Cover Vs Man

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by CloakNNNdagger, Dec 13, 2008.

  1. CloakNNNdagger

    CloakNNNdagger Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    17,154
    Likes Received:
    1,416
    I know that we're now supposed to be playing more one-on-one "man." However, I've noticed commonly, and TOO commonly in even crucial stop situations where the opponent just needs 3-5 yds for a 1st down, our corners are lined up 10 yds off their man. A majority of these cases, the opponent converts to 1st down on a short out or curl. What's with this? I know our corners aren't calling where they line up. And I feel that this formation accounts for a significant factor why teams seem to come back on us in the 3rd and 4th quarters. What's with this? I know our corners aren't calling where they line up.
     
  2. infantrycak

    infantrycak Mod. Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    55,020
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Yup--keeps happening and it is inexplicable IMO. What I really want to know is who is calling that coverage, Smith or Hoke? If it is Smith against Hoke's advice then fire him. If it is Hoke with Smith's assent, fire them both.
     
  3. TexansSeminole

    TexansSeminole Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2006
    Messages:
    8,794
    Likes Received:
    404
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Yea, we did the same thing last year. It's the main reason I want a new defensive coordinator. RS puts the secondary in bad/weird positions pretty often. I never understood the hybrid SS/FS for both safety positions either. I'm not sure this is Hoke's fault. I don't think he controls the positioning of the corners.
     
  4. TimeKiller

    TimeKiller Guest

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2008
    Messages:
    7,648
    Likes Received:
    548
    Location:
    This giant tree, standing 10,000 ft. high but not
    They want the safeties to be okay at everything but not good at anything...:thinking:

    Probably why none of our safeties ever really make plays. As far as their coverages go they usually seem to be too far down the field to man cover, any zone they run usually just means stand back until you see the guy with the ball and go try to tackle him.

    As far as the corners lining up 10 yards off on 3rd and 6...I just don't know what to say about that anymore. It's just time for a new DC. It's been time.
     
  5. TexansFanatic

    TexansFanatic Extremist

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    2,192
    Likes Received:
    188
    And by that rationale, shouldn't Kubiak be held accountable as well?

    Doesn't the DC also need the HC's assent?
     
  6. gary

    gary Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2006
    Messages:
    22,279
    Likes Received:
    837
    Location:
    Wheelchair
    They need to play closer up on all three downs but even more so on third and short because that is when most teams run those short out or curl plays to pick up those few yards that they need to pick up the first down.
     
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2008
  7. bah007

    bah007 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    9,524
    Likes Received:
    494
    Location:
    Spring, TX
    I played CB my entire football life and I can tell you for sure this is on the defensive coordinator.

    When you have a conservative defensive playcaller, he would rather guard against the fade and leave the slants open so that his CBs don't get beat deep.

    It makes absolutely no sense. We give up 3rd down conversions on short passes all the time because our coaches are so afraid of moving our CBs up only to get beat deep on a double move or a fade.

    When I played, my coach would constantly try to move me 10-12 yards deep on 3rd and 5. I would just pretend I couldn't hear him and stay where I was. You can get away with that in high school and college, if you don't don't play by their rules in the pros, you're gone.

    It's an obvious sign that Smith has no confidence in his CBs.
     
  8. gary

    gary Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2006
    Messages:
    22,279
    Likes Received:
    837
    Location:
    Wheelchair
    If it is all on the DC then RS better be gone at the end of the season.
     
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2008


  9. b0ng

    b0ng Ooops

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    7,889
    Likes Received:
    613
    Sometimes. I know that Kubiak isn't calling the defensive plays or how the coverage schemes are going to act. Now if our coach was Bill Cowher, oh yeah you know it would be on his head.
     
  10. RipTraxx

    RipTraxx Free Agent

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Messages:
    600
    Likes Received:
    16
    Location:
    Kingwood
    Man press all the time!
     
  11. Maddict5

    Maddict5 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Messages:
    5,477
    Likes Received:
    315
    how have we done on 3rd down since dunta went back to cb1 and (presumably when) we went back to man? i dont have any stats but it seems we're quite good the last 3 weeks
     
  12. ObsiWan

    ObsiWan Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2007
    Messages:
    18,474
    Likes Received:
    1,156
    Location:
    League City, Tx
    This is just a SWAG but IMHO, its because our CBs are relatively small and cannot effectively jam WRs of decent size and/or strength.

    So the question is, is it better to try and jam then fail, and possibly get beat deep OR do you play back a few yds and let the CBs keep the play in front of them and make the tackle (hopefully).

    Our conservative coaching staff mostly always go with the latter choice - hoping our "awesome" pass rush will cause the opposing QB to make a mistake.

    In my little fantasy world, our CBs would recognize down and distance, pretend to play off the WR, and jump those short yardage curls and outs for pick six's.
     
  13. CloakNNNdagger

    CloakNNNdagger Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    17,154
    Likes Received:
    1,416
    I haven't seen any let up on this 10 yard cushion mentality in the last 3 weeks. As I pointed out in my initial post, despite the fact that we have won, we have consistently "lost ground" in the 3rd and 4th quarters in significant part to using that approach. It makes no sense at all.

    When the CB's play that far off the receivers, beside giving up easy yardage, it takes the threat of a CB blitz out of the play book for the most part, and essentially fails to keep the O "honest" for that possibility.
     
  14. CloakNNNdagger

    CloakNNNdagger Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    17,154
    Likes Received:
    1,416

    ObsiWan,

    It really doesn't take a large, strong CB to effectively jam big, strong WRs. It just take a split second of messing up their timing.


    And giving them 10 yds, as we've seen many times certainly has not avoided our CBs from getting beaten. But it sure has consistently given the O easy 1st downs.......and just as effective trots down the field.
     
  15. ObsiWan

    ObsiWan Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2007
    Messages:
    18,474
    Likes Received:
    1,156
    Location:
    League City, Tx
    I know the jam is as much about technique as it is about size. But do you think really our guys have either the size or technique to do it effectively. I've seen them whiff on attempted jams many times then have to play catch-up to the WR. I just think our conservative coaching approach would rather not take getting beat deep on a whiffed jammed.
     
  16. gary

    gary Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2006
    Messages:
    22,279
    Likes Received:
    837
    Location:
    Wheelchair
    Still the amount of space they give up way too much.
     
  17. CloakNNNdagger

    CloakNNNdagger Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    17,154
    Likes Received:
    1,416

    If it's technique, we have yet another reason to thank our coaching staff.
     
  18. D-Frank

    D-Frank Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2008
    Messages:
    194
    Likes Received:
    17
    GREAT question! some stat guy/gal break it down for us please :mario3:
     
  19. ObsiWan

    ObsiWan Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2007
    Messages:
    18,474
    Likes Received:
    1,156
    Location:
    League City, Tx
    I'm not disputing that. I was just hazarding a guess as to why it happens. Until the DBs get coached up more and get better technique like CNNND says, we'll most likely continue to play back.
     
  20. dalemurphy

    dalemurphy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    6,127
    Likes Received:
    663
    Location:
    Austin
    NO! when you do that, things happen like what we did to GB on that final drive. The only reason OD gets wide open and picks up 25 yards on that play is because we knew to expect man coverage and we exploited it...

    Mixing and disguising coverage is the key and we finally started doing some of it. Let's hope it continues. Dunta's interception last week was directly a result of giving a man look but falling into a zone. Watch the tape!
     

Share This Page