AJ's (not Andre) offseason talk

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by Wolf, Jan 16, 2010.

  1. Wolf

    Wolf 100% Texan

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    37,961
    Likes Received:
    1,702
    Location:
    Kerrville
    from Jan 10th

    http://www.examiner.com/x-778-Houst...rs-to-future-contracts?cid=channel-rss-Sports
     
  2. b0ng

    b0ng Ooops

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    7,891
    Likes Received:
    613
    If we get 2 franchise tags I'm thinking that Smith might lean to using both of them.
     
  3. Blazin' Toro

    Blazin' Toro The Underdog

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2008
    Messages:
    172
    Likes Received:
    8
    Location:
    New York
    This will cause a lot of controversy but I believe they should franchise Dunta again. Unless there is any quality CB's in Free Agency, I think the draft should be focusing on the OL and Safety.
     
  4. nero THE zero

    nero THE zero Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    2,749
    Likes Received:
    184
    Location:
    Spring
    I agree and I think we will (unless he doesn't sign an extension.)

    That said, if we do franchise him, I think we should give a legitimate effort in trading him. I feel that, given the lack of a salary cap, there's no reason not to tag him. You either tag him, trade him, and reap the benefits of a nice draft pick, or you tag him, overpay him, and reap the benefit of having a quality CB on your team.

    With no cap constraints I really can't think of a reason not to do this.
     
  5. Goldensilence

    Goldensilence hipster elite

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2007
    Messages:
    5,211
    Likes Received:
    353
    Location:
    Austin
    I say let him walk. I guess he's a decent CB, but after seeing David Gibbs get good production from two late round picks I'm inclined to believe that for once we can sign a decent CB and let guys develop.

    Might be an uncapped year but, still I wouldn't tag Dunta "Pay me Rick" Robinson.

    The good news that is that there's not a whole bunch of big contract guys we have to make tough decisions about. Sign Ryans and OD. No Brainer. I think Butler is a good swing backup. I'd like to see them offer Pollard a good contract. It's nice to see solid safety play for once.

    Other then that we shouldn't have to offer big contracts to the other guys IF they are worth keeping around anyway.
     
  6. ObsiWan

    ObsiWan Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2007
    Messages:
    18,660
    Likes Received:
    1,184
    Location:
    League City, Tx
    I'd offer him a top 10-15 contract. No matter what he thinks, he's not top 3 or top 5 quality. But when I slow down and think about it, I can't think of 10-12 guys who are head & shoulders above him at his position.

    And for those who say "let him walk", I have two questions:
    (a) Can we reeeeally make a playoff run with two or three youngsters at CB? I mean, you're talking Reeves, Quinn, Bennett, Moulden, and McCain as our CBs. Are they playoff quality with no Robinson to stick on the other guy's #1? I'm not sure.
    (b) If not, how much would we have to give up to bring in equivalent talent level? Maybe I'm alone in this but I don't believe our secondary is deep enough to lose a starter quality CB and not replace him with like quality.

    Does anyone want to burn up a 1st day pick on a CB when we need to bolster the OG/OC spot and find a quality RB or real FS with those picks?? And while I wouldn't mind trying to find more 2nd day nuggets like McCain and Quin, finding a stud CB is a shot in the dark. Seemed to work in GQ's case but not so much in Bennett's or Moulden's. So you'd like to bring in a proven player to replace a proven player. And that's gonna cost us.
     

Share This Page