Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

Falcons ‘most likely’ partner if Texans deal No. 1 pick in 2014 NFL draft

Status
Not open for further replies.
what if Houston would take 1-6, 2nd, 4th and 2015 2nd? Smith should not get caught up in points for points but players he could draft with a trade.
There's the rub. Can Ricky get his guy @1-6? If he has to spend picks to move back up, it's not really worth the effort.
 
what if Houston would take 1-6, 2nd, 4th and 2015 2nd? Smith should not get caught up in points for points but players he could draft with a trade.

I´d definetly want the first next year. I´d be ok with just 1-6, 2nd and next years first. I´d probably consider 1-6, 3d and next years first...

At 6 one of those guys is definetly available:

Clowney
Robinson
Matthews
Mack
Watkins
Bortles
Manziel

I´d be ok with any of them - and even with Bridgewater even though his stack has fallen.
 
what if Houston would take 1-6, 2nd, 4th and 2015 2nd? Smith should not get caught up in points for points but players he could draft with a trade.




Originally Posted by JB
I would want 6, 37, 68 and 2015 first that will likely be mid 20's

This is pretty much how I feel. I might consider their fourth instead of their third since this is a very deep draft. I would not accept anything less than that. But I would start the negotiations off with JBs reply.

I said this a week ago. NO!!! The future pick must be a first rounder IMO.
 
Originally Posted by JB
I would want 6, 37, 68 and 2015 first that will likely be mid 20's



I said this a week ago. NO!!! The future pick must be a first rounder IMO.
Why do you expect THAT MUCH ? And if you say Draft Value Chart, why do you think it's relevant this year, what do you base it on ?
 
Why do you expect THAT MUCH ? And if you say Draft Value Chart, why do you think it's relevant this year, what do you base it on ?

I don't know if you are talking to me or Mussop, but if to me then I would have to ask if you had trouble with reading comprehension. I said that is what I wanted, not what was expected. But I wouldn't do it for much less. As far as the Draft Value Chart, I referenced it for just that, so we would have a reference point
 
Why do you expect THAT MUCH ? And if you say Draft Value Chart, why do you think it's relevant this year, what do you base it on ?

Why is it not relevant? Jimmy Johnson inventor of the chart says just because rookie salary has changed, player value has not, so the chart is still relevant.

For Me: it's swap 1st in 2014, plus ATL 2nd RD; 2015 1st RD and 2015 3rd RD.
 
Why is it not relevant? Jimmy Johnson inventor of the chart says just because rookie salary has changed, player value has not, so the chart is still relevant.

For Me: it's swap 1st in 2014, plus ATL 2nd RD; 2015 1st RD and 2015 3rd RD.

Convince them, that future #1 would be 32nd overall & I'm sure they do that deal. :handshake:
 
Why is it not relevant? Jimmy Johnson inventor of the chart says just because rookie salary has changed, player value has not, so the chart is still relevant.

For Me: it's swap 1st in 2014, plus ATL 2nd RD; 2015 1st RD and 2015 3rd RD.
It's too arbitray, too random. Logically we know that draft classes change every year, consequently every one is unique. Some classes have very valuable QB prospects, while other classes don't but might have very deep talent where there's not that much difference between the 3th overall and the 6th overall.
For example the Draft value chart says that last year Eric Fischer was as valuable as both Tavon Austin and Sheldon Richardson combined. That's silly, but on the other hand, there's no doubt that the 2012 top pick (Andrew Luck), was certainly more valuable than both of those players together.
If the draft classes were the same, and evenly balanced throughout the rounds it would mean something, but they are anything but that. If you were to base a DVC on logic, you'd have a different Chart for every year/Draft Class.
 
The main reason to trade down is not just the extra picks this year but that 1st rounder next year. The QB draft is next year. Pack up with players this year, trade draft assets next year to move up into the top 2 picks. That's the smart way to rebuild this team.
 
The main reason to trade down is not just the extra picks this year but that 1st rounder next year. The QB draft is next year. Pack up with players this year, trade draft assets next year to move up into the top 2 picks. That's the smart way to rebuild this team.

Lots of people have been saying this. Who is the can't miss guy next year? I know Winston and Hundley are basically gone. I don't like Winston's chances to be frank, and I like Hundley but not so much for O'Brien's style of offense. I don't see a potential Luck next year either.
 
I´d definetly want the first next year. I´d be ok with just 1-6, 2nd and next years first. I´d probably consider 1-6, 3d and next years first...

At 6 one of those guys is definetly available:

Clowney
Robinson
Matthews
Mack
Watkins
Bortles
Manziel

I´d be ok with any of them - and even with Bridgewater even though his stack has fallen.
I understand what you want but Falcons allegedly shot that down & I am thinking "get what you can Ric" in this deep draft.
 
Lots of people have been saying this. Who is the can't miss guy next year? I know Winston and Hundley are basically gone. I don't like Winston's chances to be frank, and I like Hundley but not so much for O'Brien's style of offense. I don't see a potential Luck next year either.

Mariota out of Oregon, Winston and Petty out of Baylor to begin with, plus Hundley out of UCLA
 
Charlie Casserly.
Oh... Well...
Why didn't you say so...
Guardian-of-the-Emerald-City-Gates.jpg


That's a horse of a different color
 
Beginning of '13 season this draft looked to be super strong at Qb and that supposedly has not turned out.

Mariota was expected to come out, no-one could have predicted he'd get hurt during the season and come back to school.
 
Beginning of '13 season this draft looked to be super strong at Qb and that supposedly has not turned out.

Depends on how you define "Super Strong"

I always heard there were no "can't miss" franchise guys, but several that will have long successful careers. Looks that way to me. McCarron, Carr, Murray, Bridgewater, Mettenberger.... I'm sure two of those guys will be starters & Garoppolo, Bortles, Manziel, Fales, may add another.
 
Atlanta Journal Constitution: Here’s what it would cost to land Jadeveon Clowney
Here’s what it would cost for the Falcons to trade up to the No. 1 spot to land Jadeveon Clowney.
The Falcons have to make up 1,400 points in the Draft Trade Value Chart.
After the Falcons and Texans flopped first-round picks there would be 1,400 point differential. The Falcons’ second-round pick (530 points) and third-round pick (250 points) this year, would leave them short of 620 points.

The Falcons would likely have to send next season’s first-round pick to make up the difference, if they believe the Falcons will draft 30th or lower next season.

If the Falcons win the Super Bowl, the 32nd pick would have the value of 590.

Let’s sum that up, it would be a 4-for-1 trade.
–Falcons would get No. 1 overall 2014 pick.
–Texas would get No. 6 overall 2014, No. 37 (second), No. 68 (third) and next year’s No. 1
.
 
–Texas would get No. 6 overall 2014, No. 37 (second), No. 68 (third) and next year’s No. 1.
******
Not gonna happen, no way Jose, not even close. Maybe they could get ATLs first and second and a mid-round 2015 pick, but that's the best deal they'll see if they see that.
 
Swap firsts then take atl's second this year and next. I think that's about right and a deal I'd do.
 
–Texas would get No. 6 overall 2014, No. 37 (second), No. 68 (third) and next year’s No. 1.
******
Not gonna happen, no way Jose, not even close. Maybe they could get ATLs first and second and a mid-round 2015 pick, but that's the best deal they'll see if they see that.

Swap firsts then take atl's second this year and next. I think that's about right and a deal I'd do.

Nope. Its 1,2,3 this year and #1 next year. If they don't agree....meh, fudge em. You still have the #1 overall pick.
 
–Texas would get No. 6 overall 2014, No. 37 (second), No. 68 (third) and next year’s No. 1.
******
Not gonna happen, no way Jose, not even close. Maybe they could get ATLs first and second and a mid-round 2015 pick, but that's the best deal they'll see if they see that.

Swap firsts then take atl's second this year and next. I think that's about right and a deal I'd do.

Nope. Its 1,2,3 this year and #1 next year. If they don't agree....meh, fudge em. You still have the #1 overall pick.
I'd take either of the top two scenarios before playing hardball and getting stuck with the 1st overall pick. Way too deep of a draft to do that.

JMHO, though....
 
I think some are slipping into 'this is what I want for 1.1' syndrome and not remembering the deal has to be accepted. Watkins and Robinson are probably only two "minimal risk" choices. Most now agree none of QBs are solid first pick so if we can get a trade from another team offering a top 8 player + at least two more picks, why refuse deal if 2015 first not offered?

Yeah I want it but let's not cut our nose off to spite face
 
I think some are slipping into 'this is what I want for 1.1' syndrome and not remembering the deal has to be accepted. Watkins and Robinson are probably only two "minimal risk" choices. Most now agree none of QBs are solid first pick so if we can get a trade from another team offering a top 8 player + at least two more picks, why refuse deal if 2015 first not offered?

Yeah I want it but let's not cut our nose off to spite face

I agree with this logic. The draft is loaded this year, so why not give a buyer's incentive to secure two more picks in the first 3 rounds? I feel like the draft chart only works when teams are jumping over themselves to get a certain player.
 
I think some are slipping into 'this is what I want for 1.1' syndrome and not remembering the deal has to be accepted. Watkins and Robinson are probably only two "minimal risk" choices. Most now agree none of QBs are solid first pick so if we can get a trade from another team offering a top 8 player + at least two more picks, why refuse deal if 2015 first not offered?

Yeah I want it but let's not cut our nose off to spite face

I agree with this logic. The draft is loaded this year, so why not give a buyer's incentive to secure two more picks in the first 3 rounds? I feel like the draft chart only works when teams are jumping over themselves to get a certain player.
I'm with you guys. I think of it as swapping Clowney (or whoever the Falcons draft @ 1-1) for the chance to fill three spots for the upcoming season.
Next year can take care of itself.
 
I'm with you guys. I think of it as swapping Clowney (or whoever the Falcons draft @ 1-1) for the chance to fill three spots for the upcoming season.
Next year can take care of itself.
yeah a first round is good but you do not know where that team ends up picking or who will be there. Go for most you can get but get something. I'm not sure Browns and Vikings are out of it yet.
 
yeah a first round is good but you do not know where that team ends up picking or who will be there. Go for most you can get but get something. I'm not sure Browns and Vikings are out of it yet.

If the Browns are in it, what's the price difference, in picks, between taking #4 or #26? Taking #26 is one helluva trade back and would take considerable more compensation, imo, even if they were in rounds 3-4.

What would be acceptable to you?
 
If the Browns are in it, what's the price difference, in picks, between taking #4 or #26? Taking #26 is one helluva trade back and would take considerable more compensation, imo, even if they were in rounds 3-4.

What would be acceptable to you?

I would take #4, 26, and a 4th in 2014 plus a 3rd in 2015 and give them our 3:1 this year
 
The fly in the ointment of all this trade down talk is St. Louis at #2. They are almost assuredly going to trade down, but with who. Whoever they trade down with could seriously F up our ability to trade down and still get the QB that we want.
 
The fly in the ointment of all this trade down talk is St. Louis at #2. They are almost assuredly going to trade down, but with who. Whoever they trade down with could seriously F up our ability to trade down and still get the QB that we want.

Unless they trade down with a team that doesn't want a qb.
 
If the Browns are in it, what's the price difference, in picks, between taking #4 or #26? Taking #26 is one helluva trade back and would take considerable more compensation, imo, even if they were in rounds 3-4.

What would be acceptable to you?
We get Browns 1.4 & 1.26, 2.3, 3.7 & 3.19 = both of their firsts, swap seconds and both their thirds.

Cleveland gets 1.1 & 2.1

You have to give them incentive to trade. In this deal, I am unconcerned about points.
 
Evan SilvaVerified account
‏@evansilva More Werder: "Word on the street" is #Texans asking #Falcons for RG3-like haul to get from 6 to 1. (That was 3 1st-rounders & 2nd-rounder.)

If Rick pulls this off after getting a pick in trade for Schaub....
 
Honestly, an epic deal of this nature seems too good to be true...as a Texans fan.

Yeah it does. Maybe the Texans actually like Clowney and it would take this sort of package to pass on him? Otherwise, forget the 2016 1st rounder, add a 3rd round pick this year and make it happen. Two 1st-rounders, a 2nd-rounder & a 3rd would seem a tad more realistic.
 
Its a new day in Houston. BOB will lead us out of the darkness and into the light.

I hope you're right. Every new regime brings the potential to change the nature of Houston's pro football history.

I'm on the fence....waiting. Grass is always greener yada yada yada, but half the time it's because the grass grows well over a septic tank. :shades:

My conditioning as a lifelong H-town football fan has made me jaded and cynical, but I try not to put all that baggage on a new head coach. However, I cannot run from it. It is me, so I sip some koolaid - mainly to make sure it's not poisoned for the rest of you - and wait to react.

If they pull it off, I'll be happy to react in a very happy manner. :D Might even put on my dancing shoes with DocBar.
 
If Rick pulls this off after getting a pick in trade for Schaub....

Unlikely to happen. So is this, imo...

Jason La Canfora ‏@JasonLaCanfora
Bottom line is no one is buying Texans are locked in on a guy at 1, know they could get QB at 6 or lower. Asking price will drop I reckon

Would not be surprised at all if ultimately a 2015 1st round pick and a 2014 3rd is enough to go from 6th to 1st. Stay tuned

Also, the Rams at 2nd overall open for business. ATL could go to 2nd pick for Mack. Further hurts HOU leverage. I still smell a trade

I still believe the asking price for the 1st overall pick will drop closer we get. ATL want to keep '14 2nd rnd pick but plenty of options..
 
Unlikely to happen. So is this, imo...

Jason La Canfora ‏@JasonLaCanfora

If all we do is swap 1's and get a 3 i'll be pissed. I agree our asking price may drop the closer we get but not as much as he thinks. I think there's more then just Atlanta in the trade up camp...let them bid against each other.
 
I read it as swap firsts this year, get their 1st next year and their third this year. Need something else as it appears Atlanta does not want to give up their 2nd round pick.
 
I read it as swap firsts this year, get their 1st next year and their third this year. Need something else as it appears Atlanta does not want to give up their 2nd round pick.

If they wont include this years 2nd in that deal then Rick needs to walk away.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top