BuffSoldier
Veteran
Now I'm sorry. I know this is the billionth Reggie Bush thread, but I have a question for everyone in the Bush bandwagon. Why would we use the first pick and maybe, with the top 3 players coming out, the most valuable pick in NFL draft history on a back that is going to split carries?
Reggie Bush will split carries with DD if we draft him. So why would we use the first overall pick on someone to do that?
Why would we even draft a back when we have hired a new coach who has shown the ability, with Denver and the scheme he runs, to turn almost any back into a pro-bowl caliber back. Think TD, Portis, Bell have all been very productive back in his zone blocking scheme. We already have a back that is capable of rushing for 1200 yards and averaging about 4 yards a carry in this offense, his stats will have to inflate with a better offensive system. Why so we need antoher back??
Oh and I dont love D'Brick. The Texans dont have to draft him. They could trade down twice and pick up Winston and alot of other picks, or Mario Williams at 4 or AJ Hawk. I just want the Texans to make the smartest decision for the team and not for the fans or for popularity.
Reggie Bush will split carries with DD if we draft him. So why would we use the first overall pick on someone to do that?
Why would we even draft a back when we have hired a new coach who has shown the ability, with Denver and the scheme he runs, to turn almost any back into a pro-bowl caliber back. Think TD, Portis, Bell have all been very productive back in his zone blocking scheme. We already have a back that is capable of rushing for 1200 yards and averaging about 4 yards a carry in this offense, his stats will have to inflate with a better offensive system. Why so we need antoher back??
Oh and I dont love D'Brick. The Texans dont have to draft him. They could trade down twice and pick up Winston and alot of other picks, or Mario Williams at 4 or AJ Hawk. I just want the Texans to make the smartest decision for the team and not for the fans or for popularity.