Yes. A successful running scheme has nothing to do with a dual threat QB. Ex: Foster and Tate……A dual threat QB helps to establish a successful run scheme, or am I missing something important?
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Yes. A successful running scheme has nothing to do with a dual threat QB. Ex: Foster and Tate……A dual threat QB helps to establish a successful run scheme, or am I missing something important?
Nevertheless, a dual threat QB can enhance a successful running game ala Ravens.Yes. A successful running scheme has nothing to do with a dual threat QB. Ex: Foster and Tate……
Bad example as Lamar has been hurt quite a bit in his career. Dual threat isn’t as important as being able to withstand hits and being accurate throwing the ball.Nevertheless, a dual threat QB can enhance a successful running game ala Ravens.
Pound that frickin rock!No you want an established run scheme. Because that sets up playaction.
Kinda - I like a mauling Oline too.A dual threat QB helps to establish a successful run scheme, or am I missing something important?
Kinda - I like a mauling Oline too.
You don't really want your QB to run it - that's what the RB's are for.
Still, I agree you don't want a statue back there.
Yes, as long as the QB is feared for his passingI just picture a Kubiak designed roll-out with a QB who is actually a threat to run it. Defenses would HAVE to take that threat serious, opening up the passing game with ease.
Clayton Tune's play fakes reportedly are outstanding.No you want an established run scheme. Because that sets up playaction.
I was thinking the same thing again last night re CT. I don't think he is the ultimate answer but the guy I think is is likely going to Carolina.Clayton Tune's play fakes reportedly are outstanding.
If Young is not there at #2, I'm coming around to going defense at #2 and #12; and going with Tune in a late, third day round. From what I'm reading, he should fit well in a WCO.
Most definitely, even when he had that chump, our running game was better.Nevertheless, a dual threat QB can enhance a successful running game ala Ravens.
Edit: I am going to stop here. I think we are talking about the same thing, only I prefer my QB be able to run vs not run like Schaub. Does he need to be able to run in a West coast? No....but I would prefer he be able to. Only makes the offense more dangerous. Memories of Schaub still gets my ulcers acting up.
One person said he was hard to coach and it isn’t because of what these jokes are saying. They took it way out of context.
That's what I was referring to when I said you could use him in different positions. During blitz packages, slide him outside our starting DE's where he can have a virtually uncontested run at the QB or RB in the backfield.Why not also put him on the line with four other guys?
Until they ran up against a team that wanted to win.Good Schaub and AJ were dangerous.
Teams have got to figure out how to run when the QB is not under center.Yes. A successful running scheme has nothing to do with a dual threat QB. Ex: Foster and Tate……
No comparison to Tyree Wilson?Nick Bosa: 6’4” 266 33” arms 10 3/4” hands
Will Anderson: 6’ 3 1/2” 253 33 7/8” arms 9 7/8” hands
Anderson is not exactly comparing Bryce Young to other QBs. And he’s got longer arms than Bosa. I am not concerned with his size holding up as a 4-3 DE. I am confident the coaches will figure out a way to make use of Anderson’s skillset.
How many play actions to make up his deficiencies?Clayton Tune's play fakes reportedly are outstanding.
If Young is not there at #2, I'm coming around to going defense at #2 and #12; and going with Tune in a late, third day round. From what I'm reading, he should fit well in a WCO.
What I like about you best is you really know how to make up your mind!I can tell you exactly what the Texans are going to do at 1:2. They are either going to draft a QB or not.
In my opinion, not enough people are talking about pressures and focusing only on sacks.
I wished he had played center last season rather than guard. He did well at center 2 years ago .
What defiencies do you refer to?How many play actions to make up his deficiencies?
Arm strength is not only important in deep routes. They are extremely important in throwing into tight windows in intermediate range passes.........tight windows which become much tighter in the NFL.What defiencies do you refer to?
His primary weakness is his arm strength on the deep routes. But he has plenty of strength out to the intermediate range, which fits the wco.
He's accurate with fine touch, can hit receivers in stride, reads the field well and works through his progressions, uses his eyes to manipulate safeties, has a quick release and throws a nice spiral, and can use his legs.
Except for his deep passing issue, his other issues are correctable and in our offense could do very well. I think you may be thinking he would be drafted to start.
He had lots of those also... more than any other prospect if I'm not mistakenIn my opinion, not enough people are talking about pressures and focusing only on sacks.
The report I read says he does have sufficient arm strength to drive the ball through tight windows out to the intermediate range. Are you suggesting otherwise? I think I do recall reading he does have a hesitancy to throw into tight windows and this sometimes leads to sacks. But this is a head problem and should be correctable.Arm strength is not only important in deep routes. They are extremely important in throwing into tight windows in intermediate range passes.........tight windows which become much tighter in the NFL.
Miss me on Torrence. From what I've seen, he can't move on a rail.IF I were to take Bryce Young at #2 (and I would not), my next two picks (assuming no trades were available) would be #12 O'Cyrus Torrence (RG) & #33 John Michael Schmitz (C). Those are the two best IOL in this draft & I wouldn't care that we just traded for Mason. The best RG would start. That would at least give Young a fighting chance to survive the NFL. He'd have to live with the current skill position players we have until the next off season. If the Texans take him, they have to protect him.
So 3 1st rd picks under the age of 27 isn't enough?Enough to finally get it right. If I had my way, C- Michael-Schmitz (Minnesota) would be my first piece. Later in the draft, I’d select C/G- Ricky Stromberg (Arkansas). Both of these guys have been their OL QB’s at Center. They’re both smart and been a big part of OL’s that had dominant running games.
I’d be fine with this investment in the draft…..and could take a flyer on G- Andrew Vorhees (USC) if he’s still on the board late due to his injury. He’d be my 2024 insurance policy if Green doesn’t pan out in 2023.
Investments start in the trenches…..b/c solid trenches make skill players look a lot better.
This team needs to keep taking QBs early and often until they get it right. It's the surest path to a SB.
So 3 1st rd picks under the age of 27 isn't enough?
How long do you give them to pan out?No, not if those 3 1st rd picks don’t all pan out. You keep picking them until they do.
No, not if those 3 1st rd picks don’t all pan out. You keep picking them until they do.
Until they ran up against a team that wanted to win.
Schaub was perfect for this team when we got him. For what that team was. But when they started getting into the play-offs, he didn't have it.
So 3 1st rd picks under the age of 27 isn't enough?
Texans OL has been performing very well with the known exception in the center of that line. Coaches performing well anywhere on the offense with the possible exception of the RB coach is a different story.If they’re not performing……then no, it isn’t enough.
Some underlying issues could be coaching, might be the system, play calling could be a big factor, or the player just doesn’t have the drive to be the best player they can be at the pro level. So many factors play a roll, so there’s no black-eye if teams have to go back to the well.
Texans OL has been performing very well with the known exception in the center of that line. Coaches performing well anywhere on the offense with the possible exception of the RB coach is a different story.
How long do you give them to pan out?
If they’re not performing……then no, it isn’t enough.
Some underlying issues could be coaching, might be the system, play calling could be a big factor, or the player just doesn’t have the drive to be the best player they can be at the pro level. So many factors play a roll, so there’s no black-eye if teams have to go back to the well.
Nobody knows what DeMeco is going to do. And it’s not just him making the decision.Same applies to offensive lineman. You keep picking them until you get it right. And I think DeMeco will be grabbing a center faster than some of you will like.
Dude made up some false crap and you people took the freaking bait and ran with it.That puts me all the **** out on him.
Everyone knows I want the guy with the undisputed motor and work ethic. Anyone who even has a question of not having their heart in it is completely out for me. Even if it's smokescreen BS, I don't want anyone who'd even be believable as having that issue.
In fact, if anyone has a list of those guys with that concern please share it so I can know if my "interest" is misguided.
I don't want any of those ******* loafs here. Someone who's "hard to coach" and "some people doubt his drive" and the fact that he's got that agent makes me think that this guy runs at the first sign of trouble and is in the business of blaming others and whatnot. No thanks.
Give me JJs. Give me DeMecos.
That's why I said possible exception. Players have to have talent also. No coaching was going to fix Burkhead but Pierce was allowed to shine.The “exception of the RB coach” invalidated your point. It was Dameon Pearce. Blaming coaching is the easy way out, looking for the quick fix.
This is probably the most honest and thorough evaluation of Tune which is mostly consistent with my observations. He has developmental potential, but likewise has significant limitations.The report I read says he does have sufficient arm strength to drive the ball through tight windows out to the intermediate range. Are you suggesting otherwise? I think I do recall reading he does have a hesitancy to throw into tight windows and this sometimes leads to sacks. But this is a head problem and should be correctable.
Dude made up some false crap up and you people took the freaking bait and ran with it.
Now we’re judging players off of what someone else said versus actual facts.
That’s the freaking world we live in. Smh
I've seen it mentioned that the Texans could trade pick 1.2 to the Raiders, so I tried that in this mock. What do y'all think?
I'm having too much fun with these too. I've done like 50 of them with PFF. Those are two good drafts. I wouldn't mind either one of them.I think the PFF algorithm for trades is kinda broken. I've done a couple of similar trade backs and the number of picks you end up with are just ridiculous. I did a tradeback with the Colts where they basically gave me their entire draft (and some picks the next couple of years).
View attachment 11911
I did a Lions one, too.
View attachment 11910
I'm having entirely too much fun with these.
Raiders giving their entire draft plus to move from 7 to 2 is not remotely realisticI've seen it mentioned that the Texans could trade pick 1.2 to the Raiders, so I tried that in this mock. What do y'all think?
View attachment 11909