I know that a review is very difficult. I want to try the second half to see where the Texans were and are becoming. Vikings. There's no clear cut who the best or worst O-lineman was. Pitts and Winston get the slight edge. But nobody get a C. Dressen, Salaam, Slaton, and Leach can be equally blamed when considered the times they were required to block. Both QBs threw stupid INT. Reeves was the worse CB, manhandled by Berrian all day. A lucky INT can't change that. If Bennett had the same lucky INT, he would have been the best CB that day. They all make some good plays, some bad plays, one more than the others. This day, Kubiak would have to take a big share of the blame for the loss. He subjected his QBs to an agressive defense, and did not counter enough, let alone soon enough. It's true that the LBs, especially Diles can play better. The D-line can play better. This day, Reeves' the main culprit on the D. The O dilema to be shared between the QBs and the O-line. And Kubiak.