ATXtexanfan
Hall of Fame
texas just has to win out, the ball is in there hands. big win today but, everyone crowned USC champs after they beat the hell out of the buckeyes. then they lost to oregon st. good thing no k-state on the schedule.
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
It is unlikely that the Longhorns will win out. They can, but this is one grueling schedule. Even if they can manage to lose only one game to one of the ranked teams on their schedule, then they will most likely play for the Big 12 Conference Championship against Missouri probably. If they can manage to win that game, then Texas should at the very least make it to a BcS bowl.
if texas wins out and so does penn st, do they play in the title game over usc and the sec champ (given bama loses and the sec champ has a loss)
At the end of it all, Texas will have one of the toughest strength of schedules in the nation.
An undefeated Texas gets into the championship game no matter what.
Penn St plays in a weak conference. I could actually see a 1-loss USC or Alabama getting over them in the polls.
I'd rather the Horns not have to see Mizzou twice .... Hopefully another team in the Big12 North finds a way to beat them. Kansas , Kansas St. and Nebraska are not pushovers .... There have been many more surprising upsets thus far this season.
Yeah , this is one hell of a schedule not to mention the possibility of playing Mizzou a second time in the Big12 Championship game .... which I had completely forgotten about until reading your post.
I think its quite possible we wake up Monday and have a new #1 with the way Bama struggled w/ Kentucky along with the UT win over OU , Mizzou's loss and LSU's loss. They will be no lower than #2 unless of course Penn St. leaps them but I dont see that happening.
If the Horns can avoid a loss in the next three they are the team to beat for the title.
McCoy set himself up nicely for a shot at the Hiesman too ....
So does anyone have any thoughts on Oklahoma only dropping to #4???
Also USC @ #6 is ridiculous...
LINK
I think Oklahoma was given a gift and USC as well.
OU isn't dropping because they lost to the #1 team.
So what if Texas would have lost to OU by a last second field goal or something like that, would they have moved up from #5 to #4 because they barely lost to the #1 team? Some how I doubt that.
BTW, not knocking your logic since you are probably right. I am just knocking the system.
Texecutioner, I don't know about anyone else but I have a hard time reading your posts because of the bolded text. For some reason its hard on my eyes, especially when you have made a long post. Just an FYI.
Texas would have fallen to 8 or 10 i bet
So what if Texas would have lost to OU by a last second field goal or something like that, would they have moved up from #5 to #4 because they barely lost to the #1 team? Some how I doubt that.
BTW, not knocking your logic since you are probably right. I am just knocking the system.
Texecutioner, I don't know about anyone else but I have a hard time reading your posts because of the bolded text. For some reason its hard on my eyes, especially when you have made a long post. Just an FYI.
So what if Texas would have lost to OU by a last second field goal or something like that, would they have moved up from #5 to #4 because they barely lost to the #1 team? Some how I doubt that.
BTW, not knocking your logic since you are probably right. I am just knocking the system.
Well OU fell 3 spots after the loss.
If Texas had lost I would have expected them to drop about 3 spots to #8.
True, but they would have just barely lost to the #1 team in the country in my scenario. Why would that make them the #8 team in the country? They didn't lose to all those other teams 6 teams. All that would tell us is they aren't the #1 team in the country and it doesn't tell us that they aren't better than those 6 other teams in front of them who in all likelyhood would be blown out by OU. If it took the #1 team in the country a last second field goal to beat them then it tells me Texas is closer to #2 than #8.
Just some food for thought exposing the ridiculous system of ranking.
or................. that OU isn't as good as everyone thought they were in being the #1 team which would somewhat diminish Texas' win over them..especially if OU were to lose another game or two.
Alabama & USC for the NC..... Florida vs UT/OU in another BCS bowl
Ok polls aside, what 5 teams are clearly better than they are? You could probably name maybe 1 & that's it. IMO USC can beat any of the current or past top 5 teams from this year on any given night b/c they just have too much talent... I also feel the same way about Florida.
Ok polls aside, what 5 teams are clearly better than they are? You could probably name maybe 1 & that's it. IMO USC can beat any of the current or past top 5 teams from this year on any given night b/c they just have too much talent... I also feel the same way about Florida.
I actually think that is what might be hurting them just a little bit. They know that have all of that talent and they continue to hear that they are so stacked, so it is almost like they just expect to win and think it will easily happen as oppose to feeling like they have to work their tails off to achieve success. I think that it hurts their hunger a bit.
That is also maybe a reason as to why I like what my Horns are doing this year. There aren't those celeb. types of players on their teams this year like in the past with Benson, Roy WIlliams, and Limas Sweed types, but the core guys in play making positions have just gotten it done and feel like they have a lot to prove every week while some of these other extra talented teams don't.
Maybe I'm wrong, but just my![]()
In the Big 12 South alone I think that there are four teams that could line up and beat them on any given day on a neutral field. UT , OU , OSU and TT. Then you can add the rest of the country.
Their loss came from a team who wont sniff the top 25 .... When the BCS rankings come out , I'd bet that knocks them down the list below all the SEC one loss teams as well as OU and Mizzou based on SOS alone.
certainly some truth to that as far as USC goes but we both may not agree as to how much of it is present. I mean it's not like they've lost 2-3 games this year, they lost 1 close game to a team on the road that apparently has had their number the last couple of years; kinda like you guys & A&M.
My point was more to the other poster saying that they were overated. USC isn't currently in the top 5 now, but they definitely are in the discussion.
UT...maybe, certainly have the talent to pull it off.
OU...same as UT.
No way Missouri, OSU & TT can play with them, b/c they all lack defense.
& even still, those teams are not clearly better, if better at all than USC. You forget that USC absolutely stomped 2 ranked teams earlier this year themselves & I don't think any of those big 12 teams u named has played more than 1 ranked team & has either lost or barely won.
Texas has the D to run the table. Muschamp has instilled that fire in this team, and just one the defensive side of the ball either. He has made many guys feel like they can do anything, and you are really seeing it in guys like SHipley and Cosby and now Obbania (Mis spell) as well. Sergio Kindle is just getting started as far as being a dominant play maker for this D His best football is yet to come, and just wait until Jared Norton gets more involved.
The offensive side of the ball will be determined upon how well the O line can continue to block for Colt and how many BIG plays can Colt consistently make. Colt has proven that he is a STUD and can answer over over and over, but Texas has to have more games where the D dominates and Colt isn't forced to be incredible just to win against some of these teams down the stretch that have really good offenses. Plus, it will be helpful when we get Fozzy Whitaker back which he should be this week against Missouri.
this is where we disagree...Texas' d didn't dominate anything Bradford pretty mcuh tore them apart. Both teams essentially had the same game plan on defense & IMO OU executed it a bit better Colt just made plays with his feet that bradford couldn't make & Stoops screwed the pooch on 2 seperate occasions.
It might be a tad bit tougher to pass rush & blitz on Daniels as he's more mobile than bradford & just about equal to bradford as a passer. I still think that UT will win though.
Other than that,
They are #4 in the coaches poll .... the one that matters.
#5 in the Harris Poll
and #6 in the AP
Each of those polls has them ahead of three as well as once beaten teams from the SEC in LSU and Florida (two of three) and Georgia who easily play tougher competition.
A loss to a team who is outside the top 25 doesnt earn you a spot above those teams IMO.
this is where we disagree...Texas' d didn't dominate anything Bradford pretty mcuh tore them apart. Both teams essentially had the same game plan on defense & IMO OU executed it a bit better Colt just made plays with his feet that bradford couldn't make & Stoops screwed the pooch on 2 seperate occasions.
It might be a tad bit tougher to pass rush & blitz on Daniels as he's more mobile than bradford & just about equal to bradford as a passer. I still think that UT will win though.
Other than that,
Texas killed the OU running game. Killed it.
They made OU one-dimensional & that is why Bradford had so much passing yards.
Well they were playing one of the best offenses in college football. Did you expect the Texas D to totally shut them down. No way that was going to happen. I don't think you realize how many young guys that have in that secondary that are playing at a really high level right now.
Earl Thomas is RS Freshman that just came away with two picks in that game and a few nice tackles. He will be the next Michael Griffin for them.
Chiki Brown is another Freshman I believe and has a lot of size for a CB. They still have Palmer, Aaron Williams who is a young stud and Beasley who can make things happen.
Blake Gideon is another really young safety as well.
This is a really young secondary, but they have worlds of talent and if Texas's pass rush can continue to be a good as it has, then this young secondary won't have to play lights out and things will come easier for them. Texas has as good of LB's as anyone in the country. Muckleroy, Kindle, and Norton are all studs that each have at least one more year there.
This win is going to give this D a lot more confidence, and don't sleep on the fact that they did have two key stops at the end of the game that showed some character and heart. Definitely something to continue to grow on.
That's like saying you killed texas tech's rushing offense even though they're clearly a passing team....i.e. it doesn't really matter much in the grand scheme of their offense...at least not to the extent it did when they had Peterson. OU had been running the ball well, but by no means was the running game a major factor in how they ran their offense....
When you consider All but 1 game Bradford had 300+ passing yards & 3 TD's... they've been a passing team all year & that didn't change saturday.
USC does NOT belong in the top 10. Start the chants now
Ohio St. went from 5 to 14 for losing to the #1 team. So if anyone is going to say that OU should only drop 3 spots for losing to the #1 team then they need to look at what happened to Ohio State.
The only difference is that Ohio State was overrated. They are winning games by 3 or 7 points to teams they should be crushing 52-10.
This is how I think the top 10 should be.
1.) Texas - Won all their games decisively and beat OU in the RRR.
2.) Alabama - Look strong in the running game and beat Georgia making it look easy.
3.) Penn State - Talented squad that has wins against Illinois, Purdue, Wisconsin.
4.) Florida - Only loss was by 1 point to SEC team Ole Miss and dominated LSU.
5.) BYU - High scoring offense who can score on anyone.
6.) Texas Tech - Another high scoring offense but a loss would drop them big time.
7.) Oklahoma State - Good QB play gives them an undefeated record and win against Mizzou.
8.) USC - Weak loss to OSU dropped them but they have a good chance of running the table on the rest of their schedule with a chance at the NCG.
9.) Oklahoma - No big wins yet, but a team that can beat anyone.
10.) Georgia - Talented QB and RB, but got ran over by Alabama and need more wins to move up the list.
& How on earth you guys can rank USC 8th & rank Florida #4 even though the exact same thing happened to Florida the same week & in the same fashion no less is beyond me. Especially since USC has already beaten 2 ranked teams & Florida only 1. They are the exact same team imo; a wealth of talent all over the field, great coaches, they both just had a hiccup. If you're placing a premium on SEC play, then UT shouldn't have jumped Alabama. I can't tell if you guys are being serious or biased in the sense that u just don't like USC.
I disagree that you think Oregon State and Ole Miss are the same caliber of team.
Ummm.. they pretty much are. they have 3 losses each, 1 great win against a top 5 team & neither are currently ranked. Ole Miss doesn't get points b/c they play in a tougher conference, especially since they really haven't played any of those tough opponnents (except for florida). Neither should OSU for playing 3 top 15 teams either. They are who they are; the Texas Tech's of their respective conferences.
Also as far as Alabama goes, I cant imagine any team deserving of the #1 spot for having a bye. You dont "advance to go" for being idle. Besides their win over Clemson and Auburn dont even look like quality wins at this point. Those teams are horrible.
no team should be able to leap frog you either mainly based on the fact that you didn't play..especially a team 3 spots behind you from the jump. & you really don't want to compare Alabama's schedule to UT's at this point b/c it's not even close as to who had the tougher road despite Clemson & Auburn being horrible.
For the first time in as long as I can remember, the SEC is not the best conference in college football.
They were last year.
They are not this year.
That doesn't mean they won't be next year.