Glenn to stop Owen(6'3") from catching the ball without commiting a penalty. If you watched last night's game, Shockey was boxing out DemarcusWare & Roy Williams... ODaniels on AaronGlenn is a mismatch.
Aaron Glenn is the best cover corner I have ever seen in my life. He could cover Yao Ming on a fade route and knock it away without getting called for interference
I guess you were born after Deon Sanders retired.....
Aaron Glenn is the best cover corner I have ever seen in my life. He could cover Yao Ming on a fade route and knock it away without getting called for interference
I guess you were born after Deion Sanders retired.....
Aaron Glenn is the second best cover corner I have ever seen
I didn't like losing him, but I never thought he was THAT good.
Primetime shut down his half of the field.No but Deion was great. But he couldnt stick to guys like Glenn can. And now that pass interference is such a ridiculous penalty a lot of Deion's techniques would be illegal, especially the armbar