Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

Suggestions That Could Improve The NFL Game

CloakNNNdagger

Hall of Fame
FMIA: Smart NFL People Share 25 Ways To Make Pro Football Better


The idea: ask smart people, 25 of them, in and around football, what they’d do if they could change one thing about the sport of professional football.

I’m getting out of the way. From Ron Wolf to Pete Carroll to Amy Trask to Mike Florio, here goes.I’ll be back to wrap things up.

The Lead: Game Change

Ron Wolf: Cut Down On Flags
Pro Football Hall of Fame general manager

I spent 38 active years in professional football. I came in not knowing anything at all about pass interference, and guess what? After those 38 years, I left without knowing what pass interference is. I think that the officials have responsibility in too many areas nowadays. The rule that drives me batty is “players in a defenseless posture.” The thing I fail to understand is throughout the ages when hasn’t a receiver been in a defenseless position? Interestingly, football has always been a game of blocking, tackling and kicking. It is supposed to be a spartan game and necessary roughness was a huge part of its attraction and still is. It’s my firm belief that the game should go back to the coaches and players to determine the outcome of a contest. There are way too many flags flying in today’s game. It takes away from the spectacular aspect of the sport. People love the toughness, the dedication, the overall athletic skill of the performers on the field, and they should be the ones that determine the final outcome of any contest—not the officials.

Rick Gosselin: Help Defenses By Extending The Bump Zone
Covered NFL in Kansas City and Dallas for 47 years, Pro Football Hall of Fame voter

In 2008, NFL quarterbacks completed 61 percent of their passes league-wide. Ten years later, NFL quarterbacks were completing passes at a 65 percent clip. In 2008 there were six individual 4,000-yard passing seasons. In 2018, there were 12. Quarterbacks league-wide completed 1,381 more passes in 2018 than they did in 2008. But defenses intercepted 46 fewer passes in 2018 than they did in 2008. The NFL has long been a passing league, but it’s become way too easy of late for offenses to complete passes, gain yards and score points. The NFL has stacked the rules against the defense for years and it’s no longer a fair fight. It’s time to level the playing field. I’d extend the NFL bump rule from five yards to 10. Make the receivers work a little harder for space in their routes and also their catches. The 10-yard cushion would also give NFL defenders a physical counter to all the “rub” routes that have become staples in NFL offenses. The NCAA doesn’t have a five-yard rule. Neither do high schools. At those two levels, defenders are allowed to contact receivers until the ball is in the air. The NFL needs to follow suit.

Dean Blandino: Make Every Play Replay-Reviewable
FOX officiating analyst, former NFL vice president of officiating

Two thoughts:

• I have come full circle on this since I worked in the league, but I now think coaches should be able to challenge anything they want. Don’t increase the number of challenges. Put the onus on the coach to save his challenges. This would simplify the rule because you wouldn’t have to wonder what’s reviewable and what isn’t. Now that the leaguer has added pass-interference to reviewable calls, we’re going to see the creep begin. Next year, they’ll add something else. By not opening it up to all things being reviewable, all we are doing is delaying the inevitable.

• The league needs to put real resources behind officiating. Nothing the league does impacts the game more than officiating, and I believe it’s probably the area least valued by the league. I don’t want this to come across as sour grapes, because the NFL treated me great. But officiating in the NFL is treated almost as a necessary evil. You see on-field officials, good ones, moving to network jobs before the end of their careers. The NFL needs to be competitive and compensate the officials better, and also give them better resources in training.

Brandon Carr: Take Away Some Protection of the Quarterbacks
11-year veteran cornerback, Baltimore Ravens

I was playing for Kansas City in 2008, in the game when Bernard Pollard blitzed and injured Tom Brady. [Brady tore his left MCL and ACL in the first game of 2008 when Pollard hit him around the knee. The NFL created a rule to outlaw hits by defensive players to the knee or lower leg of a quarterback in the pocket in 2009.] I appreciate the Competition Committee trying to make the game as safe as possible for the players. I love the fact that the last CBA outlawed two-a-day practices in training camp—that’s going to allow me to extend my career. But the rules protecting the quarterbacks are pretty tough for defensive backs. Think about it: a 185-pound nickel back blitzes and can’t hit the quarterback low because of the Brady rule, and he has to be careful about hitting him high to avoid hitting him in helmet. Think of that 185-pound DB trying to bring down Ben Roethlisberger, or 245-pound Cam Newton. He’ll hit him around the waist and might just bounce off. This game’s hard enough for the DBs. I think a DB should be able to tackle a quarterback [in the pocket] by the legs.

THE REST OF THE STORY
 
Suggestions I like:

Extend the bump zone.
Convert the onside kick to 4th & 15.
Both teams get an OT possession.
All players active.
Run the clock on incompletions until last 4 min of each half.

Ignored the ones which don't affect play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JB
Suggestions I like:

Extend the bump zone.
Convert the onside kick to 4th & 15.
Both teams get an OT possession.
All players active.
Run the clock on incompletions until last 4 min of each half.

Ignored the ones which don't affect play.

I like the ones listed, I dont like the run the clock until the last 4 mins suggestion. I'm sure Kubiak would love this suggestion though. It would've made him something more than a slightly above avg HC.
 
Suggestions I like:

Extend the bump zone.
Convert the onside kick to 4th & 15.
Both teams get an OT possession.
All players active.
Run the clock on incompletions until last 4 min of each half.

Ignored the ones which don't affect play.

I also liked Eric Winston's playoff seeding idea
 
I also liked Eric Winston's playoff seeding idea

I was torn about that one. It kinda seems if you go there you should just have the top 6 go regardless of whether they win the division. We had an 8-8 division winner and an 11-5 (same record as division winner) miss along with another 11-5 team in 2008.
 
Why do you dislike running the clock?

Gives teams more of a chance to comeback from large deficits.

See: Pats/Falcons SB.

Never would have happened with your proposed new rule. It also would encourage teams with leads to become even more conservative and basically change the way football is played.
 
I was torn about that one. It kinda seems if you go there you should just have the top 6 go regardless of whether they win the division. We had an 8-8 division winner and an 11-5 (same record as division winner) miss along with another 11-5 team in 2008.

I think it should definitely be the top 6 regardless
 
Gives teams more of a chance to comeback from large deficits.

See: Pats/Falcons SB.

Never would have happened with your proposed new rule. It also would encourage teams with leads to become even more conservative and basically change the way football is played.

I don't follow the more conservative idea...
 
I don't follow the more conservative idea...

?

Say you have a 17 pt lead with 10 mins left in a game, with the rule Cak proposed the team with the lead could run the ball 3 times and take 2 mins off the clock 2 times = 4 mins. That would make the offense have to score 3 times without the benefit of the clock stopping for 6 of those 10 mins making a comeback impossible.

Example: Pats/Falcons SB.

Go back and check out how the clock stopping on both Pats and Falcons inc passes allowed the Pats to comeback.
 
?

Say you have a 17 pt lead with 10 mins left in a game, with the rule Cak proposed the team with the lead could run the ball 3 times and take 2 mins off the clock 2 times = 4 mins. That would make the offense have to score 3 times without the benefit of the clock stopping for 6 of those 10 mins making a comeback impossible.

Example: Pats/Falcons SB.

Go back and check out how the clock stopping on both Pats and Falcons inc passes allowed the Pats to comeback.

Teams with leads already run the ball to run out clocks. Teams behind would have to if anything be more aggressive having less time to work with.
 
Teams with leads already run the ball to run out clocks. Teams behind would have to if anything be more aggressive having less time to work with.

Check out the Pats/Falcons SB and tell me there's anyway the Pats could've made that comeback.

You would be fundamentally changing the game and that's been happening far too often for my taste in the last decade under the reign of God'ell.
 
Check out the Pats/Falcons SB and tell me there's anyway the Pats could've made that comeback.

You would be fundamentally changing the game and that's been happening far too often for my taste in the last decade under the reign of God'ell.

Very little has changed in the game under Goodell and NONE by him. The owners make rule changes.

Oh no, teams have to plan a little more on time. That sucks. I've never liked that teams don't get intentional grounding for throwing under the center's ass so we just won't agree here.

But it won't be more conservative. Teams will be encouraged to score now instead of assuming they have days to catch up.

And spare me Falcons v Pats, we all watched.
 
Very little has changed in the game under Goodell and NONE by him. The owners make rule changes.

Oh no, teams have to plan a little more on time. That sucks. I've never liked that teams don't get intentional grounding for throwing under the center's ass so we just won't agree here.

But it won't be more conservative. Teams will be encouraged to score now instead of assuming they have days to catch up.

And spare me Falcons v Pats, we all watched.

The owners do vote on rules changes, ever wonder why these changes weren't made under Tags? #leadership.

Spoken like a true Kubiak fan of football. Get a lead and sit on it. Your proposed rules change perpetuates this to a T. Tell me what do you have against the game as it is?

Great response to the Pats/Falcos SB. No response to the question. You and I both know there's no way the Pats could've comeback from that deficit with your proposed rules change. Maybe that's why you appear to so vehemently want the change.
 
?

Say you have a 17 pt lead with 10 mins left in a game, with the rule Cak proposed the team with the lead could run the ball 3 times and take 2 mins off the clock 2 times = 4 mins. That would make the offense have to score 3 times without the benefit of the clock stopping for 6 of those 10 mins making a comeback impossible.

Example: Pats/Falcons SB.

Go back and check out how the clock stopping on both Pats and Falcons inc passes allowed the Pats to comeback.

Teams can run the ball now to take time off the clock. Falcons lost the game because they went conservative, not because they went pass happy.

Maybe the 4 minutes needs to be changed to 4th qtr?
 
The owners do vote on rules changes, ever wonder why these changes weren't made under Tags? #leadership.

Lots of rule changes under Tagliabue. In fact, just avout everything you beotch about, protecting QBs, PIs, etc. started under Tagliabue.

Spoken like a true Kubiak fan of football. Get a lead and sit on it. Your proposed rules change perpetuates this to a T. Tell me what do you have against the game as it is?

As the suggestion said, this would speed the games up. Nothing Kubiak about it. Every team in the league will run out a lead now IF they can run. OB has shown the exact same propensity just not the talent to do so.

Great response to the Pats/Falcos SB. No response to the question. You and I both know there's no way the Pats could've comeback from that deficit with your proposed rules change. Maybe that's why you appear to so vehemently want the change.

So? Maybe the Pats shouldn't have gotten down so far. And in point of fact, BS, Brady only had 4 incompletions during the comeback and they handed the Falcons a minute on the clock.
 
I like the idea of both teams getting just one possession in overtime. If it still ends in a tie, then it's a tie and the frigging game is over. I HATE those damned long drawn out overtimes in the NFL.
 
I like the playoff seeding thing by record, not division title....no reason a 9-7 division title winner should get a home playoff game over a team with a better record.

Eliminating some of the protections for the qb needs to happen as well. Qb's are too protected & no other skill player on the field gets more protections than these guys. Clay matthews got called for a few trash penalties that cost GB a couple of games last year..We've all seen defensive players blocked into a qb's plant leg & the defensive guys is the 1 called for the penalty.
 
Yeah i can see it that way as well. but then again, i've just never really cared for the rule either. Everyone else's knees are exposed out there, there's shouldn't be an exception.

Nobody else stands relatively in place.

People talk about flag football and skirts. Have been all the way back to the 70s. Fact is QBs are still getting obliterated. Anyone want to volunteer to have JJ hit them between neck & knee?
 
Nobody else stands relatively in place.

These days, they don't stand relatively in place as much. It's just a small step too far imo...especially when you factor in that all of these other guys are out there under the same if not more risk.
 
These days, they don't stand relatively in place as much. It's just a small step too far imo...especially when you factor in that all of these other guys are out there under the same if not more risk.

I get where you're coming from. Just don't think anyone else is at the same risk. Inherent to a throwing motion is planting the front leg and leaving it exposed. That's not true for any other position.

And it's such a small adjustment, go ankle or thigh and there's no flag. Just don't go straight at the knee.
 
Extending the bump zone and having all players active are really the only ones I'd care to see change.

I suppose the onside kick rule as well, since it's basically obsolete as is. I'd rather see it played at the 10 though and you have to get it across the goal line to convert. That way the scoring team doesn't have the whole field to work with. Those conversions still need to be low, just not 4 out of 55 low, or whatever it was last year.

Don't have the numbers to back it up, just the eyeball test basically, but it sure seems the current OT rules have them going deeper into OT. I thought they wanted less football for safety reasons. Changing that to both teams possessing the ball regardless of a TD being scored extends the game even more. Just another contradiction of all the safety concerns. Either leave it like it is, or scrap it altogether and just end it in regulation, win, lose or draw.
 
Back
Top