Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

Ryan Mallett (Houston, We Have A Monster)

Damn TK, you know Welker is on the Broncos and is a shell of a ghost of what he once was right? And I'd take Nuk over Edelman/LaFell any day. Gronk is certainly a better offensive weapon than what we have but the biggest difference between the two teams is of course, super obvious :)

It's not about rather this or that, just saying. New England's offense wouldn't look like New England's offense if they had Dre & Hop as opposed to Gronk & Edelman. There seems to be a lot of anxiety around here to get our TEs more involved, I don't know if that's because they know it'll open up the offense, or if they expect a Gronk&Hernandez show in H-Town.
 
I want the TEs involved because it will make the O run better particularly in having sustained drives. We used to have it with OD and Putz/Graham.
 
I want the TEs involved because it will make the O run better particularly in having sustained drives. We used to have it with OD and Putz/Graham.

This. Nothing opens up both the running game and the WR's on the outside like a successful TE seam route. Nice to see Mallett looking for Graham multiple times on that one TD drive.
 
I THought that Ryan Mallett would go in the first round of the NFL Draft back in 2011 when he left Arkansas and declared after his junior season. I thought the strong-armed gunslinger would probably go to a quarterback-needy team and start right away and probably become a big star. It didn't happen that way. Jake Locker went off the board eighth to the Titans, Blaine Gabbert went 10th to the Jaguars, Christian Ponder went 12th to the Vikings, and Mallett fell out of the first round completely. Two more quarterbacks (Andy Dalton and Colin Kaepernick) would be taken in the second round and he wouldn't hear his name called until the third round, 74th overall. He'd head to New England as the latest in a line of understudies to Tom Brady.

That fall into the third round might have been Mallett's best possible outcome, considering the success first-rounders from 2011 had after being thrown into the fire early on in their careers. Instead, Mallett sat behind Brady for three seasons before being traded to Bill O'Brien's Texans during the preseason. He got his first NFL start this past Sunday, leading Houston to a win over the Browns on the road.

So, how did he look? Is he the long-term answer for Houston at the most important position in football, a position that not even J.J. Watt can play (I assume)?

Well, as the Houston Chronicle points out, Mallett joins 16 quarterbacks over the last five seasons to be 25 or older at the time of their first NFL start. Only San Francisco's Colin Kaepernick has panned out of those "developmental" players, so the odds aren't exactly in his favor. That said, he could be another outlier.

Poise, leadership, command of the huddle, decision-making

It's tough to really know what Mallett is like as a leader just by watching game tape, but obviously, an NFL quarterback has to have some intangibles that go into becoming the general of the offense. This goes to demeanor, communication, confidence, command, decision-making, reactions to adversity, the list goes on, and generally speaking, just being able to throw the ball isn't enough. Texans' head coach Bill O'Brien commented after the game that Mallett -- who originally fell into the third round in part because of maturity and character concerns -- did all the things a quarterback should be doing, in that sense.

"What I had seen at practice I saw in the game -- the huddle command, the ability to get us into the right play at the line of scrimmage, his poise on the sideline, his communication with his teammates on the sideline," O'Brien said. "I had him down for two poor decisions. When you throw the ball whatever it was, 30 times, and you only have two poor decisions, that's not bad for a first start. Those were the things that I had seen in practice, and it was good to see that in a game."

On tape, Mallett seemed comfortable at the line of scrimmage and did a good job of pointing out protections to his teammates and getting everyone on the same page. His comfort in the offense was apparent too in the quickness in which the ball was coming out as well. According to Pro Football Focus, Mallett released the ball on average at 2.06 seconds after the snap, which was the quickest of any quarterback this week. That speaks to decisiveness and confidence in his reads, particularly in that he went 20 of 30 on the day.

Tempo

Mallett seemed at ease in an up-tempo offense -- probably in part because of his education under Bill Belichick with the Patriots, who've been known to cycle in and out of up-tempo, no-huddle looks on offense -- and that's what the Texans did against the Browns.

"He does a good job of understanding when we're going fast," said O'Brien in the postgame presser. "He tries to take a pre-snap picture of what he sees and he can process that pretty well. He did a lot of that in college with Bobby Petrino at Arkansas, and then obviously in New England he did a lot of that in practice. Coming here, we're trying to get our offense into a better rhythm and he helped us do that."

Houston ran 84 plays -- which is a relatively high number, especially for an offense that ran the ball as well as they did this week.

Throughout the game, Mallett connected with quick strikes outside, on slants, and up the seam after quick three- and five-step drops.

Schemes like this:


And this play:


The accuracy is there. The timing with receivers is there. The quick game was working, mostly, though he does need to be careful when teams start anticipating things, like on this play:


Importantly, when the Texans got out of some of the quick-game passes, he did show the ability to step up and climb the pocket on longer drops -- like on this play:


That's just one play, of course, but you like his ability to keep his eyes downfield while resetting and sliding, not panicking, not looking at the rush, and just allowing the play to develop. Bill O'Brien described this particular play in depth here.

The vertical passing game

The one obvious attribute that Mallett brings to the table, in particular over Ryan Fitzpatrick, is arm strength. There's no denying that he can put some velocity on the football, and the Texans weren't shy in asking him to let his arm out a little bit in his first start. This pass on Houston's second drive was probably his prettiest. He connects with DeAndre Hopkins for 41 yards, and it's effortlessly placed inside the corner and over the top of the safety here.



Footwork, accuracy

There were a few times where I thought Mallett's accuracy was affected by his footwork. He's a gangly 6'7 so you'd expect some sloppy or heavy footwork at times, but he just needs to be careful about weight distribution and not relying too much on his arm to make throws. His first throw of the game was a good example of this.

After a pump fake, Andre Johnson runs a wheel route. Mallett throws off his back foot and off balance with pressure in his face, though, and the pass is underthrown and probably too far inside. Johnson dives and can't come up with the ball. You could maybe chalk this up to jitters.


Play-action

Houston's run game has historically been the foundation of their offense and while Gary Kubiak is gone, some of his tenets remain with the current staff. In this one, the Texans ran the ball an absurd 54 times for a cool 213 yards so when you're a run-first team that the opposing defense is having trouble stopping, having that vertical element to complement the run game can be huge. Houston turned to play-action quite a bit in this game and with Mallett's arm, it will continue to be a huge piece of the equation.

This was Mallett's only pick on the day, but in terms of process, I like the call. Mallett could've probably taken a little air off the throw and led the receiver outside a smidge, but overall this is just a really great defensive play by Joe Haden.


Regardless, with Mallett's arm, Houston can really do some things in the vertical game on play-action, in theory.

Bottom line

Again, it was just one game, but if you're a Houston fan, I would have to think you're excited about Mallett's prospects in this offense (despite what Desmond Bryant might think). I thought he had pretty good accuracy on his throws apart from a handful near the boundary that ended up slightly inside, but the timing was there, the velocity was there, and the command of the offense was apparent.

I think that Mallett will still need to work on his footwork -- it's going to be a constant battle with his tall, lanky frame -- but it seems like O'Brien put him in a place to succeed by giving him well-defined reads that allowed him to get the ball out quickly, plus giving him a few chances to air the ball out downfield. The vertical attack is where Mallett could shine, and this talent seemed to help open things up for the Texans run game, helping rookie Alfred Blue run for 156 yards.

Fans and analysts that thought Mallett was a first-round talent back in 2011 have been pining for a chance to see what he can do at the helm of an NFL offense, so bottom line, it's exciting to see what he'll do.

More from SBNation.com
http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2014/11/19/7245285/ryan-mallett-houston-texans
 
Last edited:
One of the biggest things that has helped Mallet was not being rushed into service and getting to learn the NFL game by watching Brady from the sidelines.

Guy has poise and can read defenses. Sure he have a bad game or 2 but he has the it factor unlike Fitz.
 
I am getting bored w the idea that everything gets piled into one super thread. Makes it difficult to have go back through each page of a 20 pg thread to try and catch up on the good posts, articles, new news, etc.
 
I am getting bored w the idea that everything gets piled into one super thread. Makes it difficult to have go back through each page of a 20 pg thread to try and catch up on the good posts, articles, new news, etc.

When the subject is the same, Mallet, do we need a "he's a monster" "he's a QB of the future" etc thread from the same poster? Especially when it's quoting articles. They should be in the Mallet thread IMO. Makes it easier to keep track of what's being said without trying to figure which of the 15 new threads it's in.

*Thanks to whomever merged*
 
I am getting bored w the idea that everything gets piled into one super thread. Makes it difficult to have go back through each page of a 20 pg thread to try and catch up on the good posts, articles, new news, etc.

Everything is not getting dumped into one thread. We also don't need a 5th Mallett thread on the front page.
 
John Harris -- Put the Film on Bro: Mallet's Debut
The stat sheet said Mallett completed 20 of 30 passes for 211 yards with two TD and one INT, but dive

deeper into the REAL stats and Mallett was 25 of 32 for 230 yards with two TD and two INT. Let me explain...

I studied every pass Mallett made on Sunday, which included two completed passes that didn’t register because a defensive penalty negated the completion and the corresponding gain. The other thing I did was define “Quality completion”. I defined a quality completion as a completed pass or a pass dropped that should’ve been caught. Likewise, I gave him an incompletion for a bad throw that was still caught or an interception that was dropped. That’s how he ended up with two interceptions - the one Joe Haden picked off and the one that Paul Kruger dropped.

Here’s Mallett’s “hit chart”...

MallettPTFOB.jpg


On throws beyond the line of scrimmage up to and including 20 yards
20 of 25 (80%), 1 TD and 1 INT.
...
On throws between 10-20 yards
6-7 (86%), 1 TD.
...
Against five man pressure
7-9 (78%), 1 Int
...
Against six man pressure
0-1 (0%)...arguably
 
This tells me alot......in a much more well-worded philosophical statement than any Foster has ever been able to present.

This game is very humbling. Once you think you’ve arrived, you figure out different,” Mallett said. “So my thought process is be the best I can every day at whatever it is.”
 
Does John Harris & OB have some kind of history? I think I heard at one time or another one of them say something about playing together at Brown, or coaching, or something.

Seems like John Harris is a "BIG" O'Brien fan.

I believe they did play together at Brown
 
Thanks but...

To continue reading this story, you will need to be a digital subscriber to HoustonChronicle.com.

That's interesting. I got there via Google ("John Harris Bill O'Brien") and it gave me the full story like 'cak mentioned.

I was just curious about their relationship, as I've heard Harris talk about it on the radio. I knew they were old friends, but did not know the background.
 
That's interesting. I got there via Google ("John Harris Bill O'Brien") and it gave me the full story like 'cak mentioned.

I was just curious about their relationship, as I've heard Harris talk about it on the radio. I knew they were old friends, but did not know the background.

It was just trying to follow the Chronicle link that had me blocked. They always want money for their drivel. Using google brought it up with no problem.

Yeah seems they have a good relationship.
 
Sometimes if you copy the headline and then google it the full story comes up. No idea why.

I imagine Google cached the story after someone pulled it up in its entirety. Searching on the headline went to the cache instead of the source. Interesting.
 
I imagine Google cached the story after someone pulled it up in its entirety. Searching on the headline went to the cache instead of the source. Interesting.

The Chronicle paywall is just a simple browser based gateway that grants access through a browser cookie. The Googlebot web crawler is some proprietary software and set of algorithms that doesn't require a browser, so it captures the target HTML code and all the Chronicle content with it.

By relying on a cookie and not a certificate like SSL, it reveals how little they pay their webmasters. Why spend the money when you're the only major print media in town?
 
I could go the rest of my life without ever again hearing that Apollo 11 quote and its variations.

It's obvious that O'Brien has known the whole time what he has in Mallet. He was well positioned to know. So signing Fitz and drafting Savage weren't just fallbacks in case he couldn't acquire Mallet, they also took away leverage from the Patriots and forced them to deal for cheap.

So why did O'Brien wait this long before starting Mallet? Because Fitz signed up to be given the chance to start, and he won that, and O'Brien had to be fair. Credibility matters.

I think you mean Apollo 13.

Apollo 11 was the Moon landing with, "HOUSTON, the Eagle has landed" and, "That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind" as memorable quotes.

Apollo 13 is the one with, "Houston, WE have a problem!"
 
yeah, we learned that Case Keenum is not an an NFL starting QB. (We also learned that some Houston fans wear blinders and are unable to be objective about a home town kid.)

Keenum has NOTHING to do with Ryan Mallett.

And fans can "anoint" whoever we want, because we are fans and we have absolutely no influence on the process. That's the fun of being a fan. No responsibility and no accountability. We get to have fun with it.

That said, I'm a firm believer that Mallett is going to be the Texans starting QB in 2015. I'm not predicting HoF career, but it is obvious that O'Brien has his guy, and it should not surprise anyone when they sign him for a long term deal.

Personally, I'm as excited and optimistic about things as I've been in many, many years. JJ Watt is a Texan for a long time and will be a cornerstone of our defense for years to come. And things are starting to take shape on the offensive side of the ball.

In O'Brien we trust. :texflag:

I do not believe Keenum cannot be an NFL QB. But he probably won't get another chance.
 
This works with lots of other sources as well.

Really? I'll try it. The practice of paywalls is still a little experimental right now. I've read that most publications that tried it made less money than when using ad banners. People just don't want to pay for content anymore, as much for inconvenience as expense.
 
Really? I'll try it. The practice of paywalls is still a little experimental right now. I've read that most publications that tried it made less money than when using ad banners. People just don't want to pay for content anymore, as much for inconvenience as expense.

Companies who know what they're doing put hidden content in a secure area so that crawlers and Google's algorithm can't access it. If you've ever heard mention of the deep web, you have an idea. Typically, cache issues occur when something is put out publicly and then retracted. Google and/or other crawlers will have a cached copy of it. You can specifically search the cache.

For example, if you search the headline "college teammate lauds o'brien's determination", you'll see this as the Chronicle link, which gives you the first paragraph, but requires that you pay to see the rest:

Code:
http://www.houstonchronicle.com/sports/texans/article/College-teammate-lauds-O-Brien-s-determination-5107383.php

But because they don't know what they're doing, they had the article out there in full publicly before they pulled it back in house. So you can use the following link (and template) to search Google's cache to get the full story:

Code:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.houstonchronicle.com/sports/texans/article/College-teammate-lauds-O-Brien-s-determination-5107383.php

Happy hunting.
 
I do not believe Keenum cannot be an NFL QB. But he probably won't get another chance.

Sam Bradford went down with the Rams again. Case Keenum is still on their practice squad. He would be on the active roster if the coaches thought he was ready to play in the NFL. Their active QBs are Shaun Hill and Austin Davis. It would be okay if you asked "who?".

I wish Keenum the best, but the writing it on the wall. You just have to read it.
 
Apollo 13 is the one with, "Houston, WE have a problem!"

That's right. I always confuse them.

I get annoyed by clichés, and that one in particular.

Out of curiosity, I just Googled the definition of cliché. This states it perfectly:

1.a phrase or opinion that is overused and betrays a lack of original thought.

"Here we go again!"

"Houston, we have a problem!"

"New coach same as the old coach!"
 
I think you mean Apollo 13.

Apollo 11 was the Moon landing with, "HOUSTON, the Eagle has landed" and, "That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind" as memorable quotes.

Apollo 13 is the one with, "Houston, WE have a problem!"

Fun fact: The quote is actually "Houston, we've had a problem."
 
The initial comment was "I believe we've had a problem here" followed up by "Houston, we've had a problem."

http://apollo13.spacelog.org/page/02:07:55:19/

On the tapes I sound mellow and benign, or some might say fat, dumb, and happy. A pleasant evening, indeed! Nine minutes later the roof fell in; rather, oxygen tank No. 2 blew up, causing No. 1 tank also to fail. We came to the slow conclusion that our normal supply of electricity, light, and water was lost, and we were about 200,000 miles from Earth. We did not even have power to gimbal the engine so we could begin an immediate return to Earth.

The message came in the form of a sharp bang and vibration. Jack Swigert saw a warning light that accompanied the bang, and said, "Houston, we've had a problem here." I came on and told the ground that it was a main B bus undervolt. The time was 2108 hours on April 13.


link

Written by Jim Lovell, Apollo 13 Commander
 
Back
Top