OK, the secondary seems to suck (understatement of the year), especially with zero pass rush.
Before I go any further let me start with two words, Troy Nolan. This is obvious, Wilson has to go.
However what can be done with the rest of the guys realistically?
Some of it seems to be the cover two scheme, but does the roster fit another scheme? Is it all scheme, or all personell?
Should KJ be benched, and GQ, and Brice be the starters?
Where do Molden, and Mcmanis fit in at this point?
What are the odds Frank Bush pulls a rabbit out of his hat in week four until week 17 like he did last year with the pass the way he did the run?
Is there an outside chance that this was a fluke three weeks?
-Manning was excusable, Indy was behind the entire game and after all it was the Forehead playing....
-McNabb is a little more troubling as I think he's past his prime, and his recievers could keep the Skins under the Cap if there were one because part of their salary is from Social Freaking Security!!! This one hurts.
-Romo is somewhat understandable because he can put up big numbers at times, and he has a tone of weapons. What bothers me is they played horrible until they showed up at Reliant, and Roy Williams looked like a #1 WR for once.
I think we will learn a lot this week. The Raiders are running the ball well, so if we stop the run we could get exposed in the passing game. If Gradkowski puts 300 yards up, it may be time to panic! If we stiflle the run and the pass, maybe, just maybe it was a fluke to be that bad defending the pass for three straight games. Obviousley it won't be definative if we contain the Oakland passing attach, but at least it will be encouraging that we can stop something or someone. Otherwise we should just count on the Fed Ex Air Award to go to who ever plays the Texans each week.
Just wanted to verbalize all my thoughts. I know I have not provided any meanigful insight, but perhaps I'm playing the Watson to someones Holmes.....
By the way can we get a Frank Bush and/or David Gibbs face palm smiley?????
Edit: yes I know it should be "you're" in the title thread sorry.....
Before I go any further let me start with two words, Troy Nolan. This is obvious, Wilson has to go.
However what can be done with the rest of the guys realistically?
Some of it seems to be the cover two scheme, but does the roster fit another scheme? Is it all scheme, or all personell?
Should KJ be benched, and GQ, and Brice be the starters?
Where do Molden, and Mcmanis fit in at this point?
What are the odds Frank Bush pulls a rabbit out of his hat in week four until week 17 like he did last year with the pass the way he did the run?
Is there an outside chance that this was a fluke three weeks?
-Manning was excusable, Indy was behind the entire game and after all it was the Forehead playing....
-McNabb is a little more troubling as I think he's past his prime, and his recievers could keep the Skins under the Cap if there were one because part of their salary is from Social Freaking Security!!! This one hurts.
-Romo is somewhat understandable because he can put up big numbers at times, and he has a tone of weapons. What bothers me is they played horrible until they showed up at Reliant, and Roy Williams looked like a #1 WR for once.
I think we will learn a lot this week. The Raiders are running the ball well, so if we stop the run we could get exposed in the passing game. If Gradkowski puts 300 yards up, it may be time to panic! If we stiflle the run and the pass, maybe, just maybe it was a fluke to be that bad defending the pass for three straight games. Obviousley it won't be definative if we contain the Oakland passing attach, but at least it will be encouraging that we can stop something or someone. Otherwise we should just count on the Fed Ex Air Award to go to who ever plays the Texans each week.
Just wanted to verbalize all my thoughts. I know I have not provided any meanigful insight, but perhaps I'm playing the Watson to someones Holmes.....
By the way can we get a Frank Bush and/or David Gibbs face palm smiley?????
Edit: yes I know it should be "you're" in the title thread sorry.....