Kaiser Toro
Native Mod
HJam72 said:Have we tried DAVID at RB? He might be better at that.
I think we should see if he can play QB first in the new system, before we move him to RB.
Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!
HJam72 said:Have we tried DAVID at RB? He might be better at that.
Kaiser Toro said:I think we should see if he can play QB first in the new system, before we move him to RB.
Scooter said:DD. if he stays healthy, his production as a starter equals more than 2000 yards total offense. bennett's a homerun guy, but has done so with an established line and getting his yards in junktime & passing downs. if you can argue for dd's production, james allan average 3.3 yards per carry & stacey mack averaged 2.7ypc ... while DD averaged 4.3 as a rookie behind the exact same line & coach. he's also held up for 230+ carries every season (and 300+ once), while bennett has only crossed 200 once. also, despite being a "homerun" guy, bennett's even weaker in the touchdown department (12 in 5 years, dd has 23 in 3) and is not as strong as a pass catching option.
HJam72 said:That's funny because I was thought about you when I decided to joke at his expense.
Oblivion said:It might be the picture or me, but does anyone think he looks like Will Smith(Fresh Prince)?
JAXwithanX said:http://www.purplepride.org/index.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=395075#395075
got one for this forum....
TexanFan881 said:I finally got my account activated and I posted one on their other message board.
http://www.vikingsmessageboard.com/viewtopic.php?p=108541#108541
JAXwithanX said:looks like overwhelmingly the same results....i think we can just stop all the talk about Bennett being the starter now. Bennett - situational back. we here don't realize that at least 90% of the league holds DD on a pretty high pedestal as far as RB's go. we over here are just are all too busy trying to convince and pray that all David Carr needs is a line.
Porky said:Okay, let's make this fair. I said when completely healthy Bennett is the better back. That should be the criteria. Obviousely, health has been an issue. Secondly, it's not exactly objective asking a bunch of Texans homers. That's like asking showing a man a picture of his wife and Eva Longeria, and expecting him to say Eva is prettier when the wife is standing there. Half these people have probably never seen Bennett play. Not objective!