Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

Duane Brown and Mexican Meat

AcresHomesTexan

No Longer Arlington: Escaped From Jerry's World
Staff member
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...-positive-ped-test-for-duane-brown-last-year/

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/1...exans-lt-suspension-prompted-meat-warning-nfl

According to sources, the NFL Players Association proved to the NFL that the burgers and steaks Brown ate in Mexico caused the positive test. Consequently, on Tuesday, the drug program's independent administrator sent a letter warning players that consumption of too much meat in Mexico and China could cause a positive test for the anabolic substance clenbuterol.

Clenbuterol has been used to control asthma and as an unregulated weight-loss supplement. It is not used in any medication approved by the Food and Drug Administration and is banned by the NFL.
 
http://www.texanstalk.com/posts/2603745/ (from other thread):

This association with meat, especially beef, in countries such as Mexico and China has been known since 2008. The World Anti-Doping Agency entity has been dealing with this since 2010 and has had rules for international competition since then. The information and warnings have been widely distributed to athletes around the world. In fact, in their warning to athletes and teams, WADA has distributed information beginning in 2011 "to eat in only restaurants and cafeterias in these countries that have been approved by there respective organizations/federations and/or event organizers." The association is hardly a secret to any professional athlete.
 
Last edited:
After a League-wide affirmation and alert of this situation sent to all teams and players, expect no future leniency or successful appeals...........no more than previous cases of "oops, didn't know that ingredient was in my supplement."
 
After a League-wide affirmation and alert of this situation sent to all teams and players, expect no future leniency or successful appeals...........no more than previous cases of "oops, didn't know that ingredient was in my supplement."


How believable is this CnD? Brown has done PED's before, so do you think he did them again or is this food thing really plausible?
 
How believable is this CnD? Brown has done PED's before, so do you think he did them again or is this food thing really plausible?
I would not venture to say. His 1st suspension of 4 games back in the beginning of 2010 under the steroid or stimulants policy must have occurred around the end of 2009 and had to go through appeals until finalized. Typically, "probable cause" testing is established at the will of the special administer to occur any time at his will for typically a minimum of 2 years after the final decision. So by 2015, I would suspect that Brown stayed clean and was back in the "random" occasional testing with the regular players. For the announcement of this recent decision, the "offense had to be discovered by the Nov 10 2015 Bye Week or just after (because the Clenbuterol would be unlikely to have been detectable after1 week following ingestion). The appeal process is usually completed within 3-4 months. Brown's final decision was handed down after a lengthy 6 months.........telling me that the NFL really didn't have a good plan to handle the Mexican "tainted meat" claim and essentially didn't know what to do............up to now they must have been ignorant and/or oblivious to the World Anti-Doping Agency's long-standing warnings and established guidelines (which I guarantee that teams and players, being part of the international competition community, were all supplied updated WADA information as it was made available in the past). Under these circumstances, being unprepared to handle the process, they would have had to give the NFL's first case the benefit of the doubt..........not coincidentally, immediately thereafter submitting the WADA warnings and guidelines to all teams and players.........as a fair warning that this "excuse" will not be considered a valid defense in the NFL in the future.
 
Last edited:
I am reposting this from the other thread for continuity:

Clenbuterol can be a very dangerous drug in athletes that participate in high stress aerobic sports. It is a drug similar to albuterol which is used commonly for severe asthma, in that it dilates the lung tubes. However, it has other strong effects that play on the cardiovascular system............extra strong contractions of the heart muscle with abnormal hypertrophy, abnormal increased heart rate, cardiac arrhythmias and significant (sometime massive) increased blood pressure (effects that lead significant numbers of asthmatics having to cease its use. Its effects are very similar to ephedrine (which has been removed from products by the FDA for these reasons), but much more dramatic.

It is neither a steroid (though it is truly misclassified as an anabolic in the NFL Steroid Policy) nor a hormone, but is considered a PED because of its aforementioned cardiovascular effects, in addition to its metabolic effects. It brings up the body temperature and metabolic rate and to some extent (not strong) accounts for fat burning and thus creation of improved muscle to fat ratio. Animal studies have shown that it can decrease degradation of muscle, again potentially improving the muscle to fat ratio by increasing the muscle mass.............the reason that it is illegally given to livestock. Since a quad tendon rupture will occur when the muscle becomes stronger that the tendon it connects to, any further disproportionate strengthening of the muscle mass beyond its attached tendon strength is always a concern. This drug is especially dangerous for a high stress aerobic athlete because of its potential cardiac hypertrophy effects, or a condition in which the heart becomes much larger than normal due to its increased workload. This can in time lead to heart failure. This usually occurs over a long period, but when you add this to the fact that many athletes and bodybuilders already have a degree of cardiac hypertrophy due to the high amount of cardiovascular exercise they endure, it is certainly important to consider the risk.
 
So if I am reading your 2nd post correctly, CnD, it was most likely a honest mistake as the drug itself really doesn't help one become a better(?) athlete?
 
So if I am reading your 2nd post correctly, CnD, it was most likely a honest mistake as the drug itself really doesn't help one become a better(?) athlete?

Theoretically (not proven clinically) combining some of its effects can help an athlete perform as a stimulant, as a muscle mass preservative and as a mechanism to deliver more oxygen to the blood through the respiratory system. These are all effects pushed by weight lifting web sites, which are commonly read by NFL players where a great deal of misinformation resides but is still scrambled to and followed by these same NFL players................despite many of the suggestions that these effects directly translate into significant overall performance enhancements remain unproven and strictly theoretical.

As far as it being an honest mistake, which I would hope it was.............I don't know how sophisticated the NFL got in its investigation of Brown. As I posted previously, it is unlikely that a blood test would detect Clenbuterol beyond ~1 week...............However, Clenbuterol, like many other substances, accumulates in very small amounts in hair follicles. If an athlete has taken the substance over a period of time in the past, his hair test might return a positive for a period of six months or longer. Conversely, if the Clenbuterol resulted from a single incident, in which the player had eaten tainted meat for example, a hair test would almost certainly be negative.
 


Chp8-zFUgAA5EfY.jpg:large


Duane Brown ‎@DuaneBrown76


Made in the USA
1f1fa-1f1f8.png
1f64f.png
#DinnerTime

8:21 PM - 4 May 2016
 
Get down to Mexico Duane, somewhere down there is a roast roaming around with your name on it. Eat up because we didn't draft an OT this year.
 
So if I am reading your 2nd post correctly, CnD, it was most likely a honest mistake as the drug itself really doesn't help one become a better(?) athlete?

It's a drug that bodybuilders dabble with when they're dieting to try to preserve muscle mass while cutting. The NFL (and other federations) pretty much just ban/outlaw anything bodybuilders or bicyclists are known to do.
 
This thread title.... :heh: :ahhaha:

Yep. Maybe I've been on the internet too long ("Thousand Yard Stare" long....) but my eyes saw this and my brain translated it into:

"Duane Brown Sex Tape Released - Don't Click This. Seriously."

And that's exactly why this should stay in the Random Texans news; where the story was first discussed. This title is terrible, just terrible.
 
And that's exactly why this should stay in the Random Texans news; where the story was first discussed. This title is terrible, just terrible.

Maybe some of us don't translate "random thought of the day" into "actual Texans news story of the day" ... the title is proper and address exactly what is being discussed...geez WWMS (What Would Marshall Say)
 
Last edited:
That just makes it that much more unbelievable that we didn't draft an OT. They couldn't have known he wasn't going to face that suspension. Talk about dodging a bullet.

Evidently, the League, the NFLPA and the team knew enough about the tainted beef warnings that they mounted their appeal based on it. Surprising how ignorance is convenient until it's inconvenient. :chef:
 
geez WWMS (What Would Marshall Say)

I think you lean to much on the word random, which can be used in different ways. For instance, there is nothing random in news, because news is already random, so it seems that you can't adjust your thinking because you can't see the light of randomness.
 
That just makes it that much more unbelievable that we didn't draft an OT. They couldn't have known he wasn't going to face that suspension. Talk about dodging a bullet.
I don't think there was much of an OT class this year. Other than the 1st couple that were drafted there weren't any that could come in and crack the starting oline. We still have Clark, who's serviceable as a swing. Were there any OTs in our spot that could beat out Clark? I agree we should've snagged an OT somewhere during the draft, but he wouldn't have been much of a help had DB gotten suspended.
 
I don't think there was much of an OT class this year. Other than the 1st couple that were drafted there weren't any that could come in and crack the starting oline. We still have Clark, who's serviceable as a swing. Were there any OTs in our spot that could beat out Clark? I agree we should've snagged an OT somewhere during the draft, but he wouldn't have been much of a help had DB gotten suspended.

Not as a replacement for DB, or even for Clark or Newton, but as depth in case one of those guys goes down if DB had gotten suspended. There were some guys in the 3rd and 4th round we could have gotten for that.
 
Not as a replacement for DB, or even for Clark or Newton, but as depth in case one of those guys goes down if DB had gotten suspended. There were some guys in the 3rd and 4th round we could have gotten for that.
I can agree with that. Let's see what happens throughout the rest of the offseason and TC cuts. Maybe we'll grab one or two more
 
Maybe some of us don't translate "random thought of the day" into "actual Texans news story of the day" ... the title is proper and address exactly what is being discussed...geez WWMS (What Would Marshall Say)

Texans random thought of the day, not random thought of the day. Two totally different threads. Has there been anything more random and Texans related than this?
 
Texans random thought of the day, not random thought of the day. Two totally different threads. Has there been anything more random and Texans related than this?

Potentially losing your starting LT for 10 games is thread worthy, just because the reason is not ordinary does not make it random (outside of the drug test he apparently took)...If mostly middle age men see the word meat and think of anything but something other than food on a plate, nothing I can do about that.
 
Potentially losing your starting LT for 10 games is thread worthy, just because the reason is not ordinary does not make it random (outside of the drug test he apparently took)...If mostly middle age men see the word meat and think of anything but something other than food on a plate, nothing I can do about that.

There's nothing potentially about it. The only story that came out was him NOT being suspended because he won his appeal. Has we heard about a potential 10 game suspension before the result, I would agree. Plus the story broke there a solid 2 hours before this thread was made.
 
There's nothing potentially about it. The only story that came out was him NOT being suspended because he won his appeal. Has we heard about a potential 10 game suspension before the result, I would agree.

I see the line there and just disagree... i will jump off here so this discussion does not become bigger than the story or non-story as some see it.
 
His story is plausible. With the cardio demands of football you'd have to be incredibly stupid or drunk to run clen. That stuff will make you feel like you've drank 12 cups of coffee.
 
His story is plausible. With the cardio demands of football you'd have to be incredibly stupid or drunk to run clen. That stuff will make you feel like you've drank 12 cups of coffee.

Wait a minute.........you may have just described at least 1/2 of the NFL player population when it comes to trying to gain "the edge" to look better, perform better, heal better or "feel" better.:chef:
 
Surprising that Spain was not specifically named as a country notoriously known for illicit use of clenbuterol in growing their cattle. In 2010, world champion Spanish cyclist Albertao Contador was suspended for 2 full years after testing positive for traces of clenbuterol. He adamantly claimed his innocence, and that this positive test could have only been caused by ingestion of the Spanish beef. It fell on deaf ears.
 
Wait a minute.........you may have just described at least 1/2 of the NFL player population when it comes to trying to gain "the edge" to look better, perform better, heal better or "feel" better.:chef:

Hey Doc, just a quick question. A ruptured Achilles, not that long ago, was once consider a career ender. Somewhere in the neighborhood of 60% - 70% could not return to the game. Those who did often performed at at lower level. On top of that, full rehab was a 2 year process. Today a ruptured Achilles is much like a torn ACL for the players. Today, most players who suffer a ruptured Achilles return much faster than before and play at higher level than those who suffered the same injury on a few years ago. Better medicine I know, what changed?
 
Hey Doc, just a quick question. A ruptured Achilles, not that long ago, was once consider a career ender. Somewhere in the neighborhood of 60% - 70% could not return to the game. Those who did often performed at at lower level. On top of that, full rehab was a 2 year process. Today a ruptured Achilles is much like a torn ACL for the players. Today, most players who suffer a ruptured Achilles return much faster than before and play at higher level than those who suffered the same injury on a few years ago. Better medicine I know, what changed?

When I wrote the review, that was published in the Chronicle in 2011, of the 2009 landmark NFL Achilles tendon rupture article, I pointed out some limitations of the article. Even so, return to play has at least appeared to improve on the surface, but this may be more due to publicity of a select few cases. The procedure to repair a torn Achilles hasn't changed much in the past decade, other than the sutures being stronger and smaller. The main reason for an improved result is the improved postoperative rehab techniques and approach available today. Despite this, the return of pre-injury performance still remains guarded (perfect example, Wilfork.....made it back......but with definite postinjury performance limitations) , with the only major change regarding statistics appearing to be that now the numbers of NFL Achilles tendon rupture are rivaling those of ACL ruptures.
 
When I wrote the review, that was published in the Chronicle in 2011, of the 2009 landmark NFL Achilles tendon rupture article, I pointed out some limitations of the article. Even so, return to play has at least appeared to improve on the surface, but this may be more due to publicity of a select few cases. The procedure to repair a torn Achilles hasn't changed much in the past decade, other than the sutures being stronger and smaller. The main reason for an improved result is the improved postoperative rehab techniques and approach available today. Despite this, the return of pre-injury performance still remains guarded (perfect example, Wilfork.....made it back......but with definite postinjury performance limitations) , with the only major change regarding statistics appearing to be that now the numbers of NFL Achilles tendon rupture are rivaling those of ACL ruptures.
Thanks!
 
Wait a minute.........you may have just described at least 1/2 of the NFL player population when it comes to trying to gain "the edge" to look better, perform better, heal better or "feel" better.:chef:

Clen is a known substance within the athletic community, it really has one place, as a high powered thermogenic to help shed fat. I can see your point but it's a fairly known substance within any athletic community.
 
Clen is a known substance within the athletic community, it really has one place, as a high powered thermogenic to help shed fat. I can see your point but it's a fairly known substance within any athletic community.

You're absolutely correct. And that's the only significant effect that has been proven. My statement of "to look better, perform better, heal better or "feel" better" was as a general statement of what many NFL players are willing to take in order to gain "the edge".........not specifically what Clenbuturol could in fact do for them.
 
You're absolutely correct. And that's the only significant effect that has been proven. My statement of "to look better, perform better, heal better or "feel" better" was as a general statement of what many NFL players are willing to take in order to gain "the edge".........not specifically what Clenbuturol could in fact do for them.

The NFL's got it on "the list" just because they figure anything a bodybuilder would use should be verboten.
 
The NFL's got it on "the list" just because they figure anything a bodybuilder would use should be verboten.

A few animal studies have shown what was mistakenly taken for "anabolic" properties of Clenbuterol, increasing skeletal muscles, when what was happening was the decrease of muscle breakdown. Even so, this effect interpreted as increasing muscle mass never showed any corresponding power output. Evidence from these same studies have consistently shown a decrease in physical performance due to long term use of clenbuterol by up to 40%. No studies of this sort has been performed on humans, and the amounts used in these animal studies are much higher doses than a human could safely consume. Its cardiovascular adverse affects on humans are inarguable. Let's remember that Clenbuterol was first produced as a veterinary prescription drug for horses..............not as an anabolic, but as an anti-asthmatic, bronchodilator. There's a reason that only a handful of countries in the world have approved its use in humans.............and, even so, by prescription only.
 
Back
Top