Now about level of competition.
There is no statistical system that captures every nuance of a game perfectly. However, when we all see what we see it's nice to look at the raw data which we hope confirms what we saw.
Jameis Winston played very well in 2013, Marcus Mariotta is one of the QBs to watch in 2014, & several people were disappointed that Bret Hundley decided to return to school. If you look at ESPN's College Football Total QBR - 2013 Season Leaders You'll see those three rated pretty well.
ESPN takes all the stats & calculates a QBR number "equally" for each QB. It doesn't matter than I like QBs who throw few interceptions, or played in a "pro" offense, or played in the SEC. All stats are tabulated & the QBR is calculated the same.
Looking at just the QBR, we see :
That's just some of the QBs in this class plus Winston, Mariota, & Hundley for comparison.
Now if you take into account the defenses these QBs played against, you get
So what does this mean? Nothing if you don't want it to. Your eyeball tells you that so & so is a good QB & this doesn't change anything. Or if you "knew" so & so wasn't as good as he looked, maybe this will help support your argument.
For me, it confirms that I'm not the only one who thinks some guys look good because they played weaker teams & some people looked worse because they played stronger teams.
It also tells me that Mariota & Winston are on a different level & I'll make a point to watch them in 2014. It also tells me if you liked Hundley in the first round, you shouldn't have a problem with Bortles in the first round (I never liked Bortles in the first round).
There is no statistical system that captures every nuance of a game perfectly. However, when we all see what we see it's nice to look at the raw data which we hope confirms what we saw.
Jameis Winston played very well in 2013, Marcus Mariotta is one of the QBs to watch in 2014, & several people were disappointed that Bret Hundley decided to return to school. If you look at ESPN's College Football Total QBR - 2013 Season Leaders You'll see those three rated pretty well.
ESPN takes all the stats & calculates a QBR number "equally" for each QB. It doesn't matter than I like QBs who throw few interceptions, or played in a "pro" offense, or played in the SEC. All stats are tabulated & the QBR is calculated the same.
Looking at just the QBR, we see :
- Jameis Winston.... 85.8
- Marcus Mariota..... 85.2
- Teddy Bridgewater 84.5
- Derek Carr............ 81.7
- Johnny Manziel..... 80.8
- Zach Mettneberger 78.4
- Aaron Murray........ 78
- Blake Bortles........ 77.7
- Brett Hundley....... 77.6
- Aj McCarron.......... 77
- David Fales........... 75.1
- Tajh Boyd............. 74.7
- Connor Shaw......... 70.8
- Bret Smith............ 70.3
That's just some of the QBs in this class plus Winston, Mariota, & Hundley for comparison.
Now if you take into account the defenses these QBs played against, you get
- Marcus Mariota......... 89.5
- Jamies Winston........ 88.5
- Johnny Manziel......... 86.3
- Aaron Murray............ 86.1
- Zach Mettenberger.... 85.1
- Bret Hundley............ 84.8
- Aj McCarron.............. 82.7
- Teddy Bridgewater.... 80.9
- Connor Shaw............ 80
- Tajh Boyd................. 79.5
- Blake Bortles............ 78.9
- Derek Carr................ 76.3
- Stephen Morris......... 73.7
- David Fales.............. 71.3
So what does this mean? Nothing if you don't want it to. Your eyeball tells you that so & so is a good QB & this doesn't change anything. Or if you "knew" so & so wasn't as good as he looked, maybe this will help support your argument.
For me, it confirms that I'm not the only one who thinks some guys look good because they played weaker teams & some people looked worse because they played stronger teams.
It also tells me that Mariota & Winston are on a different level & I'll make a point to watch them in 2014. It also tells me if you liked Hundley in the first round, you shouldn't have a problem with Bortles in the first round (I never liked Bortles in the first round).