I don't think there's a Texan fan who doesn't think DeMeco deserves to get in. That's not the question. The question is: "WILL he get in?" I just don't see it. To do so as a Houston rookie, you must be clearly better than the competition. Now, you can certainly put up arguments that DeMeco is one of the two best MLBs in the AFC, but there are other arguments for other people.
The two most astonishing things about DeMeco's performance are:
1) He's a rookie and
2) He's running away with the solo tackle count
The trouble is that the first is irrelevant to the ProBowl - that's why you have rookie of the year awards, after all. The second is VERY relevant, but most ProBowl voters will never know, because the ProBowl ballot only has one column for tackles and does not break out solos vs. assists.
Since he's kind of quiet, he gets no RayLewesquian press and a bunch of people don't even know he exists. There's two things that could get him in ... one would be to LEAD the NFL in combined tackles, preferably by 10 or more or two, to bump up his "special" stats - picks and sacks. He is leading AFC MLBs, but only by a little bit. It's not enough to make a guy who only barely knows who he is vote for him over say London Fletcher (1 fewer tackle and 1.5 fewer sacks, but 1 extra INT). All else being equal, people are always going to vote for the "name".
Oh, and for the guy who said Zach Thomas' performance has been reminiscent of Jamie Sharper, remember - Jamie Sharper got in the ProBowl.