Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

Rams trade to #1 overall

So you believe if Kevin Dyson had gotten one more yard, the Titans would have won Super Bowl XXXIV 23-23?
Fisher would have run Eddie George up the middle for the two pt conversion.
Edit:
either that or faked it to George and let McNair bootleg it in.
 
I'd be surprised (okay, shocked) if Goff and Wentz aren't off the board by pick #3 so I don't think grabbing one of them is doable any longer.

That was my attempt at being sarcastic. Obviously, trading up now is all but impossible, if it weren't before.
 
Never understood why the trade value draft chart remains germane, since I recollect no updates to the methodology since Johnson and team produced it in the early 90's, and draft value changed immensely with the advent of the salary cap in 94, and subsequent CBAs. Outside of media and fans having a platform for discussion, it is antiquated.
Johnson disagrees with you, has stated that players still have similar values regardless of salary cap and that is why the NFL Value Chart is still used..
 
This trade actually may have some implications for us. Follow my logic here: Rams won't be targeting Lynch at 15 anymore which may have him slip to #22. Broncos may be interested in making a trade up to acquire Lynch in this range, and therefore may be interested in trading for 22.
 
So, I wonder where the Texans would have to trade up to now to get one of these two "can't miss" QB's since we all know paying Os was a terrible move.
That's not going to happen but FYI there is only 270 point differential in Rams picking at #15 and the Texans picking at #22.
 
Johnson disagrees with you, has stated that players still have similar values regardless of salary cap and that is why the NFL Value Chart is still used..

Perhaps that is why he did not find similar success after the salary cap was instituted. As you most likely know he did not create the concept, but refined it.

As I have stated, it is antiquated. With that said, teams may have revised their own chart, which is more interesting. As General Patton stated, "if everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking."

For fan dialogue, it is fun to use and do not deny it.
 
It certainly shows how ridiculous the idea was that the Texans could move up to take a QB. I think everyone, everyone, can now agree that signing Osweiler was the correct move for the Texans.
Lol. Nice job Lucky. You beat me to it.

Posting this was the only reason I even opened this thread. Absolutely laughable to think we could give up anything less than a king's ransom to move up and get Goff or Wentz. And now, both will almost certainly be gone by the time the Chargers are on the clock.
 
Love that we're going to see the production of this trade play out on Hard Knocks.

actually we'll see it for years in our division with the amount of picks the titans have to reshape their team now. Better hope they screw it up.

Aside from that this just reeks of a "splash" type move by the Rams to get more butts in seats & build up fan fervor for their move to LA. But what I will say is if the QB they select works out...& them landing Gurley last year..Austin coming along..they might be a problem next year in the NFC west. They pretty much already own Seattle right now.
 
Last edited:
I see the Rams taking Wentz #1. Cleveland will then try to trade out of #2 because they are run by analytics guys and analytics guys always want to accumulate assets. If they can't trade out they will take Goff and I will weep for him as he is sent off to the graveyard for his career to die before it ever began.
 
That's not going to happen but FYI there is only 270 point differential in Rams picking at #15 and the Texans picking at #22.

Good justification.

Don't forget all the other "points" given up.

Not worth it to me.
 
Perhaps that is why he did not find similar success after the salary cap was instituted. As you most likely know he did not create the concept, but refined it.

As I have stated, it is antiquated. With that said, teams may have revised their own chart, which is more interesting. As General Patton stated, "if everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking."

For fan dialogue, it is fun to use and do not deny it.
Darn near impossible for Johnson to duplicate success in Miami he had in Dallas. Having a QB in the twilight of his career vs HOF QB at the peak of his had more to do with level of success than the salary cap. And as Johnson has stated players still have similar value to day as they did when he introduced the chart.
 
I see the Rams taking Wentz #1. Cleveland will then try to trade out of #2 because they are run by analytics guys and analytics guys always want to accumulate assets. If they can't trade out they will take Goff and I will weep for him as he is sent off to the graveyard for his career to die before it ever began.

I can see the analytics guys not taking a QB at that slot and building a team the right way by addressing the OL, DL, and other skill positions while RG3 takes all the hits. Not like they won't be picking high next year.
 
Darn near impossible for Johnson to duplicate success in Miami he had in Dallas. Having a QB in the twilight of his career vs HOF QB at the peak of his had more to do with level of success than the salary cap. And as Johnson has stated players still have similar value to day as they did when he introduced the chart.

He introduced his version of the chart. That chart, after the salary cap was instituted, he leveraged for four drafts - one future hall of famer (Taylor), perhaps a second (Thomas), and two solid pros. Other than that they were awful drafts with many picks in 96-97.
 
I can see the analytics guys not taking a QB at that slot and building a team the right way by addressing the OL, DL, and other skill positions while RG3 takes all the hits. Not like they won't be picking high next year.

It's not like Cleveland hadn't tried that method at one time or another as well.

Last year, four of their first five picks (two #1s, a 2, two 3s) were DL or OL

2014 their first pick was a CB, their 3rd, a 2nd round pick was an OT

It's not necessarily their draft philosophy that's been killing them.
 
It's not like Cleveland hadn't tried that method at one time or another as well.

Last year, four of their first five picks (two #1s, a 2, two 3s) were DL or OL

2014 their first pick was a CB, their 3rd, a 2nd round pick was an OT

It's not necessarily their draft philosophy that's been killing them.

It's as simple as ...


effinlol
 
It's as simple as ...


effinlol
rock_hall_of_fame.jpg


I dunno.... this is a pretty cool place to go in Cleveland

...but that's all I got
:)
 
I can see the analytics guys not taking a QB at that slot and building a team the right way by addressing the OL, DL, and other skill positions while RG3 takes all the hits. Not like they won't be picking high next year.

The right way? Is that the way the RAMS just did for 4 years when they traded the RG3 pick and still haven't even hit the 0.500 mark to date since accumulating WAYYYY more?

This is using REAL numbers since we now know where the future picks landed:

Redskins Received #2 - 2012 (2600) vs. Rams received #6, 39 - 2012, #22 - 2013, #2 - 2014 (1600+510+780+2600 = 5490)
 
That's not discounting the future picks - that's not correct.

This is using REAL numbers since we now know where the future picks landed:

Redskins Received #2 - 2012 (2600) vs. Rams received #6, 39 - 2012, #22 - 2013, #2 - 2014 (1600+510+780+2600 = 5490)

No discounts needed when attempting to show the value of players and how it hasn't worked out to make them a power house "the right way".
 
That's not going to happen but FYI there is only 270 point differential in Rams picking at #15 and the Texans picking at #22.
Yeah, and there's a 575 point difference between the three 2nd and 3rd round picks the Rams were able to trade, and the two picks the Texans have in those rounds this year. That's a cumulative 845 point difference which is more than the value of this years first round pick for the Texans.

In fact, if the Texans were to trade every pick they have in this draft, and the next two, they would fall around 325 points short of what the Titans got from the Rams, or a low 2nd round pick's difference (Don't know if Clowney's going to command that given the remaining injury concerns). This assumes that both the Rams and the Texans draft in the same position in both 2017 and 2018, and it also assumes one pick in each round for the Texans in 2017 and 2018 as opposed to the two 5th round picks they have this year.
 
Last edited:
It certainly shows how ridiculous the idea was that the Texans could move up to take a QB. I think everyone, everyone, can now agree that signing Osweiler was the correct move for the Texans.
Wow The Rams made them an offer they could not refuse. I am glad The Texans didn't mortgage the farm. I understand the Rams needing to make a splash to get instant buzz from an apathetic fan base but if he player doesn't pan out it will put them in a deep hole.
 
While the Bucs probably wouldn't have traded the #1 pick, this would have made a lot more sense last year with Winston and Mariota on the board. I just don't see any of these QBs being #1 overall pick quality this draft.
 
Yeah, and there's a 575 point difference between the three 2nd and 3rd round picks the Rams were able to trade, and the two picks the Texans have in those rounds this year. That's a cumulative 845 point difference which is more than the value of this years first round pick for the Texans.

In fact, if the Texans were to trade every pick they have in this draft, and the next two, they would fall around 325 points short of what the Titans got from the Rams, or a low 2nd round pick's difference (Don't know if Clowney's going to command that given the remaining injury concerns). This assumes that both the Rams and the Texans draft in the same position in both 2017 and 2018, and it also assumes one pick in each round for the Texans in 2017 and 2018 as opposed to the two 5th round picks they have this year.
I'm not going to rehash this again, we've already had a 100 pages of this discussion. But Clowney or Mercilus wouldi make up for one of the Rams 2nd rd and them some. We can continue this conversation in 2020 when we will actually have some concrete evidence to discuss. So until then take a BC Powder.
 
Last edited:
While the Bucs probably wouldn't have traded the #1 pick, this would have made a lot more sense last year with Winston and Mariota on the board. I just don't see any of these QBs being #1 overall pick quality this draft.

I don't either, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and bringing in the local hero to lead the new team has a certain flare. They can play up the Goff can be another Rodgers theme
 
While the Bucs probably wouldn't have traded the #1 pick, this would have made a lot more sense last year with Winston and Mariota on the board. I just don't see any of these QBs being #1 overall pick quality this draft.

I think there are definitely #1 overall "worthy" QBs in this draft, but for whatever reason those guys aren't even in the conversation. Still... Wentz isn't too different from McNair who was taken #3 overall & Goff isn't too different from Carr/Harrington.

All it takes if for one person to fall in lover.
 
I think there are definitely #1 overall "worthy" QBs in this draft, but for whatever reason those guys aren't even in the conversation. Still... Wentz isn't too different from McNair who was taken #3 overall & Goff isn't too different from Carr/Harrington.

All it takes if for one person to fall in lover.

Well everyone this is a draft day first a random fan who goes by the online handle thunderkyss ran up with a card saying Connor Cook!!! over and over again on it, turned it in then promptly ran to the green room and kidnapped Cook laughing and shouting "hahaha I got my QB of the future" Police not sure if they should arrest this man or let him and Cook fade off into the sunset to live happily ever after.
 
Police not sure if they should arrest this man or let him and Cook fade off into the sunset to live happily ever after.
Don't let tk fool ya. AJ McCarron is still his true love.

webb4-e1452370663594.jpg


*Disclaimer* - thunderkyss is not pictured to the left of McCarron.
 
I did say that I thought someone would trade up to #1 to take a QB, I thought it might be Dallas so I was wrong there.
 
I did say that I thought someone would trade up to #1 to take a QB, I thought it might be Dallas so I was wrong there.

ha I can now hold this over your head along with the absurd notion that Coker would be a 1st round QB. lol jk man got to bust your balls every now and again
 
ha I can now hold this over your head along with the absurd notion that Coker would be a 1st round QB. lol jk man got to bust your balls every now and again
In this case I beat you to it. (I'm not afraid to admit I made a mistake or got it wrong, it will happen again) And I thoroughly expect you to conveniently forget how I also dropped Coker to a late RD draft pick.
 
This trade actually may have some implications for us. Follow my logic here: Rams won't be targeting Lynch at 15 anymore which may have him slip to #22. Broncos may be interested in making a trade up to acquire Lynch in this range, and therefore may be interested in trading for 22.
That's possible. But if Goff/Wentz go 1-2 in some order, as I think they will, Lynch could see his value rise. The Niners and Eagles could take a real hard look at Lynch, now.
 
Back
Top