Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!
We don't know if she was lying or not. We just don't. That's why we need to let evidence speak.So it’s not rape when it’s forced. That young lady who said he threatened her career if she didn’t go down on him was flat out lying.
I don't think a threat to slander her "business" is enough coercion.I was just asking a question. What do consider rape basically.
I personally would like a new owner either way. Would really hate it though if he were to take the team elsewhere as did Bud…If it ever comes out McNair knew and signed him anyway, the Texans will need a brand change. New name, potentially owner.
We almost got this one trained.I personally would like a new owner either way. Would really hate it though if he were to take the team elsewhere as did Bud…
I wonder if Hannah is sharper than Cal?We almost got this one trained.
I don't think a threat to slander her "business" is enough coercion.
I'm just not seeing it. I can't imagine you dropping to your knees just because Jj Watt said he's going to smear your business.Her business is what puts food on the table and a roof over her head .... You don't think the threat of losing that is "enough coercion."?
Imagine if your livelihood was suddenly gone and you had to start over in another field because you had been blackballed ?
I'm just not seeing it. I can't imagine you dropping to your knees just because Jj Watt said he's going to smear your business.
I'm just not seeing it. I can't imagine you dropping to your knees just because Jj Watt said he's going to smear your business.
Those situations are totally different. I don’t think it applies here.I’ve a lot of stories about the movie/TV entertaining business. Managers and directors taking advantage of women actors just like that. Using their power to get what they wanted. That’s the reason why these women are coming out now. I knew a Kentucky Friend Chicken manager who would hire only pretty women and he also would use his influence to get what he wanted.
Those situations are totally different. I don’t think it applies here.
I’m not seeing. I don’t think I ever will. I’m out of this discussion.
I'm with TK on this. I don't get the Watson "threatens" to block her entry into the market argument. What happens if he refers other players who will expect this extra service? Does she want that clientele or having to deal with guys like Watson?
Also, thinking about this. If the masseuse doesn't provide the extra services and let him know she will go public about his behavior. If she goes public, doesn't Watson have more to lose than the masseuse? Again, not trying to minimize this issue, but these masseuses are well aware of the sleazy people they will encounter and to think that in that moment, the only thing they can think about is the loss of potential income seems just as wrong.
Hey Steel where is your buddy Buzzbutt these days ? You know the last we heard from him which was during his honeymoon when he was attempting to sharpen his social media persona with a very cavalier attitude about his allegedly initial experience with a masseur.Shocking that you made this post.
Buzbee will year this line of thinking up if this goes to court.
Hey Steel where is your buddy Buzzbutt these days ? You know the last we heard from him which was during his honeymoon when he was attempting to sharpen his social media persona with a very cavalier attitude about his allegedly initial experience with a masseur.
Here's a tough question for you, and don't hedge:1st of all, he's not my buddy, I've never met the man.
2nd of all it's going to be atleast a yr before this goes to trial and we will hear plenty from Buzbee then. I cant wait, it should make for great entertainment.
On a side note I bet the Pervert wishes Buzbee would've become the mayor.
Let me ask you, if you bought a 1970 GTO Judge at market value, but found out it was a dressed up Lemans after driving it for four years, would you try to sell it for a profit, or dump it for whatever you can get?Here's a tough question for you, and don't hedge:
Would you rather see DW4 behind bars or the Texans trade him for three first round picks & multiple other mid round picks ?
Here's a tough question for you, and don't hedge:
Would you rather see DW4 behind bars or the Texans trade him for three first round picks & multiple other mid round picks ?
In this specific instance only (not the other accusations), I think the thing to concentrate on is did Watson say what is being claimed. Whether she performed it or not, he can not make that type of statement and if so should be held accountable for it. Joking or with intent, you just can't do those types of things.Those situations are totally different. I don’t think it applies here.
I’m not seeing. I don’t think I ever will. I’m out of this discussion.
I had a 67 GTO convertible gold with a black top. I also had a 1970 Dodge Super Bee. Okay back to the debate!Let me ask you, if you bought a 1970 GTO Judge at market value, but found out it was a dressed up Lemans after driving it for four years, would you try to sell it for a profit, or dump it for whatever you can get?
Good point. How do you prove that he said it? Are there any text messages or any other type comments in which he said that? I am not talking about apologizing for making somebody uncomfortable cuz we don't know what they were uncomfortable about.In this specific instance only (not the other accusations), I think the thing to concentrate on is did Watson say what is being claimed. Whether she performed it or not, he can not make that type of statement and if so should be held accountable for it. Joking or with intent, you just can't do those types of things.
Good point. How do you prove that he said it? Are there any text messages or any other type comments in which he said that? I am not talking about apologizing for making somebody uncomfortable cuz we don't know what they were uncomfortable about.
You'd choose that over the Texans getting all of those high picks, dank what about our comeback, our resurrection ?Not a tough question at all
Behind bars, if proven guilty. This is where people who are serial sexual predators should end up.
I really don't think that's a comparable analogy which is what I think you are attempting, but I'm really not sure ?Let me ask you, if you bought a 1970 GTO Judge at market value, but found out it was a dressed up Lemans after driving it for four years, would you try to sell it for a profit, or dump it for whatever you can get?
You'd choose that over the Texans getting all of those high picks, dank what about our comeback, our resurrection ?
It’s a perfect analogy. The Texans thought they were getting the real deal. They got a bill of goods.I really don't think that's a comparable analogy which is what I think you are attempting, but I'm really not sure ?
This is and has been my stance. The ladies will have an uphill battle proving their story. The truth is meaningless if they can't prove it (sad but true). At this point, there still hasn't been enough evidence to prove their story. Until/unless something changes, I don't see this being anything other than DW4 eventually paying them money.Good point. How do you prove that he said it? Are there any text messages or any other type comments in which he said that? I am not talking about apologizing for making somebody uncomfortable cuz we don't know what they were uncomfortable about.
Not enough evidence from the public's perspective. We have no idea what evidence there actually is.At this point, there still hasn't been enough evidence to prove their story.
If they do have evidence he should be charged and face trial.You'd choose that over the Texans getting all of those high picks, dank what about our comeback, our resurrection ?
Odd question. Why not just say do you like the guy as a person or not? Otherwise seems he should be behind bars if his actions warrant it or traded if they don’t. The worst scenario and one thats got the NFL, not to mention this country, in a downward spiral is if this just gets swept under the rug because justice Is just what those in power and wealth say it is.Here's a tough question for you, and don't hedge:
Would you rather see DW4 behind bars or the Texans trade him for three first round picks & multiple other mid round picks ?
Does the prospective buyer know it’s a Lemans?Let me ask you, if you bought a 1970 GTO Judge at market value, but found out it was a dressed up Lemans after driving it for four years, would you try to sell it for a profit, or dump it for whatever you can get?
Yes by all means, why not just say that, and thankfully we have you Dejaview to ask that question.Odd question. Why not just say do you like the guy as a person or not? Otherwise seems he should be behind bars if his actions warrant it or traded if they don’t. The worst scenario and one thats got the NFL, not to mention this country, in a downward spiral is if this just gets swept under the rug because justice Is just what those in power and wealth say it is.
Yep that's what I'm talking about too, show me the evidence.If they do have evidence he should be charged and face trial.
OK now I see your point - I'm kinda dense so folks need to often explain things to me.It’s a perfect analogy. The Texans thought they were getting the real deal. They got a bill of goods.
Odd question. Why not just say do you like the guy as a person or not? Otherwise seems he should be behind bars if his actions warrant it or traded if they don’t. The worst scenario and one thats got the NFL, not to mention this country, in a downward spiral is if this just gets swept under the rug because justice Is just what those in power and wealth say it is.
This was a forgone conclusion to force the next step by either the Texans or the NFL. Wouldn't it be ironic if he and the Texans settle their differences and move forward together?
Or he just was not going to miss out on 50k a day. He also wasn’t getting on the CEL that easy after his stuntThis was a forgone conclusion to force the next step by either the Texans or the NFL. Wouldn't it be ironic if he and the Texans settle their differences and move forward together?
This was a forgone conclusion to force the next step by either the Texans or the NFL. Wouldn't it be ironic if he and the Texans settle their differences and move forward together?
Here's a tough question for you, and don't hedge:
Would you rather see DW4 behind bars or the Texans trade him for three first round picks & multiple other mid round picks ?
The fact that he still wants a trade has shown he has learned nothingIf guilty….behind bars and never mention his name again o
If not guilty…..highest bidder and then never mention his name again on this site.
If not guilty…..he decides to honor his contract, apologizes to the team ownership, players, fans, and the City of Houston….then he’s QB1, Taylor- QB2, and Mills- QB3. Optimal situation since Mills would get to develop at a slower rate and Taylor would be a solid backup should he be called on. Watson would have 2-3 seasons to rebuild his image and the Texans could really cash in at some point.
No it hasn't, if thinking only of the 2021 season. If he shows, and I laid out several weeks ago why he would, the Texans are going to be paying him his $10M base salary for 2021.I think that ship has sunk.
I know better than to make too many posts in this thread because nuance gets lost when trying to make a point on this subject. However, why is that shocking? I think you misread my point. I'm saying it's wrong or chauvinistic for people to assume that in the moment of making a moral decision to participate in these alleged activities, of all of the things to cross their minds would be future clients and earnings.Shocking that you made this post.
Buzbee will year this line of thinking up if this goes to court.
So what’s your asking price?Does the prospective buyer know it’s a Lemans?
People know what Watson is, they know what he’s accused of.
Forgone if you ignored everything he’s been saying.This was a forgone conclusion to force the next step by either the Texans or the NFL.
Watson has officially reported at TC for testing with the other Texans QBs.
Well, they are lawyers, so they're used to wallowing in the mud.I know better than to make too many posts in this thread because nuance gets lost when trying to make a point on this subject. However, why is that shocking? I think you misread my point. I'm saying it's wrong or chauvinistic for people to assume that in the moment of making a moral decision to participate in these alleged activities, of all of the things to cross their minds would be future clients and earnings.
Again, it's easy to have the viewpoint while never being in that situation and having a view from the peanut gallery, but of all the reasons to go along with these alleged shenanigans, I don't know if future clients or earning potential is enough of a reason to participate. Especially if a reference from an alleged "Pervert" might lead to more perverts visiting you.