You seem drunk and angry most of the time so what’s your point?
drumk most of the time yes, angry no ,but it does get more difficult to suffer fools every year
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
You seem drunk and angry most of the time so what’s your point?
Ok you have talked about his limited time as a LT in several posts now, just using this one to save time. Correct me if I’m wrong, and I’ll admit I may be, but the important thing about the LT is he is guarding the QBs blind side right?
If so then Howard’s time playing RT is equal to playing LT because they had a left handed QB so his blind side is RT. I’m sure there are more details involved but the important thing to me on that is he was the guy trusted with the blind side whether it was LT or RT.
I've had these conversations for two days and have come to several conclusions .
1. If Dillard was all that as a LT he'd be a top 5 pick cause that's where stud LT prospects go . Jonah Williams went before Dillard .
2. I'm not condoning the Texans picks but I am trying to figure their angle . I think they believe they can lift these small school guys with better weight and nutrition training will pass up some of these big school guys who had more advantage .
3. We'll see if going off the worn path will lead them to prosperity or get them fired . Maybe this has some Cal influence also .
But if rumors are true that they tried to trade up for Dillard then they had him ranked much higher than Howard and sraight up bungled it.
Doesn't help that a successful franchise in the eagles confirmed he is worth trading up for there
First, we don't know what Williams was drafted to play. The Bengals have a vet LT in Cordy Glenn. Will Jonah take over at LT next year? Is he being looked at as a RT, or OG, now? We don't know.I've had these conversations for two days and have come to several conclusions .
1. If Dillard was all that as a LT he'd be a top 5 pick cause that's where stud LT prospects go . Jonah Williams went before Dillard .
They had a 3rd. Who wouldn't trade Howard and Warring for Dillard straight up?The Texans didn't have a 4th .
They had a 3rd. Who wouldn't trade Howard and Warring for Dillard straight up?
Much the same was said when Duane Brown came out, but then it came out later that San Diego was prepared to take him with the next pick or so. And DB didn't start his rookie year either. I just think that it's much too early to determine it it' was a reach or not. NFL teams obviously had him rated higher than most draft pundits and if the Texans had him that high on their board then he was the value pick regardless of what you or I think... I don't get why most think that teams have the same board they do. Fans are fans and not in the business for a reason.
What does time have to do with it? Again, they drafted a project athlete with our most valuable draft asset. I don’t need time to know it was a reach.
They also had future picks.They had a 3rd. Who wouldn't trade Howard and Warring for Dillard straight up?
No. The important thing is he can play on the left. The foot movements, hand use, etc. is reversed. LT is also more valued because it is the traditional weak side and receives less TE assistance & faces the best pass rushers. Did their entire formations change with a QB change? - did the defenses flip? It's very much to his credit that can flip. But full time LT experience would be better than full time backside.
Also Atlanta could have selected Andre Dillard #14. Like Texans OL needed fortified to protect Matt Ryan but they choose OG Lindstrom (I would call that just as big of reach as Howard but still a fine prospect who address need). Then they traded back into first to get OT Kaleb (maybe because Texans choose Howard). Just a point other teams have similar issues/needs so often is the case their is a rush to address.
Maybe they had Dillard as a top 10 player. Extreme value if he dropped to 23. Then Howard as the 29th best player. Maybe the were torn about which guy they really wanted. Dillard has the pedigree, would have been the "smart" pick.But Howard wasn't their guy, Dillard was.
Did they have them ranked almost equally? Doubtful
The Falcons have Matthews at LT. McGary isn't the pass blocker Dillard is, but a proven RT. Lindstrom is the perfect ZBS OG for Atlanta. But passing on Brian Burns and leaving him for a division rival is weird.Also Atlanta could have selected Andre Dillard #14. Like Texans OL needed fortified to protect Matt Ryan but they choose OG Lindstrom (I would call that just as big of reach as Howard but still a fine prospect who address need). Then they traded back into first to get OT Kaleb (maybe because Texans choose Howard). Just a point other teams have similar issues/needs so often is the case their is a rush to address.
I think the Falcons were looking for a plug and play RT. Not a guy who might be able to play LT in a year. I think that's how the OT boards shaped up. Teams that could afford a developmental season had Howard higher. Those that needed a rookie starter had McGary, Little, and Risner higher. Those that don't give a **** about medicals had Taylor higher.So maybe Atlanta had Howard ranked ahead of Kaleb?
Lol you can’t really be going to that can you? What difference does it make what hand the QB throws with? I’m not wasting my time on this.
But if rumors are true that they tried to trade up for Dillard then they had him ranked much higher than Howard and sraight up bungled it.
Doesn't help that a successful franchise in the eagles confirmed he is worth trading up for there
But Howard wasn't their guy, Dillard was.
Did they have them ranked almost equally? Doubtful
The Falcons have Matthews at LT. McGary isn't the pass blocker Dillard is, but a proven RT. Lindstrom is the perfect ZBS OG for Atlanta. But passing on Brian Burns and leaving him for a division rival is weird.
Third, the Eagle run a lot of zone read, where the OTs used position blocks rather than fire across the LOS. That's what Dillard has experience at. He was a good fit for what Philly asks of their o-linemen.
Now, you're assuming. Alabama State averaged 108 rushing yards/game with a 3.0 ypc average. Not putting it all on one OT on a bad small college team. But we certainly don't have evidence that Howard can run block at a NFL proficient level.So much assuming going on.
Did I miss it when Gaine said he had Dillard rated ahead of Howard on his board?
Howard knows how to run block, something the Texans want to do.
I haven't heard read this rumor. I've read that there was an offer from a team ahead of the Texans to trade down with the Texans but they wanted one of our twos. This was a no go with the Texans. I haven't heard of the Texans initiating an offer to trade up.But if rumors are true that they tried to trade up for Dillard then they had him ranked much higher than Howard and sraight up bungled it.
Doesn't help that a successful franchise in the eagles confirmed he is worth trading up for there
So much assuming going on.
Did I miss it when Gaine said he had Dillard rated ahead of Howard on his board?
Howard knows how to run block, something the Texans want to do.
Dillard not so much. He'd be better served with the Cardinals.
Run blocking isn’t his strong suit, as he will overextend his hips, lunging and finding himself off balance. Dillard will need to get better at holding onto his blocks, showing poor hand placement at times. draftwire
Now that sounds like a work in progress to me.
![]()
Now, you're assuming. Alabama State averaged 108 rushing yards/game with a 3.0 ypc average. Not putting it all on one OT on a bad small college team. But we certainly don't have evidence that Howard can run block at a NFL proficient level.
And if Gaine did have Howard above Dillard, he's not lasting long as a NFL GM. I'm giving Gaine the benefit of the doubt that he just couldn't come up with a deal to move up. Not a ringing endorsement, but not on the level of a flat out evaluation whiff.
What was the line's fundamental failure last season? - protect the QB. Run blocking was needs improvement not atrocious.
Who'd improve the rushing attack more, an OT from a small program or the #1 RB who was from a major? - yeah, the RB.
Your first response was the QB needed protection and the run blocking was not atrocious.
So your solution is to draft a running back? We will just have to disagree about that.
![]()
I apologize. Been some seriously snippy responses if you don’t toe the company line here. Look even if that was a factor, he only played a couple of years at a small school at OT. I don’t know how it can be looked at any other way than what I said earlier.Actually I wasn’t “going with” anything. I was asking based on my understanding of the importance of the LT position. Guessing I shouldn’t have wasted my time with trying to discuss something with you either.
I apologize. Been some seriously snippy responses if you don’t toe the company line here. Look even if that was a factor, he only played a couple of years at a small school at OT. I don’t know how it can be looked at any other way than what I said earlier.
Not to me they won’t. They didn’t get the value they could of out of this draft. I like the players but hate where they drafted them. They took too much risk. This draft was loaded with solid talent and this was a chance to add serious depth to a top heavy team. Instead we reached for need.If it works Bill & Brian will be geniuses . If it don’t they’ll lose credibility . Of course that works with the pundits too . Those that give the Texans a D will look dumb . I’m hoping this draft pans out to be at least a B .
This draft was loaded with solid talent and this was a chance to add serious depth to a top heavy team. Instead we reached for need.
They coach scared and they take minimal risk. They are petrified of making a mistake and that's not how you build a winner.
FA & this draft, looks more like they're piling up mistake after mistake, big risk on Kalil, big risk on Roby, big risk on Howard, big risk all around. A lot of sht has to go right for this to be a success. Things that regularly hasn't gone right at all.
Which is why I always preach need for FA and talent for the Draft. You don't fill needs in FA then that will affect your decision making in the Draft.
That being said, every fan on this site was saying we needed multiple OT's and CB's from this Draft. The Texans did that yet most appear unhappy anyway.
My issue isn't with the players or the positions. It's with the process. This team is right on the cusp yet the FO shows no sense of urgency. No aggression. They wait for things to happen instead of making them happen. They coach scared and they take minimal risk. They are petrified of making a mistake and that's not how you build a winner.
Honestly, team is much better. More speed man coverage ability in the secondary. More bodies on the OL. 2 major holes filledKalil and Roby are on 1-year deals. FO doesn't see them as risk. To them, risk is using cap space on long term deals even if you have $64M in space.
But yes, a lot of things have to go right for this to be a success. This team is not really any better than the team from last year and the schedule is going to much, much tougher.
Honestly, team is much better. More speed man coverage ability in the secondary. More bodies on the OL. 2 major holes filled
Only shame is play calling. Same argument I had when kubiak was hereThe defense is handled much differently though. They did address holes in FA. Its a shame O'Brien makes so many dumb moved on his side of the ball.
But by the end of the year most of the pressure came from inside, our inept guards and center couldn't handle stunts. What killed us against the ColtsOn secondary I agree, but we can't assume 4 of our OTs can play. Two are projects and the other two have questionable health.
But by the end of the year most of the pressure came from inside, our inept guards and center couldn't handle stunts. What killed us against the Colts
Which is why I always preach need for FA and talent for the Draft. You don't fill needs in FA then that will affect your decision making in the Draft.
That being said, every fan on this site was saying we needed multiple OT's and CB's from this Draft. The Texans did that yet most appear unhappy anyway.
My issue isn't with the players or the positions. It's with the process. This team is right on the cusp yet the FO shows no sense of urgency. No aggression. They wait for things to happen instead of making them happen. They coach scared and they take minimal risk. They are petrified of making a mistake and that's not how you build a winner.
Howard looks like Brooks to me. Big athletic guard. Same for Scharping, big athletic guard
While I don’t disagree the problem is that you may not have great or even any choices in F/A for the positions you need. I mean look at this F/A for LTs. You basically had Trent Brown, that was the only choice really worth considering and he would have broken the bank.
F/A for need works if you only need one or two players but when you need 3+ the price tag gets to high and the choices to slim.
Howard looks like Brooks to me. Big athletic guard. Same for Scharping, big athletic guard
Square peg round hole. Brown is a rt, was average even with Brady smh. Just like solder, average at best. Why would you want that? We have that with Davenport. Big long slow feetThere were value guys to be had. Ty Nsekhe signed for 2 years, $14M. Daryl Williams resigned for one year coming off injury.
I would have preferred either to broken Khalil and Seantrel. Heck I'd even prefer to bring back Lamm