Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!
whiskeyrbl said:Hands down it is AJ. No way we Dis this guy if we don't want him to leave in 08.
michaelm said:100% agreed, but I still say that Moulds has a good shot at being our most productive wideout statistically (if we get him...)
My Exactly100% agreed, but I still say that Moulds has a good shot at being our most productive wideout statistically (if we get him...)
KSig44 said:Moulds=McAffrey=possesion reciever
AJ=R. Smith=distance threat
Comparison was made to the late 90's Bronco's because comparing AJ to Lelie is an insult to AJ.
KSig44 said:My statment wasn't that I thought Moulds was as good as McAffrey, it was more of what role the two will play in Kubiaks offense. I think Moulds is better than McAffrey and AJ is better than Rod Smith at this point in thier careers.
TexanBacker93 said:If Kubiak is installing the W.C.O there really isn't as much distinguishing the #1 and #2 receivers. Both will start. Both will be on the field for most of the offensive plays. Both will probably see similar numbers of balls thrown to them. Think of the Broncos offense in 2000. Both McCaffery and Smith had 100 catches with over 1000 yards each. They also had 98 catches amongst their 3 tight ends. Anderson ran for 1,400 yards. The QBs were Griese and Frerotte. I think the Texans can have similar (even if not at those same levels) success. Everyone goes away happy. Especially the fans watching the fireworks.