I agree. I wouldn't want to see Ragone either...mainly because I just want to see them let Carr sling it. I don't care about sacks, throwing it away, etc...
Let him run, let him audible, let him 'quarterback' the team, let him make mistakes, let him throw interceptions because he believes he can missile it through there....I just want to see us go after it. If we win in the process, then I'm pretty happy about that. I'd rather not win if it means the same old plodding, trying not to lose, 12-10 score where David throws 18 times.
I didn't mind the blitz last week against Boller because I would've never thought them to have the stones to do it. Yes, we lost because of it but we TRIED something. Now, CC will be more familiar with that situation, the LB's realize they'll have to be quicker, the corners will look for different things, etc...
I just want to see us experiment and go after something to learn something - not try and salvage McKinney, Capers, Bradford's jobs and get 'meaningless' wins.
If we get wins by gambling on our younger talents - Sanders at CB, CC and Earl gambling, Shantee Orr blitzing, Travis Johnson going all 4, Weary, Milford starting on OL, etc...then those are not meaningless to me.
I personally would like to see Reggie. However, I'd love to have a HAWK, BRICK, or WINSTON and another pick...for me it's not playing for the #1, for me it's the future. I think Capers and Casserly have shown a BAD ability to judge talent. With that said, they may have gotten some right - Orr, Babin, Milford, CC, Earl...I just want to see them play and roll the dice a little.
If we win, we win....