Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

Longhorn Network's 5 New Shows: Why No One Will Watch Them

Aggie Yell has got a big headline that says Bye Bye Big 12. Isn't this a tad premature?

Premature secession is becoming an epidemic among Aggies this year.

I really can't stand all the banter about this potential move. Aggies are acting like the SEC is some sort of football utopia that will fix everything that's wrong with A&M recruiting, when in reality, it will make it harder to recruit Texas players against Bama, LSU, Auburn, FU and Tenn. I think this is a terrible move for A&M if it happens, but all this talk about something that is currently a rumor is just stupid. If A&M doesn't go to the SEC because they reject A&M's bid, it will be a huge embarrassment to the school. Also, acting like a bunch of whiny bitches right now, could hurt our chances of getting into any other conference when the Big 12 dissolves. I really don't like how this is being handled.
 
tex, you're not reading my posts carefully enough; I really couldn't care less when other people talk bad about me or things I like, seriously.

it's the fact that you steadfastly claim to not like people taking shots at your school then continue to do just that which makes me respond like I have.



I am one of those people if you're gonna make statements like this one.

If you don't like my statements then I'd suggest you get some thicker skin as a fan or don't read them. I've said several times that I actually root for the Aggies in many cases and would like for them to get a lot stronger, but you keep looking for negatives and crying about them. It's not my duty to appease you or your Aggie feelings. You certainly haven't done that when talking about the Longhorns or other schools, so stop with the pot and kettle routine. It's gotten sad at this point. This is the exact type of routine of bitterness of why a lot of fans consider the Aggies as the little brother to the Longhorns by the way. Oh, maybe I shouldn't have said that since I didn't attend UT. After all I don't have that right according to you. Lol! I guess I turn this same idea around and ask if you "currently" attend Texas A&M. If not, then maybe you're not in a position to root for them either. And you should probably drop your support for the Texans as well. After all you're not a member of the team or on any of the coaching staff, nor do you work for the organization, so you shouldn't root for the Texans. You see how that works? You see how silly that sounds? This is exactly the reasons why I said from the very beginning that I find rhetoric like this from Aggie fans as amusing. You like to poke, but call foul and complain when the results don't fit your plan.
 
If you don't like my statements then I'd suggest you get some thicker skin as a fan or don't read them. I've said several times that I actually root for the Aggies in many cases and would like for them to get a lot stronger, but you keep looking for negatives and crying about them. It's not my duty to appease you or your Aggie feelings. You certainly haven't done that when talking about the Longhorns or other schools, so stop with the pot and kettle routine. It's gotten sad at this point. This is the exact type of routine of bitterness of why a lot of fans consider the Aggies as the little brother to the Longhorns by the way. Oh, maybe I shouldn't have said that since I didn't attend UT. After all I don't have that right according to you. Lol! I guess I turn this same idea around and ask if you "currently" attend Texas A&M. If not, then maybe you're not in a position to root for them either. And you should probably drop your support for the Texans as well. After all you're not a member of the team or on any of the coaching staff, nor do you work for the organization, so you shouldn't root for the Texans. You see how that works? You see how silly that sounds? This is exactly the reasons why I said from the very beginning that I find rhetoric like this from Aggie fans as amusing. You like to poke, but call foul and complain when the results don't fit your plan.

:kubepalm:


Am I allowed to root for them since I have a son currently a student???

Dayum. I thought once an Aggie, always an Aggie. Guess I need to go have them rewrite the traditions.
 
:kubepalm:

Like clockwork, I knew you'd be piggy backing.

I wasn't the one that made the suggestion that you had to go to school in order to root for a team. You Aggies fans have done that in this thread and have done that in others when you don't like the results of comments and complaints about other schools. See how that works? You just give me more material to work with when that's not even my intention, but since you want to go there........
 
Like clockwork, I knew you'd be piggy backing.

I wasn't the one that made the suggestion that you had to go to school in order to root for a team. You Aggies fans have done that in this thread and have done that in others. See how that works?

This will at least give you something else to cry for with the Aggies now.

Please show me where I said that. I asked a question because I had a theory about attitude and era.

Being an Aggie sports fan gets one used to heart break, I can't deny it. Kinda good training to be a Texans fan.
 
Please show me where I said that. I asked a question because I had a theory about attitude and era.

Being an Aggie sports fan gets one used to heart break, I can't deny it. Kinda good training to be a Texans fan.

You didn't, but if you read closely enough, you're fellow Aggie fan Pbat did. And this is only one of several times I've seen Aggie fans in here resort to that ploy in a discussion regarding Texas or the "alleged" rivalry between both schools. It seems like every time this stuff is being discussed at length that always comes into play. I wasn't suggesting that you couldn't root for your Aggies. I was turning the statement around to show how silly it was. Rooting for a college football team is no different than rooting for a Pro Hockey team in Canada or an NFL team in your own city.
 
first off, yes, I do attend and will be graduating from texas a&m either this december or next may with a degree in petroleum engineering, depending on whether I get an internship this fall with petrohawk/bhp in australia.

now, you're still not comprehending what i'm saying. I don't care if you're gonna bash me or my school (well, not exactly true, especially when you bash in your specific condescending way, see my paragraphs under the quote) i'm used to it and don't take offense too much. I don't get my feelings personally hurt by it, and usually have some clever retort to give back to them because that's my personality.

however, don't say you don't like it when people take shots at the school you support then turn around and do it right back. this is what gets at me. you have an inability to sense your own hypocrisy. you've stated multiple times you don't like it when people say stuff about the longhorns, then you respond in like. if you don't like it, then why do you do it?

Rooting for a college football team is no different than rooting for a Pro Hockey team in Canada or an NFL team in your own city.

you are correct, it's not! people are free to root for whoever the hell they want. but this patronizing mumbo jumbo about a&m being a cute little doormat for the high and mighty longhorns, or how anything an aggie says shouldn't be taken seriously or however you put it earlier in this thread is just freakin' stupid, even moreso in my eyes coming from someone who didn't even attend said school. it's total snobbishness/dooshbaggery on my part, but i'd much rather have an actual graduate talk **** instead of a t-shirt fan trying to talk down to me because it's just comical coming from people who don't know what it's like to attend either of the schools involved.

as an aside to this, real longhorns, not people on a message board, and I get on great as it is. there's always ribbing and jokes to be had, but there's usually a lot of respect there between us, because we know how great both institutions truly are, in their own separate ways.
 
Last edited:
first off, yes, I do attend and will be graduating from texas a&m either this december or next may with a degree in petroleum engineering, depending on whether I get an internship this fall with petrohawk/bhp in australia.

Good for you. I hope that it works out well for you.

now, you're still not comprehending what i'm saying. I don't care if you're gonna bash me or my school (well, not exactly true, especially when you bash in your specific condescending way, see my paragraphs under the quote) i'm used to it and don't take offense too much. I don't get my feelings personally hurt by it, and usually have some clever retort to give back to them because that's my personality.

Well you do seem to care, but you also seem to have had no problems criticizing Longhorns fans in the past and the alums in general. Some of it I've even agreed with. And weren't you just earlier in this thread calling all MMA fans a bunch of *********s or something like that, yet you're calling my hypocrtical?

however, don't say you don't like it when people take shots at the school you support then turn around and do it right back. this is what gets at me. you have an inability to sense your own hypocrisy. you've stated multiple times you don't like it when people say stuff about the longhorns, then you respond in like. if you don't like it, then why do you do it?

Well as I've stated before, when Aggies do it, I just find it amusing. When most other fans of other teams or schools do it, I do as well. I know that Texas is doing great things to stay competitive and it's not a school to frown upon. Not to me any way. If someone else feels differently, well that's their perogative, but it isn't going to change my thoughts one way or the other. But if someone is smack talking or trashing my favorite team just to do it or out of hate, or where it's not legit, then I'll gladly put a few things in perspective for them or send some of it back. You know that old saying in here that people like to use. "Don't start none and there won't be none." Well that goes hand in hand doesn't it. You don't see me jumping in on Aggies threads just to bash them consistently. You've never seen me start an Aggie thread to bash them. But if I'm going to listen to some digs being taken at the school or team I root for and I don't consider it legit, then it's game on!! If you consider that hypocritical, because I'm not going to turn the other cheek because you say so, well so be it. I disagree, because I'm not running around looking for reasons to pick on Aggie.



you are correct, it's not! people are free to root for whoever the hell they want. but this patronizing mumbo jumbo about a&m being a cute little doormat for the high and mighty longhorns, or how anything an aggie says shouldn't be taken seriously or however you put it earlier in this thread is just freakin' stupid,

Well sorry, but that's how I feel. That's how a lot of fans that root for UT feel and even fans that don't like either team that I talk to seem to get the same feeling as that.

even moreso in my eyes coming from someone who didn't even attend said school. it's total snobbishness/dooshbaggery on my part, but i'd much rather have an actual graduate talk **** instead of a t-shirt fan trying to talk down to me because it's just comical coming from people who don't know what it's like to attend either of the schools involved.

And see, it is quite obvious that you do push this tired rhetoric. "You didn't go to school there so you can't root for them!! T-shirt fan!!" Lol! What the hell is a T-shirt fan any way?? And just because you strut around your campus singing the Aggie fight song or how you miss your mommy around the dorms doesn't make you anymore educated of a fan or about the school in general than a guy that didn't go there ever or someone who went there 30 years ago. Half of my family went to UT for the record. My grandfather whom I'm very proud of was a big time Alum over there that donated a ton of money there annually and told me football stories about his years at Texas ever since I was a little kid. So did my father who didn't go there by the way, but his brother did and a lot of my cousins did. I've been attending games out there since I first knew what football was. Some 18 year old brat who just graduated HS and is enrolled there because he decided to go there probably doesn't know half of the stuff I know and have cherished about the team since I was little. But according to you, HE has more right to say the things I'm saying than I do?? Puuuullleeeeese!! That's a bunch of horseshit if I've ever heard it in my existence. Show me this rule that states only school enrolled students should root for a college football team. In case you haven't noticed, it's a business and it operates for revenue and off of what the fans bring in. My family has contributed a lot of money to that school and has raised all of us to root for that school. We weren't forced to attend there though and never was that something I cared about doing when I graduated.



as an aside to this, real longhorns and I get on great as it is. there's always ribbing and jokes to be had, but there's usually a lot of respect there between us, because we know how great both institutions truly are, in their own separate ways.

Real Longhorns. Lol! You see that's the thing you obviously can't get past. Either you went to school there or you didn't and that's the thing with you. Guess where I did go? I went to University of Houston. I never cared about that place one way or the other either. Never cared about their athletics, because I took classes there. That didn't make me "a cougar." I wanted to live in Houston when I graduated. I didn't automatically become some Cougar fan for life because some bitter fan of some other school such as yourself said I had to. I knew where my fan allegiences were and they weren't going to change. Your whole premise behind this is silly.

I do agree that both institutions are great schools though. I have a lot of friends that attended A&M and partied there a lot when I was younger. You keep this chip on your shoulder completely looking past many of the statements in here that I have said.
 
Premature secession is becoming an epidemic among Aggies this year.

I really can't stand all the banter about this potential move. Aggies are acting like the SEC is some sort of football utopia that will fix everything that's wrong with A&M recruiting, when in reality, it will make it harder to recruit Texas players against Bama, LSU, Auburn, FU and Tenn. I think this is a terrible move for A&M if it happens, but all this talk about something that is currently a rumor is just stupid. If A&M doesn't go to the SEC because they reject A&M's bid, it will be a huge embarrassment to the school. Also, acting like a bunch of whiny bitches right now, could hurt our chances of getting into any other conference when the Big 12 dissolves. I really don't like how this is being handled.

It's a terrible move for UT, that's for sure because if A&M leaves I don't see a team that would want to join the Big XII with LHN looming as trying to give UT the ultimate recruiting advantage. It's not the football games that won't be on LHN, it'll be all of the behind the scenes coaches access crap where they can showcase their prospects on their own network.

I know the Big XII is just been UT and OU for the last decade but it won't remain that way forever, and I just wonder what OU does if A&M leaves. There is no way in the world that the SEC would reject a bid by A&M unless it had a bunch of ridiculous stipulations to it like having to take in Baylor as well or some nonsense like that. SEC wants an inroads to Texas high school football programs, no way they would turn A&M down flat by themselves.
 
T Shirt fans weren't such a big deal to Aggies in the '90s. Just sayin.

Yeah, in those Mackovich years Aggie fans hardly cared what Longhorns fans had to say or thought. The funny thing is that you stated in another thread that you were known as this VY hater or something like that around your die hard Longhorn friends and over here like some sort of apologist for him. I've experienced the very same thing regarding VY and also with Texas in general depending on who I'm talking to. If I'm talking to certain friends of mine that are die hard homers for UT, they get extremely angry at times when I'm telling them certain things that aren't perfect about the team or making my feelings known about Mack Brown and Greg Davis. They say I'm not a real fan at times because I don't tow the line of fan worship and I get called "a closet Aggie" at times thinking I'm going to be insulted by it. Lol!
 
I don't mind seeing the Ags cut and run, since this "rivalry" has always been a one sided, emotion driven tradition. My only concern is the other SEC schools having more of a recruiting footprint in Texas. The upside is that I will get to see some SEC football in College Station.
 
ESPN radio is saying A&M is going to be announced Monday and Clemson, FSU, and Mizzou are also likely. Apparently Doug Gottleib is breaking the story.

Gottlieb is saying A&M going to the SEC is a sure thing.
 
NCAA shoots down college networks showing prep games

The spate of new television networks affiliated with different NCAA conferences knew that they wouldn't get a chance to broadcast high school games for at least a year. Now it appears that they may never get that chance.

According to a variety of sources, the NCAA officially ruled that networks affiliated with individual schools or individual conferences will not be allowed to broadcast any high school events. The decision was based on the logic that televising events on those networks would provide their affiliated colleges with an unbalanced recruiting advantage.

The NCAA's decision goes far beyond the temporary, one-year ban on televising high school events that was agreed upon by Big 12 athletic directors at a meeting at the start of August. And while the NCAA's ruling will also affect schools in the Pac-12 and Big 10, the clear catalyst behind the move was the Longhorn Network, which had announced plans to broadcast a slate of 18 high school football games earlier in the summer.

In the meantime, NCAA President Mark Emmert told the Austin American-Statesman that a long-planned summit on university and conference-affiliated television networks would go forward as planned, even with the issue of high school broadcasts now settled.

http://rivals.yahoo.com/highschool/...networks-showing-prep-g?urn=highschool-wp4566
 
I root for all Texas schools, unless they are playing UT.

however, living in Austin, what I found out is lots of UT fans are snobby. And what was ironic is that my friends and I went camping and ended up camping next to some A&M people. It was some pretty good times, down to earth both us and them, sure we had a little ribbing going back and forth but was pretty cool

Last season was tough, but probably the most humorous saying I think I read on here was "oh, the doctors finally beat the lawyers" ...after the Baylor game
:lol:
 
I don't mind seeing the Ags cut and run, since this "rivalry" has always been a one sided, emotion driven tradition. My only concern is the other SEC schools having more of a recruiting footprint in Texas. The upside is that I will get to see some SEC football in College Station.

Yeah, that's one thing no one has really talked about much thus far. Hopefully it doesn't make that much of an impact.
 
aTm to the sec is sweet. i think they will be able to hold their own. man can't wait for the likes of bama and florida to visit college station. also can't believe UT has run off neb and aTm. funny how OU is still standing by their side
 
Does all of the SEC being able to recruit Texas have the possibility of a huge impact?

Yeah, as much as the Longhorns seem to think this won't effect them, I think they will be singing a different tune in the next 4 years. The SEC recruits very well in general, but not very well in Texas (compared to the Big 12 schools). Pending realignment, every other year LSU, Bama, Auburn, and the Miss's will have a game to invite Texas recruits to.
 
Does all of the SEC being able to recruit Texas have the possibility of a huge impact?

It will be part of the pitch to families, especially for those schools in the West.

I would like to see UT go Independent for football. What happens with basketball and baseball will be interesting to see should they go that route.
 
I've had people tell me they prefer college football to the NFL because it's "pure". Please. "Pure" greed. Rivalries and tradition take a backseat to $$$. We know the NFL is about $$$. No one's hiding that. College football and their noise about "student athletes" makes me ill. Treat these guys like employees and provide them health insurance after their playing days are over. Don't tell me the money's not there.

[/rant]
 
aTm to the sec is sweet. i think they will be able to hold their own. man can't wait for the likes of bama and florida to visit college station. also can't believe UT has run off neb and aTm. funny how OU is still standing by their side

Run off??? This isn't about the Longhorn Network anymore. The NCAA ruled against showing high school game recruits, and there were even concessions made regarding what games get shown,etc. So all the bitching A&M did regarding certain aspects of the LHN were all quelled. And let me ask you a question, would A&M turned down the opportunity to get their own friggin network with ESPN? Hell no!

So what is this really about? This is about A&M trying to get out from under Texas shadow. They are wanting to show they can make their own decision and make it out on their own. Plain and simple. Texas didn't run anyone off, so quit acting like this is all big bad UTs fault.
 
Why did NU leave the BIGXII?

8 reasons:

1. 12/05/09 ... Texas 13, Nebraska 12
2. 10/27/07 ... Texas 28, Nebraska 25
3. 10/21/06 ... Texas 22, Nebraska 20
4. 11/01/03 ... Texas 31, Nebraska 7
5. 11/02/02 ... Texas 27, Nebraska 24
6. 10/23/99 ... Texas 24, Nebraska 20
7. 10/31/98 ... Texas 20, Nebraska 16
8. 12/07/96 ... Texas 37, Nebraska 27


In all seriousness. If A&M or Nebraska had a chance to join forces with ESPN to create their own network, the first of its kind.... do you honestly think they would have said no?
 
8 reasons:

1. 12/05/09 ... Texas 13, Nebraska 12
2. 10/27/07 ... Texas 28, Nebraska 25
3. 10/21/06 ... Texas 22, Nebraska 20
4. 11/01/03 ... Texas 31, Nebraska 7
5. 11/02/02 ... Texas 27, Nebraska 24
6. 10/23/99 ... Texas 24, Nebraska 20
7. 10/31/98 ... Texas 20, Nebraska 16
8. 12/07/96 ... Texas 37, Nebraska 27


In all seriousness. If A&M or Nebraska had a chance to join forces with ESPN to create their own network, the first of its kind.... do you honestly think they would have said no?

What does it matter, then those schools would be in UT's position where it looks like everybody is trying to get away from them if they had their own network. They'd say yes, and other teams would slowly back away from them (like they are now). This kind of all started when the Big10 Network came about and made a ton of money for the entire conference, and they show everything Big10. But the LHN is not going to be the same kind of animal with all the schools getting the same amount of exposure and I think that's why you have this same issue coming up so soon after it appeared to have been settled.

This re-alignment stuff is going to keep happening if the BigXII is going to be perceived to be controlled by the southern division (Namely UT), and I'm very interested in seeing if the whole conference dissolves if A&M is actually going, which is something I have to see to believe. I read a rumor that 3 teams were in talks with the PAC to jump ship if A&M leaves (I think the teams were OU, OSU and TTU but I could be wrong) so it could get really interesting early next week.
 
What does it matter, then those schools would be in UT's position where it looks like everybody is trying to get away from them if they had their own network. They'd say yes, and other teams would slowly back away from them (like they are now). This kind of all started when the Big10 Network came about and made a ton of money for the entire conference, and they show everything Big10. But the LHN is not going to be the same kind of animal with all the schools getting the same amount of exposure and I think that's why you have this same issue coming up so soon after it appeared to have been settled.

This re-alignment stuff is going to keep happening if the BigXII is going to be perceived to be controlled by the southern division (Namely UT), and I'm very interested in seeing if the whole conference dissolves if A&M is actually going, which is something I have to see to believe. I read a rumor that 3 teams were in talks with the PAC to jump ship if A&M leaves (I think the teams were OU, OSU and TTU but I could be wrong) so it could get really interesting early next week.

Actually, you nailed it. This all began with the Big 10 network. The Big 12 was never going to get a true network going, and they struggled to get any true TV deal done that was comparable to other conferences that all were more advanced than the Big 12 for the most part. The only conference that the BIG 12 had a better TV was the Big East. Pretty bad. Meaning, Texas did what they felt they had to do in lue of all of this. Again, if any other school in the Big 12 was in the same position and had an opportunity to do what Texas did by partnering with ESPN, you better believe they would have done it.

IMO, the dissolution of the BIG 12 was going to eventually happen. I thought we all knew that after the PAC deal did not happen, that staying together was temporary anyway? The super conferences looks like it will still happen, and I agree... where this all ends up will be interesting. But trying to put all the blame on Texas for this as they are the big bad monster is just not accurate.
 
Found this post over on Texags. Seemed pretty damn on point to me....



Just want to cleanup a couple of things and then I’m out. Here are a few facts:

1. NU and CU left because they were pissed that all votes seemed to go to the South or the old SWC schools, not just to Texas. No more partial quallifiers, Conf HQ to Dallas, Conf Champ Game to Texas, etc.

2. A&M voted with Texas on just about every item ever voted on in the BigXII

3. Before the LHN came along, Texas NEVER got a single benefit from the BigXII or other schools that A&M did not also get.

4. A&M voted for unequal revenue.

5. A&M received a higher than average % of tv revenue every year they were in the BigXII, not just this year. Always have benefited from unequal revenue since the very first year.

6. Texas approached A&M about some sort of network several years ago. At the time neither one knew how big it could be and both thought the schools themselves would have to pay up front money. A&M Ath Dept was in a serious financial bind and didn’t think there would be much revenue so they declined.

7. A&M and all other parties knew about the LHN last summer.

8. possible high school games on the LHN were discussed and common knowledge to everyone back in December.

9. When all school met a few weeks ago and concerns about hs games and 2nd BigXII game were discussed, LHN agreed to not show hs games until NCAA ruled and also offered to drop the whole idea altogether if necessary. But also showed how a strong LHN could benefit all schools.

10. Texas went over it’s entire contract with all schools there.

11. As for the additional BigXII game, Fox and ESPN made a deal that would allow that to happen. Fox gave concessions to ESPN but would get something in return in the future. No one knows what that was but they didn’t give it up for nothing and it would have likely included additional games to Fox to the benefit of other conference schools.

12. The additional BigXII game on LHN would mean a windfall for another BigXII team so the BigXII agreed to allow it as long as both parties agreed. LHN had already been talking to Tech about the game and offered them a significant amount of money. $5mil over and above what they already get, plus 2 more games on TV that would otherwise not have been televised. That opportunity was only available to Tech as a result of the LHN. Nothing was done behind Tech’s back and Tech would have done very well if they so desired. Texas would make the same amount of money whether Tech agreed or not.

13. Contrary to popular belief, there was never anything even remotely bad in that contract, as pointed out by various non-partial lawyers, etc since. And all was known by A&M and others at this meeting.

14. All schools left the meeting satisfied that there were no issues and as long as Texas kept it’s word and did not attempt to televise hs games they would commit to the BigXII.

15. Nothing changed after that. The LHN ceased any planning of televising hs games. Texas even reiterated that if it kept everyone happy they would try to insure that LHN did not televise any hs games regardless of what NCAA ruled because it wasn’t a huge part of the network. Meanwhile A&M continued talks with the SEC.

16. Initially, A&M agreed and made a 10 year commitment to the BigXII last summer in exchange for a guaranteed $20mil/year payout from the conference. Beebe agreed that the conference would come up with the money to pay from a combination of NU/CU buyout money and increased tv contract revenue. Texas and OU agreed to forego their usual unequal revenue split of the buyout fee to allow A&M to have a greater share…as well as the other schools.

17. With the new $1.2 bil Fox contract for the conference 2nd tier tv rights (already signed) A&M is now assured of getting at least the promised $20mil every year.

I’m sure everyone is going to pick every one of those apart or just simply say, stupid arrogant sip but I’m pretty sure those are the facts. Not sure I see where all the greedy sip rhetoric is coming from. Although, like I said, I do think A&M just saw an opportunity to move east and used a lot of this to ratchet up the hate. I also understand that fans are fans and get riled up about things that they sometimes don’t have the full story on but that A&M admin knew all the facts and based their decision more on just getting out and not all the hate spewed on these boards.

oh, and for the guy who asked

18. Once A&M joins the SEC, you will no longer be able to host the 7 on 7 tournament because the SEC has banned them for all member schools. Technically they are considered non-scholastic so they are not a school sponsored activity, nor are they UIL sponsored so the LHN could probably televise them. Realistically, I doubt they will and the NCAA will probably change the rule to close any possible loopholes but there is nothing to stop the tournament form moving to Austin, even if it is not televised.

With that, I’m out. Good luck ags and have a good year.
 
Wonder if the coogs get out of CUSA with all the realignment stuff going on

There has been a lot of buzz about UH being invited to the Big12 if A&M leaves for the SEC.

But you never know what will happen.
 
There has been a lot of buzz about UH being invited to the Big12 if A&M leaves for the SEC.

But you never know what will happen.

I can't imagine that actually happening unless UH does something to replace or upgrade Robertson Stadium.

Would the BigXII possibly lose their AQ status if they replace A&M with Houston?
 
8 reasons:

1. 12/05/09 ... Texas 13, Nebraska 12
2. 10/27/07 ... Texas 28, Nebraska 25
3. 10/21/06 ... Texas 22, Nebraska 20
4. 11/01/03 ... Texas 31, Nebraska 7
5. 11/02/02 ... Texas 27, Nebraska 24
6. 10/23/99 ... Texas 24, Nebraska 20
7. 10/31/98 ... Texas 20, Nebraska 16
8. 12/07/96 ... Texas 37, Nebraska 27


In all seriousness. If A&M or Nebraska had a chance to join forces with ESPN to create their own network, the first of its kind.... do you honestly think they would have said no?

Exactly. Neither school would have said no. This is what kills me about this whole issue. I have been listening to some of the sports radio pundits and the UT fanboys are bitching and moaning about A&M leaving the Big12 conference.

I am assuming that with a straight face, they are saying that A&M's move is not about money. Instead it is about A&M running from UT and their TV deal.

News flash:

It is always about the money!


The University of Texas went and got their payday with the Longhorn Network. Now they have heartburn when another school goes to another conference for more money? Sounds like the lawyers want their cake and to eat it too.
 
I can't imagine that actually happening unless UH does something to replace or upgrade Robertson Stadium.

Would the BigXII possibly lose their AQ status if they replace A&M with Houston?

Plans to expand Robertson Stadium are already complete. $51 million has been raised so far for the $120 million dollar project. In the meantime, 2 - 3 years, UH home games would be played at Reliant Stadium.

The BigXII would not lose the AQ status.

uh-new-stadium-downtown.jpg
 
Plans to expand Robertson Stadium are already complete. $51 million has been raised so far for the $120 million dollar project. In the meantime, 2 - 3 years, UH home games would be played at Reliant Stadium.

The BigXII would not lose the AQ status.

uh-new-stadium-downtown.jpg

Home games on Saturdays? I can't imagine that the field would be ready to go for an NFL game if it just had a college game played on it the day (or night) before.

Are they doing some sort of scheduling thing where the Coogs and the Texans are playing opposite each other (One home one away every weekend)?
 
Thank you all for not acting on my earlier post. It was as tacky, rude, and disrespectful. I was drinking bigtime last night and have no other excuse. Anyway, carry on. My apologies and sincere thanks again. :smooch:

:fans:
 
I'm more likely to go see the Coogs games at Reliant. BTW, what's the seating capacity of the renovated stadium?

Ultimately it will be 50,000+.
I actually prefer to see the Coogs play at Robertson Stadium, it has a more college atmosphere to it.

Home games on Saturdays? I can't imagine that the field would be ready to go for an NFL game if it just had a college game played on it the day (or night) before.

Are they doing some sort of scheduling thing where the Coogs and the Texans are playing opposite each other (One home one away every weekend)?

That's a good question. I'm not sure how the scheduling would be handled?

http://www.chron.com/sports/photogallery/UHs_plans_for_athletics_upgrades.html#22013403
 
Ultimately it will be 50,000+.
I actually prefer to see the Coogs play at Robertson Stadium, it has a more college atmosphere to it.



That's a good question. I'm not sure how the scheduling would be handled?

http://www.chron.com/sports/photogallery/UHs_plans_for_athletics_upgrades.html#22013403

Interesting times for sure, and I am hoping that we can get out of CUSA and at least be in an AQ conference for a little while before everybody decides that superconferences are for the best.

It'd also be nice to have a nationally recognized football program that would have a legitimate shot at winning everything in this city. I have a feeling that if the Coogs were winning a lot more there'd be a much more tangible buzz locally for the football team.

God I'd love to see UH in a big bowl in my lifetime.
 
Exactly. Neither school would have said no. This is what kills me about this whole issue. I have been listening to some of the sports radio pundits and the UT fanboys are bitching and moaning about A&M leaving the Big12 conference.

I am assuming that with a straight face, they are saying that A&M's move is not about money. Instead it is about A&M running from UT and their TV deal.

News flash:

It is always about the money!


The University of Texas went and got their payday with the Longhorn Network. Now they have heartburn when another school goes to another conference for more money? Sounds like the lawyers want their cake and to eat it too.

It's funny how OU saw UT getting its own network and said "we need one of those of our own."

But A&M saw it (after rejecting a joint network with the Horns) and broke their legs scurrying away.

UT could've gotten more money last year. They could have joined the Big 10, or the Pac 10 by themselves after A&M pulled this whiny card a year ago. UT didn't. They stood by their centuries old rivals. They told potential conferences that it was everyone, or no one.

A&M is ditching their brothers. That's the difference.
 
I love the outrage from butthurt UT fans. Nebraska leaves, Colorado leaves? No big deal guys we got all the teams that matter.

A&M? **** YOU YOU WERE SUPPOSED TO BE OUR BROTHER.
 
I love the outrage from butthurt UT fans. Nebraska leaves, Colorado leaves? No big deal guys we got all the teams that matter.

A&M? **** YOU YOU WERE SUPPOSED TO BE OUR BROTHER.

Dude we didn't play Nebraska for a century
 
SEC to Texas A&M..."No Fat Chicks" (stolen from friend)..LOL

http://espn.go.com/college-sports/s...fied-current-alignment-extend-invite-texas-am
The Southeastern Conference is not extending an invitation to Texas A&M to become its 13th member, but isn't ruling out adding the Aggies in the future.

University of Florida president Dr. Bernie Machen said the conference's presidents and chancellors met on Sunday and "reaffirmed our satisfaction with the present 12 institutional alignment."


"We recognize, however, that future conditions may make it advantageous to expand the number of institutions in the league," Machen said.
 
Not So Fast

Chip Brown said:
A source locked into Texas A&M's situation said the Aggies will be announced as members of the Southeastern Conference beginning in 2012 within 21 days.

"Texas A&M wants the SEC, and the SEC wants Texas A&M," the source said.

The SEC presidents met Sunday and decided to take no action on Texas A&M but certainly left the door open.

"We discussed criteria and process associated with expansion," said Florida president Bernie Machen, chairman of the SEC presidents and chancellors, in a statement.

The A&M source said the process to complete A&M's move from the Big 12 to the SEC was always expected to take two to three weeks. That process continues uninterrupted, the source said.

I don't know what to believe anymore. . .
 
It's funny how OU saw UT getting its own network and said "we need one of those of our own."

But A&M saw it (after rejecting a joint network with the Horns) and broke their legs scurrying away.

UT could've gotten more money last year. They could have joined the Big 10, or the Pac 10 by themselves after A&M pulled this whiny card a year ago. UT didn't. They stood by their centuries old rivals. They told potential conferences that it was everyone, or no one.

A&M is ditching their brothers. That's the difference.

I don't buy it. The only school UT cares about is UT, to think otherwise is foolish. Likewise the only school A&M cares about is A&M, to think otherwise is also foolish.

Disclaimer...I never attended or sought to attend University of Texas or Texas A&M. Furthermore, my kids have never attended either school.
 
I'm hearing talk now that the SEC can't invite A&M, that A&M must first apply otherwise there is some legal problems the SEC could incur.

The A&M Board of Regents meets tomorrow to discuss among other things, conference affiliation. Stay tuned, it may not be over quite yet.
 
Back
Top